Kike CEO of Big Pharma corp., Pfizer, says the covid scam & mass-murder was just a warm-up, suckas

[Apollonian]

Pfizer CEO Admits Covid Was Just a ‘Rehearsal’​

Frank Bergman June 21, 2024 - 12:54 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/pfizer-ceo-admits-covid-just-rehearsal/?utm_source=mailpoet/

[vid at site link, above]

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has admitted that the Covid pandemic and mRNA shot rollout was just a “rehearsal” for something far larger.
Bourla made the admission while gloating about Pfizer’s future as a vaccine maker.
The pharmaceutical kingpin was defending his company over reports that Pfizer’s “best days” are now in the past since the Covid pandemic was over.
“I truly think that the best days of Pfizer are ahead of us, because Covid was for me was like a rehearsal.”
He th

Bourla then suggested that Covid seems insignificant because Pfizer is now “after cancer and many other things in the years to come.”

WATCH: [ck site link, above, top]

This is not the first time Bourla has talked about new revenue “opportunities” for Pfizer from cancer, however.

As Slay News reported last month, Bourla revealed that his pharmaceutical company is expecting to reap “blockbuster” profits from treating the global surge in turbo cancers among the Covid-vaccinated.
Since Covid mRNA shots were rolled out to the public in early 2021, cases of rapidly developing cancers in young, healthy people have skyrocketed.
Oncologists and leading doctors around the world have been raising the alarm about the issue.
Many are reporting that patients who appear healthy are often dead within a week of being diagnosed.

The rapid onset of the disease has led to experts dubbing the phenomenon “turbo cancer.”
Evidence has continued to mount to suggest that the global turbo cancer epidemic is directly linked to Covid mRNA shots.
Many scientists have pointed to the DNA fragment contamination in the injections as the cause of the cancers.
However, the devastating impact is not bad news for everyone, apparently.

According to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, skyrocketing cancer cases present an opportunity to make “blockbuster” profits.
Celebrating these new opportunities, Bourla gloated that cancer “is our new Covid.”
Meanwhile, Bourla is not the only powerful globalist to describe the Covid pandemic as a test.
The daughter of World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab has declared that tyrannical restrictions during the Covid pandemic served as a precursor to coming “climate lockdowns.”

According to Nicole Schwab, Covid was a “tremendous opportunity” to test how the public would comply with authoritarian measures that could be used to usher in the WEF’s “Great Reset” agenda.
The WEF’s promotion of the “climate crisis” narrative seeks to “create a change that is not incremental…to position nature at the core of the economy,” according to the younger Schwab.
Nicole Schwab made the comments in a recently unearthed video that was recorded during a WEF panel discussion in 2020.
“This [COVID] crisis has shown us that first of all, things can shift very rapidly when we put our minds to it and when we feel the immediate emergency to our livelihoods,” Nicole Schwab says.

“And second, that clearly the system, I mean, you mentioned it earlier, that we had before is not sustainable.
“So I see it as a tremendous opportunity to really have this Great Reset and to use this huge flows of money — to use the increased levers that policymakers have today — in a way that was not possible before to create a change that is not incremental but that we can look back and we can say this is the moment where we really started to position nature at the core of the economy.”
In addition, Klaus Schwab’s WEF previously argued that the pandemic served as a mass global experiment that can be used to impose future restrictions.
As Slay News reported in September 2022, the WEF declared that Covid pandemic-related lockdowns have proved that “billions of citizens across the world” would comply with global restrictions on freedoms for the sake of “climate change.”
In an article published by the WEF, the organization lauds how “billions” of people complied with Covid “restrictions,” arguing that they would do the same under the guise of reducing carbon emissions.

Titled “My Carbon: An approach for inclusive and sustainable cities,” the article suggests that the same fear tactics could be used to impose further “restrictions” on the general public.

READ MORE – Top Cardiologist Drops Bombshell: Covid Shots Caused 112,000% Spike in Brain Clots

 

[Apollonian]

Ex-Pfizer VP Blows Whistle: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Were ‘Designed Intentionally to Harm People’​

Frank Bergman
December 5, 2024 - 12:56 pm

Link: https://slaynews.com/news/ex-pfizer...tentionally-harm-people/?utm_source=mailpoet/

[vid at site link, above]

The former vice president of Pfizer has blown the whistle in an explosive testimony to warn the public that Covid “vaccines” were “designed intentionally to harm the people who received them.”
Dr. Mike Yeadon testified that the Covid mRNA shots are “masquerading as vaccines.”
Yeadon is a British retired pharmacologist.
After he left the pharmaceutical industry, Yeadon started raising concerns about mRNA “vaccines” during the pandemic.
Until 2011, he served as the chief scientist and vice president of the allergy and respiratory research division of the drug company Pfizer.

He is also the co-founder and former CEO of the biotechnology company Ziarco.
Dr. Yeadon issued his whistleblowing statement in a video testimony for the Northern Island Parliament.
However, rather than rely on lawmakers and government officials to convey his message to the public, Yeadon has just released his entire video statement online.
At the opening of his statement, Yeadon declares:

“In the next 15 minutes or so, I would like to address those of you who’ve been vaccines injured, or bereaved, and also those of you who are involved in the political process in Northern Ireland as well as anywhere else in the world who might hear me.
“At the end of this process, I hope you will believe what I’m going to tell you.
“Which, shockingly, is that the material masquerading as ‘vaccines’ were designed intentionally to harm the people who receive them.
“I’m probably the most qualified former pharmaceutical company researcher executive in the world speaking out on this matter.

“Since I spent my entire career in the business of working with teams designing molecules to be new potential medicines, I think I am qualified to comment on it.
“And that is my shocking judgment that has only been reinforced over the last almost four years since I first said it.
“I also have some suggestions for what we can do together to fight against the global crime which is ongoing.”
Yeadon continues by explaining how the vaccines are designed and detailed evidence to support the allegations that they are designed to harm and kill people.

He revealed that Big Pharma vaccine scientists discuss at length how they can “hit a particular molecular target” in order to do the most damage to a person.
Yeadon argues that scientists with no ties to the vaccines should be able to see that the harm they cause could not be an accident and could only ever be part of the design.

WATCH: [ck site link, above]

Yeadon bombshell statement comes after he made similar remarks during a seperate testimony last month.
The former top Pfizer executive provided a stunning video statement to the Impfopfer Resistance Conference held in Vienna, Austria in early November.
During his 15-minute statement, Dr. Yeadon made staggering allegations against Pfizer and the wider “vaccine” industry.

He asserted that the Covid mRNA injections were developed with the intention of depopulating the human race.
“The purported ‘vaccines’ against this alleged illness COVID-19 were, in my view, deliberately designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility,” Yeadon warned.

WATCH: [ck site link, above, top]

Ex-Pfizer VP Testifies: Covid 'Vaccines' Were 'Deliberately Designed' to 'Kill & Reduce Fertility'

The statement from Dr. Yeadon follows a chilling warning from another leading vaccine expert.
As Slay News reported, a world-renowned virologist, who served as Bill Gates’s lead vaccine advisor, has warned the public that the devastating true impact of the mass Covid mRNA vaccination campaign has yet to play out.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, a former senior vaccine advisor at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, is warning that “vaccinated people” are facing a wave of deadly disease.
Bossche is sounding the alarm over a looming collapse of immunity among those who received the Covid mRNA injections.

According to Bossche, the long-term results of the “vaccines” will be a widespread global wave of turbo cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and ultimately death.
He warns that countries with the highest vaccination rates will be most impacted by the looming wave of death and disease.
Bossche issued the warning during a recent interview where he argued that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are “truly an insult to science.”
He then continued to explain how “highly vaccinated countries” are a ticking time bomb for a looming mass death wave.

READ MORE – Renowned Virologist Warns ‘Vaccinated People’ Face Looming Wave of Death & Disease

 

[Apollonian]

Revealed: The Hidden Pfizer Report That Shows Heart Conditions in the Vaccinated Getting Worse Over Time​

by Nick Hunt
11 December 2024 9:00 AM

Link: https://dailysceptic.org/2024/12/11...ns-in-the-vaccinated-getting-worse-over-time/






I told you here about Pfizer’s abstract of its Interim Report 5, showing at least 23-40% higher risk of some heart-related conditions in the vaccinated, but that the MHRA, the U.K. medicines regulator, was withholding publication of the full report. As I said at the time : “In summary, if, as I suspect, MHRA is worried by the results in Pfizer’s ‘Interim Report 5’ then no wonder it is sitting on it.”
Well, MHRA is still sitting on the report but I’ve managed to obtain a copy. It looks like I was right – the detailed results in the full report are even more worrying than the Hazard Ratios in the abstract which I reported last time (below).

To recap: this is a report of a Post Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine. National regulators routinely require pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct PASS studies as a condition of authorisation of most new medicines. The regulators provide data to the manufacturer covering millions of patients registered in national healthcare systems. The manufacturer then conducts analysis, matched for things like age and sex, to determine whether the medicine has increased the risk of specified health conditions.
Let’s dive straight in. Below are some heart-related cumulative incidence graphs from Pfizer’s full ‘Interim Report 5’. You will immediately notice that the incidence for each type of condition is significantly greater in the Covid vaccinated (bad) – but we already knew that from the Hazard Ratios in the abstract. What’s worse is that the curves diverge over time, i.e., the relative incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated increases over the time period of the data in the report (December 8th 2020 – March 21st 2022). I wonder what happened subsequently.
Acute cardiovascular injury (23% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse; page 130):

Arrhythmia (27% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse; page 138):

Heart failure (2% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse, though not quite statistically significant at this point; page 146):

Stress cardiomyopathy (30% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse, though not yet statistically significant; page 153):

Coronary artery disease (40% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse; page 160):

Myocarditis (21 days) (130% higher in the vaccinated, though not quite statistically significant; page 168):

No wonder MHRA is still sitting on the report. Perhaps it is hoping that Pfizer can spirit away these horrendous results from its Final Report (apparently still in preparation).
These results don’t just affect Covid vaccinated individuals. They also have wider safety implications for, say, aviation where the third party consequences of sudden pilot incapacitation from a heart condition can be catastrophic for passengers and those on the ground – especially for single pilot operations.
As I said in my last article, I wrote to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) about this in October, sending it a copy of Pfizer’s abstract of its report. CAA’s reply was a tragic comedy. It thought that Pfizer’s report was describing 37 events in 12 million people so it was completely dismissive. Apparently, at that rate, “if all U.K.-licensed commercial pilots received the vaccine, we would expect fewer than one to have experienced significant adverse effects”.
Sadly for the CAA, Pfizer’s report is actually describing 37 different types of events (and thousands of them) and the relative incidence for each type of event between 12 million vaccinated people and 12 million unvaccinated people matched for things like age and sex. I replied pointing out that:

• Pfizer’s abstract of its Interim Report 5 (March 2024) shows a higher incidence of heart problems in the Covid vaccinated population.
• CAA’s aeromedical regime for pilot licensing is based on the rate of sudden incapacitation in the general population.
• CAA’s aeromedical regime was never 100% effective – there was always residual risk of a pilot passing the medical with a subclinical heart problem which later manifests during flight. It calls this residual risk the “1% rule”.
• Pfizer’s report means that the rate of sudden incapacitation in the general population has increased, so proportionately more pilots will pass medicals with subclinical heart problems which, in turn, increases the risk of sudden pilot incapacitation in flight.
• It is axiomatic that CAA needs to adjust the periodicity and depth of its aeromedicals.

I await CAA’s further reply.
There is one other thing which has happened in the background: Esther McVey MP has asked a couple of Parliamentary Questions about Pfizer’s report of increased heart problems in the Covid vaccinated:

• The first asked if MHRA had consulted other industry safety regulators about Pfizer’s report. The answer was no. It seems to me that there is clash of safety cultures: MHRA think safety is relative (“safe equals benefits greater than risk”) so it probably didn’t even occur to its officials to consult other industry safety regulators who actually deal in absolute risks.
• The second question asked the Department for Transport what implications Pfizer’s report had for CAA’s aeromedical regime. DfT denied that it had any implications at all. It seems to me that DfT/CAA is ignoring the obvious.

So where are we now. We’ve got MHRA not consulting other industry safety regulators about the obvious wider safety implications of Pfizer’s report of increased heart problems in the Covid vaccinated, and CAA unable to read Pfizer’s report properly or being in denial.
This is, quite literally, deadly serious. The truth will out.