the Hebrew Satan

S

Sophia

Guest
29

http://www.xeper.org/pub/gil/xp_FS_gil.htm

The original Priesthood of Set in ancient Egypt survived

for twenty-five recorded dynasties (ca. 3200-700 BCE).

It was one of the two central priesthoods in predynastic times,

the other being that of HarWer (Horus the Elder).

Unification of Egypt under both philosophical systems
resulted in the nation's being known as the
Two Kingdoms and in its Pharaohs wearing the famous
Double Crown of Horus and Set.

( Which is now the crown of the pope,

YEP ! they stole that, too ! S. )


riginally a circumpolar/stellar deity portrayed
as a cyclical counterpart
to the Solar Horus,

Set was later recast as an evil principle
by the cults of Osiris and Isis.
During the XIX and XX Dynasties S
et returned
as the Pharaonic patron,
but by the XXV Dynasty (ca. 700 BCE
)
a new wave of Osirian persecution
led to the final destruction of the original Priesthood of Set.

When the Hebrews emigrated from Egypt
during the XIX Dynasty,

however, they took with them a caricature of Set:

Satan

(possibly from the hieroglyphic Set-hen,
one of the god's formal titles).

Originally a sort of prosecuting angel for YHVH,

the Hebrew Satan was changed by Christianity

into a personification of everything God was not -

and since God was supposed to be good,

Satan was necessarily bad.

Alluring or mysterious deities
from religions

competing with early Christianity -

such as the Hellenic/Roman Mysteries

and the Persian Mithraic faith -

were also bad,

hence the Christian Satan was decorated
<b
r> with many of their characteristics,

such as Pan's horns & cloven hoofs.

Non-Christian gods generally were

redefined as Christian demons

and given a place in the C
hristian Hell

(another name stolen and perverted,

this time from ancient Norse mythology). </span>

Christian propaganda notwithstanding,

there is no record of any actual Satanic religious underground

throughout the course of Christian European history.

The myth of such a witch cult, however,

was promoted and actively

used by the Christian churches to terrorize their followers

into docile obedience and to eliminate

those who could not be threatened.

The number of accused Satanists

tortured and burned to death

in medieval and Renaissance Europe will never

be known conclusively,

but estimates run as high as 13 million.

Man
y European museums still display the grisly,

almost unbelievably cruel devices used in such torture,

and detailed records of the trials and confessions

of the victims survive in shameful abundance.

Cases of torture, murder,

and genocidal extermination

of in
fidels and heathens in other areas of the world

similarly abound -

and stand collectively in testimony to the appalling legacy

of the world's major monotheistic religions.

It must further be remembered that the more tolerant climate

of modern times did not come about through the wishes

of conventional churches themselves,

but rather through their increasing rejection

by
a mankind exhausted

by religious warfare and terrified by the wanton viciousness

of such establishments as the Holy Office

(better known as the Inquisition).

<span style=\'color:red\'>If the Enlightenm
ent of the 17th and 18th centuries succeeded

in reducing Christianity -

the dominant monotheism of Europe -

to a secular moral propaganda device,

it was not until the late 19th century that the so-called Black Arts

began to be tolerated, and then only in their

most simplistic and socially innocuous forms.


From
Freemasonry came a ceremonial magical offshoot -

Rosicrucianism - which became increasingly more sophisticated

in the Rosicrucian Society of England (S.R.I.A.)

and then in the famous Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (G.'.D.'.).

In 1904 an Adept of the G.'.D.'. named Aleister Crowley

broke away from that disintegrating body to form his own
<
br> Order of the Astrum Argenteum (A.'.A.'.).

To the Rosicrucian/ceremonial magical philosophy of the G.'.D.'.,

Crowley added first a strong emphasis on attainment

of the highest level of self-conscio
usness

(Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel)

and later the Masonic/sexual magic practices

of Germany's Order of Oriental Templars (O.T.O.).

The latter practices, together with Crowley's cavalier lifestyle,

brought him public notoriety.

His organizations survived his 1947 death only in

highly-fragmented and doctrinally simplistic factions.

`````````````````````````````````
n
Others followed , as The TEMPLE OF SET

See link.
 
29

Who And What Is Satan And Evil
From brothah Ptah:

"In the Bible the evil one is spoken of Satan, otherwise known as the Devil. His origin and everything that centers around him, his attributes, can be traced back to the older source in the theology of the Metu Neter of the Africans of Kemet (Egypt). In the name of Set, also rendered Sat and Sut, the deity who personifies evil, we get the origin of the biblical Satan. From Set, it grew into Set-an, and ultimately Satan. The word an is actually the name of one of the ancient cities of Lower (northern) Kemet, which was ruled by Set, and known as On in the Bible and Heliopolis to the Greeks, meaning the city of the Sun, or the abodes
of the sun gods Amen-Ra and Osiris, who are both referred to as "An of a million years..." in the Kemetic records.

From Eve, comes the term evil, further corrupted into D-evil, hence the f
all of man blamed on the woman. In the
Hindu pantheon we have the goddess Devi, in which one of her attributes was death, from whence we get devi-ation, devi-ant, devi-ous, devi-lment, all signifying mischief, misconduct or to turn away from the righteous path. A Deva is Hindu for a deity, but is commonly applied nowadays to a radiant, elegant, classy and stylist woman of high character. The word Deva is also the prefix of the term deva-station, which is the aftermath of destruction.

Destruction, deviation, darkness, corruption, deceit, death, treachery, and lying, are all applied to Set in the Kemetic Theology. As the god of darkness, Set ruled during the six months from September to February, coinciding with the seasons of fall (which why we fall back one hour) and winter (when crops aren't ab
le to grow or are killed of). The nights are longer than the days. And it is during this period of time that the sun, represented by Ausar (Osiris to the Greeks), is said to be enveloped or ensnared by
the darkness of Set; whence we get "sun set,"
the time of the day referred to as the Eve-ning hours, which is when the sun begins to "go down," descending below the horizon into the realm of darkness.
http://www.raceandhistory.com/historicalviews/07092001.htm
 
29

Some of the concepts that people hold about the devil are:

1) Most conservative Christian churches teach beliefs that are grounded in the 1st century CE - that Satan is a profoundly evil, fallen angel who is totally dedicated to the destruction of everyone's lives. He is a supernatural being who "walketh about, seeking whom he may devour," and is aided by countless demons. He and his demons are all pervasive. They engage in world-wide "spiritual warfare," and are a continual threat to all. They can dwell within people, as in demon possession.

2) Liberal Christian churches tend to view Satan as a principle or concept of evil, without any physical ex
stence or personality. They acknowledge that Jesus and his disciples believed in the presence of a living entity called Satan. They realize that the gospel writers wrote of exorcisms which drove indwelling
demons from within people. But they attribute these
beliefs to the pre-scientific level of knowledge at the time.

3) Archeologists and anthropologists, religious historians and other researchers have traced the development of the concept of Satan from its origin in the Zoroastrian religion, via the ancient Babylonian Empire, to ancient Judaism, and finally into Christianity.

4) Most present-day Satanists belong to religious groups such as the Church of Satan or the Temple of Set. Most of the former are Agnostics; they do not believe in Satan as a living entity or as a God; they view Satan as a basic force or principle of nature. Members of the Temple of Set recognize the ancient Egyptian god Set as a deity. Both groups' beliefs of Satan have little in common with Christian bel
iefs.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_sat1.htm
 
29

http://www.xeper.org/pub/gil/xp_FS_gil.htm

A3: For the last two thousand years most of the social cultures

in which the Temple currently exists

have been dominated by one or more branches of JudÃÆ’ ÃƒÆ’”�Å¡¦o/Christianity.

This influence is far more pervasive than most people consciously realize,

extending into these societies' most basic assumptions

about group & individual relationships,

law, justice, ethics, social mores, family units,
cosmology, and metaphysics.

It is easy to not be a member of a Christian church,
or to call oneself a non-Christ
an;

it is far more difficult to escape from J/C social conditioning.



Within this climate many of the aspects of Set are symbolized

in religious imagery by the positive attributes of
the J/C Satan.

While Judaism, Christianity, and Islam created their Satan distortio
n

of the Set neter of ancient Egypt in order to fashion an evil scarecrow

to intimidate and control their societies,

they could not help endowing Satan with such Setian attributes

as independence, creativity, honesty, artistry, and intellectual genius -

as these same attributes, except in severely controlled

and approved forms, are sins against God in J/C/I culture.

Therefore many persons of Setian disposition and potential

first became aware of their true nature through an unusual interest

in and attraction to Satan and Satanic imagery.

[This was the case of the Temple of Set as a whole,

which from 1966 t
o 1975 - as the Church of Satan -

was exploring the Left-Hand Path from within J/C terminology.]

Hence it is sometimes necessary to use the Satanic metaphor

to initially communicate with J/C-s
ocialized individuals

concerning the Setian interests and capabilities they are otherwise incapable

of expres
sing.

Once such persons understand a little more what they are

actually awakening in themselves,

they are more easily able to recognize and jettison

the entire cage of J/C reference-points,

then enter a much larger universe of thought and being as Setians.

The Contemporary Environment

In the United States the 1960-70s CE, despite [and in part because of]

periodical psychopolitical strains such as the Vietnam War,

generally represented a period of flourishing liberalism and freedom
in personal affairs.

Exploration and innovation were tolerated and encouraged in society.

It was
a time of breakthroughs in civil rights;
of increased respect for racial, ethnic, sexual, and religious groups.

There was controversy; but on the whole it was constructive
and progressive in tone. By the e
nd of the 1970s,
despite continued growing pains, Western culture appeared
to have moved decisively into the utopian Age of Aquarius.

The 1980s, however, heralde
d a sharp and surprising reversal
of this climate into conservatism and intolerance.

The most primitive, fundamentalist branches of Christianity
gained converts and sought political power.

And controversial minority groups were assaulted
with fresh waves of discrimination and repression.

Nowhere did this new Inquisition strike more directly
than at New Age religions in general
and at Satanism in particular.

Invoking the same despicable tactics that their predecessors

used over the centuries against alternative creeds,

fundamentalists now began t
o disseminate hate-propaganda

accusing Satanism of the most hideous crimes imaginable:

human & animal sacrifice, cannibalism,

the kidnapping/sexual abuse/murder of children.

That n
one of this was in the least true mattered
not at all to the accusers.

If the Big Lie could be repeated loudly & often enough,
it would catch hold.

Suddenly it became dangerous to be an avowed Satanist

in communities infected with anti-Satanic hysteria.

The witch-hunt eventually spread to several other countries as well,
among them the United Kingdom, Italy, New Zealand, Canada,
Australia, and Germany.

Why should the same post-World War II generation that had grown up
in the open atmosphere of the 60s-70s tolerate,
even encourage a relapse into the brutish hatreds
and persecutions of the Middle Ages?

Perhaps for the very reason that it was a generation unprepared
for what might be termed humanity's religious impulse
.

During the 60s-70s religion was generally dismissed
as something quaint and obsolete:
superstition embarrassing to an age of science, computers,
and Project Apollo.

God was dead, an
d Christianity was invoked merely

as an excuse for Christmas revelry and other entertainments

(such as Jesus Christ Superstar & the Jesus Freak revolution of 1970).

Even the formation of the Church of Satan in 1966
was somewhat anti
climactic:

It didn't arise in response to a threatening Christianity -

for Christianity already appeared to be a dead horse.

The carcass was there to be kicked around a bit
for the sake of theatre, but there was no expectation
that it had any energy left to get up and kick back.

The religious impulse proved to be important
to both Satanists and non-Satanists.

In the case of Satanists it brought about an increasing interest
in exploring the human equation and the metaphysica
l and psychological
roots of the great Satanic/psyche-centered philosophies of history.

Even had Anton LaVey not provoked the crisis of 1975,
it is clear that the evolution of Church of Satan
in
to something like the Temple of Set -

a completely non-Christianized, positive high Satanism -
would have proceeded inexorably.

Non-Satanists, meanwhile, found themselves adrift

in a society whose JudÃÆ’ ÃƒÆ’”�Å¡¦o/Christian moral values had disintegrated

into mater
ialistic hypocrisy.

In such an arid wilderness of steel and stone,

there arose a longing for something/anything spiritual -

and the remnants of Christianity were there to offer

the appropriate opium after various New Age fantasies
had been tried and found to be wanting.

In the 1980s, however, there was a difference in Christian evangelism.

The new herd of converts had not received a gradual education enabling

it to see Christianity in at least some
historical context.

Rather it perceived Christianity as a completely novel experience -

and so it was far more vulnerable to Christian propaganda

than the previous, more worldly generat
ion had been.

The result was an eruption in the 1980s of a fundamentalism

as mindless and brutish as that of the Middle Ages.

Now, as before, it needed a scarecrow -

and Satanism was a word with an appropriately scary sound.

Christian fanatics who knew [and cared] nothing whatever


about actual Satanism suddenly embarked upon passionate

[and financially profitable] campaigns brandishing

the scarecrow before credulous followers.

Complicating the situation was the perennial impulse

among alienated youth and antisocial elements to deliberately shock

society by flaunting its bogymen.

If prudish elements of the community were going to terrify themselves

with scarecrow Satanism, then Heavy Metal rock
music

would affect this same image, as would the occasional psychotic criminal
and teenage gang.

Fundamentalists happily showcased such aberrations

as proof of the scarecrow's exi
stence.

The Temple of Set, now the world's preeminent Satanic religious institution,

found itself in the awkward position of having not only to defend authentic

Satanism against the shrill screams of the scarecrow-merchants,

but also to reject superficial glorification of the scarecrow

that would return Satanism's image to nothing more
than
anti-Christian Devil worship.

Both challenges have been addressed,

but not without the cost of time and energy drained
from the Temple's own magical and philosophical interests.

By the 1990s the initial danger was largely averted.

We were able to establish the truth about Satanism sufficiently

to expose the falsehoods of the scarecrow-merchants

in all but the most ignora
nt backwaters of society.

That same society, however, continues to flail about

for the moral anchor that the large mass-religions claim to offer.

Christianity's strength lies today,
as throughout its history,

in the absence of intellectual education and mental effort

which it demands of its sheep.

It has also become quite accomplished at exploiting

humanity's fear of death,

sexual neuroses,

and other irrational hatreds and insecurities.

The new century is therefore a time of challenge
for the Temple of Set.

Our philosophy has never been more sophist
icated,

yet we pursue it in the midst of a confused,
superficial, and paranoid social environment.

It is not the task of the Temple of Set to be a savior of the masses -

but rather to encourage suitable individuals

to apprehend and attain their own divinity.

The wisdom with which our Initiates exercise this divinity
<
br>may well determine whether humanity advances to the stars -

or succumbs to the entropy of the universe

as one more inconsequential curiosity of nature.

*******************************
*****************************
 
Back
Top