albion
Registered
Religiously and philosophically, many of those in the racialist movement are blatantly anti-Xtian, choosing to align with the Northern European pagan pantheon. (The World Church of the Creator, a racialist organization, is also a fully legal religion, praising the self as a "Creator" and standing as one of the more fervent haters of the Judeo-Xtian ideology in the racialist camp.) Vampiir Kremator of the band Maschinezimmer 412 summarizes one difference as thus: "Satanism is more of an ideology while Odinism is more spiritual." (- from "Worm Gear" magazine; Issue 4, p.18.) Runes (ancient divination tools of these Northern Euro-cultures) have shown an archetypal/aesthetic and/or symbolic significance to Odinists, Satanists, Nazis, and racialists; sometimes for similar reasons, sometimes not. The war culture of the ancient Norse people is a shining testament to the glory of s
uperior human traits such as intelligence and performance
, akin to the cornerstones of Satanic virtue and certain racialist ideals.
I say certain because, in all fairness, every grouping on Earth will attract different types, and not all measure up to high standards. Below the true Satanists of quality are the wannabes, no-brains, conformists, and music subculture-obsessed that any extreme group will find clinging to its legs. So it is with the racialist movement, though seemingly more tolerant of their leeches:
One of those revo
lutionaries in the racialist movement is Universal Order head, James Mason. This National Socialist expresses a fondness for the writings of LaVey (and had reprinted, in the Xtianity issue of Mason's former newsletter SIEGE, a section of "The Book of Satan" from LaVey's The Satanic Bible) though not a fan of encouraging law-abiding behavior:
So, again, it's a matter of taking what you agree with and discarding that which is against your individual nature. Or against nature in genera
l, for that matter. Much is why both racialists and Satanists typically take an anti-Xtian stance: because the Xtian religion (and most of the other "major" religions) is truly anti-nature. (This, again, figures into Nietzschean philosophy, as well as the writings of Ragnar Redbeard. Conversely, this excludes the amass of Ku Klux Klan members, many of whom subscribe to the Xtian Identity movement: a group who
believes that the White Race is the chosen people of their god, and that the J*ws are descended from "Satan." The largest racialist group to personify this mindset is Aryan Nations.) Both (especially Satanists) despise the allowances given to people who invariably display parasitic behaviour upon society. Intelligence and performance are the standard and immutable rule in Satanism, whereas race criteria come into play (sometimes, in addition to our checklist items) with racialists. Consider the following for either philosophy:
Particularly for the aforementioned group, the hierarchy racialists ascribe to this human worth is (perhaps, surprisingly) not just measured from race to race, with the White Man on top. Concerning whites, this uncredited racialist author agrees:
Spread to a more inclusive plane, those are truly beautiful, misanthropic words any Satanist could appreciate (and their attribution to Social Darwinism is well implied). Not entirely amazing, this is not the media picture painted side-by-side with the dominant PC-rhetoric in current rotation, from the corporate cable news channels to the "hippest" zines (both illusively priding themselv
es on "objective" reporting).
And it's this insecurity of the herd and its reflective media
that cloud the perception of the nucleus of any being who strives for higher ground. Satanists and racialists are vastly and vehemently shunned by certain parts of society (though, Satanists may get substantially less of this backlash, depending on situation, location, and people). One could say that we are even feared - and for good reason - though not for many of the propagated "horrors." Herein lies a difference between many racialist groups and us: Racialists, understandably so, do not want to be the minority (either racially or ideologically); Satanists, knowing that we are a minority, are quite happy (and often, quite giddy) to be such and, in many cases, encourage the human dross to steer clear of us. For some Satanists, it becomes unproductive to promote otherwise.
To facilitate the elements of attempted (and defensively projected) fear and ostracism toward us (the collecti
ve us, mind you), the mainstream media enlist their core troops from what seems to be some centralized propaganda departmen
t and direct them to those they can cash in on the quickest: Satanism and racialism are two of the more popular; the more convoluted the definition, the bigger the paycheck. (Just ask Jerry Springer.) Both of us, as if by some incredibly unoriginal group of ad execs, are portrayed as "gang members" (oh, you haven't read the Xtian-aimed-at-law-enforcement propagandist pap trying desperately to peg Satanists as "gang-related?" It's out there, believe me), "hate criminals," and generally of a mindless and uncontrollably violent nature. Resistance Records writes in adequate defense to these claims:
Of course, these terms used - hate crimes, in particular - are thoroughly subjective. Hate is fine in this country... as long as its forms fall neatly into the anal-retentive pegholes of social acceptability and political correctness. (And there are comparative levels on which the herd are allowed to judge religions. For example: Xtianity is somewhat oka
y to pick on; and perhaps moreso with the passing years. However, Judaism is verbotten. Can't scrutinize that religion; after all, "they" had a holocaust, don't you know. Let it be known that this Satanist is fully unrepentant in his understanding that these religions, in a core sense, are two sores on the same infected whore.) "Smash the racists' right to have websites" is okay. "Smash affirmative a
ction" is not okay. If I read the meter correctly, any unorthodox racial viewpoint publicly expressed (especially in our obsessively sensitive American culture) elicits a more emphatic condemnation than murder. Severe, but you get the idea. Free speech is for the fresh-breathed. Democracy is for the pretty people.
And neither of us is, in the largely social sense, pretty. We take that unto ourselves to some degree and, in the Satanist's case, use it to our best advantage, knowing full well an unswerving human truth: Society without its devils (even its White dev
ils) is an unchallenged society: weak, non-analytical, complacent and delusional; and I mean sizably moreso than it already is. Just as Satan, the accuser, will always (yet, sometimes covertly) swing the social pendulum in the other direction every once in awhile in the name of balance, so will racialism ferret out race issues that may be worth looking at, regardless of those who (in cowardice) would rather not discuss anything related to such
"sensitive" topics (e.g.: race, gender, class, etc.) for fear of offending someone, presumedly anyone. In this world of say-nothings and safe smiles, I'd rather offend than pretend, at my discretion; the very fire behind both Satan and swastika.
Link: http://www.purgingtalon.com/nlm/racialism.htm
uperior human traits such as intelligence and performance
, akin to the cornerstones of Satanic virtue and certain racialist ideals.
I say certain because, in all fairness, every grouping on Earth will attract different types, and not all measure up to high standards. Below the true Satanists of quality are the wannabes, no-brains, conformists, and music subculture-obsessed that any extreme group will find clinging to its legs. So it is with the racialist movement, though seemingly more tolerant of their leeches:
(- from the Resistance Records website)
One of those revo
lutionaries in the racialist movement is Universal Order head, James Mason. This National Socialist expresses a fondness for the writings of LaVey (and had reprinted, in the Xtianity issue of Mason's former newsletter SIEGE, a section of "The Book of Satan" from LaVey's The Satanic Bible) though not a fan of encouraging law-abiding behavior:
(- from "OHM Clock" magazine; Issue 3, p.9)
So, again, it's a matter of taking what you agree with and discarding that which is against your individual nature. Or against nature in genera
l, for that matter. Much is why both racialists and Satanists typically take an anti-Xtian stance: because the Xtian religion (and most of the other "major" religions) is truly anti-nature. (This, again, figures into Nietzschean philosophy, as well as the writings of Ragnar Redbeard. Conversely, this excludes the amass of Ku Klux Klan members, many of whom subscribe to the Xtian Identity movement: a group who
believes that the White Race is the chosen people of their god, and that the J*ws are descended from "Satan." The largest racialist group to personify this mindset is Aryan Nations.) Both (especially Satanists) despise the allowances given to people who invariably display parasitic behaviour upon society. Intelligence and performance are the standard and immutable rule in Satanism, whereas race criteria come into play (sometimes, in addition to our checklist items) with racialists. Consider the following for either philosophy:
(- from the National Alliance website)
Particularly for the aforementioned group, the hierarchy racialists ascribe to this human worth is (perhaps, surprisingly) not just measured from race to race, with the White Man on top. Concerning whites, this uncredited racialist author agrees:
(- from the Resistance Records website)
Spread to a more inclusive plane, those are truly beautiful, misanthropic words any Satanist could appreciate (and their attribution to Social Darwinism is well implied). Not entirely amazing, this is not the media picture painted side-by-side with the dominant PC-rhetoric in current rotation, from the corporate cable news channels to the "hippest" zines (both illusively priding themselv
es on "objective" reporting).
And it's this insecurity of the herd and its reflective media
that cloud the perception of the nucleus of any being who strives for higher ground. Satanists and racialists are vastly and vehemently shunned by certain parts of society (though, Satanists may get substantially less of this backlash, depending on situation, location, and people). One could say that we are even feared - and for good reason - though not for many of the propagated "horrors." Herein lies a difference between many racialist groups and us: Racialists, understandably so, do not want to be the minority (either racially or ideologically); Satanists, knowing that we are a minority, are quite happy (and often, quite giddy) to be such and, in many cases, encourage the human dross to steer clear of us. For some Satanists, it becomes unproductive to promote otherwise.
To facilitate the elements of attempted (and defensively projected) fear and ostracism toward us (the collecti
ve us, mind you), the mainstream media enlist their core troops from what seems to be some centralized propaganda departmen
t and direct them to those they can cash in on the quickest: Satanism and racialism are two of the more popular; the more convoluted the definition, the bigger the paycheck. (Just ask Jerry Springer.) Both of us, as if by some incredibly unoriginal group of ad execs, are portrayed as "gang members" (oh, you haven't read the Xtian-aimed-at-law-enforcement propagandist pap trying desperately to peg Satanists as "gang-related?" It's out there, believe me), "hate criminals," and generally of a mindless and uncontrollably violent nature. Resistance Records writes in adequate defense to these claims:
(-from Resistance Records website)
Of course, these terms used - hate crimes, in particular - are thoroughly subjective. Hate is fine in this country... as long as its forms fall neatly into the anal-retentive pegholes of social acceptability and political correctness. (And there are comparative levels on which the herd are allowed to judge religions. For example: Xtianity is somewhat oka
y to pick on; and perhaps moreso with the passing years. However, Judaism is verbotten. Can't scrutinize that religion; after all, "they" had a holocaust, don't you know. Let it be known that this Satanist is fully unrepentant in his understanding that these religions, in a core sense, are two sores on the same infected whore.) "Smash the racists' right to have websites" is okay. "Smash affirmative a
ction" is not okay. If I read the meter correctly, any unorthodox racial viewpoint publicly expressed (especially in our obsessively sensitive American culture) elicits a more emphatic condemnation than murder. Severe, but you get the idea. Free speech is for the fresh-breathed. Democracy is for the pretty people.
And neither of us is, in the largely social sense, pretty. We take that unto ourselves to some degree and, in the Satanist's case, use it to our best advantage, knowing full well an unswerving human truth: Society without its devils (even its White dev
ils) is an unchallenged society: weak, non-analytical, complacent and delusional; and I mean sizably moreso than it already is. Just as Satan, the accuser, will always (yet, sometimes covertly) swing the social pendulum in the other direction every once in awhile in the name of balance, so will racialism ferret out race issues that may be worth looking at, regardless of those who (in cowardice) would rather not discuss anything related to such
"sensitive" topics (e.g.: race, gender, class, etc.) for fear of offending someone, presumedly anyone. In this world of say-nothings and safe smiles, I'd rather offend than pretend, at my discretion; the very fire behind both Satan and swastika.
Link: http://www.purgingtalon.com/nlm/racialism.htm