NNN-reader
Official Poster for email reporters
Yet More Reason Patriots Need Generate Initiative
(Apollonian, Dec 05)
Below-copied story, "Judge Tosses Fourth Amendment," fm AP (originally),
is interesting, NOT MERELY overtly AS THREAT TO CONSTITUTION. The real
significance is it subtly assumes, as u notice, the idea we gotta watch
out for "Terror" when the actual fact it is our own gov., working with
the Jews/Israelis, which is doing the terror. Once again, pls ck
judicial-inc.biz, a tremendous website.
Thus we have interesting and sublime DISINFORMATION directed at the
goyim and mammon-worshippers, but especially among the "elders." Thus
is HERESY prosecuted and applied by the money-power behind the Federal
Reserve Bank (Fed) counterfeiting scam which is only one able to afford
to subsidize such incessant repetitions and intensive propaganda.
Thus
is heresy prosecuted by means of moralism (Pelagian fallacy of
"good-evil"); delusion reinforced by disinfo, all within Mammon and
Spenglerian "Decline of the West."
Thus the senile elders are persuaded terror, for example as allegedly
perpetrated by Musselmen against the West, is the fact by means of
expedient repetitions, however crude.
Thus it is all the more imperative we patriots generate our own kind of
initiative and momentum to not only impeach and remove Bush, but the
entire crew and complex of conspirators. We must end the
Democrat-Republican "good-cop, bad-cop" charade. It would be idiotic to
remove Bush to put in Cheney, eh?--or Democrats.
CONCLUSION: Thus we must generate our own patriot momentum-initiative:
reversion of election of US Senators by state legislatures, as
originally. Lynx and Lamb (see PrussianBlue.net) could well help this
necessary advocacy of de-acti
vati
on of Orwellian empire Honest
elections and death to the Fed.
Apollonian, combat-scholar/theologian, part-time exorcist, Chri
stian
patriot
----------below copied fm 9 Dec WhatReallyHappened.com, fm
UnknownNews.org-----------------------
Judge tosses Fourth Amendment
Random searches without warrant, without cause for suspicion ruled Ok
by Larry Neumeister, Associated Press Dec. 3, 2005
Random police searches of subway riders' bags to deter terrorism in the
nation's largest subway system do not violate the Constitution and are a
minimal intrusion of privacy, a federal judge ruled Friday.
"The risk of a terrorist bombing of New York City's subway system is real
and substantial," U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman said in a 41-page
ruling dismissing a lawsuit filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union.
Citing testimony that up to 50 percent of terrorist acts were directed at
transport
ation sy
stems, he said the need for counterterrorism measures was
"indisputable, pressing, ongoing and evolving." He called the searches
effective.
Berman issued the ruling hours after hearing c
losing arguments in the
lawsuit filed in federal court in Manhattan on behalf of several subway
riders.
The judge said he had no doubt that the random searches were a reasonable
method of deterring and detecting a terrorist attack. He cited testimony
by police officials who said the policy might lead terrorists to choose a
different target.
"Because the threat of terrorism is great and the consequences of
unpreparedness may be catastrophic, it would seem foolish not to rely upon
those qualified persons in the best position to know," Berman said.
In its lawsuit, the NYCLU said sporadic police searches, which began in
July following deadly mass transit bombings in London, subjected innocent
riders in New York to pointless and unprecedent
ed invasions
of privacy.
"We remain confident that this program is unconstitutional, and we intend
to appeal immediately," said Christopher Dunn, NYCLU legal director.
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg welcomed the ruling. "We have an obligation to
kee
p this city safe, and the [New York Police Department] will continue to
use reasonable precautions like bag searches to do so," he said.
Under the program, officers permit people to refuse inspection and leave
the transit system. Officers are instructed to limit inspection to what is
necessary to be sure a backpack or other large container does not contain
an explosive device.
On Nov. 14, the police department began a test project to determine the
feasibility of using explosive-detection technology in subways that would
do an instant analysis of chemicals on the surface of backpacks or other
containers.
In her closing argument, Gail Donoghue, a city lawyer who argued the case,
call
ed the searches
a "life and death" necessity and said the city should
not wait for a specific threat or an attack to implement security.
Donoghue likened the daunting task of protecting a sprawling system, with
468 subway stations, to securing the nation's borders.
By studying the habits of terrorist
s and an al-Qaida manual, law
enforcement officials concluded that terrorists look for easy targets and
do not want to encounter surprises, she said.
"Terrorists are looking for certainty," she added.
As originally published
(Apollonian, Dec 05)
Below-copied story, "Judge Tosses Fourth Amendment," fm AP (originally),
is interesting, NOT MERELY overtly AS THREAT TO CONSTITUTION. The real
significance is it subtly assumes, as u notice, the idea we gotta watch
out for "Terror" when the actual fact it is our own gov., working with
the Jews/Israelis, which is doing the terror. Once again, pls ck
judicial-inc.biz, a tremendous website.
Thus we have interesting and sublime DISINFORMATION directed at the
goyim and mammon-worshippers, but especially among the "elders." Thus
is HERESY prosecuted and applied by the money-power behind the Federal
Reserve Bank (Fed) counterfeiting scam which is only one able to afford
to subsidize such incessant repetitions and intensive propaganda.
Thus
is heresy prosecuted by means of moralism (Pelagian fallacy of
"good-evil"); delusion reinforced by disinfo, all within Mammon and
Spenglerian "Decline of the West."
Thus the senile elders are persuaded terror, for example as allegedly
perpetrated by Musselmen against the West, is the fact by means of
expedient repetitions, however crude.
Thus it is all the more imperative we patriots generate our own kind of
initiative and momentum to not only impeach and remove Bush, but the
entire crew and complex of conspirators. We must end the
Democrat-Republican "good-cop, bad-cop" charade. It would be idiotic to
remove Bush to put in Cheney, eh?--or Democrats.
CONCLUSION: Thus we must generate our own patriot momentum-initiative:
reversion of election of US Senators by state legislatures, as
originally. Lynx and Lamb (see PrussianBlue.net) could well help this
necessary advocacy of de-acti
vati
on of Orwellian empire Honest
elections and death to the Fed.
Apollonian, combat-scholar/theologian, part-time exorcist, Chri
stian
patriot
----------below copied fm 9 Dec WhatReallyHappened.com, fm
UnknownNews.org-----------------------
Judge tosses Fourth Amendment
Random searches without warrant, without cause for suspicion ruled Ok
by Larry Neumeister, Associated Press Dec. 3, 2005
Random police searches of subway riders' bags to deter terrorism in the
nation's largest subway system do not violate the Constitution and are a
minimal intrusion of privacy, a federal judge ruled Friday.
"The risk of a terrorist bombing of New York City's subway system is real
and substantial," U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman said in a 41-page
ruling dismissing a lawsuit filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union.
Citing testimony that up to 50 percent of terrorist acts were directed at
transport
ation sy
stems, he said the need for counterterrorism measures was
"indisputable, pressing, ongoing and evolving." He called the searches
effective.
Berman issued the ruling hours after hearing c
losing arguments in the
lawsuit filed in federal court in Manhattan on behalf of several subway
riders.
The judge said he had no doubt that the random searches were a reasonable
method of deterring and detecting a terrorist attack. He cited testimony
by police officials who said the policy might lead terrorists to choose a
different target.
"Because the threat of terrorism is great and the consequences of
unpreparedness may be catastrophic, it would seem foolish not to rely upon
those qualified persons in the best position to know," Berman said.
In its lawsuit, the NYCLU said sporadic police searches, which began in
July following deadly mass transit bombings in London, subjected innocent
riders in New York to pointless and unprecedent
ed invasions
of privacy.
"We remain confident that this program is unconstitutional, and we intend
to appeal immediately," said Christopher Dunn, NYCLU legal director.
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg welcomed the ruling. "We have an obligation to
kee
p this city safe, and the [New York Police Department] will continue to
use reasonable precautions like bag searches to do so," he said.
Under the program, officers permit people to refuse inspection and leave
the transit system. Officers are instructed to limit inspection to what is
necessary to be sure a backpack or other large container does not contain
an explosive device.
On Nov. 14, the police department began a test project to determine the
feasibility of using explosive-detection technology in subways that would
do an instant analysis of chemicals on the surface of backpacks or other
containers.
In her closing argument, Gail Donoghue, a city lawyer who argued the case,
call
ed the searches
a "life and death" necessity and said the city should
not wait for a specific threat or an attack to implement security.
Donoghue likened the daunting task of protecting a sprawling system, with
468 subway stations, to securing the nation's borders.
By studying the habits of terrorist
s and an al-Qaida manual, law
enforcement officials concluded that terrorists look for easy targets and
do not want to encounter surprises, she said.
"Terrorists are looking for certainty," she added.
As originally published