albion
Registered
Cavalli-Sforza dismisses the idea of Race as implying that different kinds of people are different species or sub-species, or have essentially different souls, but he accepts the reality of Race in a statistical sense.
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/gimbutas.html
He says that the Indo-Europeans ("Aryans") do not constitute a race, but are part of the Caucasoid race, with the Arabs and most people of South India. He writes, "Most inhabitants of India are Caucasoid, even if their skin is darker than that of northern Europeans. Populations in the south that speak Dravidian languages are genetically slightly different from, and darker than, northern Indians." (p. 161 above).
His data are consistent with Gimbutas' presentation of the Indo-Europeans as intruders in
to the old civilizations of Europe, Anatolia, the Fertile Crescent, Iran & Pakistan.
Those civilizations - contra Renfew - appear unlikely to have been Indo-European, even though they were Caucasoid, as the Indo-Europeans were.
Apart from India, the Aryans also invaded Western Europe (from the steppes) and the Middle East. The word "Aryan" is today preserved in the names of the countries "Iran" and "Ireland", i.e. "Eire" = "Aryan", showing the extent of the conquest. Their incursion into the Middle East may have contributed to Abraham's westward journey from Ur in Sumeria (if that be historic), and caused a westward exodus of "Hyksos" peoples into Egypt, bringing the Middle Kingdom to an end. The Aryans were nomadic destroyers of civilizations; only later did they become builders of civilizations, and then they borrowed from other peoples, just as every other civilization has done. The Bible also portrays the J*ws entering Palestine a
s nomadic destroyers: guthridge.html; the real origins of civilisation are neither "Aryan" nor "Jewish".
Ariosophy? The Rig Veda's account o
f the Aryan conquest:
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/eth-civ.html
Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza favours Gimbutas' interpretation:
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0993/9309081.htm
Camille Paglia's response: "The femaleness of fertility religions is always double-edged. The Indian nature-goddess Kali is creator and destroyer, granting boons with one set of arms while cutting throats with the other. She is the lady ringed with skulls. The moral ambivalence of the great mother goddesses has been conveniently forgotten by those American feminists who have resurrected them. We cannot grasp nature's bare blade withou
t shedding our own blood": danielou-paglia.html.
Is today's Feminism trying to restore the pre-moralistic culture of Goddess Europe? Why then was it hijacked by the Lesbian Separatists, promoting hatred between the sexes? Is Feminism fatally
entangled with ultra-leftist Marxism (Trotskyism)?
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/gimbutas.html
He says that the Indo-Europeans ("Aryans") do not constitute a race, but are part of the Caucasoid race, with the Arabs and most people of South India. He writes, "Most inhabitants of India are Caucasoid, even if their skin is darker than that of northern Europeans. Populations in the south that speak Dravidian languages are genetically slightly different from, and darker than, northern Indians." (p. 161 above).
His data are consistent with Gimbutas' presentation of the Indo-Europeans as intruders in
to the old civilizations of Europe, Anatolia, the Fertile Crescent, Iran & Pakistan.
Those civilizations - contra Renfew - appear unlikely to have been Indo-European, even though they were Caucasoid, as the Indo-Europeans were.
Apart from India, the Aryans also invaded Western Europe (from the steppes) and the Middle East. The word "Aryan" is today preserved in the names of the countries "Iran" and "Ireland", i.e. "Eire" = "Aryan", showing the extent of the conquest. Their incursion into the Middle East may have contributed to Abraham's westward journey from Ur in Sumeria (if that be historic), and caused a westward exodus of "Hyksos" peoples into Egypt, bringing the Middle Kingdom to an end. The Aryans were nomadic destroyers of civilizations; only later did they become builders of civilizations, and then they borrowed from other peoples, just as every other civilization has done. The Bible also portrays the J*ws entering Palestine a
s nomadic destroyers: guthridge.html; the real origins of civilisation are neither "Aryan" nor "Jewish".
Ariosophy? The Rig Veda's account o
f the Aryan conquest:
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/eth-civ.html
Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza favours Gimbutas' interpretation:
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0993/9309081.htm
Camille Paglia's response: "The femaleness of fertility religions is always double-edged. The Indian nature-goddess Kali is creator and destroyer, granting boons with one set of arms while cutting throats with the other. She is the lady ringed with skulls. The moral ambivalence of the great mother goddesses has been conveniently forgotten by those American feminists who have resurrected them. We cannot grasp nature's bare blade withou
t shedding our own blood": danielou-paglia.html.
Is today's Feminism trying to restore the pre-moralistic culture of Goddess Europe? Why then was it hijacked by the Lesbian Separatists, promoting hatred between the sexes? Is Feminism fatally
entangled with ultra-leftist Marxism (Trotskyism)?