American Feminism

vorlos

Junior News Editor
http://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/steinem-gloria

Steinem-Gloria-1.jpg

Gloria Steinem, who exemplifies the Second Wave of American Feminism, began her career as a journalist writing under a man's name. She went on to co-found Ms., the first feminist periodical with a national readership. An advocacy journalist, she writes passionately about issues of women's empowerment and gender, racial and economic equality.

Institution: Sylvia Edwards, Longview Community College

by Letty Cottin Pogrebin

She was born to a rebellious Scotch Presbyterian mother, raised in Theosophy, and baptized in a Congregational church at the age of ten because her mother thought she should be old enough to remember it.

She lost what little interest she had in religion when she became a feminist and started “wondering why God always looks like the ruling class,” but she still loves the pagan parts of Christmas—the tree, presents, and midnight Mass. With all this, what is Gloria Steinem doing in a Jewish women’s encyclopedia?

She is included here because her father was a Jew, because she considers herself an outsider and sees Jews as the quintessential out-group, and because she feels drawn to the spirituality and social justice agenda of Jewish feminism. She is here because, as she puts it, “Never in my life have I identified myself as a Christian, but wherever there is antisemitism, I identify as a Jew.” Finally, she is here because in the eyes of the world she is Jewish, and thus whatever she does is associated with Jews and Judaism, for good or for ill.

When historians distill the essence of the women’s movement known as the Second Wave (as opposed to the suffrage campaign, the First Wave), they often embody it in two names—Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem—both ground-breaking pioneers, both identified as Jews.

By the same token, when extremists of the ultra-right excoriate feminism, they name Steinem (along with Friedan and former Congresswoman Bella Abzug) as a leader of the “Jewish conspiracy” to destroy the Christian family.

They claim that the struggle for abortion rights is a Jewish plot to kill Christian babies, or that empowering children, women and minorities is a threat to the God-given hegemony of white Christian men. If Steinem is their Jew, she is ours.

Although she is recognized around the world as a writer, speaker, political activist, and feminist visionary, the facts about Gloria Steinem’s Jewish origins, tenuous and meager though they may are virtually unknown. To recognize those connections here is not to exaggerate their significance but merely to acknowledge the unacknowledged and to suggest that even without full-fledged Jewish identity—one forged by affiliation or halakhic legitimacy (religious law)—this is a woman who acts Jewishly in the world.

Gloria Steinem was born on March 25, 1934, in Toledo, Ohio, to Ruth and Leo Steinem. Her father, an itinerant antique dealer, spent winters selling his wares from a house trailer, usually with his family in tow; as a result, Gloria did not spend a full year in school until she was twelve years old. In the summers, Leo owned and operated a beach resort at Clark Lake, Michigan, where little Gloria apprenticed herself to the nightclub entertainers and learned to tap-dance.

Steinem’s appreciation of Judaism, such as it was, came at the hands of her non-Jewish mother. A former journalist, Ruth Steinem took some pains to make sure both Gloria and her older sister, Susanne, understood the evils of antisemitism and knew about the horrific crimes of the Holocaust.

Steinem remembers that when she was eight or so, her mother encouraged her to listen to a radio dramatization of Jewish torment under the Nazis and the story of a mother who could not get enough food for her little girl. “This is going on in the world,” Ruth Steinem said, “and we must know about it.” She also taught her daughters that being Jewish was a proud heritage.

Pauline Perlmutter Steinem, Gloria’s paternal grandmother, was born in Germany after her family’s escape from Russia and grew up in Munich, the daughter of a cantor.

She achieved the equivalent of a college education in order to become a teacher, then married Joseph Steinem and immigrated to America. Pauline Steinem died when Gloria was five, but she left her granddaughter with vivid “sense memories” of an intelligent, calm, well-organized woman who remains a strong role model.

A well-known women’s rights activist, chair of the educational committee of the National Woman Suffrage Association, a delegate to the 1908 International Council of Women, and the first woman to be elected to the Toledo Board of Education, Pauline Steinem was also a leader in the movement for vocational education. She was deeply distressed by the gathering stormclouds in Germany. In the mid-1930s, during the early years of the Nazi terror, when it cost five hundred dollars to get a Jew out of Germany and into Palestine, Pauline Steinem managed to rescue many members of her family.

Despite having the benefits of a hard-won education at the University of Toledo and a career as a journalist at a time when she first had to write under a man’s name, Ruth Steinem’s spirit was broken by the conflict between work and family that caused her to give up the career she loved.

In response to this and other strains, she suffered incapacitating depressions and hallucinations.

She and Leo divorced in 1945, and eleven-year-old Gloria became housekeeper, cook, and caregiver to her mother during a period that, at best, can be called cheerless and at worst, spiritually and financially impoverished.

In her early teens, Gloria performed at local clubs for ten dollars a night, hoping to tap-dance her way out of Toledo. When she was sixteen, she worked as a salesgirl after school and on Saturdays. The following year, she was rescued by Susanne, who persuaded their father, despite the divorce, to take over Ruth’s care for one year so that Gloria could get away and live with her sister in Washington, D.C.

In 1952, after graduating from Washington’s Western High School, Steinem entered Smith College (EXCUSE ME. HOW? HOW DID SHE DO THIS? THIS IS THE PART OF THE STORY THAT NEVER GETS TOLD. HOW THE SELECTION, GROOMING WORKS. NO GOYIM GIRL WOULD BE GIVEN THIS ENTRY TO SMITH WITH THIS "BACKGROUND"), where she danced in college productions and majored in government.

She spent her junior year in Geneva and a summer in Oxford, earned a Phi Beta Kappa key, and graduated magna cum laude.

A Chester Bowles Fellowship sent her to India, where for nearly two years she immersed herself in the culture of a people she grew to love and would often write about, first in a government guidebook, The 1000 Indias, and later in essays on the relevance of Gandhian principles to grassroots organizing, especially for the women’s movement.

Back in the United States in 1958, she moved to Cambridge, Massachusetts, and worked for Independent Research Service, a group that tried to persuade American students to attend communist youth festivals then being held in Europe.

Hoping for a career as a writer, she moved to New York City in 1960, a time when women were expected to be Gal Fridays and gossip columnists, not serious journalists.

She managed to cobble a modest living from odd scraps of assignments—working with Harvey Kurtzman, creator of Mad magazine, on his new project, Help!, a journal of political satire, and contributing short articles to Glamour, Ladies’ Home Journal, and other women’s magazines. She also did unsigned pieces for Esquire, which eventually published her first bylined piece, a story about the then-new contraceptive pill.

A year later, in 1963, Steinem herself made headlines when she got an assignment from Show magazine for which she took a job as a Bunny at the Playboy Club and wrote an exposé of the unglamorous working conditions of the club’s glorified waitresses—sex objects in rabbit ears and cotton tails.

Regardless of her new celebrity and proven investigative skills, Steinem could not persuade editors to let her cover the political subjects that interested her.

Still, rather than be relegated to the girl ghettos of food and fashion, she got as far as writing profiles of people such as Truman Capote and James Baldwin.

Simultaneously, she volunteered with Cesar Chavez’s United Farm Workers and Robert F. Kennedy’s presidential campaign, experiences that amounted to a hands-on political education.

In 1968, she became a founding editor of New York magazine, where she was finally able to graft her writing to her political interests in a column that established her as a voice for the voiceless and a force for change. (CHANGE. THERE'S THAT WORD AGAIN).

Suddenly the magazine gave her other assignments—political profiles, coverage of the 1968 presidential campaign, the New York City mayoral race, the civil rights, antiwar, and migrant workers’ movements, the first moon landing—and with them came the long-awaited satisfaction of being taken seriously.

But it was a public hearing on abortion, then illegal in the United States, that radicalized Steinem’s perception of what makes an issue “serious.” Covering this event made her question why women’s lives are rarely considered important enough for media attention and public discourse. It also led her to research the fledgling feminist movement and discover that feminism made sense of her own life.

In 1969, she began what would become a second career as a spokesperson for the women’s movement.

Often pairing herself with one of her African-American friends—usually Dorothy Pitman Hughes, Flo Kennedy, or Margaret Sloan—Steinem talked on campuses, in community centers, union halls, and corporate boardrooms, at sit-ins and street rallies.

She talked about the shared origins of race and gender caste systems, how the cultural equation of masculinity with dominance feeds the roots of violence, how sex rules stunt the development of children and suffocate the aspirations of both women and men. :barf1:

She touched women’s hearts, blew their minds, and mobilized them to start consciousness-raising groups, lawsuits, legislative strategies, and social change organizations to advance the cause of women’s liberation.

Generally speaking in those years, her analysis of shared oppression did not extend to the experience of the Jewish people, nor did she then, as she would later, make the analytical connection among sexism, racism, and antisemitism.

In 1971, she cofounded Ms.—the magazine that roared (THANKS TO WHO?)—the first feminist periodical with a national readership and the first mass-market women’s magazine with a revolutionary agenda.

In the decades since, her writing has appeared in innumerable magazines, newspapers, anthologies, television commentaries, political campaigns, and film documentaries in America and internationally. She has been the subject of many media profiles and has appeared on the cover of Newsweek, McCalls, People, New Woman, Ms., and Parade.

Never again a pen for hire, she has become a brilliant advocacy journalist whose definition of objectivity includes the overt promotion of justice and whose pursuit of truth is aided, not compromised, by her empathy for the oppressed.

What she writes about is what she believes in—women’s empowerment and feminist solidarity, racial and economic equality, reproductive freedom, nonsexist child rearing, multicultural education, stopping violence, especially the sexual abuse of women and children, and more recently, preserving the cultures of indigenous peoples and disseminating their lessons of gender balance and balance of nature. (WHAT KIND OF BS NEW AGE CR..P IS THIS?)

The titles of her books suggest both the evolution of her ideology and her state of mind at the time each was written. Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions (1983) is a collection of twenty years of her most enduring, powerfully argued essays, from the Playboy Bunny story to her satirical classic, “If Men Could Menstruate”; from her probing interviews of Patricia Nixon and Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis to the searingly confessional “Ruth’s Song,” a tribute to her mother.

Marilyn: Norma Jean (1986) is a warm, sympathetic rendering of the life of Marilyn Monroe, revisited from the perspective of feminist analysis. Revolution From Within: A Book of Self-Esteem (1992) describes Steinem’s efforts to link internal and external change into a full circle of revolution, partly through a reconsideration of her childhood and the inner life that she had repressed in her lifelong effort to be “useful to people in the outside world”—first her mother, then all of womankind and every other marginalized group.

Moving Beyond Words (1994), an idiosyncratic compendium of original and previously published works, ranges from a scathing send-up of Freud to a paean to women muscle builders; from an exposé of the censoring power of advertisers to her epiphanies at turning age sixty.

Not content to limit herself to words when action is called for, Steinem has been an indefatigable fund-raiser for women’s causes and the cofounder of several still-thriving organizations: the Women’s Action Alliance (1971), the first national clearinghouse for information and technical assistance on women’s issues and projects; the National Women’s Political Caucus (1971), a bipartisan organization devoted to getting pro-equity women into elected and appointed office; the Ms. Foundation for Women (1972), which was originally founded to channel the (nonexistent) profits of Ms. magazine into women’s activities, and which now raises and distributes funds for grassroots projects that empower women and girls; the Coalition of Labor Union Women (1974), a national group devoted to equalizing women’s position in the labor movement; and Voters for Choice (1979), a bipartisan political action committee that supports candidates pledged to protect reproductive freedom.

She has played a major role—as speaker, delegate, organizer, commissioner, journalist, or scribe—at many important public events, among them every Democratic convention since 1968, a conference of journalists at the United Nations Women’s Conference in 1975 in Mexico City, and the 1977 National Women’s Conference convened by Congresswoman Bella Abzug and others as a kind of Constitutional Convention for Women.

She has also been involved in innumerable electoral campaigns, most notably the presidential bids of Robert F. Kennedy, George McGovern, Shirley Chisholm, and Walter Mondale and his running mate Geraldine Ferraro, as well as the congressional campaigns of Colorado representative Patricia Schroeder, Maryland senator Barbara Mikulski, Texas governor Ann Richards, and Illinois senator Carol Mosley-Braun.

She joined Betty Friedan in Washington D.C. for the “March for Women’s Lives,” a mass rally to “voice opposition to government attacks” on women’s reproductive rights, in April 2004.

Steinem does have at least one meaningful current Jewish connection. Every Passover for over twenty years, she has joined a small group of “seder sisters”—E. M. Broner, Phyllis Chesler, Lilly Rivlin, Michelle Landsberg, Bea Kreloff, Edith Isaac-Rose, and Letty Cottin Pogrebin—Jewish women in New York City who plan and perform a women’s seder, usually on the third night of Passover.

The founding premise of this seder is that women matter, that women must be acknowledged for their roles in the Exodus story and their current struggle for equality in Jewish life. Using traditional ritual objects and a nontraditionalist Haggadah written by Broner and Naomi Nimrod, the group, led first by Chesler and then by Broner, also draws upon poetry, song, prayer, and personal testimony to honor Jewish women and make room for female expressions of spirituality that have been ignored or eclipsed by traditional man-made, male-led ceremonies.

Over the years, Steinem has sung “Dayenu” and “Miriam ha-Nevi’ah” [Miriam the Prophet], shared in discussions of “The Ten Plagues of Women” and “The Four Questions of Women,” and helped to make modern midrash about our Jewish foremothers.

Of her participation in this unique revisionist tradition, Steinem says: “The women’s seder introduced me to ritual. It was the first spiritually-centered occasion in my feminist life. Other feminist gatherings had a consciousness-raising component but it was more about the politics of the here and now; it didn’t admit of the past or one’s spiritual needs. When I feel most drawn to Judaism it’s not the law part that attracts me, it’s the mystical part, the Kabbalah, the Shechinah [female aspect of God]. I do feel socially drawn to Jewish warmth, sensuality, expressiveness.”

Not long ago, Steinem’s sister, Susanne, a gemologist, came across a catalog listing items of jewelry that belonged to victims of the Nazis, items that were auctioned to aid Jewish survivors when no one could locate the original owners or their heirs.

Today, that catalog rests in the library of the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. Its bookplate reads: “Donated in honor of Pauline Perlmutter Steinem by Susanne Steinem Patch and Gloria Steinem.”

Gloria Steinem married David Bale on September 3, 2000. “Though I’ve worked many years to make marriage more equal, I never expected to take advantage of it myself,” said the sixty-six-year-old Steinem, who in earlier years had spoken out in opposition to the institution of marriage. “I’m happy, surprised and one day will write about it, but for now, I hope this proves what feminists have always said—that feminism is about the ability to choose what’s right at each time of our lives.” Bale died in January 2004. (I WOULD THINK SO. WHAT A HORROR).


http://www.answers.com/topic/rafer-johnson

1823.jpg

One of Steinem's former boyfriends: Rafer Johnson
 
Gloria Steinem
Another wibbitch, a feminist Pied Piper of White women funded by CIA, also possible her jewish hags and fellow white people were funding Steinem/others out of jewish slush fund.

Gloria Steinem's CIA Connection
By JOHN D. LOFTON JR.
1 PAGE DOCUMENT, article was censored in 1975, declassified in 2004.


-A A +A


MS. STEINEM'S CIA CONNECTION​


Document Type:
CREST
Collection:
General CIA Records
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP88-01315R000300380009-2
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
1
Document Creation Date:
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date:
October 22, 2004

Sequence Number:
9
Case Number:

Publication Date:
May 10, 1975

Content Type:
NSPR
File:
AttachmentSize
PDF icon
CIA-RDP88-01315R000300380009-2.pdf
161.68 KB
Body:
P_j.6 ! (o..J) vvrN L.l- HUMAN EVE4TS ~ ~ ~`' east Gh n _;'l. - - - is MY.?.971. - ----- - - --- ~ Msm Steinem's CIA Connection ByJOHN D. LOFTON JR. With all the wild charges about the Central Intelligence Agency, it is under- standable why feminist leader Gloria Steinem is a little touchy about her Loftcn points out the inconsistency of Ms. Steinem (above) in her statements regarding past dealings with the Cen- tral Intelligence Agency. collaborator. Angered by this, Ms. Steinem called me, denied any relation with the CIA and very nicely threatened me with a lawsuit if I did not delete the allusion. Since she came on pretty strong and had caught me downtown away from my backup source material, I complied and eliminated the reference. But after studying the evidence, having talked to one of the reporters who originally wrote a news story detailing her relationship with the CIA and having talked with her at length about the subject, I am con- tinced that what I originally wrote was fair comment. The source for my reference was a Feb. 18. 1967. story in the Washington Post by Robert Kaiser reporting Ms. Steinem as ac::no`.4ledgins that she had worked clcseiv ?%ith the CIA to organize groups of Ameri.:an youth to attend World )i'ouz) '= tiva!s in Vienna and Helsinki 19A9 3rd 0"]. AIS direckof l curl.:: r: ' .: t R esczrck Kaiser, financed in part by a foundation used as a conduit for CIA money, Ms., Steinem is quoted as saying of the CIA agents, "with whom she collaborated," as Kaiser put it: "I found them Liberal; and farsighted and open to an exchange of ideas." "The CIA," she declared, "was the only one with enough guts and foresight to see that youth and student affairs were important." A few days later, the New York Times carried a similar story quoting Ms. Steinem as saying of her CIA connection: involvement with and defense of the Cen- tral Intelligence Agency over a decade ago. As she puts it--in some pretty loose talk herself-'`I don't think it's funny to be lumped with murderers and if the press is even half-right, that is what this group of governmental people are." But, as they saying goes, methinks Ms. Steinem cloth protest too much. In a : ent column quoting her on the Equal Rights Amendment, I referred in passing :eek: :GIs. Steinem as a former CIA "Far from being shocked by this involvement, I was happy to find some liberals in government in those days who were farsighted and cared enough to get Americans of all political views to the festivals." But now, Ms. Steinem denies every- thing-and then again, she doesn't. She says the newspaper accounts were mis- taken and because of the "hysteria of the times," used the letters "CIA" when they should have said "NSA,". which stands for the National Student Associa- tion. But what about the Washington Post story quoting you as using the letters $ o 003003 0 - - When I press her, she admits that at the time, she had a good idea that the CIA was in part financing her organiza- tion, though "at extremely long-distance and with no control," which- she says is the "morally important thing." Furthermore, she concedes that NSA people had told her that their money-was coming, in part, from CIA-funded foun- dations, which she says "seemed like a good use, better than buying planes and bombs." Reached by phone in North Carolina, where he is 'a visiting professor at Duke: University, Washington Post reporter Kaiser told me he is "baffled" by Ms. Steinem's denials of having collaborated with the CIA. He calls her denials "silly" and says he stands by his story. In Washington, Gene Theroux, who succeeded Ms. Steinem as head of the Independent Research Service, is reluc- tant to talk about the CIA's role in bank- rolling the group. "Oh, brother," he says when I ask. But he does say that the record shows that when Ms. Steinem hcadcd the orgggainization, it did get money from foundations funded by the CIA. When I called Gloria Steinem back, after she found out that I had killed the CIA reference to her in my col-, umn, she was very pleased. She said she was just getting ready to call me to let me know "that everything was cool and it's nice to know people check facts." Indeed it is. And a further checking of the facts has made me sorry that I ever knuckled under in the first place. As for Ms. Steinem's feeling that I am simply dredging something up from her distant past to exploit her because she's famous, I would remind her that he was the Jae .e?,) :eek: :,,:,c an tsslie this'.!:: ie thinf;,riot'me- (~ L 5'e I tri c ~ Approved For ReleaC[ 2~0 ~eil tit tlk--P aye bye it1 000300380009-2 "as a joke," an -ironic comment," you

 

Gloria Steinem Discussing Her Time in the CIA - YouTube

Gloria Steinem Discussing Her Time in the CIA Cory Morningstar 1.38K subscribers Subscribe 1.8K




The CPD Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars and practitioners from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect CPD's views. For blogger guidelines, click here.

Gloria Steinem


The Feminist Was a Spy​


Oct 29, 2015

by

Markos Kounalakis



COMMENT

Print as pdf

Gloria Steinem’s new book, My Life on the Road, recounts her life’s journeys and travels. Early reviews and profiles reveal incredible detail of Steinem’s barrier-breaking feminist role, liberal politics, romances, proclivities and style.
What is often missed, or mischaracterized, however, is the work she did as a CIA agent: Steinem was a spook.
CIA agents are tight-lipped, but Steinem spoke openly about her relationship to The Agency in the 1950s and ’60s after a magazine revealed her employment by a CIA front organization, the Independent Research Service.
While popularly pilloried because of her paymaster, Steinem defended the CIA relationship, saying: “In my experience The Agency was completely different from its image; it was liberal, nonviolent and honorable.”
Less cloak-and-dagger and more a young, energetic, global representative for American values and freedom, Steinem leveraged her underwriting to attend international youth festivals organized and otherwise ideologically dominated by America’s adversaries.
Long before the formalized concept of soft power, Steinem personified and promoted abroad the vigor and progressive nature of the U.S. youth movement.
Strange as it may seem, Steinem’s personal views and CIA political goals aligned. Her brand of social revolution, promoted by American tax dollars, was meant to counter Soviet-sponsored revolutionary messaging. Public funds were intended to slow the Soviet scourge while showing America’s alternative democratic face.
Drone-launched bombs carry a less-subtle American message to today’s targets. Given global challenges and threats, the CIA is put into a more difficult and militarized role than in the past. The Agency’s own overreach and mistakes have created a new vulnerability, further exacerbated by the publishing of Edward Snowden’s stolen files.
Perhaps, Steinem’s 1960s characterization of a “liberal, nonviolent and honorable” CIA was idealistic and self-serving, but there is no question that today’s Agency is still necessary and wildly different. The 6,700 page U.S. Senate torture report is a good place to start when seeking to understand how different.

Long before the formalized concept of soft power, Steinem personified and promoted abroad the vigor and progressive nature of the U.S. youth movement.​

Agency problems do not end with enhanced interrogation techniques and spying on Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Intelligence Committee’s computers, or former CIA Director David Petraeus’ personal mistakes and failed WMD analyses.
Heaped on to all the evidence of misdeeds are popular entertainment programs like Homeland, which reveal the moral complexity and actionable ambiguity of intelligence operations and analysis.
It is no wonder that the CIA has detractors at home and abroad. The public is keenly aware of CIA missteps. The CIA itself is also aware. Former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell recently apologized publicly for the WMD debacle, and last year CIA Director John Brennan told senators he was sorry.
It is easy to focus on failures and forget the dangers and drudgery of intelligence gathering, or to take time to celebrate the varied, but mostly secret victories of a service working hard to defend America.
It is rare for the public to see a dramatic success like Operation Neptune Spear, the codename for the Abbottabad raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
The world is in a dire period of greater global instability and conflict, with threats and challenges from Southeast Asia to Syria to borderless crime syndicates. In this environment, America needs more credible, analytic, insightful, accessible, high level and grassroots deep intelligence.
The American public may prefer to criticize or ignore the CIA’s work, but it is better served by understanding the labor and limits of intelligence.
Political leaders need to support foreign intelligence activities, but assure they are checked and controlled. Mistakes will be made, and made worse by cover-ups or reactionary calls for excessive restraint.
Steinem chose to do an honorable duty. She used her brilliance, networks, access, clarity of thought, communication skills and charm to work for the CIA.
She is celebrated anew for her personal and professional achievements, and she deserves recognition for her unapologetic service. Steinem doesn’t regret her time as a spook, saying, “If I had a choice I would do it again.” Would today’s CIA have a place for someone like Gloria Steinem?
This post was originally published in The Miami Herald and is reprinted courtesy of the author.
Photo from Wikimedia.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top