Apo essays for Mar 2020

[Apollonian]

Below-copied by ap submitted at comments, https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_...-mail-from-hitler-supporters/#comment-3744754

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Barrett Compares Christian Truth Ideal With Mere Islamic Imperium
(Apollonian, 1 Mar 20)​

Barrett: go and ck ur high-school text-books, sucker–European civilization began w. Greeks, even prior to 500 B.C., including especially the Homeric epics, Illiad and Oddysey. Christianity is itself largely a Greek inspiration, the earliest works preserved being written in Greek language. Christians then arose definitively under the Romans and sought to preserve that Greek foundation, Christ (= truth; Gosp. JOHN 14:6) affirming implicitly the OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality as necessary foundation to such truth ideal, aimed explicitly against the Pharisaic subjectivism, “midrash” (interpretation), and “Oral Law Tradition” (see Gosp. JOHN 8:44).

The "racial" impetus and orientation is the very purpose of philosophy, ethics, and all civilization, including especially the Biblic 4th (in some records, the 5th) commandment, "honor thy parentage (race)." And honor for the race also implies the determinist principle of absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" human will. Reality, including then one's personality, is determined by ancestors and all and any precedents and circumstances.

A "vibrant, powerful civilization" is ONLY possible by means of deterministic, hence racially-oriented ethics, philosophy, and culture, as history demonstrates beginning w. Greeks, then Romans, then the Germanic race which Germanic upheld Christian objectivity, reason (Holy Spirit), and determinism. "Love of self" is necessary virtue of PRUDENCE which the Greeks always recognized, and self-interest is simply the basic human condition, humans understood as creatures of will, hence self-interest, hence "sinners," when that intrinsic self-interest isn't tempered by reason (and Holy Spirit).

Thus as Christianity is worship of TRUTH (= Christ) above all, science, reason, and biology are simply aspects of the Holy Spirit, the means by which such truth is apprehended and appreciated, and whatever "purpose" there may be is mere means to happiness and whatever end is chosen--which might be anything. "Self-sacrifice" is what suckers and weaklings do in service to some clever military leader, like the original Muhammud, who inveigled the Arabs to obey his orders when he went about to ambushing the latest caravans making their way in the desert.


-----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------

123.Kevin Barrett says:
March 1, 2020 at 3:03 am GMT • 200 Words
@KenH

European civilization rose when it was Christian, and has been declining since its elites abandoned Christianity. What makes you think a “raceless and universalist creed” cannot survive, thrive, or even dominate in a hostile world, since that is precisely what Western Christian civilization (and Islamic civilization, Confucian civilization, etc.) have done? Even pagan civilizations are based on sacrifice to the gods. What historical examples show that narcissistic racial navel-gazing builds a vibrant, powerful civilization?

Spengler among others saw that the force that raises and sustains civilizations is a spiritual vision or Platonic ideal that gives men an Other worth living and dying for. Mere love of (racial) self will never do that. It is a dead end.

If your answer is that you worship the science of biology, and/or your own biological heritage, you are making a category mistake. Science only reveals what is, not what should be. It offers a description of life, not a purpose.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied essay by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.bitchute.com/video/AJ26PNQf5lEb/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Problem of Life and Living, Buddhism compared w. Christianity
(Apollonian, 11 Mar 2020)​

Not so sure this vid succeeded too well, Brian--not sure the actual subject-matter and basis thereto. Life sucks--we've always known that here in West, I venture. Homer's Illiad teaches life is war, and u have to be brave. The Odyssey (Homer) teaches, additionally, the cleverness of Odysseus by way of supplement to bravery. I seriously doubt Pannobhasa's critique of Western man's alleged failure of introspection--can that be verified or demonstrated fm Homer?--fm Old or New Test.s?--I don't think so.

Christ's solution is sublime and most successful--as one tries to satisfy one's desires, just be rational, and be sure to getting along w. fellows--watch out for Satanists and Jews, the most successful Satanists, who organize, dominate, and lead all other Satanists, even though gentiles (presently, at least) out-number Jews, as Jews are most organized, most cohesive, most committed, most successful "group-thinkers," best led and informed, as by their devilish Talmud, Zohar, and other such satanic writings and notions.

We can't eliminate Satanism, as it's simply hubris and subjectivism getting out of hand, but we can eliminate Jews and/or Judaism, a specific form of Satanism (collectivistic subjectivism). Thus we can keep satanic subjectivism to a practical minimum.

A problem then comes up about eliminating Satanism is it entails eliminating the leading Satanists, Jews, which Mischa Popoff, for one example, says we can only do by converting kikes to Christianity which is obviously idiotic--Mischa, the lying Jew, pretends that's obligatory to Christianity, which is obvious lie. Mischa is just another Jew trying to say and define what is Christianity and how it should be practiced, in deference to his Jew buddies for whom he obviously works.

Hence one conclusion is that Buddhism seems a little two-dimensional in its view of problems, compared to dear old Christianity which Christianity more accurately poses and describes the problems--Satanism/subjectivism, and most extreme, successful form of it, Talmudism.

 

[Apollonian]

Below essay by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/03/love-as-jesus-did.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hoffman, Psychotic, Liar, Hereticalist--Moralist, Above All
(Apollonian, 14 Mar 20)​

Hoffman is such a sublime psychotic, passive-aggressive, and obsessed therewith for his lies and treason (hereticalism) against Christ (= truth, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), he forgets and overlooks Christianity is worship of truth, and Holy Spirit entails reason and honesty, necessary for apprehension of such truth. "Love" then, is only most appropriate for such truth (Christ).

Thus everything about Christ and Christianity must be consistent w. that truth and honesty of Holy Spirit which Hoffman, sublime, satanistic liar as he is, cannot and refuses to grasp. For hatred of enemies is simply HONESTY, and Christ merely counsels the usual reason and honesty for most balanced understanding of one's enemy--the better for dealing w. such enemy as well as everyone else (virtue of justice).

And "turning of cheek" is merely counsel to not being too quick for mindless retaliation, for we could be mistaken, and it's not bad to thinking about things before acting.

For Hoffman is a coward, scared out of his excrement of Jews, foremost Satanists, making themselves to be co-equal w. God, insisting truth is subjective, only what they say it is ("midrash")--why Hoffman wrote his book of gross lies about unc' Adolf (Hitler), for one thing, to sucking-up to Jews, and at same time, Hoffman is such the treasonable, hereticalist psycho he imagines he impresses Jews and folks in general for his PATRONIZATION and condescension of Jew satanic monsters--such is the gross psychotic corruption of Hoffman's moralistic mentality.

And don't under-estimate Hoffman's horrendous, satanic hereticalism--Pelagian heresy by which he pretends to (a) perfectly "free," God-like will, and then (b) non-existent "good-evil." For Hoffman is moralist above all; "history" is just a pretext for Hoffman, which history he actually knows very little--as little as he understands about economics, "usury," and money and banking subject-matter, just more pretexts by which Hoffman poses as moralistic arbiter.

Thus Hoffman so miserably and putridly mis-represents the "Resurrection msg." For the moral of New Test. is that TRUTH (= Christ) is persecuted and suffers (a), even though it is most valued and valuable--indeed, worshipped. And this Christian truth is simply, at bottom, the accurate representation of that OBJECTIVE, God-given, reality, and re-assurance that such truth, though persecuted and hated, cannot be killed anymore than the objective reality.

(b) Thus truth always resurrects, always coming-back to "bite" anyone stupid enough to denying and working against such truth--as it has for Jews and Pharisaics like Hoffman, who positively hates truth--why he's such a self-pitying worm, so deservedly hated by humanity, disgusted and oppressed by Hoffman's self-righteousness, moralistic sanctimony, and slimey presumptuous unctuousness as he tells his moronic lies about such as lending at interest and dear unc' Adolf who spoke truth about Jews and their suck-alongs and imitators like Hoffman.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied by ap first posted at comments, https://www.bitchute.com/video/lDgR1cTGtsTl

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

DeNugent Deserves NO Credibility
(Apollonian, 24 Mar 20)​

Brian: in case of John DeNugent, I can say I DO INDEED, know more than just a tiny little about him, though it doesn't mean I know everything, but I do know some of quite a bit. DeNugent is a charlatan and very superficial sort of thinker-theoretician and historian, very much of a babbler and would-be raconteur, always going off on tangents and pretending to putting-out little "tid-bits" of gossipy-type side-notes. U gave DeNugent carte blanche on ur vid, and he took full advantage, we can all see.

I advise u to be very careful w. DeNugent; observe how nervously demonstrative he is as he talks to u. For if DeNugent was being simply matter-of-fact, people aren't so demonstrative--he'd just be straight-forward w. more of a monotone, far less of the facial grimaces, hand and head gestures and movements as he makes on ur vid.

DeNugent mentions HENRIK HOLAPPA, who is a good and honest person, but who was very young man (about 17 or 18) when he escaped and sought asylum in USA fm Finland; DeNugent offered him a place to stay, and Holappa spent several months w. DeNugent and his live-in girl-friend. U ought to read Holappa's account of DeNugent, how he acts and what he does.

According to Holappa, DeNugent is indeed a violent and abusive wife-beater (though they weren't married yet at time Holappa was present), and tried to put Holappa to work to making money for DeNugent--this all besides DeNugent's constant efforts begging and soliciting money, funds, and contributions, pretending he was running for various political offices. Holappa's account is low-key, matter-of-fact, and not hysterical, and very persuasive. See http://cwporter.com/holappa1.htm . See also, http://www.cwporter.com/nugproof.htm .

I notice in ur vid, Brian, u allowed DeNugent several times to speak and ramble on and on at length--this is vintage DeNugent who LOVES to babble on and spinning yarns--u went in for it as so many do w. DeNugent. I can tell u w. assurance DeNugent's exposition upon Christ attempting to "reform" the Pharisees was total b.s. DeNugent knows and cares nothing about Christianity or Christians.

I suspect u may have been somewhat taken-in by this glib liar, DeNugent, Brian, allowing him to take up wayyyy too much of ur vid, but it was interesting to see that charlatan and listen to him telling his lies. I think in case of DeNugent and the Hunts, it was matter of like spirits rather beginning in attempted collaboration, leading then to competing against one another, ending in the inevitable falling-out--one can get interesting info fm these sort of episodes, but a lot of lying too, as in case of DeNugent who is known and noted con-artist, liar, and fraud.

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://www.bitchute.com/video/lDgR1cTGtsTl/

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Something Else About Hunts--They're Anti-Christs
(Apollonian, 28 Mar 20)​

They're not only "ignorant," they're vicious, lying scum, that's the real problem, attacking an outstanding worker for the truth, like Brian, as he explains in the first of these posts about the Hunts.

But then, there's something else at work here. For note Hunts seem to be paganist--anti-Christs--and I assure u Jews have little fear of such moronic paganists, even if they're anti-Semitic. Jews FAR MORE fear serious, true Christians who worship TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6), above all.

For paganists, for one thing, even in all their anti-Semitism, DO NOT UNDERSTAND SATANISM, what it is, how it works--but many, many Christians do. And Jews are Satanists, never doubt, literally, for that's what Satanism is--extreme subjectivism, idea mind/consciousness creates reality, making subject God, the creator--satanism. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for expo on Judaism/Talmudism.

Note then many gentiles are subjectivistic, even outrightly Satanist, but they're not nearly as connected and collectivistic as Jews are, foremost collectivists, organized, cohesive, and best led among subjectivists, most effective, successful "group-thinkers," thus making Jews dominant leaders among subjectivists and Satanists even though (so far) so heavily out-numbered by the gentiles.

So u can see, without too much effort or difficulty, how Jews quite possibly, even probably, fund and send money to Hunts, even if they do so surreptitiously, Hunts pathetic dupes, in effort to subvert the real Christians and patriots whom Jews fear most, without any doubt--something about which the Hunts haven't even the slightest notion (fear and hatred of Jews against Christianity).

 

[Apollonian]

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-nazis-and-abortion-what-are-facts.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hoffman, Obsessive Moralistic, Pontificating Again, On Hitler, Abortion
(Apollonian, 30 Mar 20)​

Once again, we see the terminally sanctimonious Hoffman, the second, basking in his own imagined, concocted moralism, glorying in his demented idea that he's envied for his idiot moralism, pomposity, pontificating, and holding forth soooo lugubriously. Hoffman stinks.

For that is Hoffman's primary purpose in life, folks, to pretending to moralism, virtue-signaling, and that putrid morality of non-existent "good-evil," founded in non-existent perfectly "free" will--the basis of the old Pelagian heresy of St. Augustine and later, Martin Luther.

And such then is the DETERMINIST (absolute cause-effect; no perfectly "free" human will) nature of the Christian OBJECTIVE reality, basis of TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6)--which Christian nature and philosophy Hoffman secretly hates and rejects, like the satanic subjectivist he really is, psychotically insistent, like the Jews he pretends to criticize, upon a perfectly "free" will and thence, the fictional "good-evil."

For Hoffman is certainly no historian of any significance, nor is he even remotely any kind of economist who knows much of anything about money and banking, least of all the subject of usury. We're all sinners, Hoffman the second, and no human will can ever change that, and the only way to Heaven is by means of God's grace and mercy, including u, sucker.

So why now don't we get down to essential basic definitions of basic words and concepts, eh?

First, regarding racism, it's obviously loyalty to and pride in people, ancestors, and culture, this in accord w. the fourth Commandment of original Ten, "honor thy parentage (race)." Ck any dictionary.

Hence Hitler's magnificent leadership for the German people who were taught (a) they shouldn't eliminate any of their own precious offspring, but other races could if they wanted. (b) Another lesson is that Judaic race obviously is the primary, everlasting enemy of gentiles, including the German.

Next, regarding abortion, the right to abort is necessarily in accord w. individual freedom and choice, obviously, but the Germans were persuaded under the war-time circumstances this individualist principle should be forgone and set-aside for purposes of defense of the race in the war against Satanism, Jews, and bolshevism.

And that's another thing Hoffman overlooks, the CYCLIC history according to Oswald Spengler and the "Decline of the West," as Germans and unc' Adolf were desperately fighting not only Jews and bolshevism, but the general Satanism and hubris of Western society which had been raging since the fallacious, but successful and advancing moralism of Rousseau and Immanuel Kant.

The tragic irony of history is that Hitler and the Germans themselves rather embraced this kind of moralism, esp. of Kant, and the consequential socialism and statism which hobbled the German economy of the time, and indeed afflicts the general economics and politics of the present day.

So it's in this general historical context of Spenglerian "Decline..." which Germans and unc' Adolf must be seen: Hitler's racism was perfectly justified in accord w. philosophic determinism against the satanic enemy who ruled and oppressed gentiles and Germans, those infernal Jews who ruled then and who rule now. God bless our dear leader, hero, and saint, unc' Adolf. Heck w. the satanic, psychotic virtue-signaler, liar, heretic, and lickspittle to Jews, Hoffman the second.