Below essay by ap first submitted, but censored/deleted by kike, Unz, at comments,
https://www.unz.com/runz/alex-jones-cass-sunstein-and-cognitive-infiltration/ Unz, 8 Aug 22
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Unz FAILS To Give Due Credit To Ajax And Thematic "Consp. Theory" Of Christian Culture
(Apollonian, 8 Aug 22)
So now, after having read Unz's typical over-long article of nearly 5 thousand words, what was his pt. again?--was it don't believe in conspiracies?--that conspiracies don't exist? Or was it that conspiracy theories need to be examined w. some care for facts and logic, etc.?
And so isn't that careful examination/analysis what Ajax Jewns (InfoWars.com) tries to do?--at least his many fans seem to think so, right? So the question is, what?--is Unz just jealous of Ajax who does such effective job?--at least in opinion of his fans, right?--and that's how Ajax gets deservedly rich--which Satanic enemies of truth so positively hate, don't they?
Unz mentions "conspiracy community"--so would that refer to Christians familiar w. the story-line of New Test., in which Christ and truth (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) were victims to the conspiracy of Pharisees and Sadducees to have Christ/truth killed? But the lesson is that truth RESURRECTS, coming back to bite--which the Jews hate, don't they?--which is why Jews HATE Christ and Christianity.
And regarding US Declaration of Independence, rather sacred to real Americans, doesn't it describe and denounce a literal "conspiracy" of English King and Parliament to infringe the rights of the English citizens of American colonies?--the very reason for the revolution given by Jefferson, the main author.
Near the beginning of Unz's article, he says, <blockquote>"[t]he parents of murdered children are highly sympathetic victims, and publicly accusing them of being paid actors with imaginary children seems legally actionable, especially after they were bombarded with death threats by Jones’ legion of devoted followers. Under American libel law, even the wildest accusations may be freely made against public figures without much fear of legal consequences; but the parents of murdered schoolchildren are private individuals, so Jones appears to deserve his fate."</blockquote> Note Unz writes, "...after they were bombarded with death threats by Jones' legion of devoted followers." But HOW does Unz know this?--that these threats were made by "Jones' followers"?--was this proven in court or anywhere?--of course not (if it was proven, then give the citation)--and this statement by Unz is utterly absurd. "So Jones appears to deserve his fate"? Thus Unz jumps to another conclusion arising fm his plain malignant wishful thinking. So is Unz jealous of his rival, Ajax Jewns?
And if indeed anyone was REALLY killed at Sandy Hoax, then what and where is the proof?--citation pls. Unz tries to make light of the counter-evidence against the Sandy Hoax, but that counter-evidence is massive and substantial, which Unz doesn't want to admit.
Remember that Ajax always has been passionate in his defense of gun-rights, and that he was provoked by explicit statements made by Scarlet and Neil concerning gun-control. Regarding statements about "crisis actors," etc., Ajax said no more than literally thousands of others in tweets and various statements, and he wasn't the first to say it, and indeed, he never mentioned Scarlet or Neil by name, and there was never any proof given that he did.
Unz also should consider why satanic-globalist controlled "big-tech" has so severely CENSORED and suppressed Ajax--does Unz imagine it wasn't because Ajax was seriously and effectively discussing the issues and telling good deal of truth and facts?--thus is Ajax rewarded by his viewers/listeners.
So I submit that Unz's case, making light of conspiracy, "consp. theories," and Ajax Jewns FAILS abjectly. Why doesn't it occur to Unz who pretends to being sooooo smart, that Ajax, despite his many flaws, does a good enough job for what he tries to do, and that he's deservedly made rich for doing so in the info and msg he conveys to the people and public? And finally, that this general good work that Ajax does is PRECISELY the very reason he is persecuted, defamed, and falsely sued by corrupt shysters, in the pay of satanic "globalist," "woke" powers, making use of corrupt judges in a satanically corrupt legal system.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Western And Christian Culture Is Absolutely Founded Upon Consp. Theory, Suckers
(Apollonian, 9 Aug 22)
<blockquote>"Second, one should observe that conspiracy theories seem to be exclusively a Western phenomenon. Culturally Christian lands are especially susceptible to them, and the reason seems clear. As belief in the existence of Old Scratch has faded due to the advance of science, substitute Devils needed to be found to explain man’s misfortunes."</blockquote>
Did u ever hear of the actual plot-line of New Test.?--it is that Sadducees and Pharisees conspired to kill Truth/Christ--but that truth always resurrects (can't be killed--because the reality on which truth is based can't be killed). And Christ = Truth (Gosp. JOHN 14:6)--so there's always a general consp. against truth--it's called extreme subjectivism, holding reality is created by consciousness, according Immanuel Kant. Jews by their very religion practice a collectivistic subjectivism, led by rabbis. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best Talmudic expo.
So the subjectivist "truth" could be anything u want--which is opposed by Christ and Christianity who/which (implicitly) upholds the objective (Aristotelian) reality, the base of Christian truth which always resurrects, u see. And don't forget, satan is mere exemplar for anyone pretending they're God or godly in way of creating reality--satanism by definition. Lying is just a way of pretending to a reality which doesn't really exist in the objective reality.
Further, it's simple, basic part of New Test. plot and cultural background thereto that humans are sinners (self-interested by nature, possessed of will, though not perfectly "free," as only God's will is perfectly "free," etc.), hence they'll always have something to fight over and about. And yes, Ajax Jewns (InfoWars.com) is a gross fool who pretends to a "free" will, as u note, but Ajax is well-known tool/agent of the zionists, controlled by Israel, who pretend to oppose the "globalist" atheist "leftists" and satanists--"good Jews vs. bad Jews," u see.
"Advance of science," u say?--but isn't science founded on natural law (non-contradiction), hence will of God? Simple logic indicates u can't prove there's no God, sucker--for God is ineffable by definition. Finally, note US Declaration of Independence specifically cites the conspiracy (though the word itself isn't used) of King and Parliament against the rights of American colonists as reason for the revolution. I just wanted to clarify and emphasize truth of ur statement about Christian culture and conspiracy.
----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------------------
180. Dr. Robert Morgan says:
August 8, 2022 at 5:49 pm GMT • 18.5 hours ago • 800 Words ↑
Ron Unz: “But the simplest application of common-sense showed the implausibility of these theories. Surely it was far easier and cheaper to hire a couple of paid killers to mount a deadly attack than to recruit a large group of actors, make-up artists, and special effects wizards to stage a faked incident, afterward having to hope that none of them would ever reveal their participation in the high-profile fraud.”
Likewise, one might say that the simplest application of common sense would lead to the conclusion that if cognitive infiltration were actually being performed, there would be a host of people involved, not just Cass Sunstein. A whole army of people paid to argue on the internet would be required to bring it off; and not only that, they’d have to be meticulously coordinated over a variety of topics, and execute their plans flawlessly. Does anyone believe that our government is that competent? Where’s the evidence of this? If they exist, why has no one come forward to confess their role in it? Why no whistleblowers?
It seems clear to me that people believe nonsense conspiracy theories like this for a variety of reasons. Like belief in God, it seems to satisfy a deep emotional need in some people. There’s also a social identity attached to it; it’s a part of group membership in the “conspiracy community”, as Unz puts it. In the modern world people are increasingly isolated, and such ersatz “communities” provide a way to fulfill the primitive human craving for contact with others. The graphomaniacs writing on the Unz Review, columnists and commenters alike, are prime examples of this. For many here, it seems to consume their whole being. It’s both tragic and pitiful when unmasking “the conspiracy” becomes the center of your existence.
Conspiracy theories in general are an interesting topic. First, we should notice that it’s not only the term that is of comparatively recent advent, but the phenomenon itself. Were people spinning such theories in classical times? I don’t think so. Granted there were conspiracies, such as the conspiracies of Cataline or Piso, but they were of quite a different character than those alleged by modern conspiracy theorists. For instance, a classical equivalent of the Sandy Hook conspiracy theory might allege that Julius Caesar’s assassination was staged by “crisis actors”, and that no one actually died. Yet, to my knowledge at least, no one made that claim back then, or even anything remotely similar. For that matter, why no “crisis actors” until recently? After all, there have been actors for thousands of years. Was it just the poverty of man’s imagination that kept them from being used this way until only a few years ago? It seems foolish to think so, but I suppose if we believe in such things, then we’re forced to that conclusion.
Second, one should observe that conspiracy theories seem to be exclusively a Western phenomenon. Culturally Christian lands are especially susceptible to them, and the reason seems clear. As belief in the existence of Old Scratch has faded due to the advance of science, substitute Devils needed to be found to explain man’s misfortunes. These took many forms. Jews, globalists, “hostile elites”, Freemasons, Illuminati, pedophiles, and sex deviants of all kinds all have taken turns standing in for Satan. In the mind of the cultural Christian, all the world’s a stage for a moral contest, and there are only three actors on scene: God, the Devil, and man. Shall man blame God for his misfortune? That would be blasphemy! Shall he blame himself? Unthinkable! Thus, the process of elimination leaves only the Devil as the source of all ills. Being the one to blame is his raison d’être, and the root of all conspiracy thinking.
Third, we should notice the prominent lack of logical consistency in the arguments of many conspiracy theorists, especially the Christians. Alex Jones is an example of this, since he makes much of his Christianity. Raving on his show like a sleazy televangelist, he styles his travails as battling Satan, and claims to be a believer in “free will”, as are most Christians. Yet these are also the same people who, almost invariably, want to say that the public acts as it does because it has been “brainwashed”. But wait! What happened to “free will”? Apparently it’s a quality that can easily be lost, like a set of keys, or a misplaced hat. For the dedicated conspiracy theorist, human beings are at the same time absolutely free, and also deterministically programmable entities, mere puppets of those shadowy devils behind the scenes who are their real masters. People like Cass Sunstein, for example, or Bill Gates, or Klaus Schwab. These are the devils of the modern world.
• Agree: New Dealer, ebear
• Replies: @Autisticus Spasticus, @ThreeCranes
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
apollonian says: • Website
August 9, 2022 at 4:35 pm GMT • very recent • 200 Words ↑
@Treg
U Only Need To Open Ur Eyes
“Ron, can’t you see that you are next? The sad sad fact that you have essentially NOT stood up for Alex Jones, is greatly disappointing to me. Again, can’t you see you’re next?”
And what’s wrong w. u, buddy?–can’t u see the Jew doesn’t care? And Unz isn’t stupid, so u need to draw necessary conclusions instead of wasting ur time writing such long comments. Don’t forget or overlook who Unz is “in” with, like his buddies, Kevin MacDonald and Jared Taylor. Take due note of his adulation of Mike Hudson, his favorite economist, Hudson a close associate w. now deceased David Graeber.
Make due observance of significant tid-bits like Unz’s general contempt for “conspiracy-theorizing,” and his tolerance of such as US Federal Reserve Bank, which is no less than the main weapon of the topmost Jews and conspirators, the “fed” a veritable criminal enterprise, tantamount to outright, literal counterfeiting, but which counterfeiting is now made legalized.
----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------------
230. Treg says:
August 8, 2022 at 9:45 pm GMT • 17.9 hours ago • 2,100 Words ↑
Ron, can’t you see that you are next? The sad sad fact that you have essentially NOT stood up for Alex Jones, is greatly disappointing to me. Again, can’t you see you’re next?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inductive Logic: Basic Tool Of Consp. Theorists--Which Jews Hate, Like They Hate Truth
(Apollonian, 9 Aug 22)
The good "doctor" tells us:<blockquote> "Modern right-wing conspiracy theories mostly rely on two related ideas. The first is “Cui bono?”, and the second is “Cherchez le juif!”"</blockquote>
So what are "consp. theories," anyway?--they're attempts at solving crimes (conspiracies), the theorizers acting as detectives--like Sherlock Holmes.
So detectives, like Sherlock, make use of inductive logic, generalizing fm the evidence, posing the possible culprits, judging who is most likely. Thus among Eskimos, Watusis, Hottentots, or Jews, who would be most likely, regarding 9/11 or Sandy Hoax, etc.? Thus the most likely suspects are investigated to find who did it, the innocent methodically ruled-out. And as Sherlock explains, “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”
For 9/11, Chris Bollyn demonstrates in his book, "Solving 9/11," "it's Jews, stupid," Jews being OVERWHELMINGLY most likely, given all the pertinent facts.
Thus "cui bono" is obviously quite appropriate part of the necessary detective method, and it was first recognized by the Romans, I understand. Jews are simply notorious and justly hated for their religious (Talmudic) contempt for gentiles; after all, they gloat over having Christ/truth killed. And Jews control the central-banking system of the world, according to the Jew, Bernard Lazare, since the 14th cent., at least, as they do in this present day, unquestionably, since the time of Napoleon and the Rothschilds.
But "doctor" Morgan evidently wants to do the reverse of Sherlock Holmes, insisting that "free" will somehow rules out those dear Jews as likely suspects. And now the only question is whether Morgan is himself a Jew or merely in their pay to be so foolishly ignoring of that basic tool of inductive logic.
-------------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------------
215. Dr. Robert Morgan says:
August 8, 2022 at 8:29 pm GMT • 20.6 hours ago • 200 Words ↑
Autisticus Spasticus: “Somebody at the Occidental Observer responded with this [Bismarck quote] when I spoke about Christianity being the reason for the American Civil War. What do you think about this? ”
1. As a general rule, beware an unsourced internet quote. Many of them are apocryphal. Ironically, even the Christian economist and historian Gary North thought this quote was phony. I don’t know much about Mr. North, but it appears he was one of those typical anti-racist Christians who celebrate the American Civil War as a good thing, in that by ending slavery, it set the nation on a path to racial equality more pleasing to Jeebus.
Ellen Brown filled her book with bogus quotations. These have to be the most obviously bogus quotations of all. Their source is a raging anti-Semite who wrote in 1921.
www.garynorth.com
2. Modern right-wing conspiracy theories mostly rely on two related ideas. The first is “Cui bono?”, and the second is “Cherchez le juif!” The upshot is, because some occurrence benefited some group, it’s then taken for granted that this is evidence the group planned it, executed it, and is responsible for it. Examples are legion, and include the one you cite. Did some bankers make money from the Civil War? Even worse (or better, depending on your POV), were the bankers Jews? If so, then for the conspiracy theorist, that’s ironclad proof they played the key role in causing it. Since money is involved in virtually every human transaction, it’s also easy to slide into thinking that money controls all human activity. Funny enough, for those who think so, “free will” is again instantly forgotten.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[NOTE: when I went to enter below essay, I was prevented fm doing so by Unz, the kike, who placed the bar w. the msg attached, saying, "Too much commenting; take a break." So this Jew, "Morgan," can post his, but I can't post my reply/response--is Unz a kike w. capital "K," or what?]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"Doctor" Morgan Is A Quack
(Apollonian, 9 Aug 22)
<blockquote>"Seems you’ve missed my points."</blockquote> Readers can decide for themselves.
<blockquote>"Likewise, the Civil War was fought over the slavery question,...."</blockquote> War of Northern Aggression was horrific mass-murder by criminals and anti-Constitutional traitors to impose dictatorship over the heroic Southern people--had NOTHING to do, primarily, w. slavery, which was mere side-issue and pretext, as proven by infamous "Emancipation Proclamation" (late 1862) which resulted in Southerners losing their property in workers unless they re-entered Union.
BUT northern slaves, of Maryland, Kentucky, Delaware, and Missouri, which stayed in union, DID NOT lose their slaves (until the very end of the war when northern, Republican "radicals" decided the mass murder and killings needed a "humanitarian"-type cover & excuse)--it (Emancipation Proc.) was simple extortion to get southern states back under dictatorship, demonstrating definitively what war was REALLY about.
10th Amendment said, and still says (28 words), "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Newsflash, sucker: secession IS NOT prohibited in Const. prior to the post war amendments and court holdings.
<blockquote>"Also, if the will is truly free, as Alex Jones and most other Christians insist, then obviously, by definition, no one can FORCE it in any particular direction."</blockquote> Have u ever hrd of extortion, bribery, and duress? If someone holds a gun to ur head, u might well do lots of things u otherwise wouldn't. U make no sense, buddy, and I doubt u're any kind of genuine "doctor."
-----------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------------------
356. Dr. Robert Morgan says:
August 9, 2022 at 7:03 pm GMT • 18 minutes ago • 300 Words ↑
apollonian: “Thus “cui bono” is obviously quite appropriate part of the necessary detective method, and it was first recognized by the Romans … But “doctor” Morgan evidently wants to do the reverse of Sherlock Holmes, insisting that “free” will somehow rules out those dear Jews as likely suspects.”
Seems you’ve missed my points. With respect to the use of “cui bono?”, the problem isn’t its use, but its overuse. For example, if you’ve buy a house, it’s likely you got a loan from a banker. Should we conclude then that the bankers CAUSED you to buy a house? Or FORCED you to buy one? The Bismarck quote (if it is actually genuine, and if it describes an historical fact) says that’s the case for the American Civil War. Without the loans, no war! But obviously, it’s true that someone can profit from an action without causing it. My grocer profits from my patronage, but he doesn’t cause me to buy food. I’d need to get food regardless. Likewise, the Civil War was fought over the slavery question, and would have been fought regardless of anyone making a profit from it or not. Over-reliance on “cui bono” here conceals the truth instead of revealing it.
Also, if the will is truly free, as Alex Jones and most other Christians insist, then obviously, by definition, no one can FORCE it in any particular direction. Yet, amazingly, these “free will” nuts are some of the most enthusiastic fans of this idea that people are helpless puppets. Not only is it logically incompatible with “free will”, it’s a skewed manner of looking at things that clearly seems designed only to exculpate one party (the public) and inculpate another (whether it be Jews, globalists, Freemasons, or any other face of the Devil.) Da debbil made ’em do it! LOL.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unz Defends Hudson, Legalized Counterfeiting, Opposes Christianity, Yet Pretends He's "White"
(Apollonian, 10 Aug 22)
So what really is the story w. Unz, the Jew, but who just wants to be "white," like his buddies, KMac and Jared Taylor? Thus Unz, the Jew, wants to be "white," but he doesn't want to be "Christian" as he has the Jew's natural antipathy and resentment for Christianity.
So Unz writes off Christianity as something irrational even after it is demonstrated in accord w. the New Test. text that there's simple philosophy (esp. in Gosp. JOHN) to Christianity--worship of truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) in accord w. the implicit Aristotelian objectivity, leading then to a humane and compassionate ethics and political system, though the politics is left un-defined, the problem being the thematic Judaic satanism built upon subjectivism (Talmudism, "Oral Law Trad.," and "midrash"). Unz has most and greatest difficulty facing up to this subjectivism.
Next for Unz, u notice how he absolutely bombards us w. "economics" of Mike Hudson who babbles inanely, sticking w. the nonsense broached by Hudson's buddy, David Graeber, regarding money and what it really is, both Unz and Hudson ignoring the blatant criminal nature and fraud of the US Federal Reserve system (the "fed"), literally legalized counterfeiting--which gross criminality Unz (and Hudson) just ignore. Notice what "fed" is doing now--fueling and fostering raging inflation, destroying the Dollar and US middle class--inflation just as in Weimar Germany in early 1920s.
Still, Unz insists he's justified for opposing Christianity in general as only the satanist/subjectivist versions of Christianity ("Judeo-Christianity"--see Whtt.org for expo) presently dominate in the West, due to Judaic ownership and control of everything through and following fm the US Federal Reserve and the other central-banks Jews control and manipulate--with which all Unz is perfectly satisfied, no problemos. After all, Unz is a rich Jew, folks.
---------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------------
416. Je Suis Omar Mateen says:
August 10, 2022 at 10:22 pm GMT • 3.4 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
“Surely it was far easier and cheaper to hire a couple of paid killers to mount a deadly attack than to recruit a large group of actors, make-up artists, and special effects wizards to stage a faked incident….”
Spoken like a true conscience-less Jew, always pinching your sheckles and not caring whether you murder other people. Are you affecting a caricature of the grasping Jew or does it come natural to you, Ron?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who Is The Real Psycho?
(Apollonian, 10 Aug 22)
WHAT "ecological collapse," sucker?--why don't u give at least some specifics? U just want to bully ur way, accusing others of being "evil," which "evil" doesn't exist in an objective, determinist reality except for self-righteous psychopaths like urself, sucker. "Denying it"?--"it"--"ecological collapse"--DOESN'T EXIST, moron--u first have to say what it is, which u psychos NEVER do. And don't just refer to long babbling texts, sucker--say what it (such "ecologic collapse") is in ur own words, giving at least a few examples, fool.
The very people insisting upon "ecologic collapse" are the leftist atheists, like WEF, and ur fellow Jew, Klaus Schwab, and other Jews of CFR, Trilateralists, and Bilderbergs, the very topmost oligarchs, these being the very same people who want "population-reduction" as of "agenda-21" and -2030, fool.
------------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------------------
422. mulga mumblebrain says:
August 11, 2022 at 2:12 am GMT • 30 minutes ago ↑
@Chris Moore
Look, you Evil simpleton-ecological collapse is REALITY. The only people denying it and proclaiming it a ‘Jewish’ or ‘globalist’ plot are brain-dead Rightist psychopaths who wish humanity to be destroyed, for sick reasons that the Devil only knows.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Satanic Turmoil Vs. TRUTH In CYCLIC Hist. And "Decline Of West"
(Apollonian, 10 Aug 22)
"Johan": u don't even understand what Christianity is, sucker--it's PHILOSOPHY at the core, the Hegelian anti-thesis of Judaic/Talmudic "Oral Law Trad." by which Torah (and then everything else) only means what rabbis say it means--SUBJECTIVISM. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best Talmudic expo. Christ = TRUTH in accord w. implicit Aristotelian objectivity (Gosp. JOHN 14:6)--which philosophy then leads to the iconic and best-known Christian ethics of humane compassion, as of St. Paul.
Such understanding of Christian TRUTH then the Pharisees rejected and killed Christ the man, but truth always RESURRECTS as it cannot be killed anymore than the objective reality--such is New Test. lesson.
Human strife and warfare has ALWAYS been some version of truth and objectivity vs. lies built upon subjectivism, subjectivism holding that "consciousness creates reality," as of Immanuel Kant, which makes the subject the creator of reality--God--thus satanism, by definition.
So the great battle btwn truth vs. lies, objective reality vs. subjectivism/satanism, simply became internalized within the "vatican" (not same as CHURCH), which vatican sought to take over the real Church, and now we see establishment Christianity in the West, both Cath. and Prot., controlled by Jews, satanists/subjectivists, the commie pope, "Francis," pushing climate change lies and illegal invasion of the Western lands, etc.--a gross satanic take-over.
"Freemasonry," etc. also went through this same cultural struggle as Church and vatican--thus the world is presently dominated by satanism/subjectivism in so many areas and ways--long as the central-banks continue to push their legalized counterfeiting and fiat-currency so successfully as over last two hundred years, directed by Rothschilds and other Jews. But nowadays the banks are faltering w. too much inflation, so they want to resort to widespread warfare--so that's where we are now in the great process of CYCLIC history according to Oswald Spengler and "Decline of the West."
--------------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------------
409. Johan says:
August 10, 2022 at 6:31 pm GMT • 8.7 hours ago • 100 Words ↑
@Pierre de Craon
Freemasonry appears either to have become a generic term for various secret lodges, operating under different philosophies, or it refers to one secret lodge. Goethe, several founding fathers, and many other cultural icons, are also said to have been members of a Freemason lodge. Are you suggesting that they were into Judaism?
Moreover, joint war on Christianity, it smacks like Christian paranoia. Indeed secret lodges have fought against Christianity in as far as historical Christianity was a criminal tyranny, read: in as far. But not in the name of Judaism. That Jews create lobby clubs or secretly operating clubs against Christianity as a whole, or in order to reform it for the sake of their interests, is another matter. Christian based theories of secret lodges, so far as I have become acquainted with them appear to be the product of people who inherited a particular form of historical Christian insanity.