Apo essays for Feb 2020

[Apollonian]

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.bitchute.com/video/r7hr7mYc17Eo/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"Pastel...," Victim Of satanic Prop., Dis-Info, Subversion
(Apollonian, 1 Feb 20)​

"Pastel...," did it ever occur to u and ur sort u're a tad tooooo "smart" for ur own good? U can't prove there's no God, so what if there was one?--might he not be like the Biblic God the Father who sent Christ to inform and assure us there's such thing as TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6)--against the false teachings of the very worst of the worst?--the Pharisees.

What would be idiot purpose of "agnosticism" which is moronic "middle" btwn the opposites?--why not know w. certainty, if it's possible? God is something ephemeral, ineffable, not subject to sense perception, not subject to logical "proof"--but that's not the pt., as Christianity holds TRUTH is God (Christ being the mythologic symbol/character for it), that real thing to be worshipped, revered, and treasured.

Fact: Christianity is literary mythos in form and style delivering serious, genuine philosophy and lesson, beginning w. (a) postulate of TRUTH (= Christ), (b) founded necessarily in objective reality, (c) giving then the Christian ethics which is what's most written about, and what people love and revere most of all, throughout hist., including to this very day. Remember again, the philosophic pt. is the foundation (the objective reality) of those ethics which hereticalist Pharisees (subjectivists) deny--why Jews say and insist "truth" is only what they say it is according to Talmud, "midrash," and "Oral Law Tradition." This, foregoing, is nothing to be "agnostic" about, buddy--is reality objective or no?--so does truth exist, or no?

And if u really had a brain, as u like to pretend so much, u see the exterior myth is mere vehicle for the REAL philosophy embedded within: there's TRUTH (= Christ) because there's OBJECTIVE reality (created by God the Father, another assumption) which serves as necessary criterion/premise/standard. And of course, as Aristotle and the Greeks teach, this objectivity is a necessary ASSUMPTION, at the beginning of reasoning, which cannot itself be proven, but serves to prove everything else following--the only alternative is subjectivism, idea reality is produced by mind/consciousness, making subject God, the creator, extreme subjectivism then being Satanism (making oneself God) by definition whence anything can be deemed to be "truth" or not, such "truth" then being devaluated to meaningless. Thus Christ = TRUTH = "God," the "summum bonum."

Thus Christ affirmed the original Torah for Judeans (not "Jews," defined as followers of Pharisees/Talmudists, the middle-class party leading 5% of pop. of Judea at time of Christ)--which the Satanists (led by Jews--see Gosp. JOHN 8:44) insist only means what they SAY it means (subjectivism), according to their "Midrash" (interpretation) and "Oral Law Tradition" (noted by Christ at Gosp. MARK 7:7-9), extreme SUBJECTIVISM--Judaism IS SATANISM, the most successful, dominant, leading kind, Jews being most collectivistic, organized, hence most successful group-think artists, naturally then dominating more isolated, "individualist" gentile sort, for example, who yet out-number Jews by so much. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for expo on Talmud/Judaism. Jew Zohar, foundation of "Cabala" affirms this dual nature of God w. satanic devil.

So u see: Christianity is really just RATIONALISM wrapped within a mythic-style vehicle, called "religion"--this in order not to rejecting the less-capable humans who have difficulty w. simple logic, like urself. Note the present-day establishment "Christians" of "churchianity" ("false-prophets") insist upon confusing and mis-representing Christ (= truth) and Christianity, rather mystifying things, befuddling the people (inducing a kind of "cognitive dissonance"--which is presently so satanically successful and wide-spread). Buddhism is rather similar, I presume, evidently, according to Brian and other such-like gurus.

Try to being more analytical, "Pastel..."; there's distinct purpose for our dear Christianity--to protecting the human people, like the Shepherd protects the flock. There's excellent reason it's been around for 2000 yrs, and u have to admit it's had its successes--like the effective banishment of Judaic Satanism till the late Renaissance era when such Jew-dominated satanism began its fearsome come-back. Amen.


-------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied by "Pastel..."--------------------

PastelNiggiMonster > The Brian Ruhe Show • 9 hours ago

How can you be both a Buddhist and a Christian? It is much easier to just be Agnostic and question everything. Thinking is becoming a crime in this technocratic age. Think before it becomes illegal! Before the Niggi Terminators show up at your door or compromise your smart home system.

 

[Apollonian]

Here, below, is the sales ad placed on outside back-cover for Apollonian new booklet, "Discover Real Christianity, History and Philosophy, NOT Mere Religion, Myth," coming soon, for sale

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Satanists Want To Hide Real Christianity--Why?
(Apollonian, 1 Feb 20)​

Have u ever noticed Christianity is hated?--but hated by who?--well, Christianity is hated by Satanists to name one group among any others, so why and how is this? For Christianity must be and have a philosophy opposed to the Satanists, right?

And Satanists have a philosophy too--so what would that be, exactly?--isn't it important to know?--especially as satanists really seem to be succeeding. Shouldn't people be alarmed at this satanic success? For this growing Satanism is all around us, evermore in our proverbial faces and actually all over and upon us. People need to wake up.

So what actually is Christianity?--isn't it more than just mumbo-jumbo, chanting, and "feel-good" platitudes?--is there an actual philosophic CORE to it?

So aside fm the "religious" exterior and the mythic story to it, there has to be a genuine CORE to Christianity which is valuable for philosophy. For the ethics practiced and preached by Christ told in New Test. story is what people have always loved and admired, un-questionably--even the Satanists cannot deny, and isn't this admiration and respect for Christian ethics a main thing Satanists detest and hate?

So Christian PHILOSOPHY then is what's MOST important to be understood--why it was (and still is) so successful--why it's nowadays so horribly covered-up and deliberately hidden by its so-called defenders and "leaders." For establishment Christianity is hardly Christian at all, in all truth--it's been infiltrated by anti-Christs, heretics, and Satanists. No wonder people have so little respect for the establishment "Christian" brand.

Real Christianity then, deserves a fair and serious, even if brief examination--for it isn't and couldn't be "rocket-science," and it's got to be more than mere mumbo-jumbo and humbug. So let's find-out what the Satanists, who now rule, don't want us to know and try to hide about dear Christianity and Christian philosophy.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.bitchute.com/video/gJ0fD6uEMpHf/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Christian Philosophy In "Nutshell"
(Apollonian, 5 Feb 20)​

Hi Brian: good show, buddy, blessed by Holy Spirit u demonstrate once again. Well, remember any religion's purpose is to integrate conscious mind w. emotions, sub-conscious, etc.--to make the person whole, spirit w. mind and body, etc.

Ok, and then note the CORE of the religious vehicle is the inner PHILOSOPHY--this is the real substance of it all. And w. Christianity, worship of truth, Christ is mere character, figure, symbol for TRUTH--for truth is what we worship--Gosp. JOHN 14:6--and this should be definitive. Any Christian MUST acknowledge this worship of truth if he wants to be Christian--and the HERETICS are the ones who deviate, "going their own way."

Note also, a philosophy is also often best understood in terms of Hegelian-style anti-theses; thus Christianity stands for truth vs. Jew/Satanic lies (see Gosp. JOHN 8:44), based upon OBJECTIVE reality vs. subjectivism of Satanism (extreme subjectivism, idea that mind/consciousness is source of reality, making the subject God, the creator).

Thus truth is the basic, fundamental thing, value--EVERYTHING ELSE is secondary, including "faith," "peace," "love," etc. "Good" does not and cannot exist within an objective, hence DETERMINED reality, absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" human will. Humans are sinners by definition, and no human will can ever change this. Only way to heaven and "salvation" is by God's mercy and grace--cannot be done by human alone--as demonstrated. by St. Augustine in his battle against Pelagian heresy--ck Jewwy Wikipedia for easy source, ref.

Now then note the Christian philosophy is thus definitively laid down, Christ being TRUTH, the only way to God and hence happiness (or perhaps better, satisfaction). And the implication then is such truth principle entails the OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality as basis--it doesn't depend merely on what someone says--as the Pharisees insist, according to their filthy Talmud, "midrash," and "Oral Law Tradition." See Talmudical.BlogSpot.com, RevisionistReview.BlogSpot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best Talmudic expo.

Ok, and now finally, for this short, "nut-shell" expo here, the basics to Christian philosophy laid-down, the Christian ETHICS is founded and provided-for regarding the beginning principles--the objective reality. And note it's these Christian ethics which are most noted, discussed, and revered by the Christian people throughout the ages, fm the very beginning--these ethics being what Christianity really is all about for at least 90% of the Christian volk and "faithful" (loyalists)--they don't really grasp the more basic metaphysics too terribly well, not making a tremendously great effort to do so.

So u see, Christianity is, as in Old Testament, a LITERARY religion, tradition--getting the lessons and Christian philosophy itself fm a story given in literature--just like the Greeks got theirs fm the Illiad and Oddysey legends/myths. Christianity, worship of TRUTH (= Christ) is extremely Greek for inspiration--as was the original Torah of Mosaic law.

Remember also, this literary tradition is NECESSARY as the people of time of Christ were fairly illiterate, to great extent--they didn't necessarily attend too much schooling, so they'd stock their memory by means of this kind of mythos and story fm which they'd draw lessons and moral-type development which would be noted and discussed w. their parents and elders, family members, etc.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied by ap in response to same "Pastel," but who changed his moniker, at comments, https://www.bitchute.com/video/r7hr7mYc17Eo/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

What Is "Certainty," Anyway?
(Apollonian, 5 Feb 20)​

Kike (see below-copied): that's ur problem, isn't it?--indeed, that's THE metaphysical problem (basic premises), and it can't be proven as it's necessarily matter of basic assumption, isn't it? What is "certainty," anyway?--ho ho ho. Is anything about humanity or human life "certain"? Regardless, dumbass: Christianity isn't so much "the truth," as u put it--it's worship of truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6)--it pre-supposes truth (= Christ). We say truth exists--why?--because objective reality exists--God-given--which was original Mosaic premise which Christ defended against the Pharisees who Christ said were heretics, Pharisees pushing their hereticalist "Oral Law Tradition" and "midrash." (See Talmudical.blogspot.com, etc.)

Pontius Pilate asks Christ, "What is truth?" (Gosp. JOHN 18:37)--to which question Christ says nothing because it's either-or--u either "get it," or u don't, and u're just another loser who just doesn't get it, eh?--and it's because u're soooooooooooooo "clever," eh?--just like ur buddies, the kikes, ho ho ho ho ho ho.

if there's objective reality, logic, reason, and science all work. If reality is subjective, then there's no standard and anything goes and nothing matters or makes any diff., (a); (b) note also, to pretend to "good-evil" requires subjectivism, because otherwise there is no "good-evil" in an objective, hence determinist reality (absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" human will), and that's primary tool of Jews and Satanists against humanity. Worst enemy of truth is non-existent "good." "Do not partake of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of "good-evil," sucker. "Truth" (= Christ) depends only upon objective reality serving as standard/criterion/premise. What will u say now?--that objectivity is subjective?--ho ho ho ho ho ho.

Do u notice u're ur own worst enemy, sucker?--ho ho ho ho ho. Take ur choice, fool: Christian truth (hence objective reality) vs. Jew/satanic lies built upon subjectivism (JOHN 8:44). It really is matter of choice--what makes any sense? Things ONLY make sense in an objective reality, moron. Ho ho ho ho ho


---------------------above by ap in response to same "Pastel...," but changed moniker-------------------

BrosefNiggiStalin > apollonian • 14 hours ago

How do you know for certain Christianity is the truth? What is the truth? Even truth itself is subjective.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.bitchute.com/video/XxBk2wxGq3n5/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Excellent discussion w. Brian & Pannobhasa, Though Didn't Discuss Determinism
(Apollonian, 11 Feb 20)​

What is truth?--well, it is God = Christ = truth--see Gosp. JOHN 14:6. Christianity then is worship of truth, the highest value, summum bonum--the only way to God the Father. Note also, that very question, "What is truth?" is asked by Pontius Pilate to Christ at Gosp. JOHN 18:37. Christ replies nothing, allowing Pilate to move on to his next thought, the idea then (of the Gospel-writer) being that it is the very problem, but which Christ rather wants to leave for Pilate to figure-out for himself.

Thus truth is what is reflected by the objective, hence God-given, reality--as we confirm by observation and science, all science, logic, and reason dependent upon that objective reality and premise thereto--also known as "correspondence theory," as noted by Pannobhasa. "Coherence" then would be mere elaboration which couldn't work without "correspondence" or objective reality already implicit.

So it comes down to objectivity--or not--and nothing else works. Only problem w. this excellent discussion btwn Brian and Pannobhasa is it didn't get into the "free" will vs. determinist issue.

Note also the Greeks discussed this problem of the fundamentals of reality and philosophy, called "metaphysics," and observe that if there were no objectivity, then NOTHING works, as subjectivism falls to reduction ad absurdum--if reality is subjective, then ANYTHING goes, and there's no limit--one can both be and not be, etc.

Further, observe that this basic premise is itself obviously un-provable, as it is the most basic, nothing coming before it as premise--an ASSUMPTION (necessarily). Anything not objective then falls to reduction-ad-absurdum.

So u see, it's not provable, that basic premise for things, so it's really matter of choice, and we see that SUBJECTIVISM is extremely useful for Satanists (extreme subjectivists--idea that reality is mere product of mind/consciousness, making subject God, the creator--satanism) as it (subjectivism) is basic premise for non-existent delusion of "good-evil" which thus allows Satanists great power over the inferiors and weaklings of the world (not that they're "bad")--who are by far the most numerous and prevalent in numbers, hence politically powerful--weaklings and inferiors sooo subject to INFERIORITY-COMPLEX and "guilt," and thus "good-evil" delusion, known to Catholics as Pelagian heresy--the idea that human "free" will can choose "good," and thus the subject can WILL his way to virtue and DEMAND of God a place in Heaven.

Note then, most powerful (politically, sociologically, and psychologically) Satanists are the COLLECTIVIST subjectivists who are most organized, cohesive and best led, who collude in most effective, successful "group-think," and who have always been Jews (see Gosp. JOHN 8:44). For best expo on Judaism see Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org.

Thus Christianity hold humans are poor sinners, always have been, always will be, by virtue of the human will, which isn't perfectly "free" as God's is, but which makes the human necessarily "egoistic," thus following one's will and/or "interest"--the human necessarily self-interested and incapable of anything else, hence a "sinner."

So one sees the choice btwn objective and subjective (similar to Aristotle vs. Plato who upheld "good" along w. truth and beauty as his kind of foremost "trinity"), and as perfect "free" will is impossible but for God, the world is DETERMINIST, according to absolute cause-effect, there being no perfectly "free" human will.

Thus one sees the perfection of Christian philosophy embedded within the "religion" and myth, which philosophy is understood by only a few, most "Christians" occupied and rather fascinated by that ethical discussion and teachings found in Gospels which so much seem to dominate the interest of the volk, ethics over metaphysics.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied essay by ap submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/02/hoffmans-remarks-are-radically-counter.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hoffman, Moralistic, Heretic, And Hypocrite Above Everything Else--Eminently Contemptible
(Apollonian, 20 Feb 20)​

Hoffman: reason people rightly and understandably hate u and ur moralistic sort is u're so obviously self-righteous, pretentious, and unctuous for ur putrid moralism--and u're a Pelagian heretic as u pretend to "good-evil," which doesn't and couldn't exist within a perfectly determinist reality (absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" human will) created by a perfect and all-powerful God.

For "morality" is simply logic btwn ends and means, that's all, and there's no mystery to it--no idiotic "good-evil." Long as means serve ends, then it's logical and hence, "moral," and ultimate end(s) could be anything at all according to individual choice. Even Jews, foremost Satanists, aren't "evil"--no more than a disease which afflicts over-populated gentile humanity who succumb to such debilitating moralistic hubris as urs. In ur blinding hubris u can't see u're very picture of the very problem afflicting Western civilization.

And u're really not a "historian," so much as u're the typical, tiresome moralist, that's all. So u're additionally held in contempt as poseur and charlatan. We KNOW u know nothing about economics or money and banking, given ur amazing confession and display of such ignorance in "Usury in Christendom...," and u don't even seem to grasp the real meaning of "usury." U don't even understand the great difference btwn real money and mere currency. All u really want is that pretext for moralism--that's what u're all about.

So what u've obviously done is (a) offending the Jews who are typically outraged that u presume to analyze their satanic "religion" of lies, lying, and liars, such as it is, a blatant, naked stratagem of hatred and war against gentiles and humanity--this, in addition to ur "revisionist" rejection of holohoax.

And now (b) we see u seem to try to compensating for ur "anti-Semitism" (according to Jews, of course) by ur latest lies and lying regarding our dear hero and saint, unc' Adolf, whom u cannot grasp was humble man of the people who attempted, in perilous times of defeat of his nation's military forces, to rallying the German volk against that Jew/Bolshevik military colossus of the east who'd engineered in full view of the world at least a couple of gross mass-murders in Russia and Ukraine. Fool as u are, u pretend, in ur usual moralist manner to say what unc' Adolf SHOULD have done, when Judaic Satanism was clearly triumphant and on the march against all humanity.

What makes u so contemptible is, while pretending to be "scholar," ur half-baked incomprehension of Judaism as outright Satanism, which is extreme subjectivism, idea that reality is product of mind/consciousness, making the subject to be God, the creator, and the Jews foremost leaders of this Satanism as they're COLLECTIVIST subjectivists, most cohesive, organized, and motivated, naturally leading the goyim Satanists/subjectivists who are relatively isolated and "individualistic," though these goyim vastly out-numbering Jews.

Thus u're actually quite a subjectivist urself, pretending to the non-existent "good-evil" and Pelagian hereticalism, but typical half-baked incompetent as u are, u're stuck in the purest hubris without having either intelligence or initiative to graduate to fullest, outright Satanism urself, though u're subject to it in all ur ignorant stupidity and hubris--which then impels u to ur gross lying about unc' Adolf, Germany, and the German people.

So it isn't any wonder u're held in such overwhelming contempt in ur cowardly striving to play-up to those satanic Jew monsters, slandering dear unc' Adolf in all ur incompetence and ignorance, and u're further hated, justly and rightly, for ur brainless lies and lying in this cowardly sucking-up to Jew psychopaths and murderers. U don't even seem to realize how u're plainly seen to be sympathizing w. Jew Satanists, u're soooo filled w. that blinding hubris of urs, imagining u're such "moral" paragon and leader--u just stink to high heaven, sucker, and u can't face that other people see it and smell it.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted, but then CENSORED, deleted by kike Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_...ts-hate-mail-from-hitler-supporters/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Who's Kidding Who?
(Apollonian 24 Feb 20)​

"Realtalk": u're "psych-case," sucker, and u fool no one. Rabbis follow Talmud which is satanic war plan against all gentiles and humanity, and Hoffman does good enough job for his exposition thereof. See his Talmudical.blogspot.com and RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, also then Come-and-hear.com and TruthTellers.org.

U're typical Jew liar when u allege "utter schizobabble," which readers can judge for themselves. Further, many, if not all rabbis follow the "Cabala" mysticism of Zohar which explicitly equates God w. satan.

U Jews are subjectivists who follow "midrash" (interpretation) and "Oral Law Tradition," and u create ur own little reality, Jews dominating because of their collectivistic subjectivism, Jews most organized, cohesive, and best-led among the masses of gentile subjectivists who yet are not as well organized, more "individualist," thus dominated by Jews.


------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------

8. Realtalk says:
February 24, 2020 at 7:02 pm GMT

Don’t get taken in by Hoffman, friends. Guy seems like he’s making sense for a few sentences then veers into utter schizobabble about the grand schemes of the Satan-worshipping rabbis. Psychiatric case.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted, but then CENSORED, deleted by kike Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_h...ters/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Germany Under Conspiratorial Attack FM EVEN BEFORE 1914, Don't Forget
(Apollonian, 24 Feb 20)​

"Fool": u're aptly named, buddy. U're smart enough to note the many lies by the Jews-media, going all the way back, but it doesn't occur to u there was no "blunder" by unc' Adolf and Germans. For Germany was under conspiratorial attack fm even before 1914--see https://firstworldwarhiddenhistory....ination-of-franz-ferdinand-4-the-smoking-gun/ . Note also, the "Entente" powers were exposed for such essential conspiracy by mid-1920s, by numerous authors/historians, like Harry Elmer Barnes and Sidney B. Fay, after Versailles Treaty had falsely blamed Germany.

Suvorov, real name Rezun, notes in his works ("Icebreaker") there were 170 Soviet divisions right up on the border w. Germany and the other Eastern Europeans by 1941, w. another 70 or so divisions in 2nd echelon, ready and poised to strike. Further, by 1941 FDR (Roosevelt) and administration were already sending "Lend-lease" munitions and other vital supplies to UK, which immediately began sending to Soviets fm very get-go in June 1941 when Germans launched pre-emptive attack, supplying Soviets w. absolutely necessary food, equipment, including esp. trucks to make Soviet forces immensely more mobile against Germans.

Don't forget UK and France declared war against Germany to start the war, this after the offensive alliance w. Poland of Mar. 1939, the "allies" instigated by Jew bankers and FDR for purpose of world dictatorship of United Nations (UN), leading to present-day situation.

Hitler and Germans HAD NONE TO VERY LITTLE CHOICE over things all throughout, Germany under attack fm before 1914, Jew central-bankers at the bottom of it all. Get a clue.


------------above by ap in response to below-copied by "fool's paradise"-------

12.fool's paradise says:
February 24, 2020 at 9:41 pm GMT • 200 Words

Since we’ve been taught all our lives to hate Hitler as the worst man who ever lived, and then to find out through revisionist historians that he tried to make peace with England several times but was always rebuffed, that there was no “Final Solution”, no gas chambers, the obvious conclusion is, Hey, maybe he wasn’t as bad as depicted, what other lies have been told about him?

About Russia. Maybe Stalin wasn’t about to attack, as some historians claim, but Hitler knew that Churchill and Roosevelt were scheming with Stalin to get into the war eventually, and, a war on two fronts the last thing Hitler wanted, he gambled on taking Russia out first, a strategic blunder that cost him the war.

Was Hitler so bad for Germany? Germans worshiped him. What his National Socialists accomplished during the ’30’s was known throughout Europe as the German Miracle. So Germany had to be destroyed, for the same reason it had to be destroyed in WW1.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_...ts-hate-mail-from-hitler-supporters/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Rise Of Jew World Order--Required War
(Apollonian, 26 Feb 20)​

"John Johnson"? (see below-copied)--don't u mean John Jew-son?--another Jew pretending he's not Jew in order to make his lies and lying sound more "normal," coming fm sensible gentile, ho ho ho ho. So Jew-son tells us, <blockquote>"[h]ow can I spin it any other way? No one forced Hitler into war."</blockquote>

But hist. seen in proper context must consider WWI when Germany was attacked by "Entente" powers, Entente having deliberately murdered the Archduke, then attacked Austria for it. See "Hidden History...," by Docherty and Macgregor, https://firstworldwarhiddenhistory....ination-of-franz-ferdinand-4-the-smoking-gun/ .

Treaty of Versailles then lied to the world saying it was all Germany's fault--which lies were exploded in early to mid 20s by works of Harry Elmer Barnes and Sidney B. Fay, among many others, Germans witnessing huge, gross mass-murders by Jew-Bolsheviks in Russia and Ukraine.

Then Poland told Germany there'd be no more talk about re-uniting w. Danzig, totally German city, or there would be war; see Hoggan, "The Forced War." And the March 1939 "understanding" w. UK was an offensive alliance, UK promising to enter war against Germany when Poland decided to start it.

And why would Germany want to leave a hostile ally of the Soviet Union, the Czechs, situated literally in the middle of Germany, Germany now united w. Austria, w. only Slovakia on the eastern side, Slovakia an ally of Germany?

Of course it was "forced war," just as Hoggan titled his outstanding work, "forced" by Jew S A, UK, and France, for purpose of world gov. under the "United Nations" (UN), a huge new socialist empire run for the benefit and purposes of Jew bankers and future Israeli terror state--much like we have in this very day.

And unc' Adolf was the road-block and pretext for it all (the necessary war) within the larger "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler, as West continued to succumb to Jew money power and central-banking (literally legalized counterfeiting, pumping-out ever-larger masses of "fiat-currency," see Mises.org for expo; use their site search-engine) in the overall march of Satanism, subjectivism (anti-rationalism), the "Frankfurt School" of Jewwy degeneration, rise of homosexual dictatorship, trans-genderism, etc.


-----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------

73.John Johnson says:Next New Comment
February 26, 2020 at 6:52 am GMT • 100 Words
@Tusk

Hitler offered peace multiple times, the Allies refused. Not sure how you can spin this any other way, if they had accepted peace deals the war may (probably) have ended. The Allies are to blame, for regardless of who started the spat, they decided to end it in a bloodwar.

How can I spin it any other way? No one forced Hitler into war.

Are you talking about the 1940 peace offer? After he conquered half the continent through war?

Yea a real peace loving guy.

I’m gonna bomb your cities and then offer peace.

All he wanted was a free hand to attack the Soviet union.

He could have done that in the first place but his ego wouldn’t allow the state of Poland to exist. In his peace offering they would become a German protectorate.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/02/documenting-hitler-my-dissenting.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hoffman Continues To Bleat
(Apollonian, 27 Feb 20)​

Hoffman, in all his psychotic Passive-Aggression and self-pity just continues to bleat, complain and cry-out. But Hoffman, don't u insist on Pelagian heresy, idea of "good-evil," hence the perfectly "free" human will which will carry us to heaven, regardless God's grace and mercy?

For if "good" were something actually objective and real, then how would God possibly have any grounds for denying one his rightful place in heaven?

So Hoffman tell us, if there really is "good-evil," then what is the criterion, standard, and premise for it by which we can tell definitively the diff? Like the psychotic u really are, u constantly insist there's "good-evil," but NEVER tell us the criterion--NEVER.

U insist u're treated unfairly, and u say Suvorov (real name, Rezun) is wrong about the pre-emptive attack against USSR, but u refuse to say what are the real facts. So how many divisions did Stalin really have on his western borders?--u won't tell us, and who's fault is that?

Hoffman says Hitler should rather have relied upon mere counter-attacking any Russian invasions, Hitler operating upon what Hoffman calls "interior lines," but Hoffman doesn't tell us what his military and strategic qualifications are--did he graduate in the top half of his class at West Point?--what military training did Hoffman ever have and go through?

Hoffman insists Hitler was such a horrible person, not really Christian, but Hoffman as Pelagian heretic, pretending to non-existent "good-evil," we can only suspect Hoffman's own qualifications to be judge of Christianity. And we KNOW the German people thought rather more highly of unc' Adolf than know-it-all Hoffman, the military genius and paragon of moralism, hubris, and sanctimony.

And of course there's Hoffman's previous work on "Usury in Christendom...," in which we see Hoffman inveighs against "usury," not even capable of accurately defining and describing it, Hoffman knowing nothing about money and banking, not even understanding diff. btwn real money and mere "currency" (see Mises.org for proper economic expo; use their site search-engine for particular terms).

So we see, once again, Hoffman is NOT a "historian" at all, whatever he may say and protest--he's not even really a Christian, in all truth, merely the subjectivistic, hubris-filled moralistic and heretic, spouting "good-evil" delusions, pretending he's competent judge of things he plainly knows little-to-nothing about (military and economic), and he's been so terribly injured and treated by people who resent his hereticalism and self-righteousness, not to mention gross ignorance and presumption. Poor Hoffman.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied essay by ap submitted, but CENSORED/deleted by kike Unz, at comments, https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_...ts-hate-mail-from-hitler-supporters/#comments. Observe the kike lets fellow kike liar lie blatantly, but won't publish my own response--this is how kikes operate, folks.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Return For Another Round Of Lies, Lying
(Apollonian, 28 Feb 20)​

We see now the Jew took a short break and is back to his usual, typical lies and lying, spinning hist., covering-up simple facts; now he tells us, <blockquote>"[n]o he [unc' Adolf] wanted them [Poland] as a protectorate which means under German control. When they refused Hitler allied with Stalin and they split Poland."</blockquote> But Jew, it was already explained to u, Poland threatened Germany w. war over Danzig (a), and (b) Poland then made offensive alliance w. UK and France in Mar. '39, (c) Poland agitating, conniving, and committing acts of war, oppressing and in many cases actually murdering German citizens, UK and France thereupon declaring war when unc' Adolf finally acted against overwhelming Pole provocation.

It was "Forced War," just as David Hoggan explained and documented in his eloquent and much appreciated history. Those are the facts, Jew, all laid-out and sitting there for everyone to read; ur ignorant lies and lying are mere impotent expressions of ur filthy, satanic religion of lies, lying.

Jew-son then repeats, <blockquote>"...everyone wants to believe that Hitler wasn’t a bad guy and was forced into war."</blockquote> But those are the documented, absolutely PROVEN facts of reality, which reality and truth thereof we understand u Jews absolutely hate and detest in accord w. ur satanic religion of Talmudic lies and lying whereby u concoct (lie) ur own reality, ur own truth by means of "midrash" (interpretation) and "Oral Law Tradition," repudiated by Christ (= truth, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), which lies u Jews then enforce by means of ur collective efforts of extreme subjectivism, Jews most organized, motivated, and committed, thus dominating fellow Satanists/subjectivists among gentiles even though gentiles so heavily out-number u, gentiles not nearly so well organized or well-led.

Unc' Adolf is loved and revered as he was soooo forthright in calling u Jews out for what u are, what u stand for, what u do and how u did it--as Germans observed huge Jew/bolshevik mass-murders of gentiles in Russia and Ukraine, even before unc' Adolf came to power. See Talmudical.BlogSpot.com, RevisionistReview.BlogSpot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best expo on Judaism and Talmud.

Jew then asks,<blockquote> "So shadow Jews actually controlled Chamberlain?"
</blockquote> Jews controlled, led, and organized the all-powerful network of central-banking which prevailed in West fm during and before Napoleonic wars--see Griffin's "The Creature from Jekyll Island," and Mises.org; use site search-engine, at Mises.org, for particular terms, like "fiat-currency."

Thus "fiat-currency" and central-banking is criminal enterprise, literally legalized-counterfeiting, pumping-out evermore masses of "fiat-currency" (not real MONEY), at the very heart of the formerly Christian Europe; yes, they were begun by gentiles, like John Law in France in 1720, and such as William Patterson in England in 1694, but Jews, like Rothschilds, et al., quickly took over, took charge, consolidated, and dominated as we see, proven, documented, and before our very eyes. Jew bankers not only controlled Chamberlain, but all politicians, including esp. Churchill who is documented to having gone heavily into debt and then bailed-out and liberally subsidized by Jews and cohorts, this documented by David Irving, among others too. No wonder Churchill refused unc' Adolf's liberal offer of peace after Dunkirk.

The Jew ends his post w. blatant lies and lying, <blockquote>"[h]ow was Germany pushed into a corner? They were given concessions and didn’t need to attack the USSR through Poland. No one here has denied this inconvenient fact."</blockquote> See Jew?--this is why gentiles and all humanity throughout history, of all races and cultures, so intensively hate u Jews, ur "chutzpah," effrontery, and contempt for truth and honesty, u psychopathic monsters kicked-out of practically every country numerous times--and why we love unc' Adolf, our hero and saint.


-------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------------

109. John Johnson says:
February 28, 2020 at 4:00 pm GMT • 300 Words
@John Regan

When the Czech President came to Berlin to ask for German support to deal with the chaos, he and Hitler agreed to the peaceful partition of the country, with an independent Slovakia and a protectorate for the Czech regions.

Hitler was given Sudetenland as part of the Munich agreement and then decided to take the whole thing. The Czechs never wanted Germans to control their country.

Hitler had no problem with Poland’s existence. He wanted Poland as an ally against the USSR, which he did plan to make war against (both to secure resources for Germany and to end the danger of Communism).

No he wanted them as a protectorate which means under German control. When they refused Hitler allied with Stalin and they split Poland.

Hitler ended up killing Polish veterans that had fought the USSR after WWI. He was more interested in expanding Germany than fighting communism.

Great Britain and France did not want war in 1939, and Chamberlain was indeed popular for his determined efforts to avoid it.

Well that’s not a popular opinion here. At Unz everyone wants to believe that Hitler wasn’t a bad guy and was forced into war. Carpet bombing the Christians of Warsaw and then splitting the country with an evil dictator was somehow an act of peace.

However, the globalists (who, then as now, controlled the media and the financial system, as well as the US Government) did want the war, and they forced Chamberlain to give the disastrous guarantee to the Poles

So shadow Jews actually controlled Chamberlain? Are you saying he didn’t want to defend Poland?

which they interpreted as a general permission to run rampant. With the result that Germany was pushed into a corner.

How was Germany pushed into a corner? They were given concessions and didn’t need to attack the USSR through Poland. No one here has denied this inconvenient fact.