Get a clue, u stupid, scummy morons who call urselves "the people": covid-19 hype was GROSS prop. & lies, u idiots--Jews-media in w. big Pharma, fools


Guest Columnist

A Closer Look At The COVID Mortality Rate​

FRIDAY, OCT 28, 2022 - 08:40 PM
Authored by Ian Miller via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),


One of the most consistent efforts made by “experts” during the early stages of the pandemic was to attempt to impress on the public that COVID was an extremely deadly disease.

(Tithi Luadthong/Shutterstock)

While it’s clear that for the extremely elderly and severely immunocompromised, COVID does present significant and serious health concerns, the “experts” did their best to convince people of all age groups that they were in danger.
Initially the World Health Organization (WHO), in their infinite incompetence, made a substantial contribution to this perception by claiming that the mortality rate from COVID was shockingly high.

In March 2020, with precious little data, the WHO made the alarming claim that 3.4 percent of people who got COVID had died.
CNBC reported that an early press conference by WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus compared that expected mortality of COVID-19 to the flu:
“‘Globally, about 3.4 percent of reported COVID-19 cases have died,’ WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said during a press briefing at the agency’s headquarters in Geneva. In comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1 percent of those infected, he said.”
This stood in contrast to previous estimates, which were also above 2 percent:
“Early in the outbreak, scientists had concluded the death rate was around 2.3 percent.”
While “experts” could be forgiven for being unsure about the death rate of a brand new illness with very little data available, the fear-mongering and world-altering policy enacted based on these estimates has caused incalculable damage.
It’s now widely known and accepted that these estimates were wildly incorrect, off by orders of magnitude.
But a new paper out from one of the world’s leading experts confirms that they were off even more than we previously realized.
John Ioannidis is one of the nation’s leading public health experts, employed at Stanford University as Professor of Medicine in Stanford Prevention Research, of Epidemiology and Population Health,” as well as “of Statistics and Biomedical Data Science.”
You’d think that those impeccable qualifications and a track record of being one of the most published and cited scientists in the modern world would insulate him from criticism, but unfortunately that’s no longer how The Science™ works.
Ioannidis first drew the ire of The Keepers of The Science™ early in the outbreak, when he cautioned that society might be making tremendous decisions based on limited data that was of poor quality.
He also took part in the infamous seroprevalence study conducted in Santa Clara County, led by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.
That examination, which looked at antibody prevalence in the San Jose area, came to the conclusion that COVID was already significantly more widespread by March and April 2020 than most people realized.
This had wide-ranging implications, but the most important revelation was that the estimates of COVID’s mortality rate used by “scientists” and the WHO were almost certainly much too high.
Those estimates were created under the assumption that COVID cases were overwhelmingly detectable; that cases were captured by testing and thus tracking deaths could be achieved with a “case fatality rate,” instead of “infection fatality rate.”
That was the mistake Tedros and the WHO made two and a half years ago.
Of course, for providing substantial evidence and data that COVID was less deadly than initially feared, Ioannidis (and Bhattacharya) was attacked from within the “expert community.”
In what has now become a familiar insult, those behind the study were vilified as COVID minimizers and dangerous conspiracy theorists who would get people killed by not taking the virus seriously enough.
But Ioannidis remained undeterred, and with several authors, he recently released another review of the infection fatality rate of COVID. Importantly, the paper looks at the pre-vaccination time period and covers the non-elderly age groups; those who were most affected by COVID restrictions and endless mandates.

The Numbers​

The review begins with a statement of fact that was almost entirely ignored by lockdown “experts” throughout the pandemic, but especially when restrictions, lockdowns and mandates were at their peak early on.
“The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 among non-elderly people in the absence of vaccination or prior infection is important to estimate accurately, since 94 percent of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86 percent is younger than 60 years.” [Emphasis added.]
94 percent of the global population is younger than 70 years old.
6 percent of is older than 70 years old.
86 percent is younger than 60 years old.
This is relevant because restrictions overwhelmingly impacted the 86–94 percent of people who are younger than 60 or 70 years old.
Ioannidis and his co-writers reviewed 40 national seroprevalence studies that covered 38 countries to come to determine their estimates of infection fatality rate for the overwhelming majority of people.
Importantly, those seroprevalence studies were conducted before the vaccines were released, meaning the IFR’s were calculated before whatever impact vaccines had on younger age groups.
So what did they find?
The median infection fatality rate for those aged 0–59 was 0.035 percent.
This represents 86 percent of the global population and the survival rate for those who were infected with COVID pre-vaccination was 99.965 percent.
For those aged 0–69, which covers 94 percent of the global population, the fatality rate was 0.095 percent, meaning the survival rate for nearly 7.3 billion people was 99.905 percent.
Those survival rates are obviously staggeringly high, which already creates frustration that restrictions were imposed on all age groups, when focused protection for those over 70 or at significantly elevated risk would have been a much more preferable course of action.
But it gets worse.
The researchers broke down the demographics into smaller buckets, showing the increase in risk amongst older populations, and conversely, how infinitesimal the risk was amongst younger age groups.
  • Ages 60–69, fatality rate 0.501 percent, survival rate 99.499 percent
  • Ages 50–59, fatality rate 0.129 percent, survival rate 99.871 percent
  • Ages 40–49, fatality rate 0.035 percent survival rate 99.965 percent
  • Ages 30–39, fatality rate 0.011 percent, survival rate 99.989 percent
  • Ages 20–29, fatality rate 0.003 percent, survival rate 99.997 percent
  • Ages 0–19, fatality rate 0.0003 percent, survival rate 99.9997 percent
They added that “Including data from another 9 countries with imputed age distribution of COVID-19 deaths yielded median IFR of 0.025-0.032 percent for 0-59 years and 0.063-0.082 percent for 0-69 years.”
These numbers are astounding and reassuringly low, across the board.
But they’re almost nonexistent for children.
Yet as late as fall 2021, Fauci was still fear-mongering about the risks of COVID to children in order to increase vaccination uptake, saying in an interview that it was not a “benign situation”:
“We certainly want to get as many children vaccinated within this age group as we possibly can because as you heard and reported, that this is not, you know, a benign situation.”
It’s nearly impossible for any illness to be less of a risk, or more “benign” than a 0.0003 percent risk of death.
Even in October 2021, during that same interview with NPR, Fauci said that masks should continue on children as an “extra step” to protect them, even after vaccination:
“And when you have that type of viral dynamic, even when you have kids vaccinated, you certainly—when you are in an indoor setting, you want to make sure you go the extra step to protect them. So I can’t give you an exact number of what that would be in the dynamics of virus in the community, but hopefully we will get there within a reasonable period of time. You know, masks often now—as we say, they’re not forever. And hopefully we’ll get to a point where we can remove the masks in schools and in other places. But I don’t believe that that time is right now.”
Nothing better highlights the incompetence and misinformation from Dr. Fauci than ignoring that pre-vaccination, children were at vanishingly small risks from COVID, that vaccination uptake amongst kids was entirely irrelevant since they do not prevent infection or transmission, and that mask usage is completely ineffective at protecting anyone. Especially for those who didn’t need protection in the first place.
The CDC, “expert” community, World Health Organization, media figures—all endlessly spread terror that the virus was a mass killer while conflating detected case fatality rates with infection fatality rates.
Yet now we have another piece of evidence suggesting that the initial WHO estimates were off by 99 percent for 94 percent of the world’s population.
Just for some perspective, here’s the difference visually portrayed between what the WHO claimed and what Ioannidis found:

Even if the lockdowns, mask mandates, capacity limits, and shuttered playgrounds worked, the dangers of the virus were so minuscule that the collateral damage instantly and immediately outweighed any potential benefit.
Economic destruction, increased suicide attempts due to seemingly indefinite isolation, horrifying levels of learning loss, increasing obesity amongst kids, plummeting test scores, increased poverty and hunger, supply chain problems, rampant inflation; all of it is a direct result of policies imposed by terrified, incompetent “experts.”
Their estimates were hopelessly, catastrophically wrong, yet they maintained their unchallenged sense of authority for multiple years, and still receive awards, praise, increased funding and a sense of infallibility amongst politicians and decision-makers.
If sanity and intellectual honesty still existed, these estimates would be front page news for every major media outlet in the world.
Instead, because the media and their allies in the tech, corporate, and political classes promoted and encouraged lockdowns and restrictions while censoring dissent, it’s ignored.
Nothing could be more perfectly COVID than that.


Guest Columnist

COVID Psy-Op Exposed: ‘Network’ of Doctors Who Pushed Masking, Lockdowns on Twitter During Pandemic DON’T EXIST​

by Jamie White
January 8th 2023, 4:30 pm


Digital crisis actors/bot accounts may have been part of a military-grade psyop to push COVID tyranny on the public.

Doctors and physicians who were pushing masking, COVID lockdowns, and the experimental vaccines on Twitter during the pandemic were actually part of a “network” of fake accounts, according to a bombshell report.

An exposé by The San Francisco Standard revealed that numerous accounts purporting to be doctors in the LGBTQ community were nothing more than bots pushing the establishment COVID narratives.

The piece highlighted the account of Dr. Robert Honeyman, who described himself on Twitter as a “Doctor of Sociology and Feminist studies” with a “keen interest in poetry,” and had used a royalty-free stock photo as his profile picture.

Honeyman’s supposed husband, Dr. Patrick C. Honeyman, was also a fake account that used a stolen stock photo.


“The two fake doctors, whose accounts urged extreme caution about Covid-19, were part of a network of at least four fake accounts that touted their ties to the LGBTQ+ community, vocally advocated for mask-wearing and social distancing, and dished out criticism to those they felt were not taking the pandemic seriously,” the San Francisco Standard reported. “The Honeymans could not be reached for comment, as they do not exist. At publication time, Robert Honeyman’s account was no longer active.”

A reverse Google image search reveals Robert Honeyman’s photo is indeed a stock image from DepositPhotos.


The fake doctors were uncovered by self-described “gay writer” Joshua Gutterman Tranen, who noticed Robert Honeyman’s tweet about their husband being in a coma, and noted their ties to the LGBTQ community.

“I’m a self-identified leftist, and I understand that people have a lot of different identities, but it felt concocted in the lab about how many identities and horrible experiences can we put on one person,” he said.

Omg. Have gone down this rabbit hole and can’t stop. There’s a whole network of these frauds.
— كاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكاكا (@kookykarthik) December 13, 2022

The report noted that it’s “unclear” who created these accounts and others like it, but given the presence of other virtual-signaling symbols on their profiles like the trans and Ukrainian flags, the accounts likely were geared to influence liberals scared of COVID.

From The San Francisco Standard:

It is unclear who created the two doctors, but their bios and personas signpost identities meant to appeal to a certain type of Twitter denizen: liberal, pro-diversity and concerned about Covid. Or meant to provoke the opposite of that type of person.
Both doctors present themselves as members of the LGBTQ+ community. Robert displayed the trans and Ukrainian flags in their Twitter name. Patrick had a rainbow flag in his bio.
But there were other accounts tied to these fake crisis actor accounts.

Another account associated with the group, Dr. Gerold Fischer, displayed rainbow, trans and Ukrainian flags next to his name and described himself as “an ally for all in the #LGBQT+ Community. #WearAMask.” Fischer’s account has since been taken down.
A fourth account, Dr. Steve “Ste” Ville, who claimed an affiliation with the University of Antwerp, described himself as an “LGBTQ+ Ally” and a “Proud Mask Wearer.”
All four doctors had a few things in common. Three had created their accounts during the pandemic. Fischer’s account dated to 2019, but his earliest visible tweet was from July 2022.
Though the origin of these accounts and their purpose is unknown, investigative journalist Jeremy Loffredo estimated they were part of an “intel op.”

“On Twitter there existed an entire network of supposed ER doctors who identified as part of the trans community who constantly lost patients to COVID & received thousands of retweets. Except they don’t exist. Surely an COVID intel op,” he tweeted Thursday.

When asked whether the IP addresses of the fake accounts to be traced, Loffredo replied, “Langley VA,” the location of the CIA’s headquarters.

📍 Langley, VA
— Jeremy Loffredo (@loffredojeremy) January 6, 2023

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology used in the COVID jabs, linked to the SF Standard’s story, saying, “Just in case you were still confused about the military-grade psy ops that has been deployed against all of us.”

Just in case you were still confused about the military-grade psy ops that has been deployed against all of us.
— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) January 6, 2023

Though incredibly disturbing, this “military grade psy op” isn’t all that surprising given governments have admitted to exploiting the COVID pandemic to brainwash their citizens.

For example, the Canadian government in 2020 used the pandemic to experiment on new propaganda techniques on the unsuspecting public.

That same year the British Army deployed an “information warfare” unit to counter online dissent against COVID-19 vaccines.

Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour, who advised the UK government’s COVID response, admitted they were “unethical” and “totalitarian” in encouraging the use of fear to control people’s behavior during the pandemic.

And notably, recent revelations from the Twitter Files show U.S. intelligence agencies closely colluded with Twitter to suppress information related to COVID’s origins, the vaccines, and alternative treatments, and to censor experts who spoke out against the medical establishment’s phony narratives.

And while that was happening, an army of fake accounts on Twitter were allowed to virally spread false information about COVID with the aim of tricking people into shutting down the entire economy.

So not only was the U.S. government leveraging social media to undermine free speech and dissent about COVID policies, but at the very least they ignored the spread of actual COVID disinformation.

They may have even had a hand in this psy-op campaign themselves.


Guest Columnist

Conservative British MP Punished & Under Investigation For Tweet Exposing Covid Vaccines​

by Kelen McBreen
January 11th 2023, 6:06 pm


Establishment politicians come after free-thinker for saying the Covid jabs are deadly

UK elite are upset he compared the vaccine genocide to the Holocaust

United Kingdom MP Andrew Bridgen has been suspended from sitting as a Conservative MP – had his conservative whip removed – and will now serve without a party affiliation until a “formal investigation” is completed.

Mr. Bridgen’s crime was simply tweeting a ZeroHedge article detailing American CDC statistics showing Covid jabs are far more dangerous than previously reported.

Along with this article, Bridgen wrote, “As one consultant cardiologist said to me this is the biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust.”


Matt Hancock, the disgraced UK Health Secretary who locked the nation down during Covid, erupted at Bridgen on Wednesday, telling the Prime Minister the tweet was a “disgusting, antisemitic, anti-vax conspiracy theory” that is “deeply offensive” and “anti-scientific.”

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak agreed with his friend Hancock and condemned Bridgen’s “unacceptable” language and pledged to eradicate “the scourge of antisemitism.”

Please point to what exactly is “anti-Semitic” about his statement.

And while you’re at it, please show me the lie.

Stop pretending to care about our Jewish community in your cheap political point-scoring.

Andrew Bridgen is right.
— Avi Yemini (@OzraeliAvi) January 11, 2023

Of course, the article shared by Bridgen is completely scientific and based on government data.

Get Alex Jones’ take on the newly released CDC data below:

Additionally, it is not “anti-Semitic” to warn of another potential genocide taking place.

The British MP has been constantly sharing epic videos and articles exposing the dangerous shots lately, but apparently just typing the word “Holocaust” crossed a line for The Labour Party.

Responding to Matt Hancock calling Bridgen an anti-Semite, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra wrote on Twitter, “With the greatest respect Matt, there’s no conspiracy theory here it’s the product of a system failure of which we are all victims; the corporate capture of public health. Happy to meet with you again & present the data. Also majority of responses to your tweet are not supportive.”

With the greatest respect Matt,there’s no conspiracy theory here it’s the product of a system failure of which we are all victims ;the corporate capture of public health.Happy to meet with you again & present the data. Also majority of responses to your tweet are not supportive.
— Dr Aseem Malhotra (@DrAseemMalhotra) January 11, 2023

Heritage Party leader David Kurten praised Bridgen for standing up as the only MP to discuss vaccine injuries and deaths.

BREAKING: Andrew Bridgen MP kicked out of Tory Party for speaking up about injection injuries.
— David Kurten (@davidkurten) January 11, 2023

BBC broadcaster Dominique Samuels tweeted in defense of Bridgen, saying he was punished for “telling the truth about the COVID-19 vaccine.”

“His statements are backed up by the opinions of eminent scientists,” she wrote. “This government is on the side of Big Pharma and the WEF. It doesn’t give a damn about you.”

She also pointed out that the MP didn’t even make the statement about the Holocaust as it was a cardiologist who made the comparison.

And as usual, the mob are deciding to focus on one specific tweet because they can’t get him on the facts. He said, ‘as a consultant cardiologist has said, this is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust’.

May be a bit extreme for some, but it’s an opinion.
— Dominique Samuels (@Dominiquetaegon) January 11, 2023

The dam is starting to break regarding the truth about how deadly the Covid shots are and once the masses find out the truth, they will focus their anger on the establishment that lied and led them into an early grave.


Guest Columnist

MUST-SEE INTERVIEW: We Have Been Lied To About Every Part of the COVID Pandemic, Warns Dr. Michael Yeadon​

The Alex Jones Show |
January 24th 2023, 3:55 pm


Watch & share this masterclass breakdown by Big Pharma insider of establishment lies & biometric tyranny to help stop the bleak future globalists have planned for us all!

Former chief scientist & vice-president of the allergy & respiratory research division of Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, joined The Alex Jones Show to raise alarm over how the public was lied to on every aspect of the Covid pandemic:

“We’ve been lied to by government officials & corporate types about absolutely everything to deal with this so-called virus pandemic,” said Yeadon Tuesday. “The severity of the public health threats, the necessity to lockdown, asymptomatic transmission, the use of masks, mask testing, and finally, vaccines. Every single part of the narrative is a lie, scientifically proven.”

Yeadon goes on to detail his findings and stresses the importance of anyone listening to this interview to personally spread the word.

“They’re not frightened of me because they figure I won’t be heard. So please listen, what I ask is for you to memorize two or three of the powerful things I just told you & tell ten other people. The mass media is never going to tell them.”
Additionally, Yeadon said the globalists’ system of full-spectrum control is ready to enter its operation phase – and the key ingredients, digital ID and central bank digital currencies are about to be implemented.

“Digital ID is the heart of tyranny,” said Yeadon. ‘We are near the point where they’ll say: ‘If you don’t get your next jab, you won’t be allowed to buy gasoline, travel, or buy food.’ This system is ready to go.”

To echo Dr. Yeadon, please watch & share this monumental interview.

Also, check out our previous Dr. Yeadon video reports below: [ck site link, above, top]