Myth of the Global Village

Rasp

Senior Editor
[From: The Odinist, no. 29 (1977)]


MYTH OF THE GLOBAL VILLAGE


Sociobiology has furnished unequivocal proof that the will of survival is at once a will of identity-retention. What indeed would be the sense of preserving life were it not a question of preserving it in specific forms? 'Life' existed in the amoeba and might as well have continued its unicellular existence were it merely a question of survival. But the never-ending wonder of life is that it has come to exist in so many distinct varieties, all of which, once created, maintained their acquired form until extinction. This they could not have accomplished without the will to retain their identity.

But this evidence has not yet found total acceptance as it applies to man. Yet man, as the culminating act of evolution, is heir to all the pre-human life survival mechanics that evolved together with life as form. That the 'shaping' of man involves far more than his physical existence does not alter its biological grounding and the laws that govern it.

It should therefore no longer be a cause for confusion that human life was not fitted into one but many shapes and that therefore, man no more equals man than animal equals animal even where they are of related species.

This is the new truth preached by the prophets of the Age of Biology that will fashion the era.

The realization of this new truth will gradually dispel the ideological fog of the equality theory where it still persists whether in Christianity, Masonry or Communism (not coincidentally of Judaic origin). Over the centuries they have so thoroughly saturated human institutions and rendered the existence of human social orders so chaotic that considerable energies will have to be expended to adjust men's outlook to the new truth of the age. Those who have experienced this revolutionary change within themselves, can envision a new world rising from newly awakened creative intellectual-spiritual forces that are as much a part of the evolutionary development of human life as were those of a prior, purely physical order.


'GLOBAL VILLAGE'


Some decades ago when men took to the air for travel, compressing weeks into days and days into hours, there was born the illusion that the world had shrunk and the term 'global village' was coined. It seemed that the dawn had come for the realization of the internationalists' dream of one world and one humanity. The reality is more like a nightmare of the last twilight than the dawn of a new day. The whole 'global village' is in an uproar. Wherever the eye scans the horizon of current political events there are fires of revolt - the most violent ones erupting ever anew where the races - as the different 'shapes' of men - defy the limitations that the 'global village' would impose upon them. This is so whether it involves vast territories as in Africa or tightly packed cities like New York. What these revolts are about is space. Not just physical space in terms of expanse or possession, but mental space. Room to be alone, one tribe away from another, secure within itself and in its own borders. Race and territory, in other words.

The 'global village' concept is a failure. Men have lived thousands of years spaced out and away from each other as tribal entitles developing distinct racial patterns and the hostility bred between them was no more than a mechanism of Identity-survival.

But they lived thus not only in spatial but in temperal terms so that space and time fueled in the elemental work of shaping the souls of men as differently as they shaped the bone structure and the tissue that covers the bone. And so time was in fact the element that bound men to space, making it into the homeland that provided not only physical room but mental room for the apartness necessary to develop as a total the physical, mental and spiritual traits that bound groups of men into a kinship.

No artificial 'global village' concept can eradicate these indelible time and space imprints that live in the consciousness of all men. And so they clamour for their most elemental need: to live and survive as whatever they were made and meant to be!


THE CONFLICT AND ITS CAUSES


What we see today is a world in collision. Natural, built-in instincts of identity-survival revolting against intellectualized miscegenation promoted as 'Integration.' Whether we witness this collision between Whites and Blacks in Africa or North America, or between other races, or even between ethnological groups such as the French and English in Canada, the motivations issue from the same sources.

There are, however, some distinctions. Whereas the Blacks in Africa and the Blacks, Indians and Eskimos in North America are generously granted the right to proclaim themselves a race and demand recognition as such, for a White Man to profess race-consciousness is, to say the least, to suffer from an 'infection.' In the conflict between the French and the English in Canada, for instance, the word race long prominent in differentiating between the two 'founding races' has been dropped completely and the conflict now is merely a 'language problem.'

The most bitter battles are fought where Whites and Blacks are in collision. This is so not only because here the differences are most pronounced but because the desire on the part of the Negro to escape from his own race by way of miscegenation has ever been a powerful motivation and is being thoroughly exploited through avenues of man-made laws by the international integrationists as the surest and fastest means of destroying the White Race.

Where there was no race problem as a result of history, it was recently introduced deliberately by appealing to or inventing legal processes. In England, Blacks and other-racials were allowed entry on the basis of a piece of paper being a passport. The ensuing protests by true-blood Britishers were then called race riots. In Canada a race problem developed when Blacks and East Indians were given entry on the British citizenship or refugee status and any resulting dissension between White Canadians and non-white imports are now attributed to 'race discrimination,' a label conveniently used to cover up the miscegenation intent on the side of politicians and resistance on the part of White Canadians.

What we are here confronted with are man-made laws in conflict with natural institutions as old as the beginning of life.


SCIENCE POINTS THE WAY


Today we know a great deal about the means that maintain life as form both in the individual and the biosocial orders of which each individual is a part. The knowledge first gained by Gregor Johann Mendel has been supplemented and expanded to a point where we can now understand all systems of ecology and the social orders of functions of NATURAL LAW for the preservation of specific forms, against miscegenation. For all too obviously, miscegenation in the plant and animal world would lead to chaos.

Only man, who can bend his free will to either good or evil and whose intellect can be directed away from sound instincts of natural law by evil designs, has been made to believe that miscegenation is an improvement upon the God-Nature-willed order of humankind and that indeed man is an exception to the natural law under whose design ALL of the rest of nature exists.

We have on various occasions pointed to Robert Ardrey's works as a directive on questions of animal social orders that justify thinking in terms of apartheid. Audrey's presentation has since been re-enforced by voluminous detailed recordings gained in years of patient, exhaustive but also enthusiastic studies by two sociobiologists, Edward Wilson and Robert Trivers (you can obtain their works on interloan from your public library). Not since Darwin has the life puzzle been so vigorously attacked and revealed. With the same kind of furious reaction, of course.

But that is not all.

What could rouse the curiosity of the minds of men more than the wonders revealed, promising deeper insights yet on questions still waiting to be answered than this puzzle of life?

Our readers may recall that in a discussion on the origin of life the crystal was show to play a vital role. We mentioned that Dr. M. Ludendorff, a renowned German philosopher, on the basis of her philosophic insights, revealed the crystal to have been the bridge between inanimate and animate life years before scientists began to wonder about this possibility. The idea leading to this phenomenal realization was simple enough - as is always the case when genius deals with an insoluble problem. It was this: Life cannot exist except in a form that holds. This ability was first demonstrated in the inanimate world by the crystal. The virus is a crystal. Hence the virus acquired the significance of life's pre-requisite. For here had become manifest the will to form-consistency necessary for the birth and evolution of life.

As scientists in the fifties and sixties took up the problem of the origin of life, the crystal-virus theory became increasingly more realistic. An exhibit in Stockholm in November 1960 based on the theme of the origin of life on earth, demonstrated advances made on this subject through medical and biological research. Summarized by the Heidelberg chemist F. L. Boschke, they gave far-ranging insights into experiments made by American scientists on questions of amino acids as a necessary component in the building of life. Basic to all considerations, however, was the virus that formed crystal-structures wedged tightly between the borderlines of living and non-living matter. Then along came A. G. Cairns-Smith of the University of Glasgow with his book "On Crystals and Organisms and on the Possibility of a Crystal as an Ancestor." Cairns-Smith asked, "Where do we find accurate replication processes in the 'unevolved' world of the chemist?" (in other words, form consistency, Ed.) and answered, "It is in simple crystals .... I suggest then, as a preliminary hypothesis that the primitive genes were not just like crystals, but actually were crystals of some sort." In a footnote he added, "Schrodinger (1944) suggested that 'modern' chromosomes should be regarded as 'aperiodic crystals'." This is not a bad description of DNA.


NEW VIRUS THEORY AND APARTHEID


And what does all this mean in relation to our discussion on the verity of apartheid?

Well, it appears that the virus is now not only revealed to be the agent that initiated life but is considered to have played an important role in the differentiation of life forms including those of man.

This astounding theory is set forth by George J. Todaro in "Viruses in Evolution" (Science 1978). The contents of the article are briefly interpreted as follows:

Viruses have functions other than the transmission of diseases. Some ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses in the family of retroviruses are not transmitted through infection but are passed on genetically in chromosomes from one generation to the next. The genes of which these viruses have become a part, have the ability to move about and relocate in other parts of a cell, other cells in the animal or the cells of other animals of the same or even other species. By re-combining with cell DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid - the genetic information blueprint) retroviruses function as an information transfer system. This fact is now thought to have played an active role in the evolution of life, formerly believed to have been caused only by mutations in the DNA of individual cells.

Bearing in mind what we advanced earlier on the significance of the crystal-virus theory concerning the origin of life, is it really so surprising that, viruses continued to play an important part in the creation of life forms? And, apart from the specifics of our subject, does this not also indicate that evolution was not the petty piece-by-piece assembly-line operation once envisioned by scholars, but a dynamic, creative process that could jump 'missing links' with 'imaginative' boldness that yet preserved the link of continuity?

Thus it has now been learned that species related to one from which a retrovirus has been isolated also have related viral gene sequences. Through a system of comparisons of viral RNA to cellular DNA involving DNAs of evolutionarily related species, science can now determine the closeness of relationships among the species.

From such studies emerged the realization that the cellular DNA sequences of apes that evolved in Africa are closer to the virus RNA of the baboon than those that evolved in Asia.

A further and far more significant realization is the effect this discovery has on the theory of the evolution of man.

The DNA from all human races matches the virus RNA of the baboon somewhat like that of apes that evolved in Asia and "is quite different from apes that evolved in Africa," says Todaro.

This, according to him, indicates that the evolution of man was not confined to Africa but that the human form was shaped in different places on the globe. Whether this was a simultaneous development or one that took place over long sequences of time is not certain, of course, but paleontology has long held that earliest finds of human development were not of the same origin. The new virus theory now confirms this.

For us this new theory gives insight into life facts of the greatest import. It confirms that apartheid is not an invention of the human will or mind but of the forces of God-Nature in the building of the human form. It confirms further our own contention drawn from studies of sociobiological data that it is not space alone as territory but time as the momentum of life development that has shaped man in his different forms and determined the factor of Race.

Thus we can maintain that the beginnings of racial differences lie right here at the beginning of life itself and that in reality human history was set on its natural course not with the year one of the Judaic-Christian count of time but in the far-away dawn of man's birth wherever this may have been. And so this consideration must be the starting point for all our thinking in the sorting out of Black and White not only where it is a question of Race but of Truth.

The sequences then will follow naturally.

[Helgar]
 
Among the most dangerous ideas to the survival of the species is the "Brotherhood of Man" bull$hit. Whites expound, profess and revel in this idiocy even while their children's destruction at the hands of the hordes they profess to be "equal" with appears imminent.

What possible good can come of teaching a child that they are equal to the robbing, raping, sodomizing, murdering niggers of the world?

How is the propagation of such utter BS an adaptation that will ensure the survival of the White Race?

And if the concept of "whiteness" or "white identity" is in itself perceived to be "racist" and to be avoided, i.e., "we are all Americans", "we are all part of the global village", then how can that portion of the population possibly adapt or survive or have their genetic makeup avoid being blown out into certain extinction?

Holding two adverserial ideas simultaneously and professing both to be true when they cannot possibly be is not a sucessful survival evolutionary strategy for any species.
 
Back
Top