11 Body Parts ZOG Will Use to Track You!

Ensis

Senior Reporter
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/01/biometrics/?pid=1775&viewall=true



11 Body Parts Defense Researchers Will Use to Track You

By Noah Shachtman and Robert Beckhusen (are these two jews?)
01.25.13
6:30 AM


Cell phones that can identify you by how you walk. Fingerprint scanners that work from 25 feet away. Radars that pick up your heartbeat from behind concrete walls. Algorithms that can tell identical twins apart. Eyebrows and earlobes that give you away. A new generation of technologies is emerging that can identify you by your physiology. And unlike the old crop of biometric systems, you don't need to be right up close to the scanner in order to be identified. If they work as advertised, they may be able to identify you without you ever knowing you've been spotted. Time to identify these traitors and expose them to the world.

Biometrics had a boom after 9/11, done by the jews. Gobs of jew government money poured into face and iris recognition systems; the Pentagoon alone spent nearly $3 billion in five years, and the "Defense" Department was only one of many federal agencies funneling cash in the technologies. Civil libertarians feared the worst as face-spotters were turned on crowds of citizens in the hopes of catching a single "crook"

But while the technologies proved helpful in verifying identities at entry points from Iraq to international airports, the hype -- or panic -- surrounding biometrics never quite panned out. Even after all that investment, scanners still aren't particularly good at finding a particular face in the crowd, for example; variable lighting conditions and angles (not to mention hats) continue to confound the systems.

Eventually, the biometrics market -- and the government enthusiasm for it -- cooled off. The technological development has not. Jewish Corporate and academic labs are continuing to find new ways to ID people with more accuracy, and from further away. Here are 11 projects.


The Ear

My, what noticeable ears you have. So noticeable in fact that researchers are exploring ways to detect the ears' features like they were fingerprints. In 2010, a group of British researchers used a process called "image ray transform" to shoot light rays at human ears, and then repeat an algorithm to draw an image of the tubular-shaped parts of the organ. The curved edges around the rim of the ear is a characteristic -- and most obvious -- example. Then, the researchers converted the images into a series of numbers marking the image as your own. Finally, it's just a matter of a machine scanning your ears again, and matching it up to what's already stored in the system, which the researchers were able to do accurately 99.6 percent of the time. In March of 2012, a pair of New Delhi scientists also tried scanning ears using Gabor filters -- a kind of digital image processor similar to human vision -- but were accurate to a mere 92 to 96.9 percent, according to a recent survey (pdf) of ear biometric research.

It may even be possible to develop ear-scanning in a way that makes it more reliable than fingerprints. The reason is because your fingerprints can callous over when doing a lot of hard work. But ears, by and large, don't change much over the course of a lifespan. There's a debate around this, however, and fingerprinting has a much longer and established history behind it. A big question is whether ear-scanning will work given different amounts of light, or when covered (even partially) by hair or jewelry. But if ear-scanners get to the point of being practical, then they could possibly work alongside fingerprinting instead of replacing them. Maybe in the future we'll see more extreme ear modification come along as a counter-measure.

Photo: Menage a Moi/Flickr

Odor

In the early and mid-2000s, the Pentagon's blue-sky researchers at Darpa dabbled in something called the "Unique Signature Detection Project," which sought to explore ways to detect people by their scent, and maybe even spot and identify individuals based on their distinct smells. Darpa's work ended in 2008. The following year, the Department of Homeland Security fielded a solicitation for research in ways that human scent can indicate whether someone "might be engaging in deception," specifically at airports and other ports of entry.

Odor detection is still just a research project at the moment. The science is intricate, involving more than 300 chemical compounds that produce human odor. Our personal stinks can change depending on everything from what we eat to our environment. But it may be possible to distinguish our "primary odor" -- separate from "secondary" odors based on our diet and "tertiary" odors based on things like soaps and shampoos. The primary odor is the one linked to our genetics, and there have already been experiments with mice, which have been found to produce distinct scents unique to individuals. In 2007, the jew government's "counter-terror" Technical Support Working Group even started a program aimed at collecting and storing human odors for the military's mutt handlers. Dogs, of course, have been used to track people by smell for decades, and are believed to distinguish between humans based on our genetic markers.

Photo: Cabaret Voltaire/Flickr

Heartbeat

Your chest moves, just a little, every time your heart beats or your lungs take in air. For years, researchers have been monkeying with radars that are sensitive enough to to detect those minuscule chest movements -- but powerful enough to do it from hundreds of yards away. Even reinforced concrete walls and electromagnetic shielding won't stop these radars, or so claim the researchers at the small, Arizona-based defense contractor VAWD Engineering, who are working on such a system for Darpa's "Biometrics-at-a-distance" program.

The key is the Doppler Effect -- the changes in frequency when one object moves relative to another. We hear it all the time, when a fire engine passes by, siren blaring. VAWD says their vehicle-mounted Sense Through Obstruction Remote Monitoring System (STORMS) can pick up even small fluctuations of chests.

STORM (pictured above) "can be used to detect, classify and identify the specific cardiac and pulmonary modulations of a... person of interest," a jewish company document boasts. By itself, a heartbeat or a breathing rate won't serve as a definitive biometric. But combine it with soft biometrics (how someone subtly sways when he or she stands) and you've got a unique signature for that person that can't be hidden or covered up.

VAWD says these signature will "help improve disaster relief" and "medical care" by providing a "reliable, real time medical status equal to or better than the current devices, while increasing the mobility and comfort of the patient."

But the company also notes that its system performs "automated human life-form target tracking" even when construction materials like "Afghan mud-huts" are in the way. STORM "has already been deployed by the United States Army on one of its most advanced ground vehicles," the company adds.

Does any of that sound like hospital work to you? Nope! It sounds like all out war against us!

Illustration: Yale University/Wikimedia

Photo: VAWD Engineering


Voice

Most people are likely to be familiar with voice readers on gadgets like the iPhone. But what if there was software that could quickly analyze the voice of thousands, and even use those voices to identify specific people?

Russian biometrics firm Speech Technology Center -- known as SpeechPro in the U.S. -- has the technology. Called VoiceGrid, the system is able to automatically recognize a person's voice as their own, provided your voice is pre-recorded in a database and can be recalled by the computer. The company has also developed a version for "large city, county, state or national system deployments."

It's seen use in Mexico, according to Slate, "where it is being used by law enforcement to collect, store, and search hundreds of thousands of voice-prints." The National Security Agency has taken interest in similar technology. So has the FBI. A 2012 presentation from the National Institute of Standards and Technology -- with the assistance of the FBI -- also speculated on potential uses including identifying and clearing people 'involved in illegal activities," locating serial killers and identifying arms traffickers (.pdf). Iarpa, the intelligence community's research agency, has also been looking into ways to solve some of its problems: audio interference mainly. In 2011, the agency concluded its Biometric Exploitation Science and Technology Program (or BEST), which made "speaker recognition advances which included improving robustness to noise, reverberation, and vocal effort, and by automatically detecting these conditions in audio channels," spokesperson Schira Madan told Danger Room in an email. But we wonder if it'll detect autotune.

The Iris

Imagine a scanner than can look deep inside your eye -- from 10 feet away. Actually, you don't have to think that hard. The technology is already here. Scanners have been developed that can focus in and scan irises from a distance of 10 feet, such the IOM PassPort, developed by government contractor SRI International. The company promises the machine can scan irises at a rate of 30 people per minute -- like in high-traffic areas such as airports and train stations. SRI also claims it can see through contact lenses and glasses.

But the longer-range scanners could also see other uses, aside from airports. U.S. troops field existing, short-range and handheld iris scanners to build databases of Afghan eyes as part of a plan to use biometric data to tell civilians apart from insurgents. The Department of Homeland Security has tested iris scanners at a Border Patrol station along the Texas-Mexico border. The FBI has been working on an iris database for federal prisoners, and Google uses them at company data centers. But these systems can be fussy, and require that the targets don't move too much.

There might be another way. The Pentagon's jew scientists at Darpa have funded a research project at Southern Methodist University to develop cameras that can automatically zoom-in and scan irises, kinda like what happened to Tom Cruise in Minority Report -- and without being blocked by pesky obstructions like eyelashes and glare from light. But another problem is that iris scanners are not the most secure means of identifying people. In July 2012, a group of researchers from the U.S. and Spain discovered a way to spoof the scanners by duplicating iris images stored in databases and creating synthetic copies. That means someone could conceivably steal your eyes, in a way.

Illustration: Air Force

Periocular

Periocular

Spotting someone by their irises is one of the best-developed biometric techniques there is. But Savvides and his Carnegie Mellon colleagues think there may be an equally-promising approach in the area around the eye -- also known as the "periocular" region.

The "periocular region has the most dense and the most complex biomedical features on human face, e.g. contour, eyelids, eyeball, eyebrow, etc., which could all vary in shape, size and color," they wrote in a 2011 paper. (.pdf) "Biologically and genetically speaking, a more complex structure means more 'coding processing' going on with fetal development, and therefore more proteins and genes involved in the determination of appearance. That is why the periocular region should be the most important facial area for distinguishing people."

And unlike other biometrics -- the face, for instance -- the periocular region stays remarkably stable as a person ages. "The shape and location of eyes remain largely unchanged while the mouth, nose, chin, cheek, etc., are more susceptible to changes given a loosened skin," the researchers note. In other words, this is a marker for life. (Yet there are ways around it, just think about that.)

Nearby, Savvides and his colleagues think they've found a second biometric: the shape of the eyebrow. Face-scanners are sometimes thrown off when people smile or frown. But the eyebrow shape is "particularly resilient to certain (but not all) expression variations," the researchers note in a separate, yet-to-be-published paper. And the eyebrow can still be seen, even when the subject has most of his or her face covered. (Again, counters to that can be done)

What's not fully clear is how the eyebrow biometric responds to threading, shaving or waxing. Saavides, who responded to tons of questions about his research, says there's no fullproof means to avoid this kind of spoofing. But Saavides is also working on sensors that can analyze multiple facial cues and features, while incorporating algorithms that detect the possibility of a person changing one or two of them. A pair of plucked eyebrows might be a weak match compared to the bushy ones the computer has on file -- but the computer could also be smart enough to recognize they've been plucked.

Photo: Carnegie Mellon University

Long-Range Fingerprint Scanners

Long-Range Fingerprint Scanners

Most fingerprint scanners today require physical contact, but constantly being soaked with finger-oil and dirt can also muck-up the machines. For that reason, among others, one traitorous jew developer is working on a scanner that may one day read your fingerprints at a distance of 20 feet.

But first, scanners with a 20-foot distance haven't hit the market quite yet. One machine called the AIRprint, made by Alabama firm Advanced Optical Systems, has a range of nine feet, and uses two 1.3 megapixel cameras that receives light in different wavelengths: one horizontally polarized, and the other vertically polarized. To sort out the different wavelengths, a device beams light at your fingerprints, which bounce back into the lenses, which then combines the separate wavelengths into a clear picture. A spin-off company called IDair also has a commercial scanner that reaches up to six feet and is marketed toward "security personnel." IDair's 20-foot-range machine is currently in development, and is described as functioning similar to satellite imagery.


The jew-led military is reportedly an interested customer. The MIT Technology Review surmised that Marines may use them for scanning fingerprints from inside the relative safety of an armored vehicle or behind a blast wall. It beats exposing yourself to the possibility of a suicide bomb attack. For the civilian market, that seems better than pressing your fingertips against a greasy scanner, if you're comfortable with the idea of having your prints scanned from far away. (F'uck the jew military!)

Photo: LetTheCardsFall/Flickr

Gait

Gait

Even before 9/11, researchers were floating that notion that you could pick out someone by how he or she walks. And after the Towers fell (thanks to jew terrorism), [b\Darpa made gait recognition one of the cornerstones of its infamous Total Information Awareness "counterterror" program.[/b]

The problem is that gait can be kind of hard to spot. A briefcase or a bum leg prevents the recognition system from getting a clear view. So filming someone walk didn't make for a particularly reliable biometric system. Plus, the same person may have multiple gaits -- one for walking, and another for running, say.

But the spread of smartphones (snitchphones)has opened up a new way of identifying someone's stride. Androids and iPhones all have accelerometers -- sensors that measure how far, how fast, and with how much force an object moves.

"By using the accelerometer sensor in the cell phone, we are able to capture a person's walking pattern. As it turns out, these patterns are very good biometric traits for people identification. Because it does not require any special devices, the gait biometrics of a subject can even be captured without him or her knowing," write Carnegie Mellon University professor Marios Savvides and his colleagues in a recent paper.
(.pdf)

In a small, preliminary study, Savvides and his fellow researchers at the CyLab Biometrics Center claim they were able to get a 99.4% verification rate with the system when the subjects were walking. 61% of the time, they were even able to match someone's fast-paced gait to their slower one. In other words, you can run.... but with a phone in your pocket, it's going to be harder to hide.
Photo: sfllaw/Flickr

Sweat

Sweat

The Jewish Army wants to see some sweat. No, not workout sweat, but sweat that can betray hostile intentions. In 2010, the Army awarded a nearly $70,000 contract to California security firm Irvine Sensors Corporation to develop software that can use sensors to recognize at "abnormal perspiration and changes in body temperature." The idea was to determine "harmful intent in such military applications as border patrol (controlling civilians), stand-off interrogation, surveillance and commercial applications" including surveillance at businesses and "shopping areas."It's a bit out there, and still very much in the research stage, but makes a certain kind of sense. Elevated stress levels could give a suspect away when scanned by hyperspectral sensors that read changes in body temperature. (Yes, the person might just want to be left alone!)

Though a reliable system will have to work in combination with other biometric signals: threatening body movements, facial expressions, iris scans -- all of these will also have to be factored into determining whether someone is up to no good. The jew Army contract, dubbed Image Analysis for Personal Intent, also sought to develop sensors that read these signs from a distance of nearly 150 feet. Perhaps a bit optimistic. But in 2002, a group of scientists in Minnesota managed to determine if military recruits were engaging in deception by scanning for changes in temperature around their eyes. So if you're at all freaked out about the idea of sweat-scanners, now might be time for a cold shower.

Photo: Army


Advanced Face Recognition

Most machines that scan and recognize your face require taking a good, clean look. But now traitorous jew researchers are working on replacing them with scanners that only need a few fragmentary snapshots at much longer ranges than ever before.

One machine that can do it is being developed by defense contractor Progeny Systems Corporation, called the "Long Range, Non-cooperative, Biometric Tagging, Tracking and Location" system. Once a person of interest is spotted, the system captures a 2D image of the person's face before converting it into 3D. Then, once the image has been converted and filed in a database, it can be quickly recalled when the system spots the person for a second time. That's because 3D reduces the number of pixels needed to analyze the image, speeding up the process and allowing the system to identify a person with a mere glance. The company also claims the machine works at more than 750 feet.

But a face alone may not be enough to recognize a person with a machine. Everything from lighting conditions to distance can make it harder to get a clear picture, especially if the person being scanned is on the move, in a crowd, or ducking in and out of buildings. Using 3D models makes it easier, but the technology will likely have to be combined with "soft biometrics" like an individual's gender, height, weight, skin color and even tattoos.[/b] (and all of that can be spoofed

Slightly creepy, no? Well, it gets creepier, like the group of Swiss jew scientists working on scanning facial features to detect your emotions. Developers at Carnegie Mellon University have also developed a mobile app called PittPatt --which has since been acquired by Google -- that can scan your face and match it up with images you've shared over the internet, all in less than a minute.

Photo: Carnegie Mellon University

Rapid DNA Testing

Rapid DNA Testing

It used to be that DNA testing took months to perform, from the time when a DNA sample was picked up on a swab, to analyzing it and creating a DNA profile. Now there are machines that can do it in less than 90 minutes, and the Pentagon wants them.

This month, researchers at the University of North Texas are beginning to test a $250,000 machine for the "Defense" and "Justice" Departments, and the Department of Homeland "Security,"
so that "casualties and enemies killed in action can be quickly identified in the field," according to the Biometrics Research Group. But according to the October issue of Special Operations Technology magazine, rapid DNA testing systems co-developed by defense giant Northrop Grumman had already been delivered to "unspecified government customers" beginning back in August. One of those customers is believed to be the FBI. California company IntegenX, run by jewdogs also has a portable rapid-DNA machine that can analyze molecules taken off everything from clothing to cigarette butts. There's a simple reason why dirty kwaps are so interested. For a burglar who's breaking into houses and leaving a DNA trail, the machines could clue-in faster than the burglar is able to continue the spree. (It's all to control us and since kwaps have no duty to help us, we have no duty to surpport or obey them)



Bodyscanning worldwide on location Detailed hair, 0.1mm accuracy! - www. 3D-servicecenter.com:mad:
 
rapid DNA testing systems co-developed by defense giant Northrop Grumman had already been delivered to "unspecified government customers" beginning back in August.
This 2013 story ties in with the recent killing of Douglas and Olivia Green (see my thread). The timeframe connects with the patents for collecting DNA for body and organ snatchers, over in Ukraine back around 2014, and still going on today.
 
Carnegie Mellon University professor Marios Savvides
Marios Savvides is a Member of (WEF) World Economic Forum.
Quite an advanced website here CMU BIOMETRICS
THIS VIDEO that his company created for the CMU website above is from 2018 and is on the WEF CHANNEL at Youtube.

Facial recognition technology already works better than in the movie Minority Report, identifying an iris at an angle and a distance of up to 12 metres. Marios Savvides explains the work being done by his team at Carnegie Mellon, including AI that can infer from a masked person’s eyes what the rest of their face looks like.

Imho,
It is both Minority Report and Person of Interest combined using AI, like already being used in China along with Social Credit system using a smartphone as a passport.

Person of Interest (TV series) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_Interest_(TV_series)

 
But it may be possible to distinguish our "primary odor" -- separate from "secondary" odors based on our diet and "tertiary" odors based on things like soaps and shampoos. The primary odor is the one linked to our genetics, and there have already been experiments with mice, which have been found to produce distinct scents unique to individuals
VOCs are volatile organic compounds that are unique odors from a human body, primal odor.
They are trying to create a machine that accurately mimics a dog's sense of smell to ID people, like bloodhounds used to track.
They tested dogs to smell cancers.

It is said to be done over 5 days and up to 7 days to get a true VOCs sample from a person. They will likely be testing shorter methods to get a repeatable sample from a single specimen from a person.
An educated opinion is that though it sounds plausible, it probably will take a few more years to develop with any accuracy and speed in testing for use on masses of people; it's expensive, cannot be feasible at this time. Some thoughts shared are, ultra rapid DNA is more likely to be used if it can be designed to work within a minute or two, likely years away since the known rapid tests take upwards past 1 hour.

A primary odor is like a center radio station resonant carrier frequency for maximum power, with unwanted harmonics that are tuned out with band pass filters to block harmonics noise measured with a Frequency Spectrum Analyzer, similar to the use of VOCs Mass Spectrometry it would ignore the VOCs outside the primal odor by tuning out, or ignoring the VOCs of foods like garlic or onions &/or digestive gasses, etc.

I don't believe it could ever be accurate, because the body produces VOCs like that from garlic, etc.
One could spoil their primal odor test out in the field by eating those foods that mimic food VOCs.
How would the test know?

June 29, 2021:
To get a primary odor, researchgate calls it prime source,

Human Identification with their VOC Distribution Through CMS – SEN Model​

Most of the investigations employed the direct or indirect collection of a sample of human body odors[17] where direct collection involves the interactions of cotton/gauze pads with the skin (from a prime source of their body odor, armpit) [18] after continuous monitoring of volunteers throughout 5 to 7 consecutive days. During this treatment, they are instructed to control their ordinary life activities such as the use of cosmetics, sexual activities to obtain the qualitative form of sample.

That was fun to work through.
Not to worry about that one for a few more years. I'd focus more about AI from Savides & WEF.
 
California company IntegenX

Active company, it does help identify black suspects and gets an almost undeniable conviction.

Except in Rodney Reed's conviction for rape & murder of Stacy Stites in Texas.

IntegenX​

edit 2/22/2024 added link

IntegenX Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets automation systems to enable microsample preparation and analysis for the life sciences. It offers human identification products, such as the RapidHIT System, a human identification system for Rapid DNA—the process of producing standardized DNA profiles from mouth swabs and other human samples. The system is the first fully automated sample-to-answer system for STR-based human identification. The self-contained human identification system produces standardized DNA profiles from buccal swabs and other human samples in ~90 minutes. The RapidHIT System uses gold standard sample extraction, PCR and CE technologies. Requiring only three minutes on hands-on to generate five DNA profiles as well as positive and negative controls, the easy to use system fits into any forensic workflow. The output from the system is compatible with local, state and national human identification databases. More information on this system can be found on the website: http://integenx.com/products/rapid-dna

It is a product of Thermo-Fisher based in Virginia, NEVER FORGET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Last edited:
AIRprint, made by Alabama firm Advanced Optical Systems
That company appears to be defunct, shows up on NASDEQ but without any stock price data.
All their type of products have been mfg'd in China, and FLIR I'm familiar with, they make them as well.
According to the following page they had 2 gov't prototype contracts around 2008.
They could have merged, made a few million on their prototypes or were bankrupted.

I would rarely believe in such exotic technology.

 
11 Body Parts Defense Researchers Will Use to Track You
Brookings edu has the entire document with live links to topics discussed.

 
"By using the accelerometer sensor in the cell phone, we are able to capture a person's walking pattern. As it turns out, these patterns are very good biometric traits for people identification. Because it does not require any special devices, the gait biometrics of a subject can even be captured without him or her knowing," write Carnegie Mellon University professor Marios Savvides and his colleagues in a recent paper. (.pdf)

Not if there's no in/out signal they cannot.
Block the signals by putting phone in Faraday signal blocking bag.
The only Faraday bag I have tried (tried a few others) that works to block all incoming and outgoing cell signals is Mission Darkness brand. I've had it for several years but I'm sure there are comparable new brands out there. Mission Darkness has a phone app that is free, you can test various other blocking products.

Mission Darkness bags come in all sizes, it was reported back then that FBI, police used the brand when they seize devices from homes/businesses during warrant searches to preserve incriminating data for forensic computer/phone/extHD discovery, for criminal prosecutions.
 
Back
Top