Super-rich Jew (about $40 billion), Bloomberg, former mayor of NYC, enters demon-rat Pres. primaries

Apollonian

Guest Columnist
Billionaire Mike Bloomberg Officially Enters Run For President As A Democrat

November 22, 2019 by IWB

Link: https://www.investmentwatchblog.com...ially-enters-run-for-president-as-a-democrat/

from Zero Hedge

Will Bloomberg get “Schultz’d”?

Having earlier this year said he would not run for president, and following his registration for the Alabama primary, billionaire Mike Bloomberg has just “made it official” by filing the paperwork with FEC to register as a presidential candidate as a Democrat.

As we detailed previously, the NYT warned that , “a Bloomberg campaign could represent a seismic disruption in the Democratic race.” With his immense personal wealth, centrist views and close ties to the political establishment, he would present a grave and instantaneous threat to former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who has been struggling to raise money and assemble a ideologically moderate coalition.

But Mr. Bloomberg could also reshape the race in other ways, intensifying the Democrats’ existing debates about economic inequality and corporate power, and offering fodder to the party’s rising populist wing, led by Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, who contend that the extremely rich already wield far too much influence in politics. Mr. Bloomberg has repeatedly expressed discomfort with certain policies favored by both Ms. Warren and Mr. Sanders.

Howard Wolfson, a close adviser to Mr. Bloomberg, said that the former mayor viewed President Trump as an “unprecedented threat to our nation,” and noted Mr. Bloomberg’s heavy spending in the 2018 midterm elections and this week’s off-year races in Virginia. Mr. Bloomberg, he said, has grown uneasy about the existing trajectory of the Democratic primary.

“We now need to finish the job and ensure that Trump is defeated — but Mike is increasingly concerned that the current field of candidates is not well positioned to do that,” Mr. Wolfson said.

“If Mike runs he would offer a new choice to Democrats built on a unique record running America’s biggest city, building a business from scratch and taking on some of America’s toughest challenges as a high-impact philanthropist.“

A former Republican who repeatedly explored running for president as an independent, Bloomberg registered as a Democrat ahead of the midterm elections last year. In his past flirtations with the presidency, Bloomberg has never before taken this step… and his odds are rising (albeit still low)…
 
Bloomberg News Announces No Investigative Reporting On Michael Bloomberg — Or Any Democrat Candidates

Leftist news organization vows to control the narrative at all costs

Infowars.com - November 24, 2019 23 Comments

Link: https://www.infowars.com/bloomberg-...michael-bloomberg-or-any-democrat-candidates/

In an extraordinary show of bias, Bloomberg News has announced it will not investigate its boss Michael Bloomberg or any other Democrat candidate during the 2020 primaries.

Yes, really.

Bloomberg News Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait released a statement to staffers on Sunday, saying the Editorial Board has been “suspended” and that several editors will join Bloomberg’s presidential campaign.

“We will continue our tradition of not investigating Mike (and his family and foundation) and we will extend the same policy to his rivals in the Democratic primaries,” Micklethwait wrote.

“We cannot treat Mike’s Democratic competitors differently from him. If other credible journalistic institutions publish investigative work on Mike or the other Democratic candidates, we will either publish those articles in full, or summarize them for our readers – and we will not hide them,” he added.

Well that’s a relief!

The move is so blatantly biased and corrupt on its face that users on social media were quick to condemn Bloomberg News.

“Well, this isn’t journalism. Plain and simple. It’s trying to explain propaganda in journalistic terms,” one user said.

The news comes as the former New York mayor officially announced his presidential bid on Sunday.

The fact Bloomberg News has the gall to actually announce their intention to abandon journalism shows how out of touch the organization is with voters who actually want to learn the truth about candidates they vote for.
 
Commentary on obvious fact oligarchs/plutocrats compose so much of the Jews-media. Real problem is the central-bank--the fed--which is not only (a) a criminal enterprise, literally legalized counterfeiting (see Mises.org; use their site search-engine for particular terms), but (b) naturally, a monopoly. So criminals control everything in guise of being normal citizens--goes to show just how pathetically STUPID our society is.

 
Bloomberg Unveils Extreme Gun Control Plan

Every gun control proposal that has failed in the past is included.

Steve Watson | Infowars.com - December 6, 2019 169 Comments

Link: https://www.infowars.com/bloomberg-unveils-extreme-gun-control-plan/

Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg has announced a radical anti-Second Amendment program, calling for outright bans and a requirement for every gun buyer to obtain a permit.

Appearing in Aurora, Colorado Thursday, the location of the 2012 movie theatre shooting, Bloomberg vowed to put an end to a “nationwide madness” where firearms are concerned.

“I’m just getting started,” Bloomberg declared, adding that “As president, I will work to end the gun violence epidemic once and for all.”

“I promise you I will never back down from this fight,” he said. “That’s the kind of president this country needs and you deserve.”

Bloomberg went on to outline a gun control plan that includes every proposal that has ever been attempted, and has failed.

These include proposals to:

— Reinstate the federal ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.

— Require every gun buyer to obtain a permit before making a purchase.

— Require point-of-sale background checks on all gun purchases while closing the gun show loophole.

— Institute a new age limit of 21 for those wishing to buy handguns, semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.

— Require a mandatory 48-hour waiting period for all gun purchases.

— Institute a federal “red flag” law to deny permits to “troubled people who pose a danger to themselves or others.”

— Institute a temporary ban on gun possession for those convicted of assault or other violent misdemeanors.

— Ban all guns in K-12 schools, colleges, and universities, except for law enforcement.

— Reverse the law that gives gun makers and gun dealers immunity from lawsuits.

— Create the position of White House gun coordinator “to mobilize the public to fight gun violence and launch an inter-agency hub to fight gun violence.”

“My agenda is not some johnny-come-lately list of borrowed ideas,“ Bloomberg claimed, adding “This is part of my life‘s work, and I‘m just telling you I will get this done whether I get elected or not.“

Addressing the proposal for permit requirement, Bloomberg attempted to conflate the idea with voting rights.

“Now I know critics will say that Americans shouldn’t need a permit to exercise their constitutional rights. But voting is a constitutional right, and we require people to register to protect the rights of all citizens, and this exactly the same idea,” he argued, “because a criminal with a gun can destroy our right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

Critics argue that Bloomberg is redefining the notion of inalienable rights and misconstruing the US Constitution to frame his agenda.

Second Amendment activists also argue that the ‘red flag’ laws Bloomberg is proposing are unconstitutional and would allow the government to confiscate an American’s firearms without due process.

Bloomberg, who is surrounded by armed security 24/7, has previously made many ignorant comments regarding firearm ownership.

Bloomberg will also have a tall task on his hands if by some fluke he is elected. Newly released figures from the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives shows that there are now a whopping 422.9 million guns in the hands of Americans. The number equates to 1.2 guns for every person in the country.

The figures also show that in 2018, 8.1 billion rounds of ammunition were produced by the gun industry.

The figures also reveal that the most popular firearm in the country is the much maligned sporting rifle, often mis-identified as an “assault rifle”, the AR-15 being one of the more popular models.

The findings highlight that there are now 17.7 million of them in private hands, a record high, and more than half (54%) of all rifles produced in 2017 were modern sporting rifles.

The ATF figures also reveal that firearms-ammunition manufacturing accounted for nearly 12,000 jobs in the US, creating over $4.1 billion in goods shipped in 2017.

With a near record high of gun sales on Black Friday last week, Americans are sending a clear message in exercising their Second Amendment rights.
 
Can Michael Bloomberg Ride Racial Incoherence to Victory?

Eric Striker • December 18, 2019 •

Link: https://www.unz.com/estriker/can-michael-bloomberg-ride-racial-incoherence-to-victory/

Not too long ago, the platonic form of an evil Jewish finance-capitalist running as a Democrat would be laughed out of the room.

This was a major factor in Michael Bloomberg’s decision to run as a Republican in his then long shot bid to become Mayor of Democratic stronghold New York City in 2000. Despite lining up with Democrats on most social issues, he was able to buy a weak endorsement from Rudy Giuliani and the Manhattan GOP (and by the end of his third term, multiply his net worth from $4 billion to $54 billion), narrowly defeating his Democratic opponent by outspending him 5 to 1.
With Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders skating by in the polls on the fumes of 2016 socialist populism, the media has scoffed at the idea of an unironic plutocrat with no charisma and a straight neoliberal platform being able to buy the nomination. They are wrong.

The Eternal Jew Reveals Himself

With less than a month into the race and not one appearance on a debate stage, Bloomberg’s $100 million dollar media push has already started to bare fruit. Over half of all potential voters have seen a Bloomberg ad.

Currently, he is polling at 6% just behind Buttigieg, which seems paltry but shouldn’t be dismissed. At this time in 2003, John Kerry, another unpopular candidate among the wealthiest to ever run for president, was polling at 4% in a similarly crowded primary field.

What makes Bloomberg a unique threat is his campaign strategy. He is planning to ignore ordinary white voters in order to cobble together a non-white voting bloc with no self-starting thought by purchasing big endorsements and media repetition.

There is no reason to believe he can’t win big states with large minority participation like Texas, South Carolina and California, where his ideological predecessor Hillary Clinton crushed Bernie in 2016.

This is demonstrated by his plan to skip New Hampshire and Iowa, two traditional kingmakers that are overwhelmingly white. Bloomberg could’ve easily afforded some last minute campaigning in these states but understands that white working class heartland Democrats will be very suspicious of a New York Jew whose only agenda is taking guns from the law-abiding, have totally open borders, and cement America’s fate as a Wall Street cappuccino: Jews as the foam on top of a brown slave class. Regular whites? Invisible.

Bloomberg is absolutely right in his assumptions. He has the highest unfavorability rating of all the candidates in New Hampshire and Iowa. It’s getting harder to fool white voters, and a man who looks and acts like the Grinch Who Stole Christmas has a goy-not-named-Trump’s chance in Manhattan Real Estate.

Bloomberg 2020’s appeal can be seen in its ads looped across non-white TV sets, which feature virtually no white people unless they are gay.

So far, Bloomberg is on track to outspend his opponents in Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, Atlanta, St. Louis, Detroit and other zones where the white population is politically irrelevant, hardly more than a rare museum piece.

The gamble is on winning a pyrrhic victory in states with many delegates, then outscoring his highly competitive rivals. It’s farfetched on paper, but so is a Republican able to game the NYC city council into giving him a third term to rule as for as long as Hitler led Germany.

The Jewish World Order is Capitalist, Not Communist

Many conservatives who accept race claim that America’s browning is behind the rise of new socialist radicals: AOC, Ilhan Omar, Bernie Sanders.

But in truth, most minorities tend to vote for whatever is put in front of them or they see more of, usually the establishment candidate. Joe Biden is doing better with black voters than Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, both who have extremely white bases of support. While Somalis played a role in Ilhan Omar’s victory, her district is 70% white. While AOC’s district is majority non-white, this was also true for the recent victories of the establishment incumbent she replaced, Joe Crowley, What made all the difference in AOC’s victory, who only got 16,000 votes (4,000 more than Crowley), was young white “woke” leftists ironically pushing non-whites and ethnic whites out to gentrify Queens and change its political structure.

Meanwhile in multicultural cities like Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and so on, unapologetic Jewish vulture capitalists have recently done well in Mayoral races (Rahm Emanuel, Eric Garcetti, Mike Bloomberg).

These cities, despite having a “left-wing” reputation, have African style wealth inequality, merciless capitalist exploitation, third world levels of corruption, horrible schools, the fewest civil liberties, and the least civically engaged populations. This is combined with institutionalized anti-white animosity encouraged in non-whites as a scapegoat for the antics of Jews and the local elites ruling them, and a few government jobs to keep small groups of browns and blacks showing up every four years while they get priced out of their homes or struggle to buy groceries.

The 21st Century Robber Barons

Most Marxists are uncomfortable with the facts, but the kind of aggressive multiracialism we see in America is what keeps capitalists like Michael Bloomberg wealthy and unaccountable.

A more muted version of the kinds of corruption and lack of political representation rife in America today was seen during the “Age of the Robber Barons,” which coincided with mass immigration in the late 19th century going into the early 20th.

During this time, the unlimited flow of immigrants made it difficult for workers to organize or gain leverage on capital. Furthermore, social unity in demanding justice against unscrupulous businessmen and thieving politicians was difficult.

As Jeff Sessions has remarked, it was the 1924 Immigration Act that helped spur the creation of the American middle class. Through this immigration moratorium and assimilation of diverse Europeans, Americans were able to unite to fight back. Today, after this restriction on immigration was upended, union membership is at a 70-year low.

Immigration policy alone is not the only thing that dramatically changed the lives of Americans from the 1930s to the 50s. The scare of the Second World War, where radical white anti-capitalists in Italy and Germany took the liberal order by storm, and later the Soviet alternative swinging over capital’s heads like Damocles’ sword during the Cold War, forced the ruling class to provide more concessions to common people.

Many of these hard fought victories by white workers were overturned in the 1980s, when the Soviet Union was exhausted by the arm’s race and the promise that everyone would get rich if finance was unchained had not been tested for a while. The supposed rise in living standards households have seen since the 1970s is the product of destroying motherhood and introducing two-income households as the rich get richer.

Today we are in a new, more technocratic age of robber barons. This time, they have engineered a society that is virtually impossible to unite due to drastic differences in culture and race within 21st century America. The irony is that whites on both sides lose, including more feral white leftists whose dreams of a Bernie presidency will continue to be dashed by non-whites who are more likely to push establishment candidates through.

Bloomberg is unlikely to be the Democratic nominee, but he will do much better than expected. As the electorate gets less white, the chances for someone like Bloomberg to nakedly buy the presidency will increase.
 
Now u see why Trump had to hit the Iranians and assassinate their general--to get paid for the funding he needs against such as Bloomberg.


Michael Bloomberg says he'll spend big to defeat Trump, even if that means supporting Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren

Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/michael-bloomberg-says-hell-spend-013725024.html

Business Insider ●‎January‎ ‎11‎, ‎2020‎ ‎7‎:‎37‎ ‎PM
Associated Press/John Bazemore

•Michael Bloomberg indicated Saturday he's be open to spending $1 billion of his own money to defeat President Donald Trump — and will support the Democratic nominee even if that means helping Sens. Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

•Bloomberg told The New York Times he doesn't even want to run negative ads against fellow Democratic nominees, since his main priority is defeating Trump.

•He suggested he wasn't keen to drop a full $1 billion on the race, but did not rule it out.

•"You know how much money a billion dollars is? It's a lot of money to me. It's a lot of money to anybody," he told The Times.

The Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg suggested Saturday he was open to spending $1 billion of his own money to defeat President Donald Trump in the 2020 election — even if he's not the party nominee.

Bloomberg conceded to The New York Times that he would even put his money behind Sens. Bernie Sanders of Elizabeth Warren if they win the Democratic nomination, despite their significant disagreements over policies.

The Times reported that Bloomberg has already spent more than $200 million on advertising, despite the fact that he's only been in the race for less than two months. He also said he's prepared to spend even more throughout 2020, no matter who the nominee is.

He told the newspaper his contributions will depend on how well the candidate fares, but did not appear keen on dropping a full $1 billion on the race.

"It depends whether the candidate needs help; if they're doing very well, they need less. If they're not, they'll need more," he said. "You know how much money a billion dollars is? It's a lot of money to me. It's a lot of money to anybody."

Bloomberg is worth an estimated $52 billion.

He also told The Times on Saturday he doesn't intend on running negative ads against Democratic nominees because he believes the most important priority is defeating Trump.

"I really don't agree with (Sanders and Warren)," he said, adding, "But I'd still support them, yes, because compared to Donald Trump that's easy."

Bloomberg so far has put together an unusual campaign strategy in comparison with the rest of the Democratic field. Since he jumped into the race so late, Bloomberg has opted to sit out the first four primary contests, instead focusing on Super Tuesday states.

Though it's unclear how well the strategy will pay off, it's clear that his ad spending has dramatically outpaced that of his fellow candidates, and his poll numbers appear to have rocketed upwards as a result.
 
Bloomberg’s billionaire campaign is working

Link: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/bloombergs-billionaire-campaign-is-working-154952297.html

Rick Newman, Senior Columnist
Yahoo Finance ●‎January‎ ‎22‎, ‎2020‎ ‎9‎:‎49‎ ‎AM

Bloomberg's role in 2020

He’s a latecomer. An interloper. A carpetbagger. If Mike Bloomberg weren’t richer than god, nobody would be paying any attention to him.

But people are paying attention to Bloomberg, and it’s clearly because of his money. It should be a travesty. But maybe it’s not.

The former New York City mayor has risen from nothing to 10% percent of the vote in Morning Consult’s latest poll of Democratic primary voters, putting him in fourth place behind Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Bloomberg is still not close to Biden, the front-runner, but he has surpassed candidates such as Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, who have been campaigning for months.

Bloomberg is dwarfing the spending of everybody else in the race—including President Trump. The New York billionaire has bought at least $217 million in ad spending so far, compared with $116 million for all the other Democrats combined, except for Tom Steyer, who has spent $143 million of his own money on his campaign. Trump has spent $50 million.

Bloomberg has also suggested he’ll spend $1 billion or more to defeat Trump this year, whether on his own campaign or on behalf of whoever the Democrats end up nominating. That would be 23% more than every donor combined spent on Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016, and 55% more than all Trump donors spent, combined. In short, Bloomberg, worth about $55 billion, brings a transformative amount of money to the race.

Private money is basically required to win a national election

Is this okay? Or appalling? It’s arguably both, given that private money is an unfortunate constant in American politics and a de facto requirement for winning national races. Since the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision opened the donor floodgates, rich donors have poured money into super PACs and other groups that help tilt elections.

Several Democrats, including Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, are trying to buck that trend this cycle, relying solely on small-dollar donations. But that would put each at a huge disadvantage to Trump, who is accepting corporate funding and other large donations. Warren has raised big money before, and is a recent convert to small-donor funding. Sanders has more consistently rejected big money, but he’s also a far-left candidate likely to have the hardest time beating Trump if he becomes the Democratic nominee.

So it’s a questionable tactic for Warren and Sanders to play by rules they wish were in place, instead of playing by the rules that actually exist. A self-funded Bloomberg candidacy is one antidote to rich-donor funding, since Bloomberg isn’t beholden to kingmakers controlling his purse strings. That’s the same argument Trump made during the 2016 primary election, which he largely funded himself, although Trump flipped to the rich-donor model during the general election and is still sticking with that.

It’s obviously not a satisfying solution to rely on rich, self-funding candidates to counteract the influence of robber-barons backing puppet politicians. A better solution might be public funding of campaigns, or other limits on fundraising or spending that force candidates to focus more on substance and less on appeasing rich donors.

[Check out our Ballots & Dollars podcast on Apple and Google.]

But we’re nowhere near such reforms, and the ugly reality is that the best-funded candidates are more likely to win. Bloomberg hasn’t said much publicly about Citizens United, but a spokesperson for his campaign tells Yahoo Finance that Bloomberg believes the 2010 Supreme Court decision was a mistake he’d work to fix. “Mike will take action to create a progressive public campaign-finance system, strengthen lobbying and ethics regulations, get rid of dark money, and end campaign contributions and expenditures by corporations controlled or influenced by foreign nationals,” the spokesperson said in an email.

Bloomberg’s stance is similar to Warren’s plan to clean up Washington and reduce the influence of corporate money. Sanders and Warren seem to despise billionaires, and they might gag on a Bloomberg victory. But Sanders and Warren only represent one faction of the Democratic party. Another faction would be fine with a business-friendly Bloombergian nominee able to win some swing voters and beat Trump.

Biden is still the best bet to win the Democratic nomination, and if he does beat Bloomberg and the others, with so-so fundraising, it would prove money doesn’t always buy elections. If Biden does win, and Bloomberg offers to help fund his bid to oust Trump from the White House, Biden would almost certainly welcome it. Trump would surely accept help from any billionaire who offered it.
 
Last edited:
Trump: Bloomberg ‘Getting DNC to Rig Election’ Against Bernie Sanders

Democrat establishment copying what Clinton campaign did to Sanders in 2016

Infowars.com - February 2, 2020 1 Comment

Link: https://www.infowars.com/trump-bloomberg-getting-dnc-to-rig-election-against-bernie-sanders/

President Trump accused billionaire presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg of conspiring with the Democratic National Committee to rig the primary process against socialist candidate Bernie Sanders ahead of the 2020 election.

“Many of the ads you are watching were paid for by Mini Mike Bloomberg. He is going nowhere, just wasting his money, but he is getting the DNC to rig the election against Crazy Bernie, something they wouldn’t do for @CoryBooker and others. They are doing it to Bernie again, 2016,” Trump tweeted Sunday.

Many of the ads you are watching were paid for by Mini Mike Bloomberg. He is going nowhere, just wasting his money, but he is getting the DNC to rig the election against Crazy Bernie, something they wouldn’t do for @CoryBooker and others. They are doing it to Bernie again, 2016.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 2, 2020

Trump then said that Bloomberg is part of the corporate fake news machine, noting his company Bloomberg News would only cover Trump and ignore other Democrat candidates.

“Mini Mike is part of the Fake News. They are all working together. In fact, Bloomberg isn’t covering himself (too boring to do), or other Dems. Only Trump. That sounds fair! It’s all the Fake News Media, and that’s why nobody believes in them any more.”

Mini Mike is part of the Fake News. They are all working together. In fact, Bloomberg isn’t covering himself (too boring to do), or other Dems. Only Trump. That sounds fair! It’s all the Fake News Media, and that’s why nobody believes in them any more.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 2, 2020

Trump’s accusations come amid reports that the DNC changed its debate rules to allow Bloomberg into the next primary debate.

Additionally, the DNC has appointed several figures hostile to the Sanders campaign to its convention committee, including former Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, to oversee the superdelegate process.

Notably, in 2016, leaked emails from the DNC revealed that the Clinton campaign colluded with the DNC to rig the superdelegates in Hillary Clinton’s favor, effectively stealing the nomination from Sanders.
 
Bloomberg Eclipses Warren, Taking Third Place Nationally In New Poll

Link: http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2020/02/bloomberg-eclipses-warren-taking-third.html

February 02, 2020

On Thursday, The Hill released the latest Hill-HarrisX national poll for the 2020 Democratic primary candidates. The poll, which was conducted between January 20 and 22 on “2,003 registered voters,” is good news for billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who was a late-entrant into the race.

As expected, among Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents, former Vice President Joe Biden leads with 29% support, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) comes in second with 17% support.

What’s surprising about this survey is that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who was at one time considered a potential challenger to Biden’s dominance, has tumbled to fourth place with just 9% support, and Michael Bloomberg has risen to take third place with 11% support.

The rest of the field is about as expected, with Mayor Pete Buttigieg at 5%, businessman Andrew Yang and billionaire Tom Steyer tied at 4%, and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), and Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) tied at 2% support.

According to the poll, Biden and Bloomberg share a trait in that their support grows (for the most part) with each age group. Sanders’ support does just the opposite, shrinking as the respondents’ age increases.

Among the 18-34 age group, Bloomberg has 9% support. His support actually dips to 7% among the 35-49 age group before rebounding to 10% in the 50-64 age group and 20% in the 65+ age group. Biden follows a similar pattern, with 15% support among the 18-34 group, 29% support among the 35-49 group, 38% support among the 50-64 group, and 37% among the 65+ group.

Sanders, on the other hand, has by far his greatest support among the 18-34 age group with 31%. Among the 35-49 group, Sanders drops to 17%. He drops to 11% in the 50-64 group, and again to 7% in the 65+ demographic.

Unlike the top three Democratic contenders, whose support vacillates fairly significantly depending on the age of the voter, Warren’s levels stay within a five point boundary (8%, 12%, 8%, 7%).

Among African American voters, Biden continues to dominate with a 30-point gap between him and his nearest rival, Sanders. Biden commands 46% African American support to Sanders’ 16%, Bloomberg’s 10%, Warren and Yang’s 7%, and Buttigieg’s 0%.

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the Hill-HarrisX poll is that among “independents,” Sanders fares the best by eight points. Among independents, Sanders has 22% support, Biden has 14%, Bloomberg has 10%, Yang has 9%, and Warren has just 8%.

This is only one poll, and should be treated as such. According to the RealClearPolitics average of national polls, Biden still leads the pack with 27.2% support. Sanders, who is indeed rising, stands in second place with 23.5%. Warren still clings to third with 15%, and Bloomberg has risen to 8%.

In Iowa, which caucuses on Monday, Sanders leads by 3.6 points. In New Hampshire, which votes next on February 11, Sanders leads by a 9.5 point margin.
 
Panderer-in-chief: Bloomberg promises taxpayer-funded free gender surgery and housing to transgenders

Sunday, February 02, 2020 by: JD Heyes

Link: https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-02...payer-funded-gender-surgery-transgenders.html

(Natural News) The biggest difference between President Donald Trump and every single one of the Democratic presidential contenders running for their party’s nomination is this: Self-empowerment versus government handouts.

The Democrat Party long ago abandoned any pretense of being a “party of the common American” and instead became the party of bigger and more expensive, intrusive government. You can tell by the way its candidates are attempting to give away everything but the kitchen sink this campaign cycle.

In fact, one candidate — former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg — is actually promising a kitchen sink. And a bedroom, a kitchen, a living room, and some closets — to at least some Americans.

But there’s a catch: You have to be a transgendered person.

And if taxpayer-funded housing isn’t enough, Blooomberg will throw in free sex surgery as well, all compliments of every working person in the country.

As Breitbart News reported Thursday, Bloomberg’s campaign released a “vision” for the adoption of “a comprehensive policy to ensure LGBTQ+ equality.”

The news site reported:

The vision includes transgenders’ rights to free sex surgery and hormone treatment, rights to shelter based on gender identity, and forcing law enforcement and health care providers to undergo “cultural competency” and “implicit bias” training.

“I have been honored to stand with the LGBTQ+ community in the fight for equality and justice, from New York, where we won marriage equality in 2011, to states across the country. That fight – true to our nation’s highest ideals – has achieved historic progress, but we still have a long way to go,” Bloomberg says on his campaign website.

“As president, I will work to protect every member of the LGBTQ+ community from hatred, violence, and discrimination. We will close disparities in health care access and quality, stop violence against transgender people, and advocate for equal rights across the world. We cannot settle for anything less – and I won’t,” he continued.

What the government provides it can take away

In addition to this blatant pandering, Bloomberg also said he supports new legislation that would essentially gut existing protections for Americans who want to live and act according to their deeply held religious beliefs — a blatant attempt to criminalize the First Amendment’s ‘freedom of religion’ guarantee. Because to the Left, you can’t be a Christian who believes in traditional marriage and gender roles simply as a matter of faith. No. Such beliefs make you a bigot.

“Mike will … end the Trump administration’s practice of granting federally funded organizations a license to discriminate against people based on their religious beliefs, sexual orientation or gender identity,” the campaign website adds.

Meanwhile, President Trump’s policies are growing the economy in ways it has not for years, while creating more jobs and opportunities for all Americans across all demographics. Trump, then, is providing a means for people to provide for themselves; Democrats like Bloomberg are offering nothing but government-sponsored largess, an existence that makes those Americans who take the bait totally dependent on bureaucrats in D.C.

Because lest we never forget, whatever the government provideth, the government can taketh away.

Bloomberg’s pandering to transgenders, though, isn’t just an insult against the vast majority of Americans who do not fall into the “LGBTQ+” demographic, but it’s insulting to those he means to pander to. Programs like what Bloomberg’s proposing assume that targeted individuals are incapable of making their own way and must be helped by government.

Speaking of bigotry, dividing Americans along racial, ethnic, religious, sexual, and other lines is about as bigoted and racist as it gets. Forcing a Christian, via the taxes they pay, to support lifestyles they don’t agree with is no different from forcing a gay person to subsidize the Christian religion.

The latter would never happen, so why does the former get serious consideration?

Trump ignites passion in his political enemies, no question, but overall he’s trying to be president for all Americans. Bloomberg, obviously, would not.

Sources include:

Breitbart.com

USAFeatures.news

NaturalNews.com
 
Sanders Calls Out DNC for Changing Rules So Bloomberg Can Participate in Next Debate While Keeping Out Gabbard, Yang

Link: http://www.stationgossip.com/2020/02/sanders-calls-out-dnc-for-changing.html

[see vids at site link, above]

Senator Bernie Sanders is blasting the Democratic National Committee for changing their rules to allow Michael Bloomberg to participate in the next debate, while keeping out others like Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.

Speaking at a press conference in New Hampshire, Sanders called the rule change an “outrage.”

“I think it is an outrage,” Sanders said. “Listen, rules are rules and people like Julián Castro played by the rules, campaigned really hard. Cory Booker played by the rules. Tulsi Gabbard played by the rules. Andrew Yang played by the rules.”

“And based on the rules determined by the DNC, they were unable to participate in one or more debates,” he continued.

Sanders did not say Bloomberg’s name, just referring to him as a guy “worth $55 billion.”

“Suddenly a guy comes in who has not campaigned one bit in Iowa or New Hampshire…but he’s worth $55 billion and I guess if you’re worth $55 billion you can get the rules changed for a debate,” Sanders said.

Last week, the DNC dropped the donor requirement for participation in the February debate in Las Vegas — meaning that Bloomberg and his self-funded campaign could potentially be eligible to participate. To make the stage, candidates must now only meet a delegates threshold or a polling threshold.

In order to be eligible, candidates must have gained either one delegate in the disastrous Iowa caucus or New Hampshire primary, reach 10 percent support in at least four national polls or surveys of South Carolina and Nevada between Jan. 15 and Feb. 18., or reach 12 percent support in two sanctioned national or early-state surveys.

Bloomberg has previously not been eligible for the debates because he did not reach the donor threshold that was previously required.
 
Here, below, is what Bloomberg said about "frisking" "minorities" awhile ago, but now (he needs black votes) he's "apologized," turned over "new leaf," ho ho ho ho ho

 
Bloomberg is avoiding all scrutiny. It's time to take a long, hard look at his views

Benjamin Dixon

I unearthed a clip of the mayor speaking about stop-and-frisk that should make every American question his suitability to be president

Wed 12 Feb 2020 14.50 EST Last modified on Wed 12 Feb 2020 14.57 EST

Michael Bloomberg wants to be president of the United States yet faces little to no scrutiny. Black and brown men of New York City have been interrogated more than he has. Other candidates appear on debate stages to be questioned by the American people. Not Bloomberg. Thanks to his wealth, he can afford to sidestep this process entirely by spending millions on TV ads. Is that fair? Surely anyone who wants to be president of United States needs to be vetted. That’s why I decided to dig through reams of video and audio footage of the former mayor. What I discovered was deeply troubling.

In audio that I unearthed and disseminated on Tuesday from a 2015 speech at the Aspen Institute, Bloomberg gave his rationale for his controversial stop-and-frisk policy, saying:

“Put those cops where the crime is, which means in minority neighborhoods … [the] unintended consequences is people say, ‘Oh, my God, you are arresting kids for marijuana that are all minorities.’ Yes, that’s true. Why? Because we put all the cops in the minority neighborhoods. Yes, that’s true. Why do we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is.” He goes on to say: “Ninety-five per cent of your murders – murderers and murder victims – fit one MO. You can just take the description, Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops.”

Not only is this data point inaccurate, but it also reflects a deeply disturbing, racist worldview that harms minority men and is based on fallacious logic and inaccurate data.

The unearthed clip provides a glimpse into his deeply held philosophies regarding young minority men as well as his governing principles. The clip demands that the mayor come forward and answer to the people he ostensibly wants to lead.

Unfortunately, far from using the footage to help hold Bloomberg to account, many in the media want to divert attention away from his wrongdoings. One CNN anchor, for example, tried to malign me and question my motives for disseminating the tapes. She wondered how I got the audio and why I was distributing it now. Let me answer her: I got the audio by doing the most basic research that should be expected of any journalist. As to why I released it now, because if not now, when?

I make no apologies for my vehement opposition to billionaire Michael Bloomberg purchasing his way into the 2020 election. In fact, I believe that every American citizen should be terrified by the idea that, in the midst of a Democratic primary where big ideas are being debated and ideologies are being scrutinized, one man can advance not by merit but by the millions of his own money spent on ads. The gall of it is unacceptable.

The Aspen audio clip reveals Bloomberg’s governing philosophy: use the force of the government not to correct the underlying causes of a problem such as violence but to persecute the people who are the victims of the violence:

“And the way you get the guns out of the kids’ hands is to throw them up against the wall and frisk them. [Inaudible] and then they start, they say, [inaudible] ‘Oh, I don’t want to get caught.’ So they don’t bring the gun. They still have a gun, but they leave it at home.”

Democracy is too fragile to endure the complete circumvention of our electoral process by a billionaire

He believes that the power of the government should be wielded to control the masses instead of to promote general welfare. This is evident in other statements he has made in the past. Consider the video of Bloomberg as he explains the rationale behind the infamous soda tax:

“Some people say, well, taxes are regressive. But in this case, yes they are. That’s the good thing about them, because the problem is in people that don’t have a lot of money. And so higher taxes should have a bigger impact on their behavior and how they deal with themselves.

“So I listen to people saying, ‘Oh, we don’t want to tax the poor,’ Well, we want the poor to live longer so that they can get an education and enjoy life.”

This belief that the government should use punitive force to “correct” the ills of marginalized communities is deeply disturbing. Is this what we want in the White House? How can Americans know without the opportunity to ask?

These are precisely the types of worldviews and philosophies that must be interrogated by the American people. Instead, the mayor is circumventing our democratic process by leveraging his tremendous wealth.

Which is why, until Michael Bloomberg addresses his critics in a meaningful way, we are calling on all of those politicians and leaders who have endorsed him to rescind their endorsements. How can they endorse someone who has yet to answer for worldviews that, if he still holds them, would certainly disqualify him from being president?

Democracy is too fragile to endure the complete circumvention of our electoral process by a billionaire with enough wealth to take the easy route while other candidates do the actual work of convincing America they are the right choice.
 
Former Clinton Advisor Warns Mike Bloomberg: “Before You Put Hillary on Your Ticket, Better Hire a Taster”

News Kickby News Kick-1 days ago in News 0 comments

Link: http://www.tathasta.com/2020/02/former-clinton-advisor-warns-mike.html

Former Clinton Advisor Warns Mike Bloomberg: “Before You Put Hillary on Your Ticket, Better Hire a Taster”

Dick Morris

Former Clinton advisor Dick Morris fired a warning shot to Mike Bloomberg following Matt Drudge’s claim that Bloomberg was considering Hillary Clinton as a running mate.

“Sources close to Bloomberg campaign tell DRUDGE REPORT that candidate is considering Hillary as running mate, after their polling found the Bloomberg-Clinton combination would be a formidable force…” Matt Drudge said.

DICK MORRIS: To: Mike Bloomberg: Before you put Hillary on your ticket, better hire a taster

To: Mike Bloomberg: Before you put Hillary on your ticket, better hire a taster
— Dick Morris (@DickMorrisTweet) February 15, 2020

Dick Morris knows the Clintons very well.

Mr. Morris was a political advisor for Bill Clinton going back to his bid for Governor of Arkansas and helped Clinton with both of his presidential runs in the 90’s.
 
Bloomberg Bashes Farmers, Blue Collar Workers as Primitive Idiots in Unearthed Video

“You dig a hole, you put a seed in, you put dirt on top, add water, up comes the corn.”

Kit Daniels | Infowars.com - February 17, 2020 50 Comments

Link: https://www.infowars.com/bloomberg-...rkers-as-primitive-idiots-in-unearthed-video/

Presidential hopeful Michael Bloomberg believes farmers and blue collar workers are simpletons with jobs that don’t require much intelligence, according to newly-surfaced video.

“I could teach anybody, even the people in this room, no offense intended” to be a farmer, Bloomberg said during a 2016 talk at Oxford University in a now-viral clip.

“It’s a process: You dig a hole, you put a seed in, you put dirt on top, add water, up comes the corn,” he stated. “You could learn that.”

Billionaire Bloomberg claims he "could teach anybody to be a farmer," even implying that farmers don't have the same level of "skillset" or "grey matter" as folks in tech jobs.

So demeaning, elitist, and out-of-touch it's appalling. pic.twitter.com/Auplmdq56m

— Anna Kelly (@AnnaKellyWI) February 17, 2020

The former NYC mayor also downplayed blue collar workers.

“You put a piece of metal on the lathe, you turn the crank the direction of the arrow, and you can have a job,” he continued.

Critics blasted Bloomberg’s statements as demeaning, elitist and out-of-touch with America, particularly flyover country.

Here Mike, go out and operate this……. Looks like a tech job to me…. pic.twitter.com/wgXUNyEsFB

— jsc (@jscottcharlton) February 17, 2020

"You dig a hole up comes the corn."

Yeeeaaah… Isn't that easy.

Nevermind that to be a successful farmer you have to be a mix of mechanic, carpenter, chemist, veterinarian, horticulturalist, climatologist, geneticist, animal behaviorist…etc..etc..etc….

— Illidari Edgelord (@EdgelordED) February 17, 2020

$100 bucks says Bloomberg can't change a spark plug.

— InTheRightColumn (@TheRightColumn) February 17, 2020

Ironically, outside their private-sector business ventures, politicians like Bloomberg represent a predatory class that doesn’t actually produce anything.

At least Hillary Clinton pretended to care about working-class Americans; Bloomberg can’t even do that.

Maybe having Hillary as Bloomberg’s running mate will add a tiny, tiny drop of charisma that his campaign lacks completely.
 
Video: Bloomberg Supports Death Panels To Decrease Healthcare Costs

Dem candidate says to let elderly die to save money

Kelen McBreen | Infowars.com - February 17, 2020 16 Comments

Link: http://www.nnnforum.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=665473

Footage has surfaced of billionaire Democrat presidential candidate and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg advocating a healthcare system that would deny cancer treatment to the elderly and use funds for young people instead.

Bloomberg explaining how healthcare will “bankrupt us,” unless we deny care to the elderly.

“If you show up with cancer & you’re 95 years old, we should say…there’s no cure, we can’t do anything.

A young person, we should do something. Society’s not willing to do that, yet.” pic.twitter.com/7E5UFHXLue

— Samuel D. Finkelstein II (@CANCEL_SAM) February 16, 2020

Shot in 2011 while Bloomberg talked with a Jewish family sitting Shiva, the video shows the former NYC mayor explaining how “healthcare will bankrupt” the country if costs aren’t cut.

“If you show up with prostate cancer and you’re 95-years-old, we should say, ‘Go and enjoy … live a long life.’ There’s no cure, and we can’t do anything,” Bloomberg said. “If you’re a young person, we should do something about it. Society’s not ready to do that yet.”

Ironically, the family Bloomberg is talking to in the clip had just waited 73 hours in a New York City emergency room before one of their family members died.

The Democratic presidential candidate’s proposal is similar to Obama-era “death panels,” where doctors refuse to treat patients who are deemed too old or too expensive to care for.

Would you trust a government-run healthcare system to decide whether you deserve to live or die?
 
New Witness Corroborates Accusation That Mike Bloomberg Told Pregnant Employee to 'Kill It'

Chris Menahan
InformationLiberation
Feb. 17, 2020

Link: http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=61207

Mike Bloomberg: I Will Charge Americans With 'Domestic Terrorism' For 'Hate Crimes' If Elected

Switzerland Halts 5G Rollout Due to Health Concerns, Widespread Public Opposition

Power-Drunk YouTube Censors Floor Speech Of Sen Rand Paul For Naming Alleged 'Whistleblower'

Report: Mark Zuckerberg Requests Government Rules On 'What Discourse Should Be Allowed'

Multibillionaire Democratic 2020 presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg allegedly told one of his pregnant employees that she should "kill it" and griped that said pregnant employees are preventing him from making even more money.

From Law and Crime, "Former Co-Worker Corroborates Allegation That Bloomberg Told Pregnant Employee to 'Kill It'":

[...] the billionaire financial mogul is facing increased scrutiny over reports that he created a workplace culture of rampant misogyny, bullying, and sexual harassment–including an incident where he allegedly told a pregnant female employee that she should "kill it." Although the female employee, Sekiko Sakai Garrison, sued and eventually reached a confidential settlement with Bloomberg, one of her co-workers publicly confirmed for the first time that he too witnessed the former New York City mayor make the comment, according to the Washington Post.

"I remember she had been telling some of her girlfriends that she was pregnant," David Zielenziger, a former Bloomberg technology writer said in an interview with the Post. "And Mike came out and I remember he said, 'Are you going to kill it?' And that stopped everything. And I couldn't believe it."

In her 1998 lawsuit, Garrison claimed that after she revealed her pregnancy to Bloomberg, he responded by saying, "Kill it!"

"Plaintiff asked Bloomberg to repeat himself, and again he said, 'Kill it'" and muttered, 'Great! Number 16!' suggesting to plaintiff his unhappiness that sixteen women in the Company had maternity-related status. Then he walked away," the complaint stated.
A net worth of $62 billion is not enough, lady.

You need to kill your baby so Mr. Bloomberg can make few extra thousand bucks!
 
Mike Bloomberg: I Will Charge Americans With ‘Domestic Terrorism’ For ‘Hate Crimes’ If Elected

By RUSSIAN TROLL on 02/17/2020

Link: https://governmentslaves.news/2020/...omestic-terrorism-for-hate-crimes-if-elected/

Billionaire presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg said he will charge Americans with “domestic terrorism” for “hate crimes” if elected and bashed “nativists” in America before affirming his commitment to Israel remaining a “Jewish state” in a recent interview with the Jewish Telegraph Agency.

From JTA.org, “Mike Bloomberg: Anti-Semitism is a problem on the right and the left. Here’s how I’d combat it from day one.”:

[BLOOMBERG:] Anti-Semitic violence is on the rise. We’ve seen it in the New York area — including the recent horrific attacks in Jersey City — and across the country. As a Jew, as an American and as a human being, I am deeply disturbed every time I hear about these hate crimes.

[…] When the president calls his supporters “real Americans” — an echo of the language that nativists, anti-Semites and the KKK used for many decades — he undermines our fundamental national values.

When he is silent — and even supportive, through his words and tweets — as racist groups spread hate, he puts the public safety of our communities at risk.

When he promotes conspiracy theories that are built on lies and prejudice, we must remember: Anti-Semitism is the original conspiracy theory.

A world in which a president traffics in conspiracy theories is a world in which Jews are not safe.

[…] I will label hate crimes as “domestic terrorism” — and charge perpetrators accordingly.

I will launch a national, coordinated effort, led by the FBI director and Department of Justice, to crack down on violent extremists.

Bloomberg went on to say it’s a “solemn obligation” of the United States to ensure Israel remains a “Jewish state”:

Israel is the closest and most reliable U.S. ally in the Middle East. And I believe guaranteeing the survival of a democratic, Jewish state in the Holy Land is a solemn obligation of the United States, as it has been for more than half a century. […]

Let me be clear: I strongly oppose the BDS movement. And I vehemently disagree with everyone who fails to see why the Jewish people deserve a permanent Jewish state.

America, on the other hand, must have open borders!

SOURCE: INFORMATION LIBERATION
 
Back
Top