Study should have dis-qualified poison covid vaxx in first place, BUT Big Jew Pharma wanted to make money, so lots of "useless eaters" died

[Apollonian]

Mechanisms of Increased Oncogenesis and Increased Mortality in Cancer Related to SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein mRNA Injections: Japan​

Link: https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/mechanisms-of-increased-oncogenesis/

Repeated Exposures Cause Increased Risk (#PathogenicPriming) in One Age Group so Far; Breast Cancer an Outlier​

JAMES LYONS-WEILER
APR 12, 2024

A study by Gibo et al. (2024) entitled Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan, provides an analysis of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the vaccination efforts, on cancer mortality in Japan.
The study examines age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for various types of cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically looking at changes following the administration of the third dose of mRNA-lipid Nanoparticle injections.

The authors reported a distinct temporal pattern in cancer mortality rates.
In 2020, there was no noticeable increase in cancer mortality, indicating that the initial phase of the pandemic did not significantly affect cancer death rates. However, following the rollout of the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021, an increase in excess mortality for some cancer types was observed. This trend became more pronounced in 2022, after the administration of the third vaccine dose, where significant excess mortality was noted across all cancers, with particular increases in ovarian, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers.
The also study identified a slowdown in the decrease of age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for the four most prevalent cancer deaths (lung, colorectal, stomach, and liver) in 2021 and 2022, suggesting a deceleration in the progress against these cancers during the later stages of the pandemic.

(Left Side) The blue line with markers shows the real number of deaths from cancer (adjusted for age) per 100,000 people. A dashed line shows what the authors predicted those numbers would look like based on past data. Dotted lines frame what would be considered normal fluctuations around that prediction. (Right Side) The bottom axis shows each month of the pandemic years (2020, 2021, 2022). Years where deaths were unusually high are marked: yellow spots mean slightly higher than expected, and pink spots mean much higher than expected. The left vertical axis tells us how much higher the actual deaths were compared to the percentage expected. The right vertical axis shows the number of COVID-19 vaccinations and the deaths caused by COVID-19.
In the study figure, a vertical line shows when COVID-19 started affecting Japan. Until 2020, the number of deaths decreased, but then it stopped decreasing. In 2021, deaths were higher than what is considered normal, and in 2022, they were even higher, going beyond the highest expected limit.
Deaths were way higher than expected, first in August 2021, around the same time many people were getting their first or second vaccine shots, and then in May 2022, after a lot of people received their third shot.

By Cancer Type in Detail​

​

The study found that in 2020, only deaths from pancreatic cancer were slightly higher than what was normally expected. But as the years went on during the pandemic, more types of cancer showed unusually high death rates. In 2021, three out of twenty cancer types had higher deaths than expected, and by 2022, this number increased to five. The cancers with these higher death rates were ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, and pancreatic cancer, with ovarian cancer showing the largest increase.
For ovarian cancer, the number of deaths was about 7.6% higher than expected in 2021 and increased to 9.7% higher in 2022. Leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, and pancreatic cancer also saw increases, with leukemia deaths 8% higher than expected in 2022 and similar rises in the other types.
Interestingly, breast cancer showed a decrease in deaths compared to what was expected in 2020 and 2021. However, in 2022, there was a slight increase in breast cancer deaths, but this change was not large enough to be considered statistically significant. This means that while there was an uptick in breast cancer deaths in 2022, the numbers could still be due to random chance rather than a definitive increase.

The ovarian cancer signal is striking:

The other cancers show similar trends.

Breast cancer has a different pattern:

Mechanisms Cited​

​

The mechanisms cited in the study regarding the potential impacts of mRNA-LNP vaccines on cancer mortality and development are complex, citing various mechanisms of oncogenesis, many of which have been discussed here on Popular Rationalism many times before:​

• Vaccine Distribution and Molecular Concentration: The authors report that the number of mRNA molecules per vaccine dose is extremely high, ranging into the trillions. According to the authors, there are only about 3 times more cells in the human body than LNPs. Once injected, these vaccines are distributed widely across the body, including critical organs like the liver and ovaries.
• Spike Protein Production: The vaccines lead to the production of the COVID-19 spike protein, which remains in the body for months. This is much longer than the spike protein from the virus itself, which typically disappears within a few weeks after infection.
• Thrombosis Risk in Cancer: Cancer increases the risk of blood clotting. The spike protein and the vaccine's lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) might further raise this risk, potentially explaining higher mortality rates in cancer patients after vaccination.
• Immune System Impact: The vaccines suppress important parts of the immune system that usually help detect and destroy cancer cells. This could weaken the body's natural defenses against cancer.
  
  The authors report that following mRNA vaccination, cells that produce large amounts of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S-protein) also release exosomes filled with specific microRNAs (miRNAs), particularly miRNA-148a and miRNA-590. These miRNAs target and suppress the activity of the ubiquitin-specific peptidase 33 (USP33) and interferon regulatory factor 9 (IRF9) pathway in microglia, which then take up these exosomes. This suppression leads to a decrease in the function of type I interferons (IFN) and BRCA2, both essential for combating cancer cells by enhancing immune surveillance and DNA repair mechanisms, respectively.
  
  Moreover, the presence of the S-protein seems to enhance the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) across various immune and tumor cell types, as well as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T cells. This upregulation impairs the effective functioning of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, crucial players in the body's defense against malignancies, by promoting an immunosuppressive environment within tumors. This mechanism further hampers the immune system's ability to surveil and eliminate cancer cells, potentially contributing to an increased risk or progression of cancer following vaccination.
• Inflammation and Autoimmune Reactions: The vaccines can, via pathogenic priming, trigger autoimmune reactions, where the body mistakenly attacks its own cells. This can be particularly dangerous if the tissues attacked are immune cells and proteins.
• Interaction with Cancer-Related Genes: The spike protein may interfere with genes crucial for repairing DNA damage, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, and P53. This interference could increase the risk of cancer or worsen existing cancers.
• Hormone Receptor Sensitivity: Certain cancers are sensitive to hormones. The spike protein can bind to hormone receptors, potentially driving the growth of hormone-sensitive cancers like breast and ovarian cancer.
• Activation of Latent Viruses: The vaccine-induced immune response might accidentally reactivate latent viruses associated with certain cancers, contributing to cancer development or progression.
• Vaccine mRNA Integration: mRNA can be reverse transcribed into DNA and become integrated into the human genome, potentially causing genetic mutations that increase cancer risk.
• Reduced Screening. In Japan, during 2020, there was a notable drop in the number of people getting checked for stomach, lung, colorectal, breast, and uterine cancers by about 24.4% in community health settings, although workplace screenings barely changed, decreasing by just 0.9%. By 2021, the number of these important cancer screenings started to go back to the usual rates seen before the pandemic. The decrease in cancer screenings and overall healthcare services during the lockdown might have led to an increase in deaths from various types of cancer. However, this reduction in healthcare access does not fully explain the significant rise in death rates observed for six specific types of cancer.

The authors conclude that more research is needed to discern which mechanisms are in play. They may all be factors, or some may be more important than others in different cancer types.

THE STUDY: Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860

 

[Apollonian]

1 in 4 Vaxxed Will Die Early, Top Study Finds​

Hunter FieldingApril 16, 2024

Link: https://newsaddicts.com/1-in-4-vaxxed-will-die-early-top-study-finds/?utm_source=mailpoet/

A bombshell new peer-reviewed study has concluded that a sickening 1 in 4 people who received Covid mRNA vaccines will die early.
The shocking study found that 27.11 percent of people who have received at least one Covid injection have either already died or they have suffered an irreparable “ticking time bomb” injury that will shorten their life.
The new study, conducted by top researchers in Saudi Arabia, found that the majority of Covid-vaccinated people have suffered long-term heart-related complications, many of whom have already died suddenly.
Microbiologist and immunologist Muazzam M. Sheriff and colleagues at Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies and King Faisal General Hospital noted that more than a quarter of COVID jab recipients suffered some kind of cardiac complication after getting the mRNA variety of shot, made by either Pfizer and BioNTech or Moderna.

Nearly 15 percent of mRNA jab recipients reported experiencing heart-related symptoms within one month of injection, while others reported heart problems upwards of a year or more after doing the deed.
TrialSite News is calling Sheriff’s study a “bombshell,” with founder Daniel O’Connor telling The Defender that “the rate of hospitalized cases was certainly notable, especially given the existing cardiac myocarditis and pericarditis signal associated with the vaccines.”
According to Dr. Peter McCullough, nearly 16 percent of all COVID jab recipients who developed cardiovascular symptoms had to be rushed to an intensive care unit (ICU) for treatment – that is how bad their symptoms were.
“More than half of subjects indicated they were influenced by a healthcare professional or government agency to get vaccinated,” McCullough is quoted as saying.

“Never in recent times has there been such a cardiotoxic vaccine released on the public.”
Concerning the long-term impact of the shots, O’Connor added that many such cases of heart problems are being reported sometimes several years post-injection.
“The surge in cardiac-related incidents in the news over the last year or two doesn’t comfort one either,” he added.
Published in the medical journal Cureus, the new study out of Saudi Arabia looked at 804 participants, 379 of whom are men and 425 of whom are women.
All of them received at least one dose of an mRNA shot.
About 40 percent of the participants took just one shot, meaning they did not complete even the initial two-shot series, let alone get any “booster” shots.

Nearly 10 percent of the participants had to receive medical care for their injuries for more than 12 months while 7.11 percent were undergoing some kind of continuous and ongoing treatment at the time of the survey.
Amazingly, only about 20 percent of study participants indicated that they believe their cardiac symptoms were “strongly related” or “somewhat related” to the injections.
A full 65 percent were either “neutral,” “somewhat not confident,” or “not confident at all” that the shots were to blame.
Nearly half of the participants have diabetes or hypertension, and about 40 percent are obese.
Just over 22 percent reported other sedentary lifestyle-related health issues.
“Despite the bias of recruitment strategy to find patients with cardiovascular side effects from mRNA, these are large percentages requiring hospital and or ICU care,” McCullough further commented.
“More data are needed on these cases including diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes such as recurrent hospitalization and death.”
The study authors warn that the mass Covid vaccination campaign will eventually lead to a large reduction in the global population of humans once those impacted by the injections have died off.
Nevertheless, the government and mainstream media continue to avoid placing direct blame on the shots for anything.
TrialSite News called it “a strong study in regard to methodology, relevance, and ethical considerations,” noting that the authors seemed to “downplay the magnitude of the response” despite what “seems like an awfully high rate” of cardiac complications.

 

[Apollonian]

Top Cardiologist Raises Alarm over ‘Turbo Cancer’ Spike in Vaxxed​

Hunter FieldingApril 17, 2024

Link: https://newsaddicts.com/top-cardiol...rbo-cancer-spike-vaxxed/?utm_source=mailpoet/

[see vids at site link, above]

World-renowned American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough has issued a chilling warning about the soaring cases of “turbo cancers” being diagnosed among people who received Covid mRNA shots.
In a new video message, McCullough warns that the Covid injections are causing the “epidemic” of rapidly developing cancers.
“The COVID vaccines have at least three mechanisms by which they could start a cancer, or they could promote an existing cancer.”
He explains how the shots are destroying the immune systems of vaccine recipients and triggering deadly cancers to form.

McCullough breaks down his explanation into three main points:

1.) The messenger RNA from COVID-19 injections could severely disrupt the body’s ability to repair damaged DNA.
This breakdown in basic cell processes leads to uncontrolled mutations.
The mutations greatly increase the risk of developing cancer.

2.) The S2 segment of the spike protein, delivered specifically through the vaccine, is implicated in suppressing key tumor suppressor proteins such as P53 and BRCA.
This suppression effectively disarms the body’s primary defenses against cancerous cell growth.
It paves the way for tumors to flourish unchecked.

3.) The formulation of mRNA vaccines includes DNA process-related impurities that could carry proto-oncogenic properties.
McCullough explains:
“And the fragments that are detected are the SV40 enhancer, promoter, and origin of insertion, as well as antibiotic resistance fragments that are used in the manufacturing process.”

“So, in summary, the COVID vaccines have at least three mechanisms by which they could start a cancer, or they could promote an existing cancer, and it may occur more rapidly because tumor defense systems are taken down,” said Dr. McCullough.
“That’s what we call turbo cancer.”

WATCH: [see site link, above, top]

Elsewhere in the video, McCullough explains how vaccine-injured people can seek recovery.
“If we don’t address the spike protein, it’s not going to get better.”
Dr. McCullough recommends three key substances for those seeking recovery after the shots.

1.) Nattokinase. Why? It degrades spike proteins, as suggested by preclinical studies. • Take 2000 units twice a day.

2.) Bromelain. Why? Similar to nattokinase, it also breaks down spike proteins. • Take 500 milligrams once a day

3.) Curcumin. Why? Reduces inflammation and spike protein damage. • Take 500 milligrams twice a day and combine with 5 or 10 mg of piperine to enhance its absorption.

That summarizes McCullough’s “Base Spike Detoxification” protocol.

ADDITIONAL TREATMENTS​

Hydroxychloroquine: Added if there are signs of autoimmunity. Ivermectin: Included if there are signs of persistent infection.
Colchicine: Used if there are significant signs of pleuropericardial problems (involving the membrane around the heart and lungs).
Nicotine Patch or Oral Aciclovir: These are considered if there are neurological symptoms like brain fog.
Low-dose Naltrexone: Used to enhance the body’s natural painkilling response and reduce inflammation.
WATCH:

Please bookmark this post and share it with every vax-injured person you know.

 

[Apollonian]

Andrew Bridgen calls on UK government to immediately suspend all mRNA treatments in both humans and animals​

BY RHODA WILSON ON APRIL 19, 2024

Link: https://expose-news.com/2024/04/19/bridgen-calls-on-uk-government-to-suspend-all-mrna/

[vid & audio at site link, above]

“Given the evidence, I call on the Government once again to immediately suspend the use of all mRNA treatments in both humans and animals, pending the outcome of [the Covid Inquiry’s investigation into covid vaccines and theurapeutics],” Andrew Bridgen, Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire, said during a debate in parliament yesterday.

---

Mr. Bridgen put forward a motion in Parliament for the Covid Inquiry to open its Module 4 on the safety and efficacy of the experimental covid-19 injections as soon as possible.
On 12 January, the UK Covid Inquiry announced that public hearings for the Inquiry’s fourth investigation into vaccines and therapeutics, Module 4, was being rescheduled. The hearings were originally scheduled to take place in the summer of 2024. “They will now take place at a later date,” the Inquiry’s website states.
Three days later, Mr. Bridgen mentioned the Covid Inquiry’s decision during a debate saying he felt Module 4 had been delayed as “political pressure has been placed on the inquiry” due to upcoming general elections.
Introducing the motion for the Inquiry to open Module 4 yesterday, Mr. Bridgen began: “We are witnesses to the greatest medical scandal in this country in living memory, and possibly ever: the excess deaths in 2022 and 2023. Its causes are complex, but the novel and untested medical treatment described as a covid vaccine is a large part of the problem.”
Officials are hiding key data in this scandal. The Office for National Statistics used to release weekly data on deaths per 100,000 in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, but it no longer does so. “The public have the right to that data”, Mr, Bridgen said.
Serious experts have called for record-level data to be anonymised and disclosed for analysis which would settle whether experimental treatments are responsible for the increase in excess deaths. As Mr. Bridgen noted, more extensive and detailed data has already been released to pharmaceutical companies from publicly funded bodies. However, Professor Jenny Harries, head of the UK Health Security Agency, said that this anonymised, aggregate death by vaccination status data is “commercially sensitive” and should not be published. “The public are being denied that data, which is unacceptable,” he said.
Mr. Bridgen also mentioned that Harries had endorsed a massive change to the calculation of of the baseline population level used by the ONS to calculate excess deaths. Due to this change, “some 20,000 premature deaths in 2023 alone are now being airbrushed away,” he said.
Mr. Bridgen spoke about the “shocking things” that happened during the covid pandemic reponse: the misuse of “do not resuscitate” (“DNR”) orders, treatment protocols and the basis on which deaths were attributed to covid and to vaccines:

In March 2020, the Government conducted a consultation exercise on whether people over a certain age or with certain disabilities should have “do not resuscitate” orders, known as DNRs, imposed upon them. A document summarising the [DNR] proposals was circulated to doctors and hospitals; it was mistakenly treated as formal policy by a number of care homes and GPs up and down the country, who enacted it. At the same time, multiple hospitals introduced a policy that they would not admit patients with DNRs, because they thought that they would be overwhelmed. The result was that people died who did not need to die while nurses performed TikTok dances.
The average time to death from experiencing covid symptoms and testing positive was 18 days. It is a little-known fact that the body clears all the viruses within around seven days; what actually kills people is that some, especially the vulnerable, have an excessive immune response. Doctors have been treating that response for decades with steroids, antibiotics for secondary pneumonia infections and other standard protocols, but they did not do so this time. Even though the virus was long gone, doctors abandoned the standard clinical protocols because covid was a ‘new virus’ -which it was not. They sent people home, told them to take paracetamol until their lips turned blue, and then when those people returned to hospital, they sedated them, put them on ventilators and watched them die.
The protocol for covid-19 treatment was a binary choice between two treatment tracks. Once admitted, ill patients were either ventilated in intensive care or—if they were not fit for that level of care—given end of life medication, including midazolam and morphine … Giving midazolam and morphine to people dying of cancer is reasonable, but there is a side effect, which is that those drugs have a respiratory depressant effect. It is hard to imagine a more stupid thing to do than giving a respiratory suppressant to someone who is already struggling to breathe with the symptoms of covid-19, but that is exactly what we did.
There is a huge, stark contrast in how deaths and illnesses after vaccination have been recorded compared with those after covid. After a positive covid test, any illness and any death was attributed to the virus. After the experimental emergency vaccine was administered, no subsequent illness and no death was ever attributed to the vaccine. Those are both completely unscientific approaches, and that is why we have to look at other sources of data – excess deaths – to determine whether there is an issue.

He also addressed the use of the mantra “safe and effective.”
“The fear deliberately stoked up by the Government promoted the idea of being rescued by a saviour vaccine. The chanting of the “safe and effective” narrative began, and the phrase seemed to hypnotise the whole nation,” he said. This was despite Pfizer, for example, admitting that it was unknown whether their “vaccines” were safe or effective.
In March 2021, Pfizer signed a contract with Brazil and South Africa which said: “the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and…adverse effects of the vaccine…are not currently known.”
Mr. Bridgen told the House of Commons that the media, the Government and other authorities of had turned into big pharma’s marketing department even though Pfizer’s dubious marketing practices have been noted by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (“ABPI”), the UK trade association for medicines prescribed for the NHS.
“Only a few days ago, the [ABPI] rapped Pfizer on the knuckles for the sixth time, and said that its marketing practices had brought the industry into disrepute. It was asked to pay a paltry £30,000 in administrative expenses, with no fine on top,” he said.
“The person heading the ABPI at the moment is also the head of Pfizer UK. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has a statutory duty to carry out this work, and it has handed its responsibility to the industry. This is an outrageous conflict of interest,” he added.
Turning to the harm that the injecitons cause, Mr. Bridgen explained that this was built into their design.
“The so-called covid vaccines used the most pathological or harmful part of the virus—the spike protein—in its entirety. The harm is systemic because, contrary to what everyone was told, the lipid nanoparticles, encapsulating the genetic material, spread through the whole body after injection, potentially affecting all organs,” he said. “Furthermore, it is now plentifully evident that the drug results in continued spike protein production for many months—even years, in some people.”
The deaths thus far have been predominantly cardiac, he said, but there may unfortunately be many more as the “vaccines” may induce extra cancer deaths due to immune system damage and DNA damage.
For immune system damage, Mr. Bridgen highlighted a recently published paper by Dr. Robert Tindle, retired director of the Clinical Medical Virology Centre in Brisban. The paper describes multiple potential harms from vaccines, including harm to the immune system, which could increase the risk of cancer.
Regarding DNA damage, Mr. Bridgen explained that mRNA products risk interrupting our DNA.
“Cancer is a genetic disease disorder that arises from errors in DNA, allowing cells to grow uncontrollably. Moderna has multiple patents describing methods for reducing the risk of cancer induction from its mRNA products. That risk comes from the material interrupting the patient’s DNA. It turns out that an mRNA injection has very high quantities of DNA in it, and that massively increases the risk of disturbing a patient’s own DNA,” he said.
“Worse still, the DNA that was injected contained sequences that were hidden from the regulator. That is the SV40, or simian virus 40 promoter region, which has been linked to cancer and has been found in the Pfizer vaccines. That was no accident,” he added.
He also noted an independent study in Japan, published last week, that found links between increased cancer rates in Japan and those who took the first and subsequent booster vaccines. “Perhaps that explains why Pfizer acquired a cancer treatment company for a reported $43 billion earlier this year,” he said.
In concluding his speech, Mr Bridgen said: “The evidence is clear: these vaccines have caused deaths … At some point we will have to face up to all the evidence that is building. It was fairly convincing 18 months ago when I first spoke out, but it is unequivocal now.
“Given the evidence, I call on the Government once again to immediately suspend the use of all mRNA treatments in both humans and animals, pending the outcome of [Baroness Hallett’s Module 4] inquiry.”
To which members of the public attending the debate loudly cheered and applauded. So much so that the Deputy Speaker warned the gallery would have to be cleared if the clapping continued.
At the end of the debate, Mr. Bridgen’s motion was agreed and the House called on the Covid Inquiry to move onto its Module 4 investigation into vaccines and therapeutics as soon as possible.
You can watch the full two-and-a-half-hour debate HERE and read a transcript in Hansard HERE. Mr. Bridgen’s speech, which is at the beginning of the debate, is below.

Andrew Bridgen MP, House of Commons, Covid-19: Response and Excess Deaths debated on Thursday 18 April 2024 (20 mins)

 

[Apollonian]

America records over 1 million excess deaths among the over 65 years old since beginning of COVID-19 vaccine rollout​

04/05/2024 / By Kevin Hughes

Link: https://www.vaccinedeaths.com/2024-04-05-one-million-excess-deaths-over-65-vaccines.html/

[see vid at site link, above]

The United States has registered over one million excess deaths among those over 65 years old since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines more than three years ago.
The FDA issued the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine on Dec. 11, 2020, making it the first COVID-19 vaccine to secure authorization in the United States. After this the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine obtained an EUA on Dec. 18, 2020, and the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine received EUA on Feb. 27, 2021.
The elderly were given the COVID-19 vaccine first and the number of excess deaths registered afterwards was astonishing. (Related: Excess deaths among patients in elderly care homes skyrocketed following COVID-19 vaccine rollout.)
During the first 20 weeks of 2021, 150,085 excess deaths were reported among people aged over 65 years old compared to the 2015 to 2019 five-year average.
Then from week 21 to week 40 of 2021, a stunning 165,387 excess deaths were registered among people aged 65 and over.
This brought the total excess deaths from week 1 to week 40 of 2021 to 315,472 among those most likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.
The remainder of 2021 witnessed 133,268 excess deaths recorded which brought the total excess deaths for the year among people aged over 65 to 448,740.
“This means nearly half a million more people died than expected who were aged 65 and over during a period where excess deaths were supposed to be reduced dramatically because an apparently safe and effective vaccine was being administered to stop a wave of deaths supposedly caused by a deadly pandemic,” wrote The Expose in a report on excess deaths due to the COVID-19 vaccine.
The year 2022 improved a little, but still saw a surprising number of excess deaths with 371,466 reported among those aged over 65.
Last year, 257,415 excess deaths were registered among those aged 65 and over, with the most recent data issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirming 5,482 excess deaths were reported in week 1 of 2024.
“This means that in total, 1,069,943 excess deaths were recorded among people aged over 65 from the first time they were offered the COVID-19 vaccine to week 1 of 2024,” The Expose reported.
“This is a shocking number of excess deaths compared to the 2015-2019, five-year average. The COVID-19 vaccines were supposed to reduce the number of people dying, not increase it.”
The overwhelming number of excess deaths reaching over one million in three years is sufficient evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines are far from safe and effective.
The quietly issued numbers prove that they are exceedingly dangerous.

Americans over 65 years old “prioritized” to receive COVID-19 vaccines​

In America, individuals over the age of 65 years old have been provided many COVID-19 vaccines under emergency use authorization (EUA).
They had been prioritized to receive the vaccines because of their alleged higher risk of serious illness from COVID-19.
Booster doses had also been suggested because the vaccines clearly didn’t work. If they did, there would never be over one million excess deaths among those who have had more injections than any other age group.
This data isn’t only showing up in America because most of the Western world have shown a significant increase in excess deaths.
Follow Vaccines.news for more stories about COVID-19 vaccines and boosters.
Watch the video below about British funeral director John O’Looney’s testimony regarding the wall of silence surrounding excess deaths.

This video is from The Prisoner channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:​

Excess deaths in the U.K. are due to COVID vaccine-induced circulatory issues, NOT COVID-19.
Excess deaths in Germany only started appearing after COVID “vaccines” were unleashed, study finds.
Study: COVID-19 vaccination linked to rare neurological disorder that causes pain, muscle atrophy and paralysis.
TRUTH HURTS: CDC officials worried about publicity of COVID-19 vaccine studies damaging the public’s vaccine confidence.
Excess deaths among children continue to soar across Europe following push of COVID jabs for kids.
Sources include:
SHTFPlan.com
Expose-News.com
Brighteon.com