CONFIRMED, suckas: Trump claiming conspiracy to defraud the vote and steal election PROVEN RIGHT, AGAIN, MORONS

[Apollonian]

TRUMP WAS RIGHT: Georgia election board admits it committed FRAUD in 2020

04/16/2024 // Ethan Huff

Link: https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-04-16-georgia-election-board-admits-committed-fraud-2020.html/

[see vids at site link, above]

A letter from the Georgia State Election Board to Joseph Rossi spells game over for the false claim that there was no 2020 election fraud in the Peach State.

In the letter, which you can view below, the Georgia State Election Board admits that it violated election law in 2020. The fact that this admission is now in writing means there is no more denying that Georgia rigged its state election against Donald Trump.

The letter addresses a board meeting scheduled for May 7, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. at the Georgia State Capitol, Room 341. It explains to Rossi that he is not required to attend, but is welcome to if he so chooses.

Following a lengthy investigation by "experienced investigators," Georgia officials admit in the letter that allegations made by Rossi concerning election fraud are now "in the violation found category," meaning election crimes occurred.

While the board meeting will address both claims for which investigators found a violation as well as claims for which they did not, Rossi's claim was determined to be in the violation found category – check out the letter below:

(Fact check: There is simply no way that Joe Biden won the state of Georgia in the 2020 presidential election.)

Now what?​

The claim from Rossi is dubbed SEB2023-25 in the letter, this referring to allegations that errors occurred both in the hand count and in the machine count for the 2020 election results in Fulton County.

In the below video, The Absolute Truth's Emerald Robinson explains in further detail what the implications are of this letter and what it states:

The fact that these revelations are coming out now, just months before the 2024 election and the end of Joe Biden's first presidential term, is more than likely no accident.

"Too little, too late – intentionally," wrote someone on X towards this end.

"So much for Bill Barr and our three-letter agencies claiming that 2020 was the 'most secure election in all the land,'" wrote another about the joke that is the Washington, D.C., establishment.

Others expressed concern that nothing will become of this regardless of what transpires at the board meeting. Biden's term is almost complete, after all, and it seems inevitable that the 2024 election will go the same way as the 2020 election now that those who stole the election know they can get away with it.

"Great news, but what's the remedy?" asked someone about Robinson's report.

"If the Georgia criminal case against Trump is his claim there was election fraud, and if there was indeed election fraud, then the case against him is not valid," wrote another.

Another wrote that this is possibly all happening now in order to disqualify Trump from legally winning in 2024 because it would technically constitute a third presidential term, which is illegal.

"What if in like October they declare Trump actually did win in 2020 and therefore is ineligible for a third term?" this person wrote.

"Meanwhile Fani Willis is continuing with the bogus prosecution against Trump for pointing out exactly this," expressed another about the political circus and witch hunt against Trump.

More related news about the fraudulent 2020 election can be found at Rigged.news.

Sources for this article include:

Twitter.com

NaturalNews.com

 

[Apollonian]

Election Integrity Investigator Releases New Information About Likely Manipulation of Maricopa County’s Voting Machine Tabulators in the 2020 and 2022 Elections​

Link: https://arizonasuntimes.com/news/el...020-and-2022-elections/ralexander/2024/04/13/

[see vid at site link, above]

April 13, 2024 Rachel Alexander

Ben Cotton, an IT expert proficient in forensics and digital systems analysis, issued a declaration last month about flaws with Maricopa County’s voting machine tabulators. It was included in Kari Lake’s and Mark Finchem’s latest pleadings in their complaint challenging the use of voting machine tabulators in elections. One of those findings was that unauthorized executable programs were installed on the machines at least three times during the 2020 election, which could be used to alter election results without detection.
Cotton, whose firm CyFIR was hired by the Arizona Senate in 2021 to audit the 2020 election, summarized his findings, “It is clear, based on my findings, that unauthorized programs, databases, configuration settings, and actions were present on the voting systems in Maricopa County for the elections in both 2020 and 2022.”
Regarding the executable programs, he said, “The Maricopa EMS has a compiler installed that provides the ability to modify and create executable files and drivers on the fly that could be used to alter election results without detection. There is evidence new executable files were created at least three times during the active voting period in 2020.”
The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) did not authorize the programs to create the executable files when the agency approved the software on the machines. “These programs are not found as part of approved and certified Voting System Platform software that is listed on the EAC’s Scope of Certification posted on the EAC’s website,” Cotton said.
In addition to the three executable files created during the election, “twelve thousand five hundred and seven (12,507) executable files were created or modified after the August 6, 2019 installation date of the DVS Democracy Suite on the Maricopa voting systems,” which also were not approved by the EAC. “The creation and implementation of these files created after the installation date and certification date of the DVS Democracy Suite software violates and undermines the entire purpose for the EAC certification process,” Cotton said.
A second concerning discovery he made was that the security system to tabulate the results had no encryption, so anyone could query the database to access it.
“The encryption keys used to secure the results, encrypt and decrypt the tabulator results and protect the integrity of the EMS operations are stored in plain text in an unencrypted SQL database that is accessible with a simple SQL query,” he said. “This egregious security lapse provides anyone with access to the voting system with the tools to alter election results without likely detection.”
He said there was only one easy hurdle a hacker had to overcome.
“The only barrier to access these keys is the Windows-log-in. This log in obviously would not prevent a malicious insider from changing results. A non-insider could easily bypass the Windows log-in feature in about 5 minutes with well-known hacking techniques available on the internet,” the IT expert said.
Cotton added, “Simply put, this is like a bank having the most secure vault in the world, touting how secure it is to the public and then taping the combination in large font type on the wall next to the vault door.”
Third, Cotton found that the software used on the machines, Dominion Voting System (DVS) Democracy Suite version 5.5B, was “materially altered” after it was approved by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). “The MBS file and the database version could not have been produced by the DVS version 5.5B,” he said.
He added that this was the case in the 2022 election, too.
Cotton said all the slog.txt files he examined contained a warning that stated, “[Verification] Election database version: 1.24 is not the same as election domain version.”
Finally, Cotton found that “EAC authorized voting system auditors Pro V&V and SLI Compliance failed to detect material changes to the voting systems in their audits of February 2021.”
“The auditors only analyzed the hash values of a very small subset of the executable files on the systems,” Cotton said. “Notably the auditor did not analyze or compare any files in the subdirectories of the Windows\.Net directory associated with the EMSApplicationServer functions or any other directory on the system. The auditors did not perform a comparative analysis of the software listed in the EAC Scope of Conformance and note any deviations from the certified baseline.”
He said the “files which do not match the EAC certified file hashes are configuration files,” which “is especially significant because changes to configuration files change how the election software acts and whether ballots have been accurately recorded and tabulated.”
Cotton said, “This is an egregious breach of basic security practices that must be remedied immediately. No election results provided by these voting machines can be trusted given the subjects identified and described in this report.”
A group of election integrity investigators in Arizona exposed voting machine tabulators’ lack of compliance with the EAC’s requirements in 2022 and filed legal actions to stop their use but got nowhere.
State Senators Wendy Rogers (R-Flagstaff) and Sonny Borrelli (R-Lake Havasu) held a press conference last month revealing some new findings.

 

[Apollonian]

FBI refuses to release documents in probe into possible nationwide voter registration fraud​

Bureau responds to Just the News FOIA request by suggesting the investigation is still ongoing.

By Natalia Mittelstadt
Published: September 26, 2023 11:00pm
Updated: September 26, 2023 11:12pm

Link: https://justthenews.com/politics-po...docs-investigation-possible-nationwide-voter/

• Article
• Dig Deeper

The FBI took over a 2020 probe into voter registration fraud that began in Michigan but has denied a Freedom of Information Act request regarding the investigation, citing an exemption in that law regarding ongoing investigations.
According to the dozens of pages of police reports from the Muskegon Police Department and Michigan State Police, a firm called GBI Strategies was under scrutiny as an organization central to alleged voter registration fraud in the 2020 presidential election. The matter was initially investigated by city and state authorities before the FBI took over.
Contacts between local law enforcement and the FBI continued into 2022 but there is no evidence of what happened after that in the memos obtained by Just the News through requests made under Michigan's own Freedom of Information Act.
Last week, the FBI denied a Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts request from Just the News regarding records from the investigation into GBI Strategies.

The request sought “copies of all reports, documents, and records about GBI Strategies, including all communication and correspondence regarding investigations of GBI Strategies with Michigan government officials, city and state law enforcement agencies in Michigan, and all other state government officials and law enforcement agencies involved in investigations of GBI Strategies.”
The FBI’s response partially reads: “The material you requested is located in an investigative file which is exempt from disclosure.”
The FBI cited 5 U.S. Code § 552(b)(7)(A) for exempting disclosure of the records, specifically, "records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information … could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings."
The agency’s response continued: “The records responsive to your request are law enforcement records; there is a pending or prospective law enforcement proceeding relevant to these responsive records, and release of the information could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.”
Police from Michigan interviewed GBI Strategies employees in 2020 and cited specific instances of registrations that appeared suspicious or fraudulent, the previously obtained memos show. A Michigan State Police memo described the possible crime being investigated as "Election Fraud by Forgery."
File
60-368-20X (1).pdf
The Michigan attorney general's office confirmed last month that there was a state investigation into thousands of suspected fraudulent voter registrations, which was referred to the FBI, the Bridge Michigan reported.
Danny Wimmer, press secretary for the State Attorney General, told Just the News in August that among 8,000 to 10,000 voter registration forms that were submitted to the Muskegon clerk before the 2020 general election, some were suspected to be fraudulent.
"An organization turned in some thousands of voter registrations throughout the fall of 2020, estimated on the high end to be cumulatively 8-10,000, and some within those batches were found to be suspicious or fraudulent," Wimmer said.
There were legitimate registrations within the batches. The city clerk receiving the batches alerted authorities when she began noticing irregularities.
"None of the fraudulent material was incorporated into the state’s qualified voter file, and this had no effect on any ballot requests or associated processes. This attempted fraud was detected because the system worked," Wimmer added.
Wimmer explained to The Detroit News last month that state officials referred the unresolved investigation to the FBI because it has national jurisdiction. He independently confirmed to Just the News that "The case was referred to the FBI in March of 2021."
When Just the News first asked about the investigation on Aug. 9, the FBI National Press Office said the following day that their “standard practice [is] to neither confirm nor deny the existence of an investigation.” The Muskegon Police Department also declined to comment on the investigation “because this matter is possibly an active investigation by our law enforcement partners.”
According to a Michigan State Police report, in March 2021, "D/SGT. PONZETTI ... STATES FBI TASK FORCE SHE IS ASSIGNED TO HAS POSSIBLE INVESTIGATION REGARDING [redacted] IN OTHER STATES. REQUESTED MSP, AG AND MPD REPORTS FOR REVIEW."
File
60-368-20R (1) (1).pdf
On a supplemental police report dated May 28, 2021, it reads, “Case will remain open as FBI has opened an investigation on the nation wide organization.”
The latest dates on the report are Aug. 19, 2022, where it reads, “STILL MAINTAINING EVIDENCE FOR FBI,” and Sept. 20, 2022, which reads, “Six month supp.,” and that the status of the investigation is “open.”
According to the Muskegon police report, the FBI visited the Muskegon Police Department in May 2021 to examine the voter registration applications.
File
Incident_202019124 R.pdf
In March 2022, the Muskegon police department received a call from an FBI agent “request[ing] random copies of some of the voter applications,” according to the report. The agent also spoke with the Muskegon city clerk, who told him “there was another box of applications with thousands of applications that were turned in after the deadline thus never examined. He requested that these be retained by the police department pending further investigation.”
There is a business listing for GBI Strategies in Cordova, Tenn., but at least during the 2020 election, the company had a Philadelphia office, employees from Atlanta working in Michigan, and a supervisor in New York for Michigan workers, according to the memos.
Wimmer told The Detroit News that GBI Strategies conducts voter registration drives and is headquartered in Tennessee.
Just The News is weighing its legal options regarding a challenge to the FBI's denial of the FOIA request.

 

[Apollonian]

JUST IN: Arizona Supreme Court Overrules Sanctions and Attorney Fees Against Arizona GOP for Questioning 2020 Election​

STATION GOSSIP 10:43

Link: https://www.stationgossip.com/2024/05/just-in-arizona-supreme-court-overrules.html

In a unanimous ruling, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Maricopa County Superior Court and Arizona Court of Appeals wr...​

Biden Labels Japan ‘Xenophobic’ For Not Following His Lead In Importing Hordes Of Third Worlders

‘None Of This Is A Peaceful Protest’: Biden Finally Speaks Out On Campus Unrest

In a unanimous ruling, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Maricopa County Superior Court and Arizona Court of Appeals wrongfully sanctioned the Arizona Republican party in awarding attorney fees against them over a lawsuit challenging Maricopa County’s post-election hand-count audit procedures.
“We hold that the attorney fees award was improper because Petitioners’ claim was not groundless, thus obviating any need to determine whether the claim was made in the absence of good faith,” Justice John Lopez writes in the court’s opinion.
“During times of social and political contention and strife, we must be mindful that our courts provide a means of resolving such conflicts when issues are legitimately presented. By sanctioning parties and their lawyers for bringing debatable, long-shot complaints, courts risk chilling legal advocacy and citizens raising ‘questions’ under the guise of defending the rule of law. Even if done inadvertently and with the best of intentions, such sanctions present a real and present danger to the rule of law,” the ruling also states.

The Arizona Mirror reports,

The lawsuit was filed more than a week after the 2020 election and argued that the state law requiring limited post-election hand-count audits conflicted with the state’s Elections Procedures Manual, making it illegal to select ballots for the audit from voting centers instead of by precinct.
State law requires each county to hand count 1% of all early ballots, as well as the ballots from 2% of precincts after each election. The Election Procedures Manual issued by the secretary of state permits counties that use voting centers instead of precincts, a list that includes Maricopa County, to hand count the ballots from 2% of voting centers instead.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge John Hannah dismantled the legal arguments that the AZGOP and its attorneys made. In addition to ignoring the law and the legislature’s intent when allowing for voting centers, Hannah said the Republican Party sought a remedy that the law doesn’t allow and waited far too long to file its suit.
The judge also said the party demonstrated it was not motivated by sincerely challenging a public policy, but instead by making a political case and sowing distrust about Arizona’s elections.

However, the Supreme Court opines, “We cannot countenance the trial court’s rigid delineation between the motives underlying election litigation— ‘political’ reasons, which invite sanction under § 12-349, and ‘legal or factual’ justifications, which are permissible.” It continues, “The desire to vindicate a legal right—even if in the election context and animated exclusively by political motives—is not relevant, much less per se sanctionable. Courts should focus on the legal and factual merits of a claim and the party’s and attorney’s conduct in the course of the litigation.”
“The trial court emphasized in its ruling that Petitioners’ gravest transgression and ‘direct evidence of bad faith’ was ‘ndercutting the election’s legitimacy by raising “questions,”‘ which it characterized as ‘a threat to the rule of law posing as an expression of concern.’ But ‘raising questions’ by petitioning our courts to clarify the meaning and application of our laws and noting the potential consequences of the failure to do so—particularly in the context of our elections—is never a threat to the rule of law, even if the claims are charitably characterized as ‘long shots.’”
They further slam the trial court, writing, “the trial court dismissively described Petitioners’ interpretation of § 16-602(B) as ‘barely colorable’ despite its avowed disinterest in the merits and lack of substantive analysis.”
John Hannah is the same partisan Judge who, as The Gateway Pundit previously reported, ordered the Cyber Ninjas firm to pay a $50K per day fine until it turns over records from their review of the Maricopa County forensic audit to the far-left Arizona Republic propaganda rag.

The Arizona GOP released a statement earlier celebrating the ruling:

We are pleased with the Supreme Court of Arizona's decision to reverse and vacate the attorney fees awards previously levied against us. This ruling reaffirms the fundamental legal principle that raising questions about the interpretation and application of election laws is a legitimate use of the judicial system, not a groundless or bad faith action. We remain committed to ensuring that election laws are followed precisely, upholding the integrity of our electoral process.

VICTORY IN COURT!
The Arizona Supreme Court defends our right to question and ensure the integrity of election laws. ️ pic.twitter.com/5aRSMFcKXj
— Republican Party of Arizona (@AZGOP) May 2, 2024

Per George Behizy:

BREAKING: The Arizona Supreme Court just issued a major defeat to lower court judges that threatened the state Republican Party with sanctions for bringing election challenges against Maricopa County
"But 'raising questions' by petitioning our courts to clarify the meaning and application of our laws and noting the potential consequences of failure to do so - particularly in the context of our elections - is never a threat to the rule of law, even if the claims are charitably characterized as 'long shots'."
AZ Sup Court: "Any suggestion that a party or attorney faces enhanced risk of sanction merely because they couple political motives with a long-short effort to vindicate a legal right in the election law context intolerably chills citizens and their attorneys precisely in an area where we can least afford to silence them."

BREAKING: The Arizona Supreme Court just issued a major defeat to lower court judges that threatened the state Republican Party with sanctions for bringing election challenges against Maricopa County
"But 'raising questions' by petitioning our courts to clarify the meaning and… pic.twitter.com/wpnQm4FapC
— George (@BehizyTweets) May 2, 2024

Read the full opinion below:

View Fullscreen [see site link above, top]