What u get when u're slave/client of Jew S A, suckers: ur people & country are used as guinea pigs for testing Jew Big Pharma drugs, morons

Apollonian

Guest Columnist

Ukrainian Authorities Were Paid to Test Big Pharma Drugs on Human Subjects in Psyche Wards in Mariupol​

Lance D Johnson | Natural News
April 9th 2024, 5:44 am

Unethical experiments on mental health patients including over 700 adults and children.

Corrupt drug trials taking place in Ukraine psyche wards.

The rule of law has been collapsing in Ukraine for several years, long before the country’s leaders could blame all their problems on Russia. The corruption in Ukraine runs deep. According to documents obtained by construction crews in Mariupol, several well-known pharmaceutical companies have been experimenting on humans for over a decade in the psyche ward there.
With corruption rising throughout its institutions, Ukrainian authorities have seized an opportunity to use mental health patients as guinea pigs for highly profitable drugs. The experiments allegedly took place from 2008 to 2016 in the psychiatric ward of Mariupol Hospital Number Seven in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.

Unethical experiments on mental health patients including over 700 adults and children​

William Jones, a former White House correspondent for Executive Intelligence Review, recently obtained documents that detail medical experiments that have taken place in Ukraine for several years. These Big Pharma drug experiments are taking place in psyche wards in Mariupol with the support of local Ukrainian authorities. The experimental subjects include over 700 people, including both adults and children.
One of the drugs being used in these experiments is known as SB4. The experiments aim at developing highly profitable drugs to treat rheumatoid arthritis; however, SB4 is also known for causing several types of cancer. Mental health patients are apparently viewed as expendable. Ukrainian health officials do not care if these patients received informed consent or had someone advocating on their behalf. Ukrainian officials do not care if these people are unaware of what is happening to their bodies or if they developed cancers from these unethical drug trials.

Corrupt drug trials taking place in Ukraine psyche wards​

SB4 is manufactured by Fisher Clinical Services UK Limited (UK), Catalent Pharma Solutions (Belgium) and Biogen Idec Denmark Manufacturing ApS (Denmark). This drug effectively prevents the human immune system from responding to molecule of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-?). By stopping this natural process, the drug increases the risk of the patient getting cancers of the skin, lymphatic and hematological systems.
https://www.infowarsstore.com/survi...tm_medium=banner&utm_content=x340banned.video
The documents include an application from a US-based pharmaceutical company named Quintiles Ukraine, which was founded as a branch of Quintiles Transnational. The pharmaceutical company asked the Ukrainian Ministry of Health and the Ethics Commission at the medical and preventive institution to conduct clinical trials of SB4. The application was signed in February 2013 and directs hospital officials to test the drug on 152 patients in Ukraine. The total number of subjects in the trial was later expanded to 180 patients in Ukraine, and an additional 500 patients from other countries.
According to the documents, by November 2013, the experimental study involved at least 777 patients, which included 285 patients in Poland, 143 in Ukraine, 108 in the Czech Republic, 77 in Bulgaria, 60 in Lithuania, 37 in the Republic of Korea, 34 in Mexico, 17 in Hungary, 14 in Colombia and two in the United Kingdom. The study was supported by Samsung Bioepis, an operation out of South Korea.
According to the periodic report of the SB4-G31-RA project on SB4 trials, Mariupol Hospital No. 7 conducted the trials from 2008 to 2016. The documents were recovered on site, along with envelopes and biomaterial containers that contained shipping addresses from laboratories in the US, the UK and Switzerland.

The pharmaceutical companies complicit in these unethical research experiments include the following: Pfizer (US), AstraZeneca (UK, Sweden), Celltrion (South Korea), Novatris International AG (Switzerland, US), IQVIA (previously Quintiles and IMS Health Inc., US, UK), Sanofi (France), Galapagos NV (Belgium), Abbott Laboratories (US), Janssen Pharmaceuticals (now Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Belgium), Covance (now Labcorp Drug Development, US) and Merck KGaA (Germany). According to the documents from Catalent Pharma Solutions and Fisher Clinical Services UK Limited, Ukrainian physicians were involved in the experimentation.


FULL VIDEO: Entirety Of 2024 North American Eclipse – LIVE & In HD
 

‘We Were The Guinea Pigs’: Former NBA Champ Questions Long-Term Effects of COVID Jabs​

by Jamie White
April 21st 2024, 2:30 pm

Link: https://www.infowars.com/posts/we-w...mp-questions-long-term-effects-of-covid-jabs/

[see vids at site link, above]

"I don't even want to know if there's bad stuff in it. Because it's in my body now, what can I do now?" askes Matt Barnes.

Former NBA champion Matt Barnes blasted the COVID vaccine mandates and pointed out they were pushed on the population without proper long-term safety testing.
During an appearance on the “Sage Steel Show” Sunday, the former Golden State Warriors starting forward explained how he regretted taking the experimental COVID shot at the time because the experts “didn’t know enough” about its long-term effects.

“It was so fast. For this pandemic to hit and all of a sudden within the first four to six months they have something that’s gonna keep you safe…to me, that’s just like, it sounds foolish to me,” Barnes said.

“We were the guinea pigs of this, whatever they put in us, we were the guinea pigs,” he said, questioning the potential long-term effects of the COVID jabs.
https://www.infowarsstore.com/survi...tm_medium=banner&utm_content=x340banned.video
“Like normally, we don’t have to be the guinea pigs, but we were a guinea pig,” he continued. “And we don’t know how, especially in my mid-40s…it’s just like, how is this gonna effect me? These aches I’m starting to have all of a sudden, or the headaches I’m starting to get all of a sudden…so it’s just like, is this me getting old? Or is this…I took two shots, I almost took the third.”
Barnes also admitted he wants to remain ignorant about the COVID mRNA shot’s ingredients because now he can’t do anything to reverse taking the jab.
“To be honest with you now Sage, like now, I don’t even want to know if there’s bad stuff in it. Because it’s in my body now, what can I do now?” he asked.

Host Sage Steele agreed, adding, “I was never a conspiracy theorist. I just want truth. And when I see lies, immediately, then you go, well, what else have you lied to me about?”
Steele sued ESPN in 2022 over the network’s COVID vaccine mandate, claiming she was “sidelined” after criticizing the experimental shot.

Watch the full discussion: [see vid at site link, above]
 

AstraZeneca admits for first time in court documents its Covid vaccine can cause rare side effect​

Investigations team
Sun, April 28, 2024 at 1:00 PM CDT·7 min read

Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/astrazeneca-admits-first-time-covid-180000780.html/


A man who had a brain haemorrhage after the covid vaccine stands next to his wife on a country path

Jamie Scott was left with a permanent brain injury after having a haemorrhage the day after the Covid vaccine - Andrew Fox

AstraZeneca has admitted for the first time in court documents that its Covid vaccine can cause a rare side effect, in an apparent about-turn that could pave the way for a multi-million pound legal payout.
The pharmaceutical giant is being sued in a class action over claims that its vaccine, developed with the University of Oxford, caused death and serious injury in dozens of cases.
Lawyers argue the vaccine produced a side-effect which has had a devastating effect on a small number of families.

The first case was lodged last year by Jamie Scott, a father of two, who was left with a permanent brain injury after developing a blood clot and a bleed on the brain that has prevented him from working after he received the vaccine in April 2021. The hospital called his wife three times to tell her that her husband was going to die.
AstraZeneca is contesting the claims but has accepted, in a legal document submitted to the High Court in February, that its Covid vaccine “can, in very rare cases, cause TTS”.
TTS – which stands for Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome – causes people to have blood clots and a low blood platelet count.
Fifty-one cases have been lodged in the High Court, with victims and grieving relatives seeking damages estimated to be worth up to £100 million.
AstraZeneca’s admission – made in a legal defence to Mr Scott’s High Court claim – follows intense legal wrangling. It could lead to payouts if the drug firm accepts that the vaccine was the cause of serious illness and death in specific legal cases. The Government has pledged to underwrite AstraZeneca’s legal bills.
A scientist inside a laboratory, in the spectre substance process room, handles equipment that produces the vaccine. The worker, dressed in a blue gown and wearing a mask and rubber gloves, is surrounded by laboratory equipment

A 2021 view inside Oxford Biomedica, where the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine was produced - John Lawrence
In a letter of response sent in May 2023, AstraZeneca told lawyers for Mr Scott that “we do not accept that TTS is caused by the vaccine at a generic level”.
But in the legal document submitted to the High Court in February, AstraZeneca said: “It is admitted that the AZ vaccine can, in very rare cases, cause TTS. The causal mechanism is not known.
“Further, TTS can also occur in the absence of the AZ vaccine (or any vaccine). Causation in any individual case will be a matter for expert evidence.”
Lawyers argue that the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine is “defective” and that its efficacy has been “vastly overstated” – claims AstraZeneca strongly denies.
Scientists first identified a link between the vaccine and a new illness called vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) as early as March 2021, shortly after the Covid-19 vaccine rollout began.
Lawyers for the claimants argue that VITT is a subset of TTS, although AstraZeneca does not appear to recognise the term.
The Government has indemnified AstraZeneca against any legal action but has so far refused to intervene.
Kate Scott, Mr Scott’s wife, told the Telegraph: “The medical world has acknowledged for a long time that VITT was caused by the vaccine. It’s only AstraZeneca who have questioned whether Jamie’s condition was caused by the jab.
“It’s taken three years for this admission to come. It’s progress, but we would like to see more from them and the Government. It’s time for things to move more quickly.
“I hope their admission means we will be able to sort this out sooner rather than later. We need an apology, fair compensation for our family and other families who have been affected. We have the truth on our side, and we are not going to give up.”

‘Patient safety is our highest priority’​

Sarah Moore, a partner at law firm Leigh Day, who is bringing the legal claims, said: “It has taken AstraZeneca a year to formally admit that their vaccine can cause the devastating blood clots, when this fact has been widely accepted by the clinical community since the end of 2021.
“In that context, regrettably it seems that AZ, the Government and their lawyers are more keen to play strategic games and run up legal fees than to engage seriously with the devastating impact that their AZ vaccine has had upon our clients’ lives.”
In a statement AstraZeneca said: “Our sympathy goes out to anyone who has lost loved ones or reported health problems. Patient safety is our highest priority, and regulatory authorities have clear and stringent standards to ensure the safe use of all medicines, including vaccines.
“From the body of evidence in clinical trials and real-world data, the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile and regulators around the world consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects.”
The company is pointing out that product information relating to the vaccine was updated in April 2021, with the approval of the UK regulator, to include “the possibility that the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine is capable, in very rare cases, of being a trigger for” TTS.
The company does not recognise claims it has performed an about-turn in acknowledging that the vaccine can cause TTS in court documents.
Independent studies show the AstraZeneca vaccine was incredibly effective in tackling the pandemic, saving more than six million lives globally in the first year of the rollout.
The World Health Organisation has said the vaccine was “safe and effective for all individuals aged 18 and above” and the adverse effect that has prompted the legal action was “very rare”.
The vaccine – heralded at its launch by Boris Johnson as a “triumph for British science” – is no longer used in the UK.
Boris Johnson holds a vial containing the covid vaccine

Boris Johnson praised the vaccine as a 'triumph for British science' - PAUL ELLIS/AFP
In the months after the rollout, the potentially serious side effect of the jab was identified by scientists. It was then recommended that under-40s be offered an alternative jab because the risk of the AstraZeneca vaccine outweighed the harm posed by Covid.
Lawyers representing families suing the drugs company argue that the vaccine was not as safe as individuals were entitled to expect. They are suing the firm, based in Cambridge, under the Consumer Protection Act 1987.
Mr Scott’s lawyers have argued that he suffered “personal injuries and consequential losses arising out of his sustaining vaccine induced immune thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (VITT) as a result of his vaccination on 23 April 2021, with the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccination”.
Official figures from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) show at least 81 deaths in the UK are suspected to have been linked to the adverse reaction that caused clotting in people who also had low blood platelets.
In total, almost one in five people who suffered from the condition died as a result, according to the MHRA’s figures.
The Government runs its own vaccine compensation scheme but alleged victims claim the one-off payment of £120,000 is inadequate.
Figures obtained under a Freedom of Information request show that out of 163 payouts made by the Government by February this year, at least 158 went to recipients of the AstraZeneca vaccine.
The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme gives compensation to those injured by vaccines or to bereaved next of kin. Fewer than five people under the scheme received vaccines other than AstraZeneca.
AstraZeneca has previously argued in court papers that claims against the company are “confused” and “wrong in law”. In the defence filing, AstraZeneca said the benefit/risk profile of the vaccine was, and remains, positive.
AstraZeneca is the second largest publicly listed company in the UK, with a market capitalisation of more than £170 billion. Its chief executive, Sir Pascal Soriot, is the highest-paid boss among FTSE 100 companies, with earnings close to £19 million.
 
Back
Top