Book Review: "The Jewish Threat..." by Bendersky--US officials believed in Jew plot to rule world--& how it succeeded soooo well

Apollonian

Guest Columnist
Book Review: "The Jewish Threat..." by Bendersky--US officials believed in Jew plot to rule world

The “Jewish Threat”: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army. Joseph W. Bendersky. Basic Books, 2000, 586 pp.

Book Review

John Wear

Link: http://inconvenienthistory.com/10/4/6337

The “Jewish Threat”: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army by American historian Joseph W. Bendersky is a well-researched book that documents that many people in American military intelligence believed in an international Jewish conspiracy to take over the world. In fact, many officers in the Military Intelligence Division (MID) were saying essentially the same things about Jews as Adolf Hitler did.

Jewish Bolshevism

Colonel William Godson, one of the American Army’s most-valued intelligence officers, wrote from Poland: “The connection between the Jews and the Bolsheviki at Vilna seems to be proven without a shadow of a doubt. When the Bolsheviki entered the city they were taken to the houses of the wealthy by the Jews and apparently had this matter arranged beforehand.” Godson wrote two years later: “I am so thoroughly convinced of the reality of a Jewish movement to dominate the world that I hate to leave a stone unturned.”[1]

MID File 245 was a special central dossier reserved for data deemed particularly significant to the “Jewish Question.” Bendersky writes:

During the 1920s, File 245 contained letters between officers, secret agents, state secretaries, and embassies abroad exchanging the latest information on Jews. Among these would be interspersed lists compiled of prominent Jews who supposedly dominated or influenced German banking, industry, and politics. Far more numerous lists would be gathered of Jews supposedly controlling the Soviet government as MID became preoccupied with the link between Jews and Bolshevism. Although Zionism and Palestine received attention, much more concern was displayed toward Jewish refugees and immigration to the United States. Certain prominent American Jews, including Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, and Rabbi Stephen Wise, were considered sufficiently important to warrant individual scrutiny. Most incredible, though, were lengthy, meticulously documented reports such as “The Power and Aims of International Jewry.”[2]

File 245 and other MID records on Jews were stored with other military-intelligence material and kept classified until the mid-1970s.[3]

International Jewish intrigues began to surface within MID during the summer of 1918. An agent linked the Joint Distribution Committee of Jewish War Relief, the Federal Reserve Board, New York Jewish bankers, and the American Jewish Committee with Jewish financiers and centers of propaganda and spying in Germany. The agent also said that the Jewish Bolsheviks who had seized control of Russia now conspired to overthrow other governments. Almost all of the top leaders in the Soviet government were identified as being Jews.[4]

Other American intelligence officers reported that most Bolshevik leaders were Jews. MID’s New York office reported “that there is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews.” In Bern, an American agent reported that 90% of those attending secret Bolshevik meetings were Jews. The British government also obtained evidence that the Bolshevik movement throughout the world is an international conspiracy of Jews. The official MID viewpoint was that “Jewish intellectuals have had the leading and commanding part everywhere,” and because of “the growing power of the Jews,” they practically controlled the Soviet government.[5]

U.S. General Amos A. Fries told MID’s chief in 1926 that Polish officers believed that Jewish leaders, most disguised under Russian names, really controlled the Soviet Union. Fries wrote: “[O]f the Russian Congress some 70% were Jews and the remaining 30% were largely figure-heads…real power…was entirely in the hands of the Jews who were in it…for what they could get out of it, and very few members…really believe in the doctrines which they preach.”[6]

General Fries and Eli A. Helmick, inspector general of the army (1919-1927), viewed Bolshevism as the continuation of an international conspiracy that originated with the Illuminati in the 18th Century. They told audiences that the Illuminati incited the great French Revolution of 1789 and “were the influence which led to the bloodshed during the reign of terror.” The Communist International of Lenin and Trotsky was the modern form of this conspiracy, from which more bloody destruction could be expected.[7]

MID argued that both Jewish Bolsheviks and Jews in general in the Soviet Union profited at the expense of real Russians. Jews monopolized the privileged government offices and easy “graft jobs,” while confiscating the old regime’s most-valuable riches and smuggling them out of the country. Jews encouraged bribery and were behind “all speculation in foodstuffs.” Despite the revolutionary zeal with which Jews dispatched the Red Army against enemies, one MID informant complained that he never saw a Jew anywhere close to the front.[8]

Jews in the Roosevelt Administration

It was widely known among U.S. military-intelligence leaders that Jews played a prominent role in the Roosevelt administration. For this and other reasons, Roosevelt was widely unpopular among most U.S. army officers. Bendersky writes: “Years later, the wife of Colonel Truman Smith recounted the ‘exultation’ and ‘fierce delight’ in their social and political circle upon hearing the news of Roosevelt’s death. Finally, in her words, ‘The evil man was dead!’ ”[9]

The foreign-born Felix Frankfurter, a close friend and adviser of Roosevelt, had long been regarded by military intelligence as a dangerous Jewish radical. Frankfurter’s appointment to the Supreme Court in 1939 and his role in the New Deal was symbolic of the Jewish control of Roosevelt’s administration. Numerous other Jewish appointments caused many military officers to suspect Roosevelt of jeopardizing American domestic- and foreign-policy interests to accommodate Jews.[10]

U.S. General George Van Horn Moseley was one of the most outspoken critics of Jews. Bendersky quotes from Moseley’s writings:

Endowed with “objectionable” hereditary traits preserved by strict inbreeding, a Jew, Moseley wrote, no matter how assimilated, will always remain a Jew, a permanent “human outcast.” Describing Jews as “crude and unclean, animal-like things,” he exclaimed, “it is like writing about something loathsome, such as syphilis.” Insidiously, Jews rise from the underworld to control the economy, then government, making themselves “all-powerful.” Using international finance simultaneously with communism to further their selfish ends, they know no loyalty to any country. In the modern world, their ultimate goal is the “destruction of Christian civilization as we understand it in America today.”[11]

Congressmen were amazed by Moseley’s outspokenness when he testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee in June 1939. Moseley stated that America must learn from the experience of other countries. The “murder squads” of the Jewish Communists Trotsky and Béla Kun killed “millions of Christians” in the Soviet Union and Hungary. In Germany, “fortunately, the character of the German people was aroused” against the “internationalists” who sold them out at Versailles. Moseley stated that in developing its own refugee policy, America could benefit from the German response “for settling the problem of the Jew within their borders for all time.”[12]

Although Moseley’s vehemence made it easy for the army to publicly dismiss him as a crank, Moseley’s assertion of Jewish-Communist subversion was a widely held belief among American military officers. Moseley’s statements differed very little from the depictions of Jews by General George S. Patton after World War II. Some retired generals would also express the same views as Moseley into the 1970s.[13]

Jews Force World War II

Many military-intelligence officers saw Jews as the force behind World War II in Europe. Throughout the 1930s, many military officers foresaw a situation in which Jewish influence would involve the United States in a war against Germany.[14]

A colonel at the Army War College asked Harvard historian William Langer why “all one hears is hostility for Hitler and for Germany.” Langer replied:

I think the Jewish influence has a great deal to do with it. You have to face the fact that some of our most important American newspapers are Jewish-controlled, and I suppose if I were a Jew I would feel about Nazi Germany as most Jews feel and it would be most inevitable that the coloring of the news takes on that tinge. As I read the New York Times, for example, it is perfectly clear that every little upset that occurs (and after all many upsets occur in a country of 70 million people) is given a great deal of prominence. The other part of it is soft-pedaled or put off with a sneer. So that in a rather subtle way, the picture you get is that there is no good in the Germans whatever.[15]

John Beaty edited secret daily intelligence reports as a G-2 officer in Washington between 1941 and 1947. Beaty wrote the book The Iron Curtain over America based on his insights while inside G-2. He claimed that World War II was an unnecessary war fostered by Jews. The war was designed to kill as many Germans and Americans as possible by prolonging the war through demands for unconditional surrender and the Morgenthau Plan. The uncivilized bombing of German cities was also designed to mass murder innocent German civilians.[16]

Beaty described the Holocaust as a “fantastic hoax” and United States support for Israel as a policy fiasco. The Iron Curtain over America received strong support from many in the military intelligence community. U.S. General George E. Stratemeyer, for example, said he owed Beaty a great debt, since from Beaty’s book he finally learned what really occurred back home while he was fighting overseas. Stratemeyer said that every loyal American should read The Iron Curtain over America.[17]

Many other U.S. military leaders also concluded that Jews had influenced America to enter World War II. For example, General Albert C. Wedemeyer wrote to retired Colonel Truman Smith a few years after the war that the British, Zionists, and Communists made American entry into the war inevitable. Wedemeyer said they were motivated by selfish interests rather than the welfare of humanity. He stated that “most of the people associated with Communism in the early days were Jews.” Wedemeyer also claimed that Roosevelt’s Jewish advisers “did everything possible to spread venom and hatred against the Nazis and to arouse Roosevelt against the Germans.”[18]

Post World War II

General George Patton was removed from his position as military governor of Bavaria after the war for showing too much sympathy for Germans. Patton wrote repeatedly during the next few weeks about the plot by “Jews and Communists” to remove any officer who stood in the way of their destructive plans for Germany. Fear of Jewish opinion in the United States made American generals highly sensitive to criticism that they were treating the Germans too softly. Although most of the civilian German population consisted of women, children and old men, one general confided that “we are under constant pressure to kick the Germans around.”[19]

American officers and government officials complained incessantly in private that German-Jewish “refugees in American uniforms,” together with Jews in the U.S. government, adversely affected American policy toward Germany. For example, Major Charles Robertson, the American public safety officer in Wels, Austria, thought Patton was sacrificed merely to please “the blessed Jews.” Robertson said Jews seized businesses and property from Austrians merely because the Austrians had been Nazi Party members. As Robertson portrayed it, Jews had infiltrated the military government and protected their fellow Jews in all cases.[20]

Other officers confidentially criticized the nonfraternization and harsh occupation policies, which some considered in large measure Jewish-inspired. American Frank Mason reported from Germany that some refugee officers let Germans starve, treated German POWs with extreme cruelty, and sadistically beat SS members. According to Mason, given U.S. policy and the way the press misled Americans about events in Germany, disapproving and disgusted officers felt helpless to change the situation.[21]

The emerging Cold War caused military intelligence to resume its surveillance of Jews and Communists. Confidential intelligence summaries sent to retired General Ralph Van Deman stated that despite their denials, Jews “made an awful poor showing in World War II”; they were “powerful enough to pull the strings” necessary to keep them out of combat. The reports indicated that nefarious Jewish activities were so numerous that even a small staff could not keep up with them. Jewish organizations had unlimited funds and “dwarfed…honest, patriotic groups into insignificance.”[22]

General Charles A. Willoughby, MacArthur’s intelligence chief in occupied Japan, instigated a yearlong investigation of subversive elements in his own headquarters and in Washington. Willoughby wrote: “There appears to be a racial and geographical affinity for Communism and uncontrolled immigration has become a channel for subversion.” Willoughby upon retirement became more explicit in identifying these as Jewish influences. For example, he complained that an unprincipled Eisenhower had removed Patton “at the behest of Frankfurter, B’nai B’rith and the Jewish Conspirators.”[23]

Military-intelligence leaders also worked with Merwin K. Hart, the president of the National Economic Council, who waged a relentless battle against Jews and the Anti-Defamation League. Hart argued that left-wing Jews and Communists had worked closely together against American interests. Hart further stated that Jewish-Communist power had forced the United States to make the tragic mistake of partitioning Palestine. That decision cost America oil, alienated its natural Arab allies, and put displaced Palestinians in a dreadful plight.[24]

Anti-Jewish feelings in the officer corps remained long after World War II. For example, following a lecture at Duke Law School on October 10, 1974, General George S. Brown complained that the power of the Israeli lobby was “so strong you wouldn’t believe it.” The Israelis, Brown stated, say:

“Don’t worry about the Congress. Well take care of the Congress.” Now this is somebody from another country, but they can do it. They own, you know, the banks in this country, the newspapers, you just look at where the Jewish money is in this country.[25]

Bendersky concludes the last chapter of his book by writing: “What can be established beyond doubt…is that into the late 1970s and beyond, certain retired officers pursued their crusade to save America from a Jewish threat.”[26] These retired officers were saying similar things about Jews as Adolf Hitler did when he was in power.

Conclusion

Joseph Bendersky wrote The “Jewish Threat” to show that anti-Semitism permeated the highest ranks of the U.S. military throughout the last century.[27] Much of the book’s extensive research and documentation, however, proves the disproportionate power of Jews in America through their own words and actions. The U.S. military-intelligence leaders were merely reacting to this disproportionate power as loyal and patriotic Americans. The “Jewish Threat” thus contributes to the large body of evidence indicating that a cabal of powerful, interconnected Jews has taken control of America to the detriment of virtually all of its citizens.

Endnotes

[1] Bendersky, Joseph W., The “Jewish Threat”: Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army, New York: Basic Books, 2000, pp. xii-xiii.

[2] Ibid., p. xiv.

[3] Ibid., p. xvi

[4] Ibid., pp. 55-58.

[5] Ibid., pp. 60, 69, 116, 118.

[6] Ibid., p. 199.

[7] Ibid., p. 14.

[8] Ibid., p. 118.

[9] Ibid., pp. 212-213, 244.

[10] Ibid., pp. 226, 244.

[11] Ibid., p. 256.

[12] Ibid.

[13] Ibid., pp. 257-258.

[14] Ibid., pp. 270-271.

[15] Ibid., p. 273.

[16] Ibid., pp. 405-408.

[17] Ibid., pp. 408-409.

[18] Ibid., p. 274.

[19] Ibid., pp. 358-360.

[20] Ibid., pp. 361-362.

[21] Ibid., pp. 364-365.

[22] Ibid., pp. 392-394.

[23] Ibid., pp. 396-398.

[24] Ibid., pp. 412-413.

[25] Ibid., p. 428.

[26] Ibid., p. 422.

[27] https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Threat-Anti-semitic-Politics-U-s/dp/0465006183.
 
Last edited:
Middle Israel: Was the Bolshevik Revolution a Jewish plot?

Russian Jewry went to the Jewish state because here they would be free to study what they wish.

By AMOTZ ASA-EL
NOVEMBER 11, 2017 09:13
Updated: NOVEMBER 11, 2017 09:19

Email Twitter Facebook fb-messenger

Link: https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Middle-Israel-Was-the-Bolshevik-Revolution-a-Jewish-plot-513835/

FROM LEFT, Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky. (photo credit: WIKIPEDIA)
FROM LEFT, Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky.
(photo credit: WIKIPEDIA)

"Moses led the Jews out of Egypt, Stalin led them out of the Politburo,” whispered veterans of the Bolshevik Revolution, as winter 1927 approached the Moscow River’s banks.
The revolution that erupted 100 years ago this week was turning on its heroes, as Joseph Stalin was purging the late Vladimir Lenin’s protégés, confidants and aides. The expulsion those days of Leon Trotsky from the Communist Party was but the beginning of an anti-Jewish assault that would continue intermittently until Stalin’s death.
The revolution’s Jewish leaders would vanish much sooner than the communism for which they fought, but many Russians – to this day – still see the revolution as a Jewish plot.
Lenin’s deputies Lev Kamenev (originally Rozenfeld) and Grigory Zinoviev (born Hirsch Apfelbaum) and his treasurer Grigori Sokolnikov (Girsh Yankelevich Brilliant) were all Jews, as were Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), co-writer of the Soviet Constitution, Maxim Litvinov (Meir Henoch Wallach-Finkelstein), foreign minister of the USSR until his removal so Stalin could pact with Hitler.
This is, of course, besides Trotsky himself, builder of the Red Army and the only Soviet who served as both foreign and defense minister.
Most proverbially, a Jew – Yakov Sverdlov – oversaw the nighttime execution of Czar Nikolai, Empress Alexandra, and their five children.
Jewish revolutionaries were prominent beyond Russia as well.
Advertisement
In Germany, philosopher-economist Rosa Luxemburg led an abortive revolution in 1919 before being caught, clubbed, shot dead and dumped in a canal. In Hungary, Bela Kun – originally Kohn – led a short-lived communist coup several months after Luxemburg’s murder.
In Romania, Ana Pauker – originally Hebrew teacher Hannah Rabinsohn, and later the world’s first woman foreign minister – effectively ran the country for Stalin, before falling from grace and spending her last years under house arrest. In Czechoslovakia, Rudolf Slansky was the second-most powerful figure before his public trial and execution alongside 11 other senior Jewish communists. In Poland, two of the three Stalinists who led its transition to communism – Hilary Minc, who collectivized its economy, and Jakub Berman, who headed its secret police – were Jews.
The revolution, in short, was so crowded with Jews that one had to wonder whether “the Jews” were inherently revolutionary.
A century on, it is clear they were not.
TODAY’S JEWS are a conservative lot.
Jews are now overwhelmingly academics, bankers, businesspeople, lawyers, doctors, journalists, literati and politicians, who do not encourage their children to join the proletariat. Yes, many Jews give the poor much charity and also back assorted social-democratic political formations, but on the whole the Jews are now in the business of preserving the social-political order, rather than turning it on its head.
In Israel, an unabashedly bourgeois society that once was devoutly socialist is worshiping private enterprise, individualism and hedonism, as the prime minister the people keep reelecting smokes cigars and prides himself in having slashed social spending, sold public companies, and set the market forces loose. Jews have not been seen challenging the moneyed elite since revolution’s return in 1968 as a caricature, when Mark Rudd (Rudnitsky) and David Shapiro starred in the student takeover of Columbia University’s Low Library while Daniel “the Red” Cohn-Bendit led student unrest in France.
Why, then, were the Jews of 1917 so unsettled, and why are today’s so sedate?
Very simple.
Until 1917 Russian Jewry was abused. All the lands to their west had abolished all anti-Jewish laws, policies and directives, but the czars continued to cage the Jews in the Pale of Settlement, limit their access to higher education, block their freedom of travel, association and speech, and occasionally also encourage pogroms. The Jews were provoked, and the revolution was their counterattack.
Revolutionary Jews wanted to belong, and some of them wanted to make everyone belong – everywhere and immediately. It was a utopian urge that makes one suspect Trotsky et al. remained infected by the messianic bug of the Judaism they had vowed to shed.
Whatever its cause, that urge is gone.
THERE WAS, of course, an alternative idea, one that promised to make the Jews belong in a different way, an idea that in 1920 was juxtaposed with Bolshevism by none other than a typically insightful and visionary Winston Churchill: the Zionist idea.
“The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people,” he wrote in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, after noting “the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews,” a role that “probably outweighs all others.”
“If, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State... which might comprise three or four millions of Jews,” he now assessed, “an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial.”
It was certainly beneficial for Russia’s Jews, whose descendants eventually flocked in droves to the Jewish state, so much so that Jerusalem alone is today home to more Jews than all of Russia.
Russian Jewry went to the Jewish state because here they would be free to study what they wish, live where they please, rise as high as they could climb, and even become defense minister, speaker of the Knesset and chairman of the Jewish Agency. They knew they would belong.
The Jews who set out to redeem not their nation but all mankind ended up clubbed like Rosa Luxemburg, hanged like Rudolf Slansky, stabbed with an icepick like Trotsky, or shot by a firing squad like Bela Kun. Much as they refused to admit this to the bitter end – they did not belong.

www.MiddleIsrael.net
 
Last edited:

The Cold War: Subversion, Infiltration, and Terror​

19MAY 2024

Link: https://prepper1cense.com/2024/05/19/the-cold-war-subversion-infiltration-and-terror/

[see vids at site link, above]



Will Rogers said that everyone is ignorant – only on different subjects. Of Vietnam, more than most places, it can be said that there are no experts, only varying degrees of ignorance.MARGUERITE HIGGINS

Marguerite Higgins was a war correspondent who covered significant events in the Korean and Vietnam Wars. She died in 1966 at the age of 45 from a tropical/subtropical disease she got in Vietnam. Her statement above might be applied to the Cold War; for it can be said that there are no real experts on the Cold War. It is so vast a subject, with so many moving parts, that few historians can see the whole of it (or the essence of it). Even a Cold War historian and master of the facts like John Lewis Gaddis revealed his inability to digest the terrifying truth about Soviet communism when he suggested the United States had overreacted to the Soviet threat. This overreaction was sincere, he explained, but then he added, “Fear, after all, can be genuine without being rational.”
Gaddis thought America had no rational reason to fear communism. Here we are left to question the historian’s rationality. Communist leaders have often stated their world revolutionary ambitions. But that was just talk, right? A liberal professor might say that we should consider the more pragmatic policies of Lenin and Stalin, which supposedly prove that they were always ready to make peace with capitalism. Here we are asked to forget the murderous criminality of the communist leaders, and to omit their aggressive schemes. The Nazis never got this same benefit of the doubt. John Lewis Gaddis would have never dared to write that the Western powers overreacted to Hitler’s aggression in 1939. A double standard is clearly visible in our historian’s treatment of the communists. This is because the communists are masters of information warfare, and they would never allow the West to employ selective memory when it comes to Nazi crimes. When it comes to communist crimes, however, we are encouraged to forget. We are not allowed to conclude that communism was and is as evil as Nazism.
The most shocking article can be found below.
Liberal’s hidden agenda: more than just your guns…
… the impending collapse of the US food supply system
will steal the food from your kids’ tables…
Watch this video below to find out the great secrets hidden by the government.


William Gill, in recounting the history of communist subversion in the United States, marveled that congressional investigations into communist subversion were depicted in the American press as an assault on civil liberties. “It was the McCarthy era … that forever removed subversion from the list of palatable political issues in America,” wrote Gill. [iii] Even under President Reagan, there were no significant investigations of communist subversion. “The left,” wrote Gill, “reacted against McCarthyism with an outburst of emotionalism unprecedented in this country.” Willi Schlamm had remarked that anti-McCarthyism had swept reason from the minds of the best-intentioned Americans. “After McCarthy,” added Gill, “anti-communism was dead … as the subject for any meaningful intellectual exploration.”
The people who had read the anticommunist classics of the 1950s and 60s had not understood what Whittaker Chambers and Louis Budenz and Benjamin Gitlow had attempted to explain; namely, that communism was advancing from strength to strength. Chambers had even said that communism was destined to win the Cold War. And even now, communism’s victory appears likely. Communism was never understood by conservatives because conservatives rarely read communist books; therefore, conservative reflections on communism were full of misunderstandings. To see past all this it is more useful to say what communism is not than to say precisely what it is. Contrary to what conservatives tend to think, communism was never an economic system based on Marx’s theories. Eric Voegelin came closest to describing communism when he wrote of a spiritual sickness (he used the term pneumopathology) by which he meant a disturbance in the life of the spirit. This sickness signifies a derailment of perception in favor of a “second reality” which is more or less an ideological dream.
Even with this insight, Voegelin failed to see in communism the concentrated form of modernity’s danger. He dismissed Soviet communism as mere Russian imperialism. He did not, in a sense, take seriously his own insight into the specter that had haunted Europe and was then haunting the entire world. It was and is the hypocrisy of communist rulers that throws off the scholar and the pedant. They expect a communist to talk and act like a communist book. But even Karl Marx did not talk or act like one of his books. One must consider the flesh-and-blood reality of communists as human beings. While Voegelin shrewdly saw that Marx was “a swindler,” he failed to integrate his insights on pneumopathology with the practical necessities of political organization, nuclear war preparations, and subversion. All these intensify the pathology, concentrating it and directing it towards the most destructive channels imaginable. If you do not stop it, civilization could easily be leveled by it. But even Voegelin was not keen on stopping it insofar as he legitimized Soviet power by denying it’s communist aspect in favor of its Russian imperialist façade. The communist steals from the past because he is a thief and stealing is what he does. But his expropriation does not make him a tsarist or a Russian nationalist. Putin was a career KGB officer, and the KGB was the sword and shield of the Communist Party.
Communism strives to control the destiny of mankind according to the mad reflections of a psychopath who craves unlimited power. In practice, communism exists as a wide array of organizations, visible and invisible – as parties and governments, police agencies and armies, guerilla movements and activist cells, private clubs and false fronts. These do not have to paint themselves red or set up the hammer and sickle flag. They might, as Hitler, strike a nationalist pose; or they might show concern for “the planet” and the environment. Since most people do not want to live under communism, a good disguise is best. The game might then appear to be about feminism or critical race theory. But underneath, it is still communism because it characteristically blames capitalism and its “superstructure” for all that is wrong with the world. All these subsidiary causes are one with the communist cause, because everything from feminism to critical race theory aims at the destruction of family, culture, religion, law, etc. When destroying capitalism, one must pull down the superstructure of capitalism. He who would destroy capitalism, therefore, must pull down “the patriarchy” and every positive value or moral good. In brief, communism is a special case of nihilism that objectively produces death and destruction as a matter of course. Those who do not see this, do not see communism. Being desensitized by modernity, they cannot properly evaluate the politics of today.
As for communism’s organizational reality: Unlike society as a whole, communism has a special kind of brain. As a world movement it is governed by a hierarchical patchwork of committees or councils which communicate with each other and coordinate their political and military adventures. For many decades the “General Staff” of the communist movement was in Moscow. This was the committee of committees (i.e., the Central Committee of the Communist Party Soviet Union). When that committee went underground with the fall of the Soviet Union, we lost track of the actual center of the movement. In other words, we do not know exactly where it went or how the center was reconstituted. But we can see, from the continued coordination of communists worldwide, that the center still exists. Even if you cannot see the head of a snake, you know that the head is intact if the snake is still moving.
Perhaps the CENTER has been moved to a secret location near the Russian-Chinese border and consists of Russian and Chinese nationals. Perhaps it is, as some have claimed, hiding behind the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation. However that may be, we see the coordination of Russia and China worldwide in support of all communist regimes and communist parties. While Russia and China once pretended to be enemies, we see them working feverishly against America – to bring down the Republic. Even now the economic coordination between Russia and China is being ramped up.
Presently Russia is at war, reconquering a lost section of the old Soviet Union. We see China mobilizing and preparing. We see Iran testing her missile systems in advance of acquiring nuclear warheads. We see North Korea testing its nuclear missiles. All these bloc countries are moving towards a war footing. They are doing this because some kind of grand offensive is in the offing. Through the good offices of President Biden, who has held America’s southern border open for bloc infiltrators, China appears to be sending men of military age into the United States illegally. Mr. Wang of Lude Media has stated in an interview with me, that Beijing plans to send 250,000 troops into the U.S. by infiltrating them in civilian clothes (as illegal immigrants). Mr. Wang referred to the massing of immigrants along the southern border as Beijing’s “Ho Chi Minh Trail” into America. This reference is suggestive, and we should examine it more closely.
The communist victory in Vietnam and Cambodia, which took place in 1975, was accomplished using tricks that are now being recycled. In 1959, Ho Chi Minh began to infiltrate tens of thousands of communist troops into South Vietnam. These infiltrators formed an army of 100,000 men in the south which came to be called the National Liberation Front (NLF) or Viet Cong. They dug underground nests for themselves in remote jungles or mountains. They stockpiled weapons and blackmailed local villages into supplying food. The leaders of the NLF carried North Vietnamese passports. The NLF/Viet Cong was, in essence, an extension of the North Vietnamese Army. In the early 1960s they started ambushing South Vietnamese troops and police. Before the main infiltration of troops in 1959 there had been an infiltration of assassination teams. In the period 1957-59, the communist assassinated 67 village chiefs. With the entry of regular troops in 1959, the assassinations were extended to schoolteachers, village officials, and health workers who were murdered by the thousands from 1960-1961. And then, after several years, came a grand military offensive to seize control of South Vietnam.
The reason for bringing up the Vietnam War is not to bore you with history. It is to warn the reader that a variant of the Vietnam strategy is being prepared against the United States itself. The open border to the south has made this form of attack possible. We do not know when the infiltrated Chinese forces will begin a campaign of assassinations or attacks on American infrastructure. My advice is that everyone use their imagination as to who the targets of assassination would be and how this would play out politically.
Of course, someone is bound to discover that Chinese troops are operating inside the United States. Therefore, a general attack on the United States from abroad should also be anticipated – along the lines of the Tet Offensive of 1968; for as we can see, an attack from within is best augmented by a simultaneous attack from abroad.
There is one more thing. President Trump has begun to use the slogan, “Stop Biden’s border bloodbath.” He was referring to illegal aliens crossing the border and committing violent crimes against Americans, which is one of his campaign themes. In response, at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, Biden told the assembled reporters that Trump is the enemy of our democracy. Biden said, “The defeated former president has made no secret of his attack on our democracy.” But even more striking, Biden said that Trump had “promised a bloodbath when he loses again. We have to take this seriously.”
Of course, President Biden intentionally distorted the meaning of Trump’s words, framing Trump as a violent revolutionary intent on overthrowing the Constitution. Why did he say something so untrue, so outlandish, against Trump and his followers? One might ask if this statement was a kind of provocation. Now think, if you can, of the Chinese generals in Beijing. Think of their plan to infiltrate two field armies into the United States, as claimed by Mr. Wang of Lude Media. What are we really looking at here?
Take in the picture as a whole, omitting nothing, if you dare.
The video below is simply shocking… Because not even Trump or Putin expect such a thing!!!
This Could Kick-Start World War 3 Fellow Patriot
Our country is headed to a Nuclear World War 3
And we are NOT prepared for it…
This coming war won’t be fought with tanks and infantry like the first two…
 

German Cops Affiliated With AfD Face Dismissal Under Govt Decree, Leaked Memo Reveals​

by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Jan 16, 2025 - 02:30 AM
Authored by Thomas Brooke via Remix News,

Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/political...missal-under-govt-decree-leaked-memo-reveals/

Officials who are involved in the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party will be removed from service with the federal police, according to an internal memo leaked to the German newspaper Junge Freiheit.



The memo refers to a decree issued by Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser, of the Social Democrats (SPD). Faeser has warned federal police officers against sympathizing with the AfD and also stated that they should not join the party as members.
“They should expect to be fired,” said Faeser.
The federal police have 54,000 employees, of whom 45,000 are police officers. It is unclear how many officers are currently members of the party, however, many police are members of other parties, which means the decree and threats from Faeser are not about maintaining political neutrality.
For example, the president of the federal police, Dieter Romann, is a member of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU). A screenshot taken from the police intranet was shared exclusively with Junge Freiheit, which reads:
“If membership in such a party becomes known, there are sufficient actual indications that justify the suspicion of a disciplinary offense, at least if the officer is actively involved in such a party.”



Finally, there is an open threat of termination for officers found to be members of the party.
“If disciplinary proceedings are initiated in these cases, officers must expect disciplinary consequences up to and including dismissal,” the intranet site reads.
To underline the threat, the words “disciplinary consequences up to and including dismissal” are marked in bold in the text.
The police source who spoke to Junge Freiheit, and wishes to remain anonymous, told the paper:
“For me, this represents a significant restriction on the free formation of my own will as a police officer. In my opinion, making involvement with a party that represents more than a fifth of the population a criminal offense is an unacceptable curtailment of the basic rights of civil servants — even taking into account the obligation of neutrality. Any activity for the AfD is prohibited.”
The internal memo is entitled:
“Candidacy for a confirmed right-wing extremist party? Not a good idea as a federal civil servant!”
It is clear, therefore, that this does not only apply to the police but a range of civil service professions.
Dismissal from the civil service is not only sought in the case of candidacy but also for “other behavior that requires a targeted adoption of the political content of such a party.” This is “to be regarded as activism in this sense.”
The memo reads that the constitutional state “cannot tolerate” this because “the free democratic basic order is rather endangered if the constitutional state remains inactive and allows officials who are entrusted with state tasks and who are obliged to stand up for the free democratic basic order to question the constitutional order in its absolute core.”
In this internal warning, the German Federal Police explicitly refers to a decree of the Federal Ministry of the Interior dated Aug. 29, 2024. This provides for the “mandatory initiation of disciplinary proceedings” if one runs for the AfD, which is classified as “certainly right-wing extremist” in the German states of Saxony and Thuringia.
Furthermore, the provision applies not only to membership in the AfD but also to membership in “right-wing extremist groups such as the ‘Free Saxons’ or the AfD’s youth organization, ‘Young Alternative.’
In order to enable the new disciplinary measures against politically undesirable officials, according to the memo, Police Service Regulation 100 (“Leadership and deployment of the police”) was amended. The Federal Police informs its officers that section 1.5 “Leadership and Cooperation” has been revised.
The AfD is expected to become the second largest party in the Bundestag after the federal elections on Feb. 23 with polls currently placing them on 22 percent — its highest level of support for over a year.
Read more here...

More political stories on ZeroHedge​


Kamala Gives JD Vance Cold Shoulder On Courtesy Visit To VP Residence​



"I Speak The Truth" - Pam Bondi Pummels Dems In AG Confirmation Hearing​



After Giving Medals To Billionaires, Biden Warns Of "Oligarchs", "Abuse Of Power", & "Tech-Industrial Complex" In Farewell Address​


 
Here's a little history on how American Demon-rats, for example, "morphed," so to speak, in hist. fm the 1890s ("progressives") to Jewwy "New Deal" of FDR, fm leftist to outright commie bolshevik, as in 2024 when they ran gross communist lick-spittles, kamel-face & tampon Tim

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
O'Keefe catches a mid-level kike bureaucrat who talked about the "deep-state" activity that he himself knows about, etc.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Here's present state of civil-war charade, pushed & hyped by Jewwy FOX News/Watters

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Scummy commie (Jew) puke continue their insurrection & civil-warfare

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Trump is supposed to protect American interests & Americans, so is France now contracted-out the job to remove Owens for sake of Israeli allies?--or is it simply imperial Judaic dominance of the finances?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Latest incident of the civil war prosecuted & led by kikes & commies against Christians & white people

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Back
Top