Apo essays for Sep. 2022

Apollonian

Guest Columnist
Below-copied essay by ap submitted, but deleted/censored by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/aanglin/gavin-m...y-sitting-in-jail-right-now/#comment-5513891/ Anglin, 26 Aug 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Problem Is NOT Complexity; Rather Having To Do With Sublimity Of Simple Satanism
(Apollonian, 3 Sep 22)

We already see and know what the two basic sides of the large cultural conflict are: satanism/subjectivism vs. Christianity/objectivity, objectivity being foundation of reason and rationalism.

Note again, satanism is EXTREME subjectivsm, idea that reality comes fm consciousness, making the subject to be the creator, God--hence satanism by definition. And WHO are the leading, most successful subjectivists?--Jews, by their nature, followers of "Oral Law Trad.," by which Torah (then everything else) is merely what rabbis say it is (subjectivism, fools). Jews then are most sublime COLLECTIVISTIC subjectivists, highly organized, committed, and well-led.

Problem is these idiot establishment "Christians" of nowadays have nearly completely lost that old spirit, understanding that Christ is TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6)--just look and listen to these pathetic morons saying Christ was Jew, or that Christianity is all about "love," stupid, brainless scum--ignorance is truly their downfall--totally controlled by the satanists.

So the satanists, foremost, cold-blooded liars and frauds, run the central-banks of issue, like the US Federal Reserve Bank (the "fed") which is simply and literally legalized COUNTERFEITING, putting out practically INFINITE currency (not real MONEY, which must be scarce to have real value, like gold/silver, or some commodity--see Mises.org for best expo).

But too few "Christians" understand diff. btwn real MONEY and mere currency, so satanists are pretty much guaranteed continuing rulership until the civilization is run into the ground and utterly destroyed. Remember, it took 300 yrs for original Christians to rise to leadership of the culture, such as it was, after suffering much hardship.

Unz works for the satanists, keeping the dumb goyim distracted and diverted fm the "fed" problem which is satanists' primary weapon. Unz won't even acknowledge the obvious facts about the poison covid clot-shots which constitute blatant genocidal mass-murder by these satanists--which Unz just ignores as he essentially denies there's any genuine "conspiracy," as if such "conspiracy" is like rocket-science--when all it really is is simple criminal activity entailing collusion of knowing parties.

----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------------------


180. J. Washington says:
September 2, 2022 at 7:52 pm GMT • 1.2 days ago • 100 Words ↑

First, don’t give the Feds the slightest excuse to charge you for anything (not that the Feds need an excuse).

Second, it’s the Leftists with their riots, arson, looting, and cancel culture that are the fascists.

I am surprised that Republicans are not hitting back at dementia Biden’s fascist charge. Or maybe I am not surprised.

What is needed is a clean, patriotic Right-Wing organization that can garner millions of active men and women. The Left fears this.
 
Below-copied by ap submitted, but censored/deleted by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/runz/prof-jeffrey-sachs-on-the-covid-origins-cover-up/#new_comments, Unz 29 Aug 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Establishment Satanism Needs Be Eliminated And Abolished--As It Once Was
(Apollonian, 6 Sep 22)

U got it all wrong regarding Judaism which is satanism--satanism ought to be removed, but such generic type of satanism will always crop up fm time to time, as satanism is EXTREME subjectivism, subjectivism defined (see wikipedia) as consciousness creating reality, as in Immanuel Kant. Thus extreme subjectivism makes subject to be God, the creator--satanism by definition.

But Judaism is the leading, most established and dominant form of satanism, and it can and should be totally eliminated. Thus anyone identifying as "Jew," either racially or religiously, should be denied the vote and ability to hold office, just at a minimum--as was "good government" norm of Medieval times.

Note Christ (= TRUTH, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) explained Jews, who practice the "Oral Law Trad.," are heretics who reject Mosaic law (Torah--see JOHN 8:44), Christ then merely restating and simplifying Mosaic law. "Truth" only makes sense in an Aristotelian reality--which Jews and satanists emphatically reject--they're staunch subjectivists.

Don't doubt the present cultural struggle is against satanism which rules and dominates--"what is a woman"? And this satanist extreme subjectivism is enforced, advocated, and defended by Jews and satanists who control the central banks of issue, like the US Federal Reserve, etc., and applied in way of globalism and "woke"-ism, as we see.

Ron Unz defends, by means of strict, intensive, and heavy censorship, this globalism and its central-bank of issue instrument as he pushes his buddy, Mike Hudson, who preaches utility of central-banking and fiat-currency as matter of basic economics. Talk about CHUTZPAH, observe Unz also features Ron Paul as columnist. Unz is far too clever by half.

-----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------------------


441. A123 says: • Website
September 6, 2022 at 7:56 pm GMT • 6.4 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@geokat62

There is an easy solution — Enemies need to stop declaring war on the indigenous religion of Judaism being practiced in their religious homeland of Judea and the city of Jerusalem.

Giving up of 1,400 years of colonial settlement is not easy for Islam. However the path to peace should be obvious. Do you not see how much better it would be if:

• Jews live in religious Judaic lands of Jewish Palestine.
• Muslims live in their native religious Islamic lands.

Christians could likely obtain exclusive rights to Bethlehem as the invasive, non-indigenous Muslim religion departs the city. Rachel’s Tomb, on the outskirts of town, could easily be left on the Jewish side of any dividing line. Are there any other sites in Bethlehem that have substantial Judaic significance?

PEACE 😇

• Troll: Iris, mulga mumblebrain
• Replies: @geokat62, @Wild Man
 
Last edited:
Below-copied by ap submitted, but deleted/censored by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/runz/prof-jeffrey-sachs-on-the-covid-origins-cover-up/#comment-5538195

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Unz Review: Great Journalistic Masked Ball Of Dis-Info--As In Movie, "Eyes Wide Shut"
(Apollonian, 10 Sep 22)

<blockquote>As a matter of interest though I wonder how she [Iris] will react if you point out that identifying me as a Jew, let alone a Zionist Jew is absurd. At least only the most distorted paranoid thinking could imagine she had evidence to make it even a likely possibility.</blockquote>

It's mere matter of INDUCTIVE LOGIC, sucker--science and legal investigations are built on it. "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." —Sherlock Holmes. For note Jews are satanists/subjectivists--which they have such difficulty in admitting. Thus Jews naturally inspire, lead, and organize all the more isolated satanists/subjectivists among the goyim--who are surprisingly numerous, even when they DENY they're Satanists (like so many "Judeo-Christians").

If it walks, talks, smells, and otherwise acts like a Jew (subjectivistic and satanist), then it's good, logical, perfectly reasonable conclusion it's a Jew--unless proven not to be by some other, more conclusive evidence. In ur case, the SCIENTIFIC evidence is absolutely consistent and solid, and u confirm the tentative and inductively appropriate conclusion every time w. every added tidbit and detail. And wizzy buddy, don't doubt everyone here at Unz knows it all quite well, chump. Who do u think u're really fooling?

Unz himself is a Jew, proven and confirmed so often, working for Bilderberg, WEF, CFR, and Trilaterals, fascist oligarchs who all depend upon the central-bank of issue to dominate the society w. preponderant funding--why u Jews and satanists hate "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" which so well and dramatically implicated this simulated "banking" instrument. It doesn't matter if "Protocols..." was plagiarized so well to convey the idea.

What is Unz Review, anyway?--well, whatever, it's certainly interesting little play-ground where charlatans and mountebanks convene, as at a masked ball, and chime-in for various efforts of dis-info upon various subjects, and it's extremely entertaining and even informative in its way. No one is fooled for long, and Unz Review ends up as really useful source--of info of all kinds, including psychologic insights on Jews like u, Wiz. U're a barrel of laughs, truly. And if u're NOT a Jew, then u really should be--which u also know quite well, too, unquestionably.

---------------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------------


517. Wizard of Oz says:
September 9, 2022 at 11:51 am GMT • 1.2 days ago • 300 Words ↑
@Iris

Look out Mungo. Iris’s madness isn’t contagious but it’s manifestation on UR is more than a time waster: it could be bad for those who have reason to be concerned about the company they are seen to keep.

As a matter of interest though I wonder how she will react if you point out that identifying me as a Jew, let alone a Zionist Jew is absurd. At least only the most distorted paranoid thinking could imagine she had evidence to make it even a likely possibility.

OMF. I’ve seen what set her off. From time to time I see Disagree as not being selective enough and that Troll would suggest some tiny quota of rationality so I resort to the derisive LOL to show my utter disdain and contempt. (I’ve even used it on some of uoy more outrageous guff).

She knows so little about Chinese history or civilisation that it would be demeaning to take her kindergarten level remarks seriously. I wonder what parts of Chinese civilisation she would praise if she knew what she was talking about. Maybe the destruction of all the works of literature that weren’t in his preferred format of Chinese by the first Emperor or his having concubines killed to be buried with him? It’s the same sort of ridiculous conflating of distant past times as when Jews get uptight about so called blood libels against some Medieval nutters. I like to point out that the cances are some of my distant cousins, even ancestors may have varied witches and it is of no significance in the 21st century.
 
Last edited:
Ron Unz: Satanic Monstrosity, Gross Reduction to Absurd--Especially for K. B. MacDonald
(Apollonian, 11 Sep 22)

Ron Unz, famous Jew, is amazing (to say the least); for one thing, he says he's "white," no less than any other white person--for after all, "white" is an abstraction, and it only depends on how one defines the term--Unz surely has his own definition. So are mestizos and mulattos white? And look at the Unz Review website which features various "alternative News" stories and articles--many of these having to do w. "white nationalism." Thus Unz features K. B. MacDonald, who wrote "Culture of Critique," which criticizes Jews, also Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, and Andrew Anglin of "Daily Stormer," who is often called a neo-Nazi.

Thus with all these articles and stories fm all these "white nationalist" authors, all gathered together in one place, Unz Review understandably gets lots of attn.

So one might think Unz was partial and sympathetic to white nationalists and/or white folk in general, but u'd be dead wrong, for Unz says rather plainly (as in the comments sections, especially for his own articles) that (a) there is no genuine, serious, substantial conspiracy, (b) there's no "globalist" conspiracy, (c) and he condemns anti-vaxxers even in the face of the covid vaxx debacle and scandal of deaths and injuries for those who have rec'd the vaxx. (d) One thing Unz doesn't say too loudly or prominently is that the US Federal Reserve system/bank (the "fed") is perfectly legitimate agency.

And note Unz includes his dear comrade, Mike Hudson, as "alternative news," Hudson holding that the "fed" central-bank of issue is perfectly fine. And obviously, if Unz seriously contends there's no "conspiracy" of any substance, "globalist" or otherwise, then it's precisely because the "fed" itself is not conspiracy. For the Fed is a criminal counterfeiting (and inflation--see Mises.org; use their site search-engine for particular terms, like "fiat-currency") instrument, and it's central to the on-going conspiracy of oligarchs, like Bilderberg, WEF, CFR, and Trilateralists--for whom Unz works, though Unz won't admit it, and the morons refuse to grasp.

Thus we have the spectacle of Unz the Jew who insists he's "white" denying a main contention of many white nationalists regarding conspiracy in general, and that of the Jews in particular regarding this "fed" entity and agency--for what is it (the "fed") but legalized counterfeiting?--authorizing the inflation of the currency (not REAL MONEY). And typical Jew w. loads of chutzpah, Unz, also happens to feature Ron Paul's columns as part of his "alternative news," one of Paul's major issues being that of the illegitimate Fed scam.

Note the world-famous "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" is essentially all about this central-bank of issue (like the US Fed), and how it works for connections to everything else, like the Jews-media, the Fed which issues the credit and currency which backs that credit, this central bank being the particular instrument of the Jew conspirators--what made the "Protocols..." so famous and useful for anti-semites and Christians of the 20th cent.

So now one can see and understand the subtle mockery and joke Unz plays upon white nationalists, including especially his pretended buddy, aforementioned K. B. MacDonald, for scoffing at the "conspiracy" theme in general, and specifically regarding the "fed" counterfeiting machine and monopoly which gives the globalist oligarchs such a great advantage over everyone else, ESPECIALLY the people in general, including white people, of whom Unz pretends he's one.

Additionally, and naturally, Unz has little time or patience for Christianity which Unz passes off as mere "religion"--as if such "religion" is mere mystic nonsense--not caring to analyze whether there's any serious philosophy involved--such is the respect for "white people" and their culture demonstrated by Unz.

And such then is the patronizing contempt Unz shows for "white" people and the problems of the "fed," the globalists, Christianity, and the present on-going poison vaxxes which have caused such widespread death and injury among all people, including white people.

It's notable that Unz ran one of his own articles regarding "cognitive infiltration" as coined by fellow Jew, Cass Sunstein (Unz, August 8 2022), and the question has to do w. the sort of cog. infiltration or treatment that Unz is dispensing upon white people, white nationalists, and those who make up so much of his own audience and readership. So there's no "conspiracy"?--the "fed" is perfectly legitimate? So then why can't Unz defend the "fed" agency/entity?--why does he censor so intensively any serious exposition and criticism of the Fed function and effect upon society and economy (except for Ron Paul's, evidently)?

So obviously, Unz's attitude towards Ron Paul and those who oppose the Fed is just gross patronization, contempt, and mockery. According to Unz, the Fed's inflation is okay, and the Fed is perfectly legitimate--there's no "globalist" conspiracy, and the vaxxes are perfectly fine too. And since there's no substantial, genuine conspiracy to speak of, the white nationalists are just crazy--like those ignorant Christians. Such then is the patronizing contempt Unz demonstrates for white people, including K. B. MacDonald, don't forget--Unz, the typical, contemptuous Jew, who doesn't think it shows, evidently. Who is Unz fooling?
 
Below-copied by ap submitted, but then deleted/censored by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/runz/covid-and-...cy-of-the-alternative-media/#comment-5542522/ Unz, 12 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Unz Just Milks Same Old “Good-Jew, Bad-Jew” Game
(Apollonian 12 Sep 22)

"I have lot of respect for Ron and for his efforts."

But what exactly are Unz’s efforts?–pushing his boring articles, so miserably written?

So Unz insists he’s “white” (like a mestizo or mulatto), publishes all this “white-nationalist” and “neo-nazi” material, then turns around and spits in their faces, saying there’s no real “conspiracy” to speak of, certainly not by the globalist oligarchs (WEF, CFR, Bilderbergers, and Trilateralists), and the US Federal Reserve (the “fed”) counterfeiting scam (see what Mises.org says about it) is A-ok, perfectly legitimate.

And notice how Unz obsessively pushes Mike Hudson, as if Hudson and his babbling is significant in any way, or provides “alternative news.” Well, guess what?–Hudson just so happens to defend the Fed like any Keynesian would.

So that’s what Unz does: insists he’s white, then publishes these off-beat “alternative sources,” then turns around, spits in their face, and says there’s no real “conspiracy” to speak of, certainly not by “globalists,” and the vaxxes are a good thing even though they killed thousands which HCQ and Ivermectin would and could have done better for genuine prevention and cure. Of course, on top of all this, Unz censors the comments sections heavily and intensively, obsessively manipulating and stage-managing the dialectic and discussion–no less than the Jews-media does, and a gullible boob like u says u have such “respect” for him.

So what is it that makes Unz think he’s “alternative” media?–that he “denies” holohoax, and published criticism of Israel? Unz is just playing “good Jew” defending the leftist “globalists,” suckers. Otherwise he has u fooled just because he criticizes Israel and denies holohoax, pretending to slamming the “bad Jews.”

----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------------------

212. cohen says:
September 13, 2022 at 2:06 am GMT • 52 minutes ago • 100 Words ↑
@Tony Hall

I have lot of respect for Ron and for his efforts.
Then Jeffery Zachs started appearing in Ron well researched articles. A quick search of less than two minutes exposed scam. Two magic words Economist and Sustainable Development were enough for me.
I looked at Lancet Covid Group and found most of them are economists, psychologists, including a librarian. And these commission are issuing decree on bio weapons. you got to be kidding me? right.

I remember in one EPA’s rule making committee on cigarette emission (particulates) we had an economist from Duke Energy. He was just a warm body. I heard he bulldozed his way through and appeared in a congressional hearing as a witness/expert?.

And folks any time you see UN and the World Bank getting involved in NGOs alram bells should go on in your head. Free loading and riding the gravy train.

• Replies: @Ron Unz
 
Below-copied by ap first submitted, but deleted/censored by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/runz/covid-and-the-political-bankruptcy-of-the-alternative-media/#comments/ Unz, 12 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Unz And Unz Review: Simply Parts In Same Old "Good-Jew Vs. Bad Jew" Charade--NOT Real "Alternative View(s)"
(Apollonian, 13 Sep 22)

<blockquote>Remember that the true purpose of this website is very different than what is advertised.</blockquote> Yes, indeed, and what is advertised?--"alternative news-views." But what is actually produced?--the same old Jewwy charade, "good-Jews" (like Unz) vs. the "bad-Jews" of Israel and Judeo-Christians (JCs--see Whtt.org for expo)--who say Christ was Jew and support terror-state of Israel.

Thus Unz's real purpose is to boost and "catapult the propaganda" of the leftist, atheist, globalist oligarchs of CFR, WEF, Bilderbergers, and Trilateralists. Unz is probably heavily invested in Big Pharma--why he scoffs at "anti-vaxxers."

Thus Unz says there's no real "conspiracy," certainly none by "globalists," and that's why he puffs and pushes the psycho-babble of Mike Hudson, pretended "economist," both he and Unz saying US Federal Reserve bank/system (the "fed") is perfectly legit, even though the Fed is literally legalized counterfeiting, a criminal enterprise which issues currency through its created credit, and generates inflation--see Mises.org, Peter Schiff, Greg Mannerino, et al.

Yet at same time, Unz pretends he's "white" (like mestizos and mulattos), publishing all these "white nationalists" and "neo-nazis," like Andrew Anglin--which gives Unz notoriety and gets an audience--as he knocks Israel and dis-credits the holohoax, thus playing "good Jew" for leftists, atheists, and globalists, while opposing the "bad Jews" of Israel and the "Judeo-Christians" who make up many of the "conservative rightists" who follow Trump and Republicans, for example.

Thus Unz simply creates himself as character who plays part in the old "good-Jew vs. bad-Jew" charade, Unz defending the leftist-atheist globalists against the Israel-friendly "conservatives"--such is the Ron Unz charade in a nutshell. And Unz practices HEAVY, strict, and intensive censorship to create a phony "dialectic" in his comments section, Unz working to manipulate and stage-manage the discussions. Such, again, is the Unz Review operation in which Kevin B. MacDonald and Jared Taylor are witting or un-witting collaborators.

----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------------


281. Thomm says:
September 13, 2022 at 3:35 pm GMT • 9.3 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Astuteobservor II

Hardly. I called Ron Unz’s bluff with epic elan. I told him that if I am anything other than one of the most valuable commenters here, I insist he ban me at delete all my past comments. Like I never existed.

He declined to do that within the window of time that was offered. Hence, he effectively admitted that I am one of the most valuable commenters here. Remember that the true purpose of this website is very different than what is advertised.
 
Last edited:
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/jews-and-revolutions/#comment-5543521/ Romanoff, 12 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


The Anti-Theses Of Jew Vs. Christian Are Primarily Philosophic, Having NOTHING To Do With Non-Existent "Evil Vs. Good"
(Apollonian, 14 Sep 22)

<blockquote>"I do know, from evidence available to all of us, that not all Jews are in the evil category, that many, including readers here, object openly to the NWO template."</blockquote>

There is no "evil"--which cannot and has NEVER been defined according to a criterion which works in all cases--and this fact is simply obvious fm the study of philosophy and ethics, admitted by philosophers. In fact, pretending to "evil," which doesn't exist, is precisely what satanists do, pretending they're God who creates reality, hence "evil."

The very problem is satanism, pretending one creates (anything), like God. Thus satanism is first of all a simple philosophic proposition beginning w. idea that consciousness creates reality (as per Immanuel Kant), thus making subject to be God. Jews go further, beginning w. "Oral Law Trad.," and make it COLLECTIVISTIC for the subjectivism held to be true and proper meaning ("midrash") of Torah, etc.

Thus satanism is simply EXTREME subjectivism, which all the Jew leaders are, but not necessarily all the Jew laity, though they are very subjectivistic and given thereto.

So note "evil" is something that doesn't exist, but subjectivists (not only Jews) insist it does--without ever being able to define it, hence to treating it in proper rational manner.

And "free will" is yet another problem, for human will is not perfectly "free" as only God's will is perfectly free, by definition. That's why humans are sinners--given to self-interest in irrational ways.

Thus Christians worship TRUTH understood in an objective (Aristotelian) reality, and Christ is the symbolic personification, (Gosp. JOHN 14:6). Note then New Test. is literature, and it isn't necessary there was ever any real person like Christ.

And thus Christianity is Hegelian anti-thesis to Judaism (Gosp. JOHN 8:44), opposing the extreme subjectivism of Judaism (Oral Law Trad.), which Christ held was HERESY against Moses and Abraham. Thus the Jews and Pharisees had Christ killed, imagining they were like God (satanism) who can kill and erase truth--but which truth CANNOT be killed in an objective reality--and always RESURRECTS, coming back to bite severely.

So the satanic Jews (always the leaders) act like the original "serpent," tempting, and organizing the satanic activity and conspiracies, for the leading Jews and rabbis specialize and idealize the subjectivism which is always involved in the satanic activity. Jews are leading subjectivists, and the rabbis (and other leading Jews, like Soros and Schwab) are the leading satanists.

And Romanoff is absolutely correct for his description of the "good-cop, bad-cop" political charade which satanic Jews present to the dumb goyim--as the leftist "atheist" Jews and others of the "globalists" vs. the "rightist"-styled "conservatives" of Zionists who inveigle the "Judeo-Christians" (JCs--see Whtt.org for expo) who follow Trump and other Republicans, like Pence. Of course, Mitch McConnell is supremely pragmatic going either way as he calculates is expedient.

And one has to admit the Jews absolutely BEEEELEEEEEV in their subjectivism and Talmudism (Oral Law Trad.)--they would never say or admit they're "evil." And it's the intensity of beeeleeevin' of Jews that soooo impresses the stupid JCs, morons who never figured out Christ = truth, and it's something that exists within an objective reality--truth merely needs be acknowledged, and it isn't that intense "beeeeeleeeevin'" that gives it reality.

----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------------------


8. Larry Romanoff says: • Website
September 13, 2022 at 3:19 pm GMT • 14.1 hours ago • 200 Words ↑
@Chris Moore

“Why are you denying the narrative of the song, Romanoff? What are you scared of? Who are you working for? What exactly are you?”

I do not clearly understand what it is that you want. Rather than denying, I was attempting to expose. Perhaps you misunderstand my intentions.

I have no count of the number of “real” Jews and “so-called” Jews in the world today. My position was derived from statements in Jewish publications about the proportions of the two. I do not know the percentage of each group that is Zionist and “part of the plot”. I do know, from evidence available to all of us, that not all Jews are in the evil category, that many, including readers here, object openly to the NWO template.

You stated:

“you deftly use the Khazar theory to deny that they are the evil ((Jews)) of the Synagogue of Satan, who in reality overtook the decent Jews entirely in the centuries leading up to Christ.”

No. That is precisely the opposite of what I did. The article does NOT deny that the Khazars are the evil “so-called” Jews who overtook the decent Jews. It states precisely the opposite of what you claim. Perhaps you should read it again.

• Replies: @Chris Moore
 
These, below-copied 2 essays are latest submissions, but deleted/censored by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/jews-and-revolutions/#comment-5543521/ Romanoff, 12 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Sure, Christ Is Mere Mythic Character--BUT Delivering A Supremely Useful Message: TRUTH Is Worthy Of Worship
(Apollonian, 14 Sep 22)

Sure, Ok, what u say may be true; regardless, New Test. merely needs be LITERATURE--no less than Illiad and Oddysey which preceded. So do Illiad and Oddysey need proof they were "true"?

Can't u grasp Christianity and New Test. were/are CRUSHING criticisms (Hegelian anti-thesis) of the preceding Pharisaism and analysis of it as satanism?--extreme subjectivism, Jews making themselves co-equal w. God?--further, a COLLECTIVIST subjectivism/satanism, still in use/practice to this day--what does it get u? For whatever Jews think they have, it's going to come crashing down on them, regardless.

Does it escape u that the Talmudists absolutely HATE Christianity?--do u think there's a reason for it? For lies hate truth, as truth exposes the emptiness of lies. For truth only needs the objective reality, necessary metaphysical assumption (which can't be proven by any prior premise), which reality itself crushes Judaism, founded in putrid subjectivism (wishful thinking and question-begging).

Christianity simply teaches Christ = truth, Gosp. JOHN 14:6, the logos (sign, appearance of God's creation). And isn't such truth worth worship?--doesn't truth (as by means of logic and science) give us everything we need and want?--doesn't it resurrect, incapable of being killed?

Thus Christianity merely emphasizes that if truth is a real thing, it needs the OBJECTIVE reality as basis and framework--NOT NOT NOT the putrid subjectivism of Talmud and "Oral Law Trad." which is utterly worthless and a waste leading only to frustration and extinction.

So Christians struggle (to understanding) to make their worship pay--but not in the same way as Jews try to make their satanism/subjectivism pay. And as I note at # 50, above, Judaism requires constant, never-ending contrivance and obsession (beeeeeleeeeeeeeevin'), whereas Christianity, the real thing, is just quiet honesty--Christians don't have to fake anything, don't have to lie, lying even to themselves, keeping themselves psyched-up. Thus Christians, the real ones (not the "Judeo-Christian" morons who say Christ was Jew and support terror-state of Israel), achieve an inner peace, unlike Jews living their lies and lying.

---------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------------------

204. gay troll says:
September 15, 2022 at 2:44 am GMT • 1.0 hours ago • 300 Words ↑
@Anon

Oh ffs, you historical Jesus freaks are the worst of all possible worlds. Jesus is not attested to, you anonymous dipshit, by anybody. Philo was a Jew living in Alexandria during the supposed days of Christ. Philo wrote about the divinity of the logos. Did Philo ever deign to mention the celebrated Jewish healer who John says is the logos embodied? No. Did Seneca, whose Stoic philosophy was also echoed by Jesus? No. Did Josephus, the Jewish historian from Jerusalem, describe the coming of the King and his death and resurrection and fulfillment of the prophecies? Well, yes, but only in the space of a sentence, which proves it was the interpolation of Eusebius, and not the actual composition of a historian. Why would Josephus devote more text to describing Jesus the woe sayer than Jesus the resurrected king of prophecy?! Eusebius in fact paraphrased the Flavian testimony from the book of Luke and stuck it into Josephus in the 4th century.

Aside from that, what do you dopes have, the letters of Paul which admit to being the works of a hustler; the gospel of Mark which emphasizes that is is NOT to be read literally, and the other Gospels which are copied from Mark. Paul doesn’t say Jesus was born on Earth, nor does he say he died on Earth. Paul says he learned about Jesus Christ from the Jewish Bible and through visions! Paul would not recognize the fairy tale of Jesus Christ as a world famous exorcist and or preacher. We know Mark was written after the fall of the Temple in 70 CE. The first gospels were not known until 130 CE, and Luke and Acts and John weren’t known until 180 CE. What part of rising from the dead makes you think any of this is historical?? You don’t have a single witness to the supposed life of Christ.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sue's Expo Is Irrelevant, Questionable At Best, And Utterly Absurd
(Apollonian, 15 Sep 22)

Sue: u're utterly cracked. Christ referred to the "Tradition" of the Jews/Pharisees at Gosp. MARK 7:9, for just one ref., and if Mark knew, then so did MATT and LUKE. And Christ only suggested that u MIGHT "turn the other cheek," fool--he didn't order anyone to always having to do it. All of ur other assertions are equally tendentious if not totally false--u're just a babbling heretic urself.

U don't seem to grasp "Jew" is defined as follower of Pharisees/Talmud--different fm Judeans and descendents of Israelites. So "Jew" dietary law is already other than Mosaic law--same goes for all ur other pt.s as about "writs of divorce," etc. Christ merely gave advice as to hypocrisy of those who would condemn that particular adultress in the story. U ask, "[w]here does Moses say anything like that?"--like what?--u need to give ur references instead of random empty assertions as u do.

Then u babble about Abraham: "...who are entitled to exploit the land and its native peoples"--for these are merely ur own words, u not giving any ref. Christ didn't "amend" anything, merely clarifying, restating. How could Moses (or Abraham) be "heresy" when they were the very first to make any statements at all?--what was there before them which made what they said to be "heresy"?--u make no sense.

U say, "Jesus regarded YHWH as Satan"?--what is ur citation?--u give none, like in all the rest of ur blathering. U say, <blockquote>"If anybody it was the Holy Spirit who was the snake on a tree in Genesis, urging Eve to claim her birthright, fighting for the creation of the Elohim against the usurpation of the slave god YHWH. The Edenic serpent and the Gospel Christ are both expressions of “Lucifer”, the being that offers light and knowledge in the face of terrible ignorance."</blockquote> But these are merely ur own interpretations and opinions, giving no ref.s or any rational exposition.

So one must conclude that ur heavily erratic statements are irrelevant, at best, to the main thesis regarding Judaic/Pharisaic heresy and satanism/subjectivism which Christ thoroughly denounced and rejected, affirming instead the objective, God-created reality, as I noted in the first place.

--------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------------------


101. Sue Dunham says:
September 14, 2022 at 2:44 pm GMT • 14.3 hours ago • 200 Words ↑
@Apollonian

"...which Christ held was HERESY against Moses and Abraham."

Nonsense. Where does Jesus Christ reference an oral tradition? The Gospels do NOT show that Jesus was trying to defend the law of Moses. On the contrary. The most perfectly obvious example is when Jesus says to turn the other cheek to an attacker instead of taking an eye for an eye. Jesus also outlaws’ Moses’ writs of divorce. Jesus flaunts the sabbath and declares himself the lord of the sabbath. Jesus trivializes Jewish dietary law. Jesus prevents Mosaic judgment from being passed on an adultress. Jesus says you must be willing to abandon your family and your wealth to partake in the covenants. Where does Moses say anything like that?

As for Abraham, Jesus rejects him too. After all, the story of Abraham exists to explain why Semites are the “chosen tribe” who are entitled to exploit the land and its native peoples. Jesus blew that joint right up. Jesus took the covenants away from the “Semites” and amended them radically. Jesus regarded Moses and Abraham themselves as heresy! Jesus regarded YHWH as Satan. And YHWH returns the favor. If anybody it was the Holy Spirit who was the snake on a tree in Genesis, urging Eve to claim her birthright, fighting for the creation of the Elohim against the usurpation of the slave god YHWH. The Edenic serpent and the Gospel Christ are both expressions of “Lucifer”, the being that offers light and knowledge in the face of terrible ignorance.

• Replies: @Kapyong
 
Last edited:
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/jfreud/american...erman-america-and-the-need-to-revive-germani/ Jung-Freud, 14 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Things Will Have To Just Keep Getting Worse For REAL Christian Resurrection Of Freedom And Reason
(Apollonian, 15 Sep 22)

<blockquote>"But jews are insanely, feverishly, relentlessly, ruthlessly anti-white and anti-Christian."</blockquote> Okay, but so what? If u have a growing population of "liberals" and "progressive" morons who are happy and "prosperous"--which Jew S A has been for so long, esp. since WWII--then u MUST have the master-minds and cadre for all this "liberalism" (really just fascism which the fools can't figure out--don't even want to figure-out).

For Judaism is satanism, and satanism is EXTREME subjectivism, holding the subject to be god-like creator of reality, following subjectivism (as of Immanuel Kant) which holds reality is created by consciousness--ck wikipedia for both Kant and subjectivism. So u see, the "liberals" and leftists are all subjectivists, pretending to non-existent "good-evil," and now u gotta have the satanists to rule and organize these scummy, subjectivist, virtue-signaling puke. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best expo on Judaism.

For note, Jews are COLLECTIVIST subjectivists, ruled by satanists at the top--that's what makes them dominant, most organized and committed--and the stupid goyim can't and won't figure it out. Stupid puke (especially the Judeo-Christian (JCs) heretics who say Christ was Jew and support terror-state of Israel--see Whtt.org for expo) think Christianity is just a version/variation of Judaism, following such as the Scofield Bible (see wikipedia).

That's why we need the REAL Christianity which implicitly holds TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) is OBJECTIVE, in an objective (Aristotelian) reality, Heglian anti-thesis to Judaism and satanism--which these stupid goyim scum have lost. So what will happen?--simple, like what IS happening--evermore corruption and degeneracy, strife, and warfare--the brain-dead goons and JCs will steadily die-out, and more honest folks will achieve the real Christian insight against satanism/subjectivism, necessity of states-rights, secession, and individual freedom--overthrow and removal of the US Federal Reserve (legalized counterfeiting--see Mises.org for expo; use site search-engine for particular terms, like "fiat-currency").

It's why, ironically, things have to keep getting worse for the satanist Jew S A to finally be over-thrown by the real Christian heroes, as of 4th cent. Roman Empire.

------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------------


25. Robert Dolan says:
September 16, 2022 at 2:51 am GMT • 1.2 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Priss Factor

Good point and KMAC agrees…..if jews were benign rulers, or even neutral, it wouldn’t be so bad.

But jews are insanely, feverishly, relentlessly, ruthlessly anti-white and anti-Christian.

They claim that their genocidal attitude toward us is rooted in self preservation…..they project their own sick desires for mass murder onto our innocent gullible people who are just grilling burgers and watching negroes toss balls around.

It’s a crazy fucked up situation to be ruled by a tiny group that hates you when you’ve actually done nothing except show them kindness and fight their stupid wars for them.

Wait til those 87,000 armed IRS agents are up and running.
 
Below-copied by ap first submitted, but censored/deleted by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/jews-and-revolutions/#comment-5543521/ Romanoff, 12 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Christ Vehemently, Emphatically Rejected The Pharisaic View And Metaphysics
(Apollonian, 16 Sep 22)

<blockquote>"He [Paul] wants to include Gentiles in a fundamentally Jewish belief system."</blockquote> No, troll, u got it all wrong, u merely pushing ur own utterly wishful, tendentious "interpretation," ur own "midrash," as it were. Christ absolutely REJECTED the "Jew belief system"--subjectivism, "Oral Law Trad.," Jews holding reality, beginning w. Torah, as merely something the rabbis say it is--subjectivism.

Christ is TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), the "logos," the appearance, in the mind, of what God the Father created--and that's what we Christians worship, truth of the OBJECTIVE reality, which gives us everything we need, food, shelter, inspiration to go on living another day in this dreary world, etc. Truth and knowledge of it is closest thing to a miracle there is for us, as by means of such knowledge (and logic and science) we produce and manufacture, etc.

What St. Paul then does is to show and demonstrate, along w. Christ, how this (metaphysical) world view of truth, simply the reflection of an objective, Aristotelian, objective reality--in contrast to the Judaic, SUBJECTIVIST (see #50, above) view--goes on and gives basis for ethics and then politics, by which we live in best harmony w. fellows. So Paul simply expands upon Christ's teaching as in Gosp. JOHN, though the gospels were finished out rather later on.

For if truth is merely subjectivist, then that intense, obsessive "beeeeleeeeeeevin'" is necessary--unlike the objective version which doesn't need such obsessive "beeeeeleeeeevin.'" For the objective, Christian truth doesn't need "beeeeeleeeeevin'" to make it true--it's either-or, true or not, a fact which is reflected in the objective reality--or not. In the objective reality, truth is simply acknowledged--NOT a mere matter of sucking-along w. the crowd, or obeying the rabbi.

And note that in the subjectivist version of reality, even lies can be held to be "true," and this false truth then is affirmed and expressed by means of "beeeeleeeeeeeeeeeeevin,'" repetition, and psychotic obsessionate insistance that it's true, etc. Thus Christ vehemently REJECTS the subjectivist view of "Oral Law Trad.," noting it is CONTRARY to the original Mosaic view.


-----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------------


275. gay troll says: • Website
September 16, 2022 at 6:07 pm GMT • 1.9 hours ago • 300 Words ↑
@Kapyong

"I don’t think Paul fabricated Jesus, I think he MET him – he experienced something that he interpreted as a higher being"

I can’t agree with you there. Obviously, Paul did not meet a human being named Jesus Christ, since Paul says he learned about Jesus from the Septuagint and only witnessed him in visions. And I don’t think he “met” a higher being either – although I would be the first to admit that such a being does exist.

One of the problems is Paul’s stated motivation. As he emphasizes repeatedly, he wants Gentiles to donate gold to Jerusalem. He wants Gentiles to fill his rice bowl. He wants to include Gentiles in a fundamentally Jewish belief system. Another problem is his methodology. He says he presents himself differently to different people to get what he wants. In other words, he is a confidence artist motivated by worldly greed. And he admits to it freely.

Furthermore, Paul doesn’t struggle to relate the mystery of a “higher being”. On the contrary, he is determined to prove that Jesus Christ fulfills the old prophecies of Isaiah, making Jesus the stumbling stone that will found the reign of Zion. Paul has an obvious literary agenda: to argue that the King of the Jews fulfilled the prophecies in an invisible realm and not on Earth. Paul is not trying to articulate a new vision! He is trying to salvage an old one.

It’s all right there in the name. Paul took the name of the hero who led the “Hebrews” into the promised land and gave him the title of Mashiach or King. Jesus Christ is “King Joshua” (and Joshua means “YHWH saves”). Paul is simply first century Jewish literature. Not any kind of revelation.
 
Last edited:
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/jfreud/american...erman-america-and-the-need-to-revive-germani/ Jung-Freud, 14 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Such Is Ever Root Problem Of Culture/Civilization: Honesty And Objectivity Degenerating--To Rampant Subjectivism/Satanism
(Apollonian, 18 Sep 22)

What u're not getting is what I explained before, quite a bit at # 26, above [# 9, above, in this NNN list], regarding satanism--which is always the problem, extreme subjectivism, by which reality is held to be created by consciousness, as per Immanuel Kant, making the subject to be God, the creator--satanism.

In the case of Jews/Talmudists, it's a COLLECTIVIST subjectivism/satanism, sublimely led and organized, in which the Jews and their allies and suck-alongs among the goyim all co-operate and collude (conspiracy)--as we see in Jew S A presently--in the "liberal" and leftist goyim who are now LEGION.

So the cultural problem is satanism and rampant subjectivism which is contained while the culture is still in developing and formative stage, as early Roman empire, early Greek (before Phillip and Alexander the Great of Macedon), early America, before the great war of the 1860s, when dear Christianity was still understood as supremely anti-semitic.

But now we see in Jew S A the rise of the utterly degenerate heretics called "Judeo-Christians" (JCs--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for best expo) who say Christ was Jew and support terror-state of Israel, these JCs now forming great part of "the right" and "conservatives"--as of Trump and now DeSantis. For in this horrific and degenerate day and age, establishment Christianity, Cath., Prot., and Ortho, all pretend Christianity is mere version/variation of Judaism, not the anti-thesis, Christianity now presented as all about idiotic "love," instead of the real thing, Christ = TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) against Jew lies (JOHN 8:44).

So u see, even if u got rid of all the Jews tomorrow, as u suggest, the satanist/subjectivist problem would still rise-up again when the next new culture matured and then began to degenerate in subjectivism--that subjectivist/satanist disease would soon enough become a collectivistic power-house, religion, and organization regardless whether they actually called themselves "Jews." Such is EVER the problem of culture and civilization.


----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------------------

106. bert33 says:

September 18, 2022 at 2:43 pm GMT • 5.0 hours ago ↑
Riiight, but after iran or somebody puts a big nookerz on israel and there’s only 3 choos still left alive to tell the tale and carry on, who will they pitch about then? Who, indeed….
 
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


KMac Is LOST Within Trees, Cannot See Large Philosophic, Historical Forest
(Apollonian, 21 Sep 22)

Indeed, the easiest way of re-constituting a viable civilization is simply to resurrect what already exists in several forms--the magnificent Christian culture, but it of course must be the REAL THING, worship of TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH first and most, above all. And all the necessary material is already there, telling u everything u need to know, Christ = truth (Gosp. JOHN 14:6).

And of course, what's implicit for the original only now needs be made most explicit, as Christian truth only makes any sense within an OBJECTIVE, hence Aristotelian reality--opposite and Hegelian anti-thesis of the the subjectivist/satanist, whence reality is supposedly created by consciousness (as per Immanuel Kant), making subject to be God, the creator--satanism, by definition. Thus the battle of cultures and philosophies is apparent.

The present "Christian" establishment, Cath. Prot., and Ortho, is utterly corrupt and degenerate, those pathetic morons pretending and imagining Christianity is primarily about idiot "love." And I agree w. Saggy, # 16, above, that KMac is utterly HOPELESS in this respect regarding philosophy and vision for the real battle of ideas.

Also, of course, one must note that this cultural battle is already on-going, the satanists ascendant and much in control, but steadily losing--their last grasp upon power and ascendance is the central-banks of issue, like the US Federal Reserve (the "fed")--legalized counterfeiting, a criminal enterprise--and the other analogues, the IMF, BOJ (Japan) BOE (England), ECB (EU), etc.

So along w. a healthy, rationalist, resurrected Christianity, underlying everything else culturally, we Christians (the real ones), and whites, merely now emphasize states' rights where we establish once again our own ethno-state, well-founded in Christianity, and then civilization can begin again.

All this, foregoing, of course, is simply incomprehensible to someone like KMac, immersed within the trees of the forest of psychology (evidently), who doesn't grasp a broader philosophy (as Christianity and the West are founded upon it at root), or history, or economics, etc. To be sure, KMac provided some useful factoids, criticisms, and observations for his part, but he sadly lacks that broader, most philosophic view, as "Saggy," above, well indicates.
 
Last edited:
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


First One Must Seek For Truth, Real Object Of Worship, Rejecting Lies
(Apollonian, 21 Sep 22)

Ho ho ho, "Wiz" asks, <blockquote> "...where do you go for positive well proven, refutations [of holohoax]?"</blockquote> But wiz, it's a battle of cultures and philosophies, white, Western rationalism vs. satanism/subjectivism. Holohoax is destroyed as soon as one grasps Western rationalism, founded upon objective (Aristotelian) reality, rejecting subjectivism/satanism, foundation of holohoax--it only requires effort to be human, humanity requiring truth.

Simple knowledge of hist. in general gives one understanding of Judaism/subjectivism and its hatred of Western rationalism. U, wiz, seem to be stuck in the Judaic outlook and world-view in the first place, right?--so it would seem to be hopeless for u.

Presently, one can go to Codoh.com for good info. There's the collection of testimony of the Ernst Zundel trials of 1984 and 88, "Did Six Million Really Die," by Barbara Kulaszka, one of Zundel's lawyers; Earl Butz's "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century," is another outstanding work. Anyone not prejudiced and captured within subjectivism/satanism can escape to seeking and finding the truth--that's purpose of the basic Christian philosophy and worship of truth (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) in the first place.

----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------------------


33. Wizard of Oz says:
September 21, 2022 at 10:16 am GMT • 1.5 hours ago ↑
@saggy

What do you think are the principal lies of what you call the Holohoax – apart from the fantasy figure of 6 million plucked out of the air? And where do you go for positive well proven, refutations?
 
Last edited:
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Ruthless Honesty Is Necessary Scientific Virtue
(Apollonian, 21 Sep 22)

"Bad-mouthing"?--I gave credit to the dear man--he does his best, no doubt. But KMac, for all his analysis of the Jews, yet fails for the fullest historical context.

For hist. is CYCLIC, I submit, and every empire, as Oswald Spengler noted, goes through the rising phase, but then passes into the "decline" stage, as we see. Thus in the rising stage/phase the people of the culture thrive based upon the OBJECTIVE-determinist view of reality, as featured in the original Christianity, worship of truth (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), whence Judaic subjectivism isn't as much appreciated, in fact, is roundly rejected and reviled (JOHN 8:44).

But once the empire matures, according to Spengler, the people rather LOSE that strict objective-deterministicism and now pretend to subjectivist, otherwise non-existent "good-evil," that Platonic "good," especially, being actually worst enemy of truth, "good" product of wishful thinking, pretext then for otherwise destructive measures and conditions for economy and society--e.g., socialism and such as "fiat-currency" and central-banking, which causes inflation and as we see w. our own eyes now, is used by such as G. Soros and Klaus Schwab for destructive ends, yet nonetheless accounted as "good"--for climate and environment.

So in the cultural self-destruction phase of "Decline of the West," we see subjectivism/satanism prevailing evermore, Christian truth falling out of favor w. corrupted, deluded people--indeed, that Christianity now even totally re-interpreted as being primarily founded upon moronic "love"--against truth--which cultural developments are overlooked or even down-played by KMac who now would rather make accommodation w. such cultural enemies and lies like holohoax, against which KMac quails and hesitates to offend.

And this sort of basic Christian honesty, as I try to demonstrate regarding flawed leaders like KMac, is necessary for accurate diagnosis of the cultural and historical situation seen in fullest context. So it isn't really "bad-mouthing," but rather honesty and truth-telling which u really should consider as virtue.

---------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied----------------------------------


145. Tono-Bungay says:
September 22, 2022 at 12:11 am GMT • 35 minutes ago ↑
@Apollonian

Say, apollonian, if it’s so “easy,” as you say, then why don’t you “simply […] resurrect what already exists” yourself instead of badmouthing Kevin MacDonald?
 
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


"Pixo" Loves To Hear Himself Babble And Blather
(Apollonian, 22 Sep 22)

Pixo, buddy, u're amazingly un-informed (a), and (b) u give no ref.s for ur assertions--do u notice that? So no one w. any sense would bother to take ur statements seriously, but u're proud that maybe someone as ignorant as u would be impressed, eh?

Gold standard has never and will never be "dead," sucker--why?--because it's the best standard for the value of whatever is serving as money or currency, esp. in the paper or even digital forms. And gold (or some other metal, like silver) has served this function as standard of measure of value for long as there's been civilization and trade--thousands of yrs., for all races of people.

Gold IS money, chump--paper is just a substitute. See Mises.org for expo on the subject; use site search-engine for particular terms, like "fiat-currency."

And back in the 60s when Jew S A was inflating and printing way too many dollars, trying to pay for the southeast asian war, why wouldn't France and anyone act and work to exchange those inflated (hence devaluated) dollars for for the full ounces of gold at the (then) rate of 35 dollahs, sucker?

Inflation is COUNTERFEITING--didja' know that? So Jew S A was (and still is) defrauding people w. inflated dollars, and the only way to counter that criminal activity is to exchange those inflated dollars for real value, like GOLD, sucker. So Nixon saw Jew S A was losing its gold, and he decided to renege on the exchange agreement, tacitly admitting he was perpetrating fraud.

Only one "comatose and braindead" is a babbling fool like u, buddy. And yes, everyone was off the gold standard after 1971, but why was and is that?--it's because the governments were involved w. cheating and defrauding their own citizens, that's why. When it came time for the governments to dealing w. one another, it became a matter of negotiations, making trade much more difficult, but they did it because they all knew they were defrauding their own citizens--it's no mystery, sucker. All u need is a brain, chump, ho ho ho

------------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------------------


162. Pixo says:
September 22, 2022 at 3:49 am GMT • 3.3 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Sam Malone

The gold standard was dead long before 1971. For a long time, only Western central banks were allowed to convert dollars to gold, and they did so sparingly until France decided to poke our eye by requesting a bunch of gold be exchanged for their reserve dollars. So Nixon officially pulled the plug on the comatose braindead gold standard.

Every nation but Switzerland went off the gold standard by 1932. Switzerland stayed on until the early 1950s.
 
Below-copied by ap first submitted, but deleted/censored by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Wiz Never Tires In His Dogged Effort To Push Jewwy Agenda
(Apollonian, 22 Sep 22)

Hey wiz: didn't u ask basically the same questions, regarding holohoax, of Ron Unz, not too long ago? And then didn't Unz give u a good talking-to, rebuking u for ur trade-mark "gullibility"--which I consider u do deliberately as a polemical strategem to pretend u're being reasonable and in good faith, and to cover fact u're just insisting and pushing holohoax is the reality.

U ask, <blockquote>"How did the generality of media producers and consumers get from Hilberg’s 5..4 million Jews killed to the sacred 6 million?"</blockquote> But it's an idiotic question isn't it?--as practically no one has ever hrd of Raul Hilberg whom u want to smuggle in as a "reasonable" and established authority.

Then u continue w. ur typical Judaic mendacity, <blockquote>"...can you tell me reliably (and souced) where it could be a criminal offence to say e.g. “this film I am reviewing repeats of course the mythical 6 million Jews killed in the Nazi Holocaust as though the real figure wasn’t enough for the Zionist or humanitarian caus:”. In short I can’t believe the 6 million figure is legal protected."</blockquote>What "real figure" ("enough for the zionists...") are u talking about?--do u have a source to show it is a "real figure"?

Wiz, who do u think u're kidding?--u never hrd of "hate-speech" laws?--and u don't understand that these illegal (or un-Constitutional) laws censoring free speech and expression are always framed in a loose, general fashion? U're really just an insidious liar, aren't u?--the "6 million" figure may not be specifically "legally protected," but denying it can be used in general way of "hate-speech," can't it?--especially by worm-like Jews like urself, right?

See wiz, as u're Jew to the marrow of ur bone, u're NEVER going to lose that basic Judaic mind-set for satanism/subjectivism which is the FOUNDATION of holohoax lies, as I noted above in # 43. And so everything u do and say is simply an effort to pushing ur Jewwy/satanic agenda, right?

------------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------------


196. Wizard of Oz says:
September 22, 2022 at 10:08 pm GMT • 4.5 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@saggy

How did the generality of media producers and consumers get from Hilberg’s 5..4 million Jews killed to the sacred 6 million? And as a bonus for me can you tell me reliably (and souced) where it could be a criminal offence to say e.g. “this film I am reviewing repeats of course the mythical 6 million Jews killed in the Nazi Holocaust as though the real figure wasn’t enough for the Zionist or humanitarian caus:”. In short I can’t believe the 6 million figure is legal protected

• Replies: @saggy
 
Below-copied by ap first submitted, but deleted/censored by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Civilization Founded Upon Truth, Objectivity, Freedom--Against Subjectivism, Lies, Statism
(Apollonian, 24 Sep 22)

Remember that to have a coherent, productive discussion or argument it's necessary to define one's terms. Thus I note and emphasize (see # 24 and 149, above) that Christianity is originally Hegelian anti-thesis to Judaic subjectivism, as Christ (= truth, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) opposed the Pharisees who followed "Oral Law Trad." by which Torah (and then everything else) meant ONLY what rabbis said it meant, SUBJECTIVISM, which Jews then practice collectivistically, Jews highly organized. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best Talmudic expo.

Thus Christ implicitly held to the objective (Aristotelian) view of reality and thus truth which stands by itself, not needing any Pharisaic or rabbinic "interpretation." And the great virtue of such objectivistic Christianity then leads to the justly famous Christian ethics by which we acknowledge we're all sinners, hence self-interested, and the only thing now to be done is a reasoned temperance for this self-interest, etc.

But the great success of Christian civilization led to the horrendous HUBRIS, corruption, and degeneracy of the people who became evermore subjectivist, as we see, now pretending to non-existent "good-evil"--as for example, in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant who preached consciousness creates reality (subjectivism). Thus Christianity is held by its establishment nowadays to be all about foolish "love," not the genuine TRUTH, the establishment now captives of satanic finance and central-banking which now controls it.

So it's obviously ur vague, inadequate, and incompetent grasp of the real Christian philosophy and history which leads to ur pathetic delusions regarding alleged Christian barbarism or dictatorship, and the real battle of culture has always been basically that btwn objectivity and truth vs. satanic lies and lying (Gosp. JOHN 8:44), lies and subjectivism being the real foundation of corruption and tyranny.

-----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------------------


248. Johan says:
September 24, 2022 at 3:43 pm GMT • 6.0 hours ago • 200 Words ↑
@Robert Dolan

"White morality (The Christian value system) is the greatest force for good the world"

Christianity is a rape of the teachings of it’s prophet. Christianity is the world’s most simplistic religion, with a book at it’s core which is mostly idiotic, also keeping back progress for about 1.5 millennia.

White achievements are the achievements of the very few, the rest of the whites are of ordinary level (which is near imbecility). I am a European white, the great achievements which you talk about are the achievements which have been taking place in the triangle mainly in what is now Germany, Britain, France, Austria and some parts of Northern Europe. These were the achievements of the few, and you are no representative of that at all, you can only fly like a moth around it, enjoying a bit of the light which does not originate from yourself.

It is the rediscovery of the works of the Ancient Greeks, and Humanism, and society freeing itself from the dictatorship of the Christian church which led European culture out of it’s long period of barbarianism. A barbarianism which exceeded that of other peoples in the world (except that of Judaism). The history of Christianity is the history of criminality and backwardness.

To be a moth attracted to the light created by others is one thing, to act like a self-satisfied idiot on the credit of the achievements of other people, duly distorting historical reality, is another thing.
 
Last edited:
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Jew "Hegemony" Consisted Of Lots More Than US Federal Reserve, And Began LONG Before 1913
(Apollonian, 26 Sep 22)

<blockquote>"Since the Jewish hegemony (at least the overt form we are familiar with today) began in 1913 with the founding of the Federal Reserve and the beginning of the First World War the following year,...."</blockquote>

See my above notes at #24 and 149; Jews are leaders of the satanic counter-culture and are foremost subjectivists, extreme subjectivism being literal satanism, making oneself to be God. Jews dominate satanism/subjectivism as they're foremost COLLECTIVISTIC subjectivists, Jews most organized, committed, sublimely led by satanists. See wikipedia for meaning of "subjectivism."

Following fm ur own premise, note famous Jew author, Bernard Lazare (ck wikipedia), observed Jews were leading bankers in the West fm long ago as 14th cent.

Further, don't forget the immediate fore-runners of US central banking, including US Federal Reserve, were the Rothschilds who dominated Europe after the Napoleonic wars, and whose agents soon dominated USA even before the American Civil War, US Sec. of Treasury, Alex Hamilton reputedly working for them.

I highly doubt Jews welcomed dear unc' Adolf, who sincerely detested Jews, and knew quite a bit about them, but Jews certainly did control and influence FDR and his New Deal administration. FDR was reputedly descended fm Jews (see http://img1.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=50781), and it was his infamous "Lend-Lease" program giving lavish aid to the Soviet Union during WWII (esp. food and trucks) which enabled the Soviets to eventually prevail in that war, undoubtedly.

---------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------------------


269. Autisticus Spasticus says:
September 27, 2022 at 1:43 am GMT • 1.9 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@C.T.

Since the Jewish hegemony (at least the overt form we are familiar with today) began in 1913 with the founding of the Federal Reserve and the beginning of the First World War the following year, one question that nobody here has answered is why the Jews allowed Hitler to come to power. It would have been only too easy for them to stop him, so why didn’t they? The implication is that they wanted him to come to power, but why on earth would they want that? The only reason I can conceive is that they knew he could be used to spark another world war, which is what they wanted.
 
Last edited:
Below-copied by ap first submitted, but deleted/censored by kike, Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Judaic Satanism Controls Subjectivism, A Regressive, Degenerate Trend In Western "Decline"
(Apollonian, 28 Sep 22)

<blockquote>"No, I can’t, because I don’t buy into your premise that the Jews control everything and always get what they want."</blockquote>

Poor "Autisticus" has difficulty reading and thinking, and he seems un-aware of Oswald Spengler's "Decline of the West" and historical CYCLIC theory, the West having so pathetically and tragically regressed and degenerated into subjectivism, this subjectivism then manipulated by Jews and satanists. Thus in Europe the rise of unc' Adolf was a more peculiar reaction of Germany to the general Judaic-satanic cultural hegemony and trend.

The USA, now Jew S A, was a case of Christian establishment subjectivist degeneracy fm original Christian ideal of Truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) to the present moronic "love," which is sheer putrid heresy. Father Coughlin, the famous radio priest, merely fought a futile rearguard action as the Jews in financial control persuaded the Catholic authorities, like the local Michigan Bishop Mooney to suppress Coughlin who fought the Jewwy New Deal even after the Pearl Harbor attack, and into 1942. <blockquote>"Joseph Kennedy [father of future Pres. JFK], who strongly supported the New Deal, warned as early as 1933 that Coughlin was "becoming a very dangerous proposition" as an opponent of Roosevelt and "an out and out demagogue". Kennedy worked with Roosevelt, Bishop Francis Spellman, and Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli (the future Pope Pius XII) in a successful effort to get the Vatican to silence Coughlin in 1936.[39] In 1940 and 1941, reversing his own views, Kennedy attacked the isolationism of Coughlin." (See Wikipedia, under "Charles Coughlin")</blockquote>

--------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------------


273. Dr. Robert Morgan says:
September 28, 2022 at 5:01 am GMT • 7.5 hours ago • 400 Words ↑
Autisticus Spasticus:

“Perhaps you could answer my question, Dr Morgan. ”

No, I can’t, because I don’t buy into your premise that the Jews control everything and always get what they want. I think that’s a pretty odd assumption on your part. Most people would see the accession of Hitler as evidence that they DON’T control everything.

MacDonald says something about this in his Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition that may be of interest to you, however tangentially.

The prominence of Darwinian theories of race was not confined to the United States. Such theories were influential among intellectuals in Europe as well, including Benjamin Disraeli, Arthur de Gobineau, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Gustave Le Bon, Herbert Spencer and a large number of Jewish racialist theorists mostly associated with Zionism.

We have to wonder why Darwinism wasn’t opposed as fanatically in Europe, since Europe was also Christian. There it didn’t decline, and perhaps its most radical adherent came to power in the form of Adolf Hitler. In Scientific Humanism Lothrop Stoddard offers a solution to this mystery by saying that in Europe the masses were more accustomed to obeying their intellectual betters than were the Christians of the far more democratic country of America. He sees the combination of democracy, which elevated the common man to a position of power over public policy, and the militant anti-intellectualism of these same Christian fundamentalist rubes, as a very dangerous one for Western civilization. If he were alive to answer your question, I think Stoddard would probably say that Hitler was able to come to power in Germany because of this sociological difference. In America, Christian fundamentalists were radically opposed to Darwin’s theories. To the extent Jewish opposition in the form of Boasian anthropology was a factor in Darwinism’s decline, it found a ready ally in these Christians. They were quite eager to believe Darwinism was bunk, and were probably very glad to find their position given intellectual respectability by the Boasians. I’d say it was due to Christianity that Boas and company triumphed so easily in America. Europe was a different story, and it was only after the violent, fanatical American Christians went to war to crush Hitler and his regime that the matter was settled by force of arms.
 
Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/article/seeing-some-old-friends/ KMac, 20 Sep 22

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Jewwy "Consolidations" Not Same In Germany As In Russia During 30s
(Apollonian, 29 Sep 22)

<blockquote>"And even so, why would the Jews have allowed Hindenburg to appoint Hitler chancellor? Had they not consolidated their power then to the extent they have now?" </blockquote> "Autisticus," buddy, u are very well-named. "[C]onsolidation" of the Jew power?--well, just look at the differences btwn the soviets at the time in Russia, and then Germany.

Yes, Jew financial power over both countries was quite strong, but observe in Russia, it had been consolidated fm the top all the way down to the military, which such consolidation was overwhelming, absolute, and complete. Observe the ruthless Jewwy manner in which the Ukrainian people were mass-exterminated in the holodomor of the early 30s, the Jews-media in the West, esp. Jew S A, covering for the bolshevik murderers.

In the German instance, pre-WWII, the military was still quite nationalist and even overtly anti-semitic, despite all the Jew influence in finance, the Jew consolidation was not nearly as complete--compare and contrast this consolidation today. Indeed, the German people are facing a ruthless extermination this coming winter, Russkie energy now cut off fm Germany--all of it upon command of the ruthless 'globalist" power, enforced by Jew S A.

-----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------------------


277. Autisticus Spasticus says:
September 29, 2022 at 2:09 am GMT • 4.9 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Dr. Robert Morgan

But the Nazis were the largest, or second largest, political party in Germany in 1933, were they not? And even so, why would the Jews have allowed Hindenburg to appoint Hitler chancellor? Had they not consolidated their power then to the extent they have now? That would be quite hard to believe, since whoever controls the financial system has the means to control world affairs, and it is beyond dispute that they controlled global finance back then just as much as they do now.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top