Below-copied by ap submitted, but CENSORED/deleted by kike, Unz, at comments,
http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/being-marco-rubio/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
For Jews/Judaism, Talmud, Midrash Is Definitive, Necessarily--SUBJECTIVISM Being The Essence
(Apollonian, 17 Feb 19)
Anon: MOST of my entries and attempted postings here at "Unz Review," run by this Jew, Unz, are deleted/CENSORED. Unz only publishes what he imagines will bring the desired reaction fm readership, hoping thereby to dis-credit real, serious anti-Semitism--after all, he's Jew, right?
Ultimately people will have to judge for themselves, and I've not only given extensive exposition, which must stand for itself, but I've also given excellent references, so I'm quite content as I should and must be. Besides, all my stuff, including that which is censored/deleted by Unz, is published elsewhere, fairly easily accessed by anyone, so I'm satisfied.
But I'll simply note that thou are lying liar when thou lies and says it's only Torah which is definitive above Talmud, for Jews, when it's other way round, sucker--people will have to verify this for themselves. Torah ONLY means what Jew Rabbis say it means, moron, and Jews are DEFINED by the Talmud, thou dumbass. If one DOESN'T follow Talmud, that one is NOT NOT NOT a Jew--BY DEFINITION of the very (Talmudic) religion, fool--get a clue.
Thou makes no sense, pretending thy scholarship is superior--how could it be, when thou lies like a dog as thou do? Thou don't even understand "Oral Law Tradition" exclusively of Pharisees and Talmud which means Torah must be further explained by this "tradition," giving the "midrash" (interpretation). Torah ONLY means what rabbis say it means, sucker--as written-out in Talmud (and other rabbinic sources, like "Kol Nidre" prayer, absolving Jew monsters of lying even before they tell the lie, ho ho ho ho).
Thou are SUCH an idiot: thou says one must read the original source material, etc., and one must agree, but question is HOW MUCH? Full Talmud (Babylonian) is THREE times the length of the Christian Bible, including Old and New Testaments. Does one have to read all of it, every single word?--is it possible to get basic "drift" after--what?--two thirds?--how about half? Look at thou: thou indicates, pretends, and implies thou read all of it, but thou still doesn't understand it.
Observe further: thou doesn't even understand basic, simple philosophy of Talmud, which in ONE-WORD is "midrash"--INTERPRETATION. Torah means ONLY what rabbis say, by means of their MIDRASH, sucker.
In other words--TOTAL, ABSOLUTE SUBJECTIVISM/satanism--Torah and ANYTHING means ONLY what rabbis and Jew leaders SAY. Reality for these Satanists is what they say it is, according to mentality/consciousness (and "midrash" interpretation)--making the subject the creator of reality, God--Satanism, by definition.
Jews then simply make their satanic/subjectivist religion a COLLECTIVIST "group-think," Jews most dedicated, committed, and ORGANIZED, thus allowing them to dominate and lead all the other subjectivists/Satanists, as among goyim, even though these far out-number Jews.
So I'm going to conclude here as I don't want to expend too much effort as Unz is most probably going to delete/Censor all this, as he typically does. Amen.
------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------------
# 543, Anon[189] • Disclaimer says:
February 17, 2019 at 9:17 pm GMT • 2,100 Words
@apollonian
So the Jew monster and psychopath tells us,
“Reading the Talmud is not necessary.”
I’m not Jewish. I’m one of the most prolific anti-Judaism commenters here. In fact, as I scroll through the comments here, I can see old information of mine re-posted by participants who obviously took to what I wrote and the resources that I recommended . See comment 506 in this thread for one example, wherein Robjil remarks on the concept of “noheg l’doros”, which I posted about here recently. He links to the Chabad page to which I had linked.
I gained that information by doing the actual work in reading their primary sources, as I recommend to others here.
Not in reading second hand quotation sites that will keep you in a very limited box of understanding.
Read the Talmud if you wish. If you can find an accurate English translation, which is doubtful.
Because you will never afford nor seek to buy the complete Talmud, if you could find one that you could read, you and the rest of the anti-Jewish group who does not bother to read the core and much more accessible texts (the Old Testament) will always be reliant on second hand sources for limited quotations.
For some, that will be fine though their understanding will remain rather limited.
For others, they will find differences in interpretation or outright false quotes (when they decide to research further) that will cause them to decide that the Talmud information is too deconextualized when it isn’t spotty and therefore unreliable. Weakening both their resolve and their understanding.
[Hide MORE]
On the other hand, the Talmud is commentary on the Five Books that almost everyone has in their home. Anything expanded on in the Talmud can be found in those books, and the writing is in its full context (assuming that one understands a couple of basic premises about their code).
I understood much more when I stopped relying on second hand quotes and decided to read the Old Testament. My understanding of their religion expanded, and this effort brought to light just how psychopathic their religion is. You think that you know, but you don’t know until you read the OT. Whereas decontextualized second hand Talmud quotes did not give me the full picture.
Their primary myths are found in the OT, not in the Talmud. How are you going to be able to interpret Jewish behavior if you aren’t aware of their mythology as it extends throughout the OT? Their myths define their religion as well as provide them their primary political instruction.
Their myths explain some of their most symbolically genocidal behavior that predicts future genocide (Exodus, Purim, etc).
Not only that, but there are dozens of small details that explain modern events. For example, did you know that the Jews prophecize their treatment of the Palestinians, and their eventual genocide, in the OT?
Did you know that they prophecize the ethnic cleansing of Syria in the OT? These are not actually prophecies but instructions. You know nothing without having read and understood the OT.
If I wanted to distract slightly woken up Goyim from reading the treachary, barbarism, and genocidal intent of my religion, which is all detailed in a book that every one of them has in their house and that follows a much easier narrative format, I would certainly seek to distract by being apoplectic over another set of hard to follow books (the Talmud) that none of them have and that they will always get limited information from. Just as you are doing here.
But the OBVIOUS fact is Talmud IS Judaism,
That is neither obvious nor true. Obvious how? Via some second hand website’s claim? You are being deceptive if you aren’t merely ignorant. It is axiomatic that the Torah IS Judaism.
Judaism is the Torah, not the Talmud. The Torah includes the Talmud, but not only the Talmud. The Talmud, like the Midrash that it is based as well as all other Jewish books within the entire Torah, are commentary on the Tanakh or Pentatecuh. Which every Christian has in their home.
Talmud is definitive, and what is Talmud?–it’s written-out “midrash” (interpretation, as of Torah, first five books, Mosaic law), written-out “Oral Law Tradition,” this “tradition” the very ESSENCE of Judaism, Jews followers of Pharisees and Talmud. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for expo.
Thus Talmud is the very essence of Judaism,
How can something that is commentary on another set of texts be the essence of Judaism? That’s like stating that the apple skin is the essence of the apple. Your information is false and deceptive.
Thus? Thus from what? Websites that distract you from what they don’t want you to read and understand? Go ahead and read the Talmud, if you find that fruitful. I did not say do not read it, and I did not say that it cannot be a source for knowledge of some of their views.
I just do not find it even close to being the most fruitful use of time for anyone who has not read the Old Testament with the appropriate understanding of it. Moreover, reading and understanding the Old Testament will add much more context to the Talmud.
and to KNOW Jews, one must understand the Talmud, the written-out version of Oral Law Tradition, period.
Nonsense. You can get everything in the Talmud from the OT and the Zohar. Assuming that you understand the very easy OT coded language and perspective. The Zohar is more straight forward than the OT, and much more concise than the Talmud. However, it delves into spiritual concepts that may be over the head of some readers: depending on their background with the material. This is why I first recommend the OT.
Go ahead and read the Old Testament with only two understandings in mind:
1. All of their myths are meant to apply to the modern day, with modern tribes mapped onto Old Testament tribes and any modern position of the Jews meant to reflect their position at some point in their texts (Philistines are the Palestinians, Esau is Christianity and Europe, Persians are a Germanic tribe, etc).
Therefore, the texts are instruction for the modern day.
2. Their references to animals (beasts) and rocks are most often references to gentiles.
And you will understand the vast majority of what you need to know about their religion. To state otherwise means that you have not read the Old Testament, or that you are a lying.
My opinion is that you are too lazy to delve seriously into their materials, and prefer defending second hand Talmud quotation websites over any recommendation to do any actual work.
If you want to read the Talmud, I recommend leaving the second hand quote sites alone and instead researching it yourself on:
https://www.sefaria.org
The same information can be found, you will have it verified, and their expanding commentary will be included.
Talmud is literally the war-plan of Jews who conduct Talmudic war against gentiles.
No, its not. The Talmud is the commentary on that plan. The Tanakh is that plan. Which you would know if you had read it.
Then the Jew psychopathic monster says,
“…this text that no non-Jew possess, assuming they could read it (unlikely),….”
But fact is the Talmud is published and accessible for anyone–they can just go on-line to find out what it says.
The Talmud’s full accessibility online is new.
Second, there are the accessibility issues of length and a lack of continuity in any Talmud narrative that make it not the best choice for either starting out or relying on it over other texts.
Third, it lacks the crucial myths.
Last, it is not the central set of texts. But as I stated, and if you have the patience and prior context from reading the Old Testament, then have at it.
And note the Jew psychopath pretends no one can “read” the stinking, satanic, filthy Talmud which exhorts war against the gentile. In fact, it’s absolutely NECESSARY to read Talmud and KNOW what it’s all about–regardless the lies of Jew psychopaths and monsters like this one we have here to whom I respond.
You are obviously slightly retarded in these matters (to be more polite than I need to be) and so you should learn to be more polite.
Next, the Jew psychopath says,
“The Talmud is only a commentary on the Five Books or Old Testament.”
Yes, it’s “commentary,” but there’s a pt. and purpose to that commentary, as the commentary demonstrates the Talmudic philosophy which is (a) war against the gentiles, (b) for the purposes and “good” of Jews, as determined by the leaders, the rabbis, Jews COLLECTIVELY understood as co-equal w. God, God the servant of Jews, God acting as assassin/hit-man for Jews, as on Passover and Purim; and (c) it (Talmud) demonstrates the METHOD, “midrash” (interpretation)–SUBJECTIVISM, by which subjectivism Jews create reality within their minds/consciousnesses, making themselves God, the creator–Satanism.
No, the commentary does not (first) demonstrate all of that (and I doubt that you have read the Talmud to any significant length).
The Tanakh, on which the Talmud is commentary, first demonstrates every bit of that (but also you have not read it, and so how would you know).
The lying Jew monster tells us,
“They just don’t read them,”
which means the Jew monster pretends he’s in position to know and comment upon inferior gentiles’ ignorance, etc.–the usual, typical, traditional, obligatory, Talmudic Jew contempt and hatred for the dumb, gentile cattle.
Please, you defensive, over-emotional dolt. I am a gentile. I well know that most gentiles have not read their Bibles in full (or even at any considerable length, and especially not the Old Testament). This is not a controversial nor incorrect opinion. This is the truth. Its human nature to not want to sit down with hundreds of pages of archaic text in regard to a religion that they are not supposed to understand. Now stop defending the indefensible and wasting everyone’s time and your own energy.
The spirit of my comment was to demonstrate that if most people have not read their Bibles, which they have not, then referring them to a much longer set of hard to get and hard to read Rabbinical legal texts with dubious English translations is nonsense. That is, if you wish to build actual support for your assumed positions.
Especially when they can get all of the necessary information, minus a couple of allegories and redundant expansions on the blood curdling calls for genocide, instead in narrative and the necessary mythological form.
So we see the monumental monstrosity of Jews and Judaism–THEY WORSHIP LIES, LYING, AND LIARS, like satan, including LYING TO THEMSELVES, as in this case-in-pt., a Jew lying psychopath and monstrosity who has so thoroughly lied to himself, as we see. Such is the Talmudic war against humanity and gentiles, such is the Talmudic METHOD of lies and lying, including LYING TO ONESELF.
Time for meds. And you were leaning on the Caps Lock. Oops.
Judaism, which is just Satanism, the leading and most practical version (of Satanism) on earth, MUST BE EXTERMINATED, and Jews seem to understand this extermination is what gentiles must do, and should do, Jews wanting to get-out in-front by way of pre-empting this necessary extermination, as if to getting the gentiles to swear that they wouldn’t dare so think of exterminating this satanic filth–which gentiles MUST do to save their very lives.
The Satan concept merely refers to an adversary or accuser. The Jews are our Satan and we are theirs. Notice how we accuse one another.
You speak in this discussion like you are trying to trash it and drive it over a cliff. In real life, even if someone were to agree with your statements, being near you or associated with you would be an extreme liability because you obviously cannot control your emotions and therefore have no OpSec.
My impulse would be to treat you in these comments sections as anyone who is half sane would treat you in real life: which is to keep you at a distance due to your wild ranting style that is full with calls for genocide that will have any law enforcement agency crawling all over this comments section. But this is an electronic forum and I can’t control you nor anyone else here, and so I guess we’ll see how your insane brand of emotional dumping combined with your topical ignorance turns out here.
