Creepy Joe's flunky Jew AG, Garland, appoints spec. prosecutor to determine if Trump should be charged, does NOTHING about corrupt son, Hunter

Apollonian

Guest Columnist


BREAKING: US AG Merrick Garland To Appoint Special Counsel To Investigate Whether Criminal Charges Should Be Filed Against Trump​

Link: http://www.womensystems.com/2022/11/breaking-us-ag-merrick-garland-to.html

Women System November 19, 2022 0 Comments 0 comment


3C808096-1836-4065-A788-46B7B6A3CAA0.jpeg

US Attorney General Merrick Garland will appoint a special counsel to investigate whether criminal charges should be filed against Trump.
Trump earlier this week announced his 2024 bid for the White House so Biden’s DOJ is running interference.
The special counsel’s name has not been announced yet.
The special counsel investigation will focus on whether Trump broke the law when he took White House records to Mar-a-Lago and the other part of the probe is related to January 6.
CNBC reported:
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland will appoint a special counsel to determine whether criminal charges should be filed against former President Donald Trump in connection with two pending investigations, according to reports Friday.
News of the planned appointment of the special counsel, which was reported by The Wall Street Journal, came three days after Trump announced plans to run for president in 2024. Trump faces multiple criminal investigations.
NBC News reported that the special counsel, whose name has not been announced, will make decisions for two Department of Justice investigations of Trump.
One is focused on whether Trump broke the law and obstructed justice in connection with his removal of hundreds of documents from the White House, which were shipped to his residence at Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida. The other probe is related to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot by a mob of Trump supporters.
 

“We Cannot Let Them Get Away with It – Enough Is Enough” President Trump Responds to Garbage Special Counsel Investigation (VIDEO)​

NOVEMBER 19, 20220 COMMENTS

Link: http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2022/11/we-cannot-let-them-get-away-with-it.html

trump-maralago-.jpg

President Trump responded to the latest special counsel investigation by the Joe Biden regime.
AG Merrick Garland announced on Friday he was opening another special investigation of President Donald Trump three days after he announced his run for president.
Tonight President Trump responded to the junk investigation at Mar-a-Lago.
The video was from GETTR Live.
FOX News refused to air it.
President Trump told his Mar-a-Lago guests, “We cannot let them get away with it… Why is there not a special counsel for them? I’ve done nothing wrong. They’ve been involved in criminal activity…. These people are corrupt and yet they go after the innocent… Millions of pages, they’ve got nothing. You take a look at the fake impeachment hoax and I won. We won. We went through the whole process… Isn’t this sort of double jeopardy? We did so well in a very hostile Congress. I made a perfect phone call… Can you imagine if the call was actually a bad call?… Why aren’t they investigating all of the presidents who proceeded me? Obama, Clinton, the Bushes… They took documents with them. It is such an unfair situation that is happening. If they are going to investigate me they need to investigate all the others. They have to invade Bill and Hillary’s home… The Bush’s home… We living in a very bad country… Third world countries have their results in the next day… Our borders are wide open… Itf they really wanted to run against me they would say let him run… We’ve done nothing wrong and they’ve committed massive crimes. We are going to restore power to the people… As I’ve said earlier in the week our comeback starts right now…
 

From The Hague To Obama’s IRS Scandal: Meet Jack Smith, The New Special Counsel To Investigate Trump​

by News Kick in NEWS

Link: http://www.tathasta.com/2022/11/from-hague-to-obamas-irs-scandal-meet.html

Jack Smith, appointed special counsel by Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday, spent years as a prosecutor for the Department of Justice under former President Barack Obama and in the International Criminal Court at The Hague.
Garland named Smith special counsel to take over two DOJ investigations into former President Donald Trump, including parts of the investigation into the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, as well as the investigation into documents seized from Trump’s residence in Mar-a-Lago. The move by Garland comes days after Trump announced his 2024 bid for U.S. president.

“Throughout his career, Jack Smith has built a reputation as an impartial and determined prosecutor who leads teams with energy and focus to follow the facts wherever they lead,” Garland said at a Friday press briefing. “As special counsel, he will exercise independent prosecutorial judgment to decide whether charges should be brought.”
Smith did not attend the briefing in Washington, D.C., that announced his appointment. The DOJ said he will return to the U.S. from the Netherlands after he recovers from a recent bicycle accident, according to The New York Times (NYT). Smith has already resigned from his role as chief prosecutor at The Hague, where he has worked since 2018 investigating war crimes.
Smith accepted the appointment in a statement: “I intend to conduct the assigned investigations, and any prosecutions that may result from them, independently and in the best traditions of the Department of Justice. The pace of the investigations will not pause or flag under my watch. I will exercise independent judgement and will move the investigations forward expeditiously and thoroughly to whatever outcome the facts and the law dictate.”
Smith began work as a prosecutor in 1994 for the New York County District Attorney’s office investigating and prosecuting sex crimes and domestic violence offenses, according to the New York Post. He later moved to the U.S. attorney’s office for the Eastern District of New York and served in a number of supervisory roles, at one point overseeing the work of about 100 prosecutors.
In 2008, Smith left Brooklyn for the Netherlands to take on the role of investigation coordinator in the Office of the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court in The Hague, NYT reported. He spent the next two years overseeing war crimes investigations into foreign governments and high-profile militia groups.
Smith returned to the United States in 2010 to take up a post at the Justice Department under former President Barack Obama. For the next five years, he led the DOJ Public Integrity Section and oversaw numerous corruption cases brought against politicians and others, including the high-profile cases of former Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell and former Arizona Rep. Rick Renzi, both Republicans.
Smith took over the Public Integrity Section at a period of turmoil for the division after a high-profile case against Republican then-Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska broke down, according to NYT. After Smith took charge, the division dropped a number of cases against other lawmakers, raising questions that the division may shy away from pursuing cases against lawmakers.
“I understand why the question is asked,” Smith told The New York Times at the time. “But if I were the sort of person who could be cowed — ‘I know we should bring this case, I know the person did it, but we could lose, and that will look bad’ — I would find another line of work. I can’t imagine how someone who does what I do or has worked with me could think that.”
In the case against McDonnell, Smith’s team won initially — a jury convicted McDonnell on 11 corruption-related felony charges. The Supreme Court later overturned the conviction in a ruling rebuking the prosecution for its “boundless” interpretation of the law.
“There is no doubt that this case is distasteful; it may be worse than that. But our concern is not with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns. It is instead with the broader legal implications of the Government’s boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in a 2016 opinion. “A more limited interpretation of the term ‘official act’ leaves ample room for prosecuting corruption, while comporting with the text of the statute and the precedent of this Court.”
In contrast to McDonnell, Smith’s prosecution of Renzi stuck. The former congressman was sentenced to three years in prison in October of 2013. Renzi later received a pardon from Trump in 2021 as he was preparing to vacate the White House for incoming President Joe Biden.
During his stint at the DOJ, Smith was linked to one of the most infamous scandals of the Obama administration: the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United, the IRS unfairly scrutinized and delayed hundreds of conservative organizations’ applications for tax-exempt status from 2010-2012, according to a 2013 report from the U.S. Treasury Inspector General.
A congressional investigation into the affair uncovered that an official from the DOJ met with Lois Lerner, then-head of the Exempt Organizations Division at the IRS, in October of 2010. Days later, Lerner said in a discussion at the Sanford School of Public Policy that “everybody is screaming at us right now, fix it now before the election,” referring to Citizens United and the relaxed rules on corporate political funding.
In May of 2014, Richard Pilger, then the director of the DOJ’s Election Crimes Branch, told congressional investigators that the DOJ-Lerner meeting was set up at the behest of Smith to discuss campaign finance law. More specifically, Smith wanted to discuss the IRS being “more vigilant to the opportunities from more crime in the … 501(c)(4) area,” Pilger said according to Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), then chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
Republicans said the meeting was part of a pressure campaign on the IRS to target conservative groups in the wake of Citizens United. Both Pilger and Smith in meetings with lawmakers denied that any such pressure or influence was brought against Lerner over the Supreme Court ruling.
Smith left the DOJ in 2015, and from February of that year to August 2017, Smith worked as the First Assistant U.S. Attorney and Acting U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee. Smith then served as vice president and head of litigation for the Hospital Corporation of America before taking a post at The Hague in 2018.
 

Special Counsel Investigating Trump Was Key Figure In IRS Targeting Scandal​

NOVEMBER 21, 20220 COMMENTS

Link: http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2022/11/special-counsel-investigating-trump-was.html

Jack Smith, the special counsel appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate former president Donald Trump’s possession of classified information, was a key figure in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)’s infamous targeting of conservative non-profits, according to a 2014 report by Republicans on the House Oversight Committee.
On Oct. 8, 2010, Smith, then-Chief of the DOJ Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section at the time, called a meeting with former IRS official Lois Lerner “to discuss how the IRS could assist in the criminal enforcement of campaign-finance laws against politically active nonprofits,” according to testimony from Richard Pilger, then director of the section’s Election Crimes Branch and subordinate of Smith’s, to the Oversight Committee. Lerner eventually resigned from the IRS in 2015 following criticism of her targeting of conservative groups when denying or delaying tax-exempt status.
“This seems egregious to me – could we ever charge a [18 U.S.C. §] 371 conspiracy to violate laws of the USA for misuse of such non-profits to get around existing campaign finance laws + limits?,” Smith wrote in an email to colleagues, per the Oversight Committee report. His email suggested that the department investigate conservative non-profits that reportedly may have violated campaign finance laws, according to The New York Times.
The impetus for the meeting was President Barack Obama’s public criticism of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC, according to the report.

The Times’s article described how 501-registered charities, with ties to conservative lawmakers, were receiving donations from corporations and interest groups. At the time, these groups were also lobbying the same lawmakers on Capitol Hill, the Times writing that “The sponsors – AT&T, Chevron, General Dynamics, Morgan Stanley, Eli Lilly and dozens of others – contribute millions of dollars annually in gifts ranging from token amounts to a check for $5 million.”
Smith’s meeting with Lerner shortly followed the article. Smith also urged the IRS to be “more vigilant to the opportunities from more crime in the … 501(c)(4) area.”
IRS officials under Lerner were later involved in selecting groups with the words “tea party,” “patriot” or “9/12” in their names for audits, following Lerner’s meeting with Smith. The IRS’s scrutiny of non-profit 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) tax-exempt statuses applied for by these groups prevented them from fully participating in the 2012 presidential election between Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney, as admitted by the agency in 2013.
Lerner later resigned from the IRS and pled the 5th Amendment when questioned about her actions by the Oversight Committee, which led to her being held in contempt of Congress. However, Smith and his team had “serious conflicts of interest stemming from their interaction with the IRS,” the report alleged.
Smith was also a leader in the prosecution of former Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell of Virginia on federal corruption charges in 2014, for accepting gifts from a lobbyist that he later repaid. The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed his conviction in 2016, and all charges were later dismissed, though commentators have argued that the conviction stopped him from running for president in 2016.

In his role as special counsel, Smith will oversee two investigations into Trump. One is regarding whether he or his affiliates “unlawfully interfered in the transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election,” per the order of appointment.
The other concerns Trump’s possession of classified information at his private Mar-a-Lago estate following the expiration of his term in violation of federal law, leading to a raid of Mar-a-Lago by the FBI on Aug. 8.
Trump has alleged that the FBI unlawfully seized materials subject to attorney-client privilege, and sued to have the documents reviewed by a Special Master to judge whether or not they could be used in the DOJ’s criminal investigation of him, per court filings. Some legal commentators claim that Trump is likely to be indicted on criminal charges for possessing classified information as a private citizen.
“Based on recent developments, including the former President’s announcement that he is a candidate for President in the next election, and the sitting President’s stated intention to be a candidate as well, I have concluded that it is in the public interest to appoint a special counsel,” said Attorney General Garland, per a DOJ press release. Trump, for his part, has said that he “won’t partake” in the special counsel’s investigation.
Smith, Pilger and the Republican staff of the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees did not respond to requests for comment.
 
Carlson/FOX News comment upon the Hunter Biden laptop story, how all the original investigators of that story have been arrested by creepy Joe's admin

 

Democrat Senate Intel Chief Demands Briefing on Joe Biden’s Stashed Classified Docs​

Link: http://www.domigood.com/2023/01/democrat-senate-intel-chief-demands.html

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), the chair of the Senate’s Select Committee on Intelligence, demanded a briefing from President Joe Biden’s Justice Department on Tuesday about the stash of classified documents at UPenn reportedly related to Ukraine and Iran and dated between 2013 and 2016.
Warner stated he wanted a briefing on Biden’s mishandling of classified documents related to congressional oversight powers. The requested briefing flies in the face of the media’s decision to downplay the national security breach.
“Our system of classification exists in order to protect our most important national security secrets and we expect to be briefed on what happened both at Mar-a-Lago and at the Biden office as part of our constitutional oversight obligations,” he said in a statement to reporters.
“From what we know so far, the latter is about finding documents with markings, and turning them over, which is certainly different from a months-long effort to retain material actively being sought by the government,” he said. “But again, that’s why we need to be briefed.
On Tuesday, CNN reported Biden’s mishandled classified documents at the University of Pennsylvania’s “think tank” included intelligence materials related to Iran, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. The trove related to Ukraine specifically raises national security concerns. The Biden family has had many business dealings in Ukraine.
In 2017, Hunter Biden was paid $83,000 per month to be on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. That same year, Hunter’s salary was cut in half when Joe Biden left the White House as vice president, having visited Ukraine six times in seven years.
Concerns about the Biden family business are not the only fears critics have about the stashed documents. About $54 million worth of anonymous Chinese donations have reportedly been given to a University of Pennsylvania “think tank.” Critics fear the Chinese Communist Party could have donated money to gain access to Biden’s classified trove.
The establishment media has defended Biden’s stash as different from former President Donald Trump’s incident of allegedly keeping classified documents at Mar-a-Lago — taking pains to call Biden’s case “smaller scale.”
While Trump’s incident culminated in the FBI’s raid of Mar-a-Largo and a special counsel investigation, no similar measures have been taken by Biden’s Justice Department in the case of Biden’s mishandling of classified documents.
Republicans have pointed out that — unlike Trump — then-Vice President Biden had no authority to declassify classified documents before leaving office.
“This is a very serious situation. Vice presidents cannot declassify documents. And the fact that Joe Biden is in possession of classified documents when he was vice president, signals we need to have a serious investigation into this,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) told C-Span.
“There is a true two tier justice system stemming from m g department of justice in the way President Trump has been treated — who is allowed to classify and declassify documents. Presidents can do that,” she said.
 

Damaging 5-Year-Old Video of Biden Surfaces After Bombshell Classified Documents Story​

Link: https://www.westernjournal.com/dama...-classified-documents-story/?utm_source=email


By Joe Saunders January 10, 2023 at 3:44pm

It’s not hard to make Joe Biden look bad — when Joe Biden is around to do it himself.

Amid Tuesday’s furor over news that classified documents had been found in a suite of Washington, D.C., offices Biden used in his post-vice presidency period, damaging video from a 2018 interview resurfaced that shows Biden declaring he had no access to “classified information.”

As it turns out, classified information wasn’t all that far away.

Check out this snippet of Biden’s conversation with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell. (And as an aside, note the evident difference between today’s doddering Biden and the man in 2018. He was almost stentorian by comparison.)

Trending:
Arrest Warrant Issued for Donald Trump, But There's One Big Problem: Report

According to a New York Times report published Monday, the documents were found in a locked closet at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement, a University of Pennsylvania think tank established in Washington and named for Biden that opened in February 2018.

Lo and behold, it was in that selfsame month and year, and in the selfsame suite of offices, that Biden was interviewed by Mitchell and stated in no uncertain terms that “I don’t have access to classified materials anymore.”

Should Biden be prosecuted for this?
Yes No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
How the world might have been different if an aide nearby had said something along the lines of, “Sure you do, Mr. Vice President. Right over there.”

Naturally, the Biden-backing Times, along with the rest of the establishment media, are taking pains to point out that there’s a huuuge difference between the appearance of classified documents Biden himself admitted he had no business having and the classified documents at the home of former President Donald Trump.

Remember, that was the home that was raided by Biden’s FBI on Aug. 8, because a former president in possession of classified documents is such a clear and present danger to the republic that it requires a squad of armed men to take over his home while he is away and cart away possessions (after pawing through his wife’s underwear).

Biden had only a “small number” of documents, according to reports. He “had neither been notified that he had official records nor been asked to return them, the White House said,” according to the Times. And Biden is “unaware of their contents,” according to CBS News, which first reported the story.

But one big difference the establishment media won’t point out is that, as president, Trump had the power to declassify any material he wanted. Biden didn’t wield that authority until he was inaugurated in January 2021 — three years after the interview with Mitchell. Trump has said he declassified the documents at Mar-a-Lago but has produced no documentation to back that up.

Another point that the establishment media likely won’t stress is that the Biden White House was — allegedly — first informed of the documents’ presence in the president’s old offices on Nov. 2.

Related:
Biden Should Answer Same Question He Posed After Trump Documents Story: This Didn't Age Well
That’s an important date because it was less than a week before the Nov. 8 midterms. If the American people had known that Biden was guilty — to one degree or another — of precisely the kind of offense that supposedly justified sending a troop of FBI agents into a political rival’s home, they might have decided that Democrats really are as totalitarian as they look.

It was also two weeks before Attorney General Merrick Garland — who had approved the Mar-a-Lago raid — appointed a special counsel to oversee the investigation into the Trump documents.

“Today, I signed an order appointing Jack Smith to serve as special counsel. The order authorizes him to continue the ongoing investigation … and to prosecute any federal crimes that may arise from those investigations,” Garland said then.

It’s an interesting question whether Garland was aware at the time of the documents that had been found in Biden’s old office. If he wasn’t, surely Biden and his team were, which might have given some of them pause when Garland used the words “prosecute any federal crimes that may arise.”

For her part, Mitchell chimed in Tuesday with a Twitter post that would have done any Soviet apparatchik proud for its party-line loyalty.

See, she confirmed that the Biden documents had been found in the same spot where the president had told her to her face that he had no access to classified documents. Yet she insisted that it was all “as far as we know very different” from what Trump did.

But, naturally, “GOP is pouncing” — a phrase so hackneyed in American political reporting that it’s almost a deliberate insult to readers’ intelligence to use it.

Well, one key difference “as far as we know” is that Trump had the authority as president to declassify any documents he saw fit. Whether that exonerates him from any wrongdoing in the Mar-a-Lago affair remains to be seen.

What doesn’t remain to be seen is that Biden, in the Year of Our Lord 2018, had never had such authority.

Beyond that certain knowledge, the questions of why classified documents traveled from Biden’s vice presidential offices to offices a mile away, when that happened, and why they were never returned remain unanswered.

Sure, it could be sloppiness and ineptitude on the part of Biden and his staff; heaven knows the country has seen enough over the past two years to believe that. (Just look at his disaster of a transportation secretary in a country plagued by supply chain problems.)

But it could be something else entirely. Without knowing what the documents contain, it’s tough to say, but it’s not at all hard to imagine something damning — say, intelligence information on Chinese espionage networks in the United States. (That’s the kind of thing Chinese business partners of Hunter Biden and “the big guy” would eat up, after all.)

Regardless, Americans can count on their legacy media outlets to do their best to obfuscate reality if it appears to be causing too much damage to the leftist cause.

They’re only interested in fighting the “Republican pounce.”
 

Secret Service Does Have Records of Visitors to Biden’s Private Homes​

Link: https://www.nationalreview.com/corn...-records-of-visitors-to-bidens-private-homes/

biden.jpg
President Biden speaks in Wilmington, Del., April 2, 2022. (Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters)

By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY
January 19, 2023 10:38 AM

Listen to article


Last week, the Biden White House claimed that the Secret Service would not be able to provide the identities of visitors to the president’s private homes in Delaware — i.e., in Wilmington and Rehoboth Beach — because the agency does not maintain visitors logs. In a New York Post column headlined “Don’t believe for a moment the Secret Service doesn’t know who visits Biden’s house — it’s Congress’s job to find out,” I expressed skepticism:
Let’s say the FBI was investigating a threat against the president, and one relevant line of inquiry involved figuring out who had visited the president’s private homes in Delaware during certain dates over the last 23 months. The Secret Service is responsible for keeping these private residences secure even when the president is not on site. If the FBI told the Secret Service that it was critical to get such visitor information, do you really think the Secret Service would respond, “Gee, sorry, we don’t keep logs for that”?
I certainly don’t believe that.
Given the lawyerly way the Biden White House has answered questions about who has visited the president at his Wilmington and Rehoboth Beach homes, I am prepared to believe that the Secret Service does not keep a document that they call a “log” of visitors. But I do not believe the Secret Service lacks records of visitor information, whatever they may call those records. I am very confident that, if the agency believed it was in the interests of the president’s security that the information be produced for the bureau, it would be produced at warp speed.
Well, I’ll be darned: Fox News is now reporting that, on second thought, it turns out that the Secret Service does keep records of who visits the president at his private homes, and that it is prepared to turn over the information if requested to do so by Congress. The agency’s spokesman, Anthony Guglielmi, explains that while a document called a “visitors log” is not kept, “Secret Service does generate law enforcement and criminal justice information records for various individuals who may come into contact with Secret Service protected sites,” such as the president’s residences.
 

Garland: Too early to say if Nashville school shooting was a hate crime​

Garland said police are still investigating the shooter's motive​

Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ga...lle-school-shooting-hate-crime?intcmp=tw_pols

By Peter Kasperowicz | Fox News

Nashville cops did an 'awesome' job in responding to school shooting: Geraldo Rivera

Fox News hosts Brian Kilmeade and Geraldo Rivera give their take on the Nashville Police Department's response to the school shooting on 'The Story.'
Attorney General Merrick Garland said Tuesday it’s too early to say whether the Monday shooting at The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee, will be investigated as a hate crime.
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., suggested earlier in the say that authorities should treat it as a hate crime that targeted students and staff at the private Christian school. But when asked by Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., if federal officials would open up a hate crime investigation, Garland told him a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing that it’s too early to determine motive.
NASHVILLE SCHOOL SHOOTER AUDREY HALE: WHO IS 28-YEAR-OLD TRANSGENDER FORMER STUDENT WHO OPENED FIRE AT SCHOOL
Attorney General Merrick Garland said it's too soon to say whether the Justice Department will open up a hate crime investigation into the Nashville, Tennessee school shooting at The Covenant School.

Attorney General Merrick Garland said it's too soon to say whether the Justice Department will open up a hate crime investigation into the Nashville, Tennessee school shooting at The Covenant School. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)
"The FBI and ATF are both on the scene working with the local police," Garland said. "As of now, motive hasn’t been identified, and the police chief said at his last press conference that they don’t yet have… a conclusion with respect to motive."
"We are certainly working full time with them to determine what the motive is, and of course, motive is what determines whether it’s a hate crime or not," Garland added.
NASHVILLE SCHOOL SHOOTING: AUDREY HALE POLICE BODYCAMS RELEASED
A police officer comforts a mourner outside of The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee on Tuesday, March 28, 2023. On Monday, six people - three adults and three children - were killed inside the school in a mass shooting.

A police officer comforts a mourner outside of The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee on Tuesday, March 28, 2023. On Monday, six people - three adults and three children - were killed inside the school in a mass shooting. (KR/Mega for Fox News Digital)
Kennedy acknowledged that the shooter, Audrey Elizabeth Hale, was killed soon after the shooting began by police who stormed the school. But Kennedy said Hale could have had collaborators who might also need to be brought to justice.
In response to another question from Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., Garland said it's possible a hate crime investigation is opened. "A motive that is based on a religion on the political ideology of the victims is a hate crime," he confirmed to Hagerty.
Hale, 28, was a former student at the school who identified as a transgender person. Hale killed three students and three adults before she was killed.
NASHVILLE SCHOOL SHOOTING: OFFICERS WHO TOOK OUT COVENANT SHOOTER IDENTIFIED
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., is urging DOJ to treat the shooting as a hate crime. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., is urging DOJ to treat the shooting as a hate crime. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images) (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Sen. Hawley said Nashville police believe Hale was specifically targeting Christians, and local reports say police are examining a manifesto that Hale left behind.
"This was a hate crime against Christian children & teachers," Hawley tweeted on Tuesday. "There is no defending it. All activist groups should condemn this hate crime and all hate rhetoric that contributed to it."

"When will the White House condemn this hate crime against Christian children and teachers," he asked on Twitter.
 
Back
Top