Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest

Rasp

Senior Editor
Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest

Controversies amplify lore of Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest
Civil War figure larger than life to friends, foes alike

By historical accounts, he was a handsome man who overcame poverty and a lack of formal education to become one of the military's most respected tacticians.

As a general, he was decisive under pressure â┚¬��Ô�Å¡� the kind of leader men wanted to follow. He embraced his reputation as a tough guy, once reportedly stating that "war means fighting and fighting means killing."



But the full history of Nathan Bedford Forrest is far from glorious. A controversial Civil War slaughter and his role in the birth of the Ku Klux Klan have made him a lightning rod
for controversy.

Nearly 130 years after his death, Forrest remains under fire. Middle Tennessee State University's Student Government Association has passed a resolution asking the university to remove Forrest's name from the campus' Army ROTC building. The college had already changed its mascot to get rid of a reference to Forrest.

"He was an incredible cavalry officer in the Civil War. That is where he made his fame," said Walter Durham, state historian and author of 18 books on various aspects of Tennessee history.

But, Durham said, Forrest's historical significance in Tennessee is "exaggerated."

"The stories about him have grown to where he's become a legendary figure, and a lot of myths have grown about his place in history."

Forrest's name is on roadside historic markers all over the state. Durham said he believes those markers make mention of Forrest more often than any other Tennessean, including the three presidents who called the state home.

Until 195
1, Coffee County was home to Camp Forrest, one of the Army's largest training camps during World War II. In 1942, German prisoners of war were housed there. The camp was closed shortly after the war and subsequently sold to the U.S. Air Force, which built what is now known as the Arnold Engineering Development Center on its grounds.

Nathan Bedford Forrest State Park in Eva, Tenn., was dedicated to the general in 1929. The Benton County park bears his name because in 1864 he led a successful raid on a Federal supply and munitions depot nearby.

And a 25-foot-high statue of Forrest riding a horse looms large over a privately owned park near Interstate 65 north of Brentwood. The statue has offended many people since it was erected in 1997.

Who was Forrest?

A biographer once called Forrest "the wizard of the saddle." Many historians agree that he was the finest cavalry officer in the Civil War.

Forrest was born in Chapel Hill, in what is now Marshall County. His family di
dn't have wealth, but he acquired land and money, primarily through the slave trade, according to the Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture, published by the Tennessee Historical Society.

He enlisted as a private in the Confederate army when Tennessee left the Union. Forrest quickly rose through the South's military ranks, largely because of his keen eye for tactics and his boldness in battle. According to the Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture, he bravely led his men out of besieged Fort Donelson, was injured at Shiloh and earned victories in battles around present-day Thompson's Station and Brentwood.

"In the context of the Civil War, Forrest is an outstanding cavalry officer â┚¬��Ô�Å¡� very effective," Durham said.

Then came Fort Pillow. The fort in Lauderdale County, Tenn., was manned by Union soldiers, many of them emancipated slaves. Under Forrest's leadership, the Confederates took it in April 1864. But what might have otherwise been a routine raid turned into a blo
ody rampage that claimed the lives of scores of soldiers, many of them black.

It came to be known as the Fort Pillow Massacre.

Some historical accounts say Forrest lost control of his men. Some say the casualties came during the regular course of battle. Others claim Forrest orchestrated the merciless massacre of the blacks there.

Whatever happened, Durham said, Fort Pillow left a stain on Forrest's military career and his legacy in history. It wouldn't be the last.

After the war, Forrest became part of an effort to mobilize an organization to protect whites from the vengeance of freed black slaves, Durham said. Many whites were concerned that the newly freed slaves might seek to harm whites.

The Ku Klux Klan was created to defend whites from slaves who might want revenge. It quickly evolved into something much more sinister.

"It was not used as a protective device. It was used to intimidate the African-American population," Durham said.

Historians still deba
te the depth of Forrest's involvement in the formation of the KKK in 1866. According to the Tennessee Encyclopedia of History and Culture, he became the Klan's first elected grand wizard in 1867.

He would later call for the Klan to disband. Forrest eventually quit the KKK, some accounts say, because of the violent turn the organization took.

Rutherford County Historical Society member Susan Daniel has researched several books on local history and is the editor of the society's publications. She believes the furor over Forrest's ties to the KKK are misunderstood.

"He did not form what the Ku Klux Klan is today," Daniel said. "I think the Klan connection has never been fully portrayed ' the way it ought to be â┚¬��Ô�Å¡� the way it was intended."

What's his relevance today?

Forrest's military legacy lasted for generations. Erwin Rommel, the famed Nazi field marshal during World War II, was said to be a serious student of Forrest's tactics.

He was the best cavalr
y leader the state ever produced, Durham said, but the general's importance may be overblown, he added.

"He was an important figure in the Civil War, and in the formation of the Ku Klux Klan. But he really made no other contribution to Tennessee or the well-being of Tennesseans," Durham said.

Other historians, such as Daniel, disagree.

"He was a Middle Tennessee boy and he claimed quite a bit of notoriety," Daniel said. "He was probably one of the best generals the Southern states ever had."

Two hundred and five MTSU students signed the petition seeking the name change. If a building name committee at MTSU votes to remove Forrest's name from Forrest Hall, the change would ultimately be decided by the Tennessee Board of Regents.

"We run into this around the state from time to time," said J. Stanley Rogers, a former MTSU student body president who now serves on the Board of Regents.

Rogers, who graduated from MTSU in 1961, said he was reserving judgment on the issue u
ntil it's formally brought to the board.

"I think students certainly have the right to express their opinion," Rogers said. "I love history and I love a lot of our past. Sometimes there has to be a balance."

Daniel doesn't want to see the hall's name changed.

"He was a hero to most of the Southern people ' I don't think it had anything to do with his racism, if he had any," she said of Forrest. "I think it was named for him because he proved himself as a hero.

"I don't think it's Confederate imagery. I think it's hero worship, basically," she said. "His issues involved racism, but it goes above that.

"I get tired of this constant changing of things just because somebody's nose gets out of joint about it."

While he downplays Forrest's role in the grand scheme of state history, Durham said he'd be reluctant to encourage the university to rename the building.

"Putting that name on that building was part of Tennessee history. At that time, some people w
anted that name on that building. It says something. What it says, I'm not sure. Maybe it says the Old South legends are still alive and still want to be recognized," Durham said.

"It was not done for no reason. It was done because someone wanted to make a statement."
 
NATHAN B. FORREST: Most accusations are misleading

NATHAN B. FORREST: Most accusations are misleading

There have been many accusations leveled against Nathan Bedford Forrest in a campaign to vilify him. Most are false or misleading.

In a Point of View column, S.L. Stoll claims that Forrest "made his fortune selling human beings."

In truth, Forrest was a successful farmer in Tennessee with holdings in land, livestock and slaves. As a man of his time, he occasionally sold or purchased slaves. And, on some of these transactions, he made a profit. He did trade in slaves but that was not the endeavor that made him his fortune.

Stoll accuses Forrest of capturing and brutally executing black Union soldiers. The accusation is probably based on the battle at Fort Pillow in Tennessee. Forrest directed a staff officer to go to the fort under a flag of truce and offer terms of surrender. The offer was refused, so the battle began.

A large percentage of the defenders were black. They had been told by their white leaders that Forrest and his troops would torture and execute them as runaway slaves, so the black soldiers refused to put down arms and were shot.

After the battle, the Union gunboats were called to the shore under a flag of truce where Forrest's troops helped the Union soldiers load their wounded aboard for transport to medical treatment.

Many of those Union wounded had already been treated by Forrest's medical staff. None were buried alive, none were tortured and none were executed.

Stoll says that Forrest was an organizer and the first Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. In truth, Forrest was inducted into the KKK 18 months after it was organized and did become its Grand Dragon. Using the power of that position, he ordered it disbanded in 1870 and resigned.

Forrest is seen by many historians as a dishonorable raider more than the military leader that he was.

He had his own supply train that was driven, guarded and supervised by black men loyal to him.

His personal escort company has been rated as the best military fighting force in the war. It had 105 members. At the surrender in Gainesville, Ala., it numbered 110.

Two members of his escort were black. One died fighting and the other received pensions after the war, as did many of the wagon unit. They were also welcomed at reuinons after the war.

Forrest was a natural leader who lived during a trying time in our history.

If he had fought for the Union, he would have been lionized as a hero instead of vilified. He simply saw himself as defending his homeland from invaders.

History has shown that the right side won, but the men and women of the Confederacy did not have the favor of 20/20 hindsight.
 
Nathan Bedford Forrest was not guilty of serious accusations

Nathan Bedford Forrest was not guilty of serious accusations

Let me congratulate columnist Tonyaa Weathersbee and the adjunct FCCJ instructor for reinventing the wheel regarding Nathan Bedford Forrest.

Could you really have thought no one had picked this up previously?

Forrest was complex, intelligent and strong. Yes, he was a racist, as were 90 percent of Americans at the time, but he did not order and lead the slaughter at Fort Pillow.

Be aware that one of Forrest's officers had been captured, tortured and executed shortly before this battle. His face was skinned and his nose and genitals cut off.

The "Tennessee Tories" (local Union supporters) and "smoked Yankees" (black soldiers in blue uniforms, many local) were inside what they thought was an impregnable defensive position and taunted the Confederates.

The Union forces may have been drinking, but no matter what else, you have to be able to back up "trash talking." They didn't.

In a brilliant tactical move, the Confederates got inside the fort, to the horror of the occupants, who panicked and tried to flee. It was mass confusion with intermittent periods of chaos.

Blue coats were throwing down weapons, picking them back up, putting up their hands and putting them back down.

The U.S. flag was never lowered - no surrender was made. Some individuals might try to surrender, but in the hailstorm of violence, that didn't work.

The Confederates kept on firing until Forrest, who had not ordered a slaughter and was not inside when it started, stopped it.

He was not pleased by his men's lack of control, but, as a realist, he knew that "war means fighting and fighting means killing."

He did it well. During the war, he killed 30 enemies with his own hand. He said he ended the war one horse ahead. He had killed one more man than he had horses shot out from under him.

He was an intuitive genius described by Gen. Robert E. Lee as the greatest Confederate officer. Forrest was the only man in either army who began as a private then rose to lieutenant general. This was no ordinary mortal. But he must be seen in the context of his era.

Now for the Ku Klux Klan. Forrest's views on society and blacks were typical of the time. He had made money in land and slaves before the war - legal business then - but he was known to provide well for his property.

Starved and beaten slaves were worth less. He believed that slavery was the appropriate status for blacks (a view widely shared in the North also).

During the war, when black Yankees were captured, Forrest preferred to return them to slavery. In the tumultuous times of Reconstruction - Tennessee had more than its share of tribulation owing much to the radical Parson Brownlow, and a major riot in Memphis - many former Confederates feared for their safety and turned to the KKK for protection.

Forrest did not found it. He probably led it. He had been called the "wizard of the saddle" during the war and maybe he was the "grand wizard" of the Klan.

As Allen Trelease documents so well in White Terror, the Klan rose with much support from the white community but when the Klan proved excessive and embarrassingly violent, white opinion turned against it, including Forrest who called for it to be disbanded.

It was out of control. He disapproved. The Klan began small, grew rapidly, fell rapidly and was finally finished off by martial law.

Forrest fought the war hard, but at the end he told his soldiers to go home and be good citizens. Is that surprising for such a tough soldier?

Forrest was quite a phenomenon. Try Brian S. Wills, author of A Battle from the Start, for a professional historical treatment rather than a left wing rant.

On the question of changing the name of the high school, if we change everything that offends someone, where do we stop?

Forrest may be anathema for some, a hero to others. He was undeniably a man of considerable, extraordinary accomplishment.

Might American Indians be offended by the U.S. flag under which they lost their world? Certainly, we can leave the name Jackson alone: Andrew, Stonewall, Reggie, Michael, Jesse? Take your pick.

Don't we have more important things to do?
 
Back
Top